Showing posts with label floods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label floods. Show all posts

19 Jan 2016

Cotswold Green Party Meeting - 23rd January

The meeting will start at 11am in the side room of The Crown pub in Cirencester (on the corner of Black Jack Street and West Market Place).

The main discussion will be on the hugely relevant topic of 'FLOODING'.

All Green Party members are welcome. 
 

21 Nov 2011

Inspiring: work of the Severn Rivers Trust

Last week the Stroud Valleys Water Forum, which I initiated as a way to bring the local flood and brook action groups together, organised the Severn Rivers Trust to join our bi-monthly meeting. Although we are in the Severn catchment we had never met up with them before - partly they are based around the main areas of work so the Frome hasn't had such a look in and partly our lack of knowledge about them - they have also grown very rapidly in the last couple of years.

Anyhow Tony Bostcock, a Director of the Trust, joined us and gave a totally inspiring talk about their activities. We also look set to tap into their knowledge and access to funds to improve habitat locally. The Severn River Trust is one of some 70 river trusts and looks to turnover £500,000 this year trying to address issues like the massive soil erosion and restore many species like eels - we learnt that the 354km river has a 11,000 plus sq km catchment and have many projects the length of it - for example they are looking at attenuation at the head of the river in Wales where the land is being returned to being a sponge.


So what next?

We agreed that Tony would join us for to walk a stretch of one of our waterways to see how interesting they are, and undertake a survey on wildlife etc to see about possibilities - in so doing he will show us how to do these surveys so we can begin to map all the rivers around us from that sort of perspective.

We are delighted he expressed an interest in becoming involved with the Frome - but we need to give him some info first. It was agreed that a section of the Painswick stream was probably best for the walk, and that we would try and do it soon on a Sunday. Anyone want to join us?

We meet again in two weeks to discuss whether to formalise the Stroud Valleys Water Forum into some structure - not sure it is necessary at the moment especially as individual groups have structures - The Ruscombe Brook Action Group even has a formal partnership agreement with local Councils and other bodies. Anyway let's see what the discussion brings...

1 Jan 2011

Living Flood Histories presentations uploaded

Welcome to 2011! Some might remember I was a speaker at a workshop at University of West of England (UWE) in Bristol before Christmas on flooding - see my blog here for full details. There were plenty of lively discussions - well now resources from this workshop are being posted on the project website under ‘Workshop follow-up’. The programme, briefing paper and powerpoints are already available although some are more difficult to understand if you weren't there (including mine). However both audio and video of the presentations will also be available very soon! See details of the workshops at: www.glos.ac.uk/research/csfc/lfh/Pages/workshopfollowup.aspx

Workshop 2 is entitled 'Flood heritage: exploring flood archives for understanding the known pathways to resilience' and will be at the University of Gloucestershire - unfortunately I have another appointment so will miss this - but there are some places left if folk are interested.

7 Dec 2010

New flood warning codes

Last night I went to a meeting at Ebley Mill about the new flood codes - was slightly shocked that only 5 Parish Councillors, flood wardens and water course wardens there in total - and I was the only District councillor. It was an icey evening and I hope it was that rather than lack of interest that kept folk away....especially as Parishes are meant to be putting together the local emergency plans....

We had a talk from the Environment Agency which covered the new flood warning codes - you can see them here and above. In the last two years Gloucestershire has had 140 severe flood warnings under the old system - now a flood warning means something slightly different - basically that we need to take action whereas before there were still some questions as to whether flooding would occur and how serious it would be.

You can read more about how to be prepared for a flood, check for floods around the country and how to sign up for alerts here. The system does seem to be significantly improved. I asked about how implementation of the codes were going locally and it seems all flood risk households will have had a letter and will have been signed up to telephone alerts unless they have opted out. The EA have also done talks like this one at various places.

However as a resident pointed out last night we should be doing more to reduce the likelihood of flooding occurring in the first place. That wasn't the focus of this talk but it is frustrating that the various agencies are not more publicly saying let's work together on solutions and involving local residents...yes I know the District Council are considering our submissions from the local water groups to develop a more comprehensive flood catchment strategy, yes the County have improved plans in place and yes the EA are working......indeed yes lots is going on but I would love to see more work done on attenuation, identifying areas like water meadows that wont be built on etc etc....Plus we need to do more in the aftermath of floods - in the recent workshop I attended in Bristol (see here) one of the key issues was the support afterwards in dealing with various agencies. But hey must dash or will be late for work...

28 Nov 2010

Living Flood Histories: great day!

Well Friday last week I went along to a day's workshop in Bristol on flooding and 'art' - it had the catchy-title: ‘Researching Learning to Live with Water: Flood histories, Environmental Change, Remembrance and Resilience'.

Photos: from the event that was also being filmed for a possible Youtube film

It was an Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project involving folk from various universities around the country - this was the first of a series of workshops - I was one of 6 speakers - the others all Profs and Docs, I was there with a local action group perspective having helped set up the Ruscombe Brook Action Group and the Stroud Valleys Water Forum - plus of course being a District councillor and sitting on the Wessex Water Customer Liaison Panel.

So what was it all about? Well it was hugely informative and interesting - learnt lots - it is exciting when different perspectives come together. Indeed to give some ideas I will attach the programme below with some additional comments - there will also be more coming soon on their blog at: http://livingfloodhistories.wordpress.com/

The aims of the network can be found here - basically about exploring the potential that arts and humanities approaches have (in interdisciplinary contexts) to contribute to our understandings of how communities have lived with flood risk in the past, and how they might do so in the future.

Friday aimed "to draw together an initial set of ideas, projects and examples from artists, interdisciplinary academics and activists who are in some way or other working with communities in relation to past flood trauma and future flood resilience. This will then serve as a springboard for the development of the network through online resources and subsequent events. In workshops two and three, we will be particularly interested in projects which seek to work between artist practices/ humanities research approaches and practical development of resilience in communities."

There is a great introduction to the project here. It includes: "The July 2007 floods in Gloucestershire were considered by hydrologists to be a very extreme event, with percentage probabilities of occurrence of <0.5>200 year return period) on some rivers (Marsh and Hannaford, 2007). It represented the biggest peacetime civil emergency in recent history. The scale of these floods brought the possible interaction between fluvial (river), pluvial (surface water) and groundwater flooding in a single event on to the radar of the public and those involved in flood risk management. The severity of the 2007 floods was again matched by those in Cumbria in 2009. Lives, property, strategic infrastructure, and the fabrics of local communities and economies were inundated and destroyed. Many other smaller, but equally severe at the local level, instances of flooding of settlements and parts of settlements have occurred and seem set to continue across the UK. Across Europe and globally, extreme floods events have also occurred in the 1990s and 2000s."

Indeed as it goes on these events have helped confirm the view that out climate is changing. However as the day noted and this blog has done too - flood and drought are two sides of the same coin. A point perhaps missed by policies and approaches like the Pitt Review - although the Pitt Review does embed the idea of resilience - how can communities, and society more generally, be (made more) resilient in the face of flood risk and flood events.

One aspect these workshops hope to explore more about community resilience is that of community knowledge. Not something Pitt considers - but as the introduction says "the community knowledge around flood resilience is embodied within the stories that reside within individuals and communities and are shared about past flooding experiences."

In the arts there is a growing interest in landscape, place, nature, community, environment and environmental history - in Stroud we have groups like the excellent 'Walking the Land' that have had many local exhibitions and walks and more. The arts as this 'Living Flood' project hopes to show can help with investigating local histories of flooding, helping manage the after effects of floods and living with flood risk, connecting those who have no experience of floods with those who have to help prepare in areas identified as flood risk. It is extraordinary that houses continue to be built on flood plains.

Anyway here is that programme below from the first day to give a flavour of it - apols as all these are notes - hopefully the reports and papers will be available on the web as I cannot even begin to do justice to them here!!

Learning to Live with Water: Flood histories, Environmental Change, Remembrance and Resilience. Workshop 1: Floods and environmental change: conceptual frameworks for thinking about watery landscapes and living with floods.

Date Friday 26th Nov. at UWE Bower Ashton Campus, Bristol (pictured left).

Programme

10.00 - 10.30 Registration and coffee

10.30. House-keeping introduction

10.35. Network / workshop introduction by Professor Lindsey McEwen and project team (Dr Owain Jones (pictured left), Dr Iain Robertson and Professor Mike Wilson)

10.45. Reading 1: From Small Memories by José Saramago. Lissa Carter, who performed the readings is a theatre specialist working in the south-west - trained at New College and later completed a MA in Feminist Performance at Bristol University. She has taught acting skills for many years and is a voice specialist. I loved these readings that were delivered beautifully - many of them bringing to life flood experiences, many of them bringing a smile...what a treat for us!

10.50. Talk 1: Dr. Lucy Veale. School of Geography, University of Nottingham “Representations of climate change in East Midlands museum collections”. This was fascinating and has inspired me to see if we can do something similar in Gloucestershire - see their network here and more about the Mubu climate change project here. Lucy talked about some of the pitfalls of climate change exhibitions but also some of the possibilities. I've already started some conversations on this - as blog readers will know I have long felt the County has failed us with their library service not being used to promote actions for a lower carbon economy - climate change is one of GCC's aims yet they don't seem to use the tools they have to help tackle it - it took me far too long to get the Energy Monitors project off the ground despite all around being keen and willing - I am hoping that project will encourage more similar projects. But now museums I can see more clearly museums have huge potential......each region really needs a Lucy to get this ball rolling but I understand from an artist at this event that there is already interest in this area.....

11. 10. Talk 2: Dr. Chad Staddon, Bristol Water Group, University of West of England (UWE)
"Climate Change, Extreme Weather and People: the socio-cultural experience of flooding". I also loved this talk as it posed questions like are floods really what we should be focusing on - this goes back to my comment earlier re flood and drought but also a wider issue....

11.30. Coffee

11.45. Reading 2: From Waterland by Graham Swift

11.50. Talk 3: Dr. Simon Read, School of Arts and Education, Middlesex University and Artist: “Imagining Change. (Artist as mediator in coastal flooding histories and future scenarios)”. Again another fascinating talk about the Suffolk coast and use of beautifully painted maps to plot and record flooding and impact - to show how the 'armour' defences along the coast - rocks from Norway - are collapsing and communities are threatened. In the afternoon a couple of artworks by Simon Read were on display including "A map of the River Deben to show topography and the indicative flood plain 1999-2010" - beautiful but also an extraordinary record.

12.15. Reading 3: From accounts of the 1607 floods of Somerset and Monmouthshire

12.20. Talk 4: Dr. Rebecca Whittle, Lancaster Environment Centre; University of Lancaster “After the rain: flood, vulnerabilityand urban resilience in Hull”. This talk was also brilliant - a great project looking at adults and children who had experienced flood - work compiled from interviews and diaries to give a real flavour of how floods impact. It isn't the flood that often causes the problems but the aftermath and dealing with insurers and more....

12.40. End of morning discussions

1.00. Lunch (with slide show of flood heritage markers/images running on loop)

1.45. Reading 4: Wetland – life in the Somerset Levels, by Patrick Sutherland and Adam Nicholson

1.50. Talk 5: Philip Booth, Stroud Green Party Councillor and Water Issue Activist: “The story of Stroud water politics and the Ruscombe Brook Action Group”. Well my 20 minutes - although I apparently ran over a couple - was looking at how RBAG was formed and what we have been doing with community groups, Councils and others. It was a whistle-stop tour of some of the highlights - missed out lots but hopefully gave a flavour. It was also good to hear that a couple of artists in teh audience were interested in something here in Stroud.

I also mentioned three artists - the international Iranian artist Ahmad Nadalian who had a big impact on me seeing how powerful art can be at getting messages across (see my blog here and here re his visit to Stroud) plus two local artists - Simon Packard (see here - his sculptures are still at Ruskin Mill) and Richard Dean (see map left which was in my presentation and see my blog here).
“These maps are not intended to scare, but the vision is rather alarming. Art making has always had a visionary, prophetic intention, to see into humanity’s dreams as well as nightmares, to explore the things we fear most. Maybe in this way we become better able to deal with these fears, and possibly also get a firm grip on what we need to do to avoid them. I hope we can all learn from their watery tales”. Dean 2009.


2.10. Reading 5: In Time of Flood James Crowden

2.15. Talk 6: Nicola Whyte Department of History, University of Exeter: “Memories of wateryscapes in the early modern period”. Wow was this interesting - I've had an awarenss of the use of court reports - think I caught something on radio 4 a while back but this was really interesting to see how these old reports can be used to look at our landscape and tell us stories - to look at memory and oral traditions and for example how flood landscapes changed grazing and impacted on local Parishes and farmers.

2.35. Discussion and short presentation by Professor Mike Pearson of Aberystwyth University. Mike was the keynote discussant at the first workshop - Professor of Performance Studies at Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, University of Aberystwyth. Professor Pearson is a leading international academic in the area of performance, place and landscape and the author of In Comes I: Performance, Memory and Landscape, University of Exeter Press, 2006 and Theatre/Archaeology, London & New York, Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2001 (with M. Shanks ). Again a very interesting talk about the carrlands project: www.carrlands.org.uk/

That is well worth a look and indeed a listen - some 3 hours of audio - but hey I'm running out of puff with this blog so must stop....

3.00. Open discussion forum on the day (inc coffee - and hey this was the best coffee I've had for many years at any conference - fresh and quality!).

3.45. End.

Thanks to the organisers and indeed for the invite.

24 Nov 2010

Flooding letter timely

As some will know I have been away some days and came home to news that Cornwall was mopping up after the devastating flash floods. The operation will last for months and cost millions, with hundreds of residents driven from their homes. Greens had written a letter to the local press about the Coalition cuts to flood defences - it was in the papers last week.

Photo: Russ' interpretation of my recent break - actually as I missed a summer holiday we took ferry to Brittany and had many wonderful walks along those beaches! It wasn't quite like this!!!

Interestingly there were a couple of people who questioned whether this was an important issue to focus on when other cuts were hitting so deep - I suspect the timely news from Cornwall highlight how we cannot and must not underestimate the impact of flooding. There is much that we need to do! See my previous comment here.

Meanwhile the Environment Agency are making significant changes to the flood Warnings that they currently issue which will take place on the 30th November. The District Council have arranged for the EA to give a training session on the new codes which will take place in the Council Chamber on the 6th December. If anyone is specifically interested in this please get in touch.

14 Nov 2010

Oldbury flood work: reminder about why new nuke is crazy plan

The Environment Agency has completed £35,000 worth of flood defence work along the River Severn. The agency has repaired more than a mile of tidal flood bank near Oldbury Nuclear Power Station, which protects an area of low lying land containing approximately 100 properties. See Gloucestershire Gazette 12th Nov 2010.

Photo: Oldbury nuke viewed with my camera from top of Ash Lane, Randwick

This should be a reminder about why we should not be considering a new nuke on this site - see press release from two years ago here - as I said then: "Nirex, Britain’s nuclear waste management agency, has said Oldbury is at “high risk of flooding". Climate change can only add to future problems."

Nirex reported in its summary of ‘Climate and Landscape Change’ that seven out of eleven nuclear reactor sites at that time were not viewed as fit for new nuclear reactors or nuclear waste sites. Four will be vulnerable to flooding and three others vulnerable to coastal erosion. Berkeley (which has since been ruled out) and Oldbury are cited as having a “high risk of flooding”, while Hinkley is at risk of “flooding and erosion”.

On top of this the Government has withdrawn funding from flood defences. Does any of this make sense?

Over the next 5 years, there will be £137m less each year to spend on combating flooding than was committed by Labour - which was already less than that seen necessary by the EA.
Indeed they asked the last Government for £1 billion a year to fight flooding. They gave only £800 million a year. All this will increase flooding risks to communities, particularly here in Gloucestershire (see our comment to press here). A quarter of homes in the UK are at risk of flooding and this could mean that people’s insurance premiums go up.

Even insurer, AXA, has asked the government to clarify its flood defence strategy. AXA claim that it is far from clear where the money will come from to implement the Flood and Water Management Act which passed into law earlier this year. With the effects of climate change and more severe weather conditions, flooding will become more of a problem, not less. The government needs to spend now so that it is not spending later when emergencies happen.

Anyhow all this just should surely confirm to any sane person that a new nuke on this site is crazy. The flood threat issue just seems to be ignored? I would welcome an answer from Oldbury about how they can go ahead? Does it mean we just dismiss those climate change forecasts and sea level rise threats? What world are we leaving for the next generation?

9 Sept 2010

Water Forum meets, Squash in a bra and more

The last couple of weeks have been slowly building up with the meetings...meeting to sort allotment water supply plus working party, a Food Transition meeting to look at a Potato Day and an Edible Open Garden project for next July plus a meeting last night about Feed-In tariffs and tonight a Parish Council meeting. I am going to try and keep it to 3 evenings a week as last year it was usually 4 or 5 weekday evenings....

Photos: first two from walk around garden before the Transition Food group meeting then a couple of pics of Forum

Anyhow the Food group one was lots of fun to start planning the projects for next year and included a walk around one of the members organic garden - a bra that was rejected by a charity shop has a new role supporting a squash (see photo) - we are starting to consider gardens for next year - already have a number but if anyone in Stroud Valleys reads this and is interested please get in touch.....our next meeting is on 13th Oct - also see my previous blog re the film, 'Food Inc', on Sunday night.

More on all those bits soon but a quick mention of the Water Forum......

Last time the Stroud Valleys Water Forum met we were hit by a power cut and the presentation from the County Council was shortened - see comments here. Last week we met again with the County to explore further their flood plans and how we can input into those. Neil Carmichael MP was there for the first 45 minutes but sadly had to leave - we are hoping to get him back to the next meeting to raise some key local issues with him.

The County has done a fair job in this area of planning re floods compared to other Councils - we also have a Green Flag award for it.

Anyhow we discussed the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessments - which are needed to be prepared. The Minister last month chose Gloucestershire to launch the plan - indeed our County website has lots of good info and videos on it - like who does what, what to do in the event of a flood, grease and more - see here - if link doesn't work it is probably due to the redesign of the website that I understand will happen very soon.

I have to say it is disappointing that Pitt's recommendations have not been fully enacted and we are still left with over a dozen bodies responsible for various bits of river and water management - what a nonsense. Who will enforce when there are problems?? Will SUDs be nationally funded?

At the meeting we also had a brief round-up re what the various local flood and water action groups are doing. Here are two of them....

Ruscombe update

I had to report that Severn Trent have not responded yet to two letters regarding the works they have tentatively proposed for sewers locally - see here background. I also mentioned the recent walk with FWAG and their recommendations.

Slad Brook update

Well remember the £500,000 - see here - I've reported there have been hiccups and stops along the way - the new Water Framework Directive is throwing a spanner in the works - if this scheme goes ahead it means water quality could go from moderate to poor - can't do that! It means a possible near doubling of costs? Or is there another way than these two large ponds? Well all along we have suggested 40 small attenuation ponds might be a better way - lower maintenance - less risk - restoring many of the sites previously used for attenuation -

21 Mar 2010

Sewage problems to be tackled, but when?

Don't read this article at meal times! This article below was sent to the Randwick Runner last week to update folk as we had a great meeting of the Stroud Valleys Water Forum where we were able to ask many questions of Severn Trent.

Photos: from RBAG meeting and Water Forum meeting with Severn Trent

The Ruscombe Brook Action Group also met the night before to pull together questions and issues (see photo). We are also looking at the next phase for Puckshole and plans for Hamwell Leaze and The Lawns - see previous blog on this.

Other issues I managed to raise with Severn Trent at that meeting include a request for:
- more info re planned works,
- issues around new developments in the area,
- Severn Trent to set up a Customer liaison panel like Wessex Water so that we can have input and feedback from the company,
- them to extend their tariffs to include an Assist tariff that is best for those in financial difficulties (they already have many measures incl their ST Trust Fund but this would be a step further).

Anyway to that article:

Many will know that about five years ago there were well over 20 incidents of raw sewage getting into the Ruscombe Brook including the Randwick tributary. This was mainly due to the sewers surcharging usually during heavy rain. Since then the Ruscombe Brook Action Group (RBAG) have been meeting monthly and incidents have been reduced to a couple a year.

There have been many successes and actions along the way including improvements along key sites of the brook, clear-ups of rubbish and furniture in the brook, work with schools, sorting out misconnections where for example a washing machine had been discharging directly into the brook, a replacement of a pipe bridge, distributing several hundred fat traps to raise awareness about blockages, working to develop a flood catchment strategy for the whole Five Valleys and this December the fitting of a 13k new grill and culvert at Puckshole to reduce flooding.
When we met with Severn Trent all that long ago they originally denied there was a problem. Since then we have come along way and they have now done extensive CCTV, flow monitoring, a manhole survey, developed a hydraulic model and much more along the sewer system.

Last week we met again with Severn Trent at Ebley Mill and the year old Stroud Valleys Water Forum. John O' Leary (pictured second from right) from Severn Trent gave us a comprehensive presentation of plans for the area including the huge works at Slad and Cashes Green. At those sites vast pipes will store 180 cubic meters of sewage during heavy rain then discharge slowly into the sewers when flows have reduced. This will hopefully stop the handful of properties in the area from getting sewage in their homes.

John was also very honest about the problems and challenges. Severn Trent now admit there are large sections of our sewer networks that are inadequate. In recent years the water company has, each year, cut tree roots that grow into the sewer pipes in the Ruscombe Valley and Randwick and down the sewers to The Lake at The Lawns opposite Tricorn House. These roots cause blockages which can lead to the surcharges and blown manhole covers...and plenty of not very pleasant stuff in our fields and gardens. Indeed on one occasion we picked up two buckets of sanitary ware alone!

Relining does not appear to be an option as the pipes are not large enough, so a proposal is being submitted for specialised 'pipe bursting' that will lead to replacement of sewer sections. However this is an expensive option as much of the sewer network is inaccessible to the 40 tonne truck they usually use. There are also hydraulic issues and other challenges. So we need to now wait to hear whether the plans are accepted and what level of priority the capital works will get.

While I am delighted the problems have been clearly accepted and documented I am concerned that we will now have to wait a long time. Severn Trent's recent determination by OFWAT means they will have to cut staff. This is not good, but we will have to see what this will mean in practice. We understand priority must be given to people that face raw sewage in their homes but equally we need to address this issue which leaves us open to sewage incidents.


RBAG have a number of projects that we are working on and will continue to push for improvements. We would welcome new members or anyone interested in learning more.


Cllr Philip Booth, Ruscombe Brook Action Group

6 Mar 2010

Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe News from your District Councillor

I've just started delivering my latest news letter - the contents of which are below - apols for delay - I usually try to get it out in January but due to a twisted ankle and the snow it has been delayed. Please also use the 'labels' or the search engine on this blog to find out more about my activities.

Dear Resident,

I feel very fortunate to live in and be part of these lively communities. We have a great village shop, schools, churches, clubs and pubs, plus many wonderful local events like street parties, the Randwick Wap, pancake races, art exhibitions, theatre and more. These all go a long way towards strengthening our communities - something that is close to my heart.

As residents will know, I have nearly completed four years as the local District Councillor. I would be proud to serve a further term and I hope you will consider voting for me this May.

This newsletter gives a taste of some of my recent actions and projects. As I hope it shows, I remain passionate about social and environmental justice and am committed to working with others to achieve the changes we need.

I would like to thank all those who have supported me and the local Green Party for funding this annual newsletter.

Cllr. Philip Booth, Stroud District Councillor for Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe ward

Want to talk to Philip?

Philip would love to hear your views, answer your questions or try to help with local problems. Email Philip on philip.booth2@virgin.net or phone 01453755451 or write to: 2 The Laurels, Bread Street, Ruscombe, Stroud GL66EL.

Some recent successes

Philip has:

  • Led a successful campaign to get a bus shelter at Stratford
  • Set up the Stroud Valleys Water Forum that is taking a lead in developing an effective flood policy for the District
  • Initiated a Countywide scheme for libraries to loan out energy monitors to help people cut their energy use
  • Supported residents who have had problems with planning issues
  • Helped get a new culvert and grill at Acres Place, Puckshole, to reduce flooding
  • Worked with Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish Council to establish allotments in the area Road
Some recent actions by your councillor:

Seeking more accountability at the Council

I have joined other Greens in calling for:
  • Councillor expenses to be published fully
  • Ending the extra cash paid to councillors who use larger cars
  • More openness around decisions to close joint-use sports centres
  • The Council to apologise to tenants for the damning report on our Council housing stock (with the exception of two other councillors, all refused to make an apology)

Working for better planning
  • I continue to oppose development on the Ruscombe Valley fields and at other key local sites that are currently threatened
  • I have been one of four councillors on an extensive inquiry into the planning process which has made key recommendations for improvements

Pressing for transport improvements
  • I have helped to gain the '20 is Plenty' traffic calming signs. I oppose County Council measures to remove these.
  • I continue to seek other local traffic calming measures (not humps and bumps)
  • I continue to work for 20mph speed limits in residential areas to reduce casualties and encourage more walking and cycling
  • I want to see a proper bus station in Stroud and improvements to cycle facilities

Protecting our wildlife and environment
  • I have been involved in projects locally such as clearing the local brook, supporting the local Hedgehog Hospital and helping develop the Stroud-based Global Bee Project to protect solitary bees
  • I have sought improvements to local grit bins and road gullies
  • I helped ensure that Severn Trent has taken action on sewage systems locally. This has led to a significant reduction in sewage incidents

Open Homes Success
  • I initiated and help organise the hugely popular Eco-renovation Open Homes weekend each September. This involves local homes with renewable energy and energy efficiency measures opening to the public and local renewable energy installers promoting their products

Tackling fuel poverty, energy security and climate change
  • I chaired a scrutiny inquiry that has made recommendations for financing energy efficiency and renewable measures
  • I am seeking opportunities for the Council to invest and make serious financial returns on investments in renewable energy

Working on your behalf
  • Opposing a large incinerator at Javelin Park near Stonehouse or elsewhere in the County
  • Actively working to ensure our waste management is more sustainable and cost effective
  • Initiated a wood fuel project in local woods
  • Raised key issues as Stroud’s representative on the Wessex Water Customer Liaison Panel
  • Sought improvements to services at Stratford Park Leisure Centre including measures to improve cleanliness and energy efficiency
  • Supported others to successfully oppose large cuts in funding to arts

See last years report here.

6 Jan 2010

Flood meeting makes progress

This week has been a busy one for meetings despite the snow - most of Monday various meetings re the Scrutiny inquiry I chair, evening meetings plus the wood fuel project and on Tuesday morning a long meeting at Ebley Mill (pictured earlier this week before snow) with District and County Council, the EA, Water 21, David Drew and Flood Action groups - particularly BARFF (Bridgend Against River Frome Flooding) who had called the meeting - indeed congrats to them for getting it together.

There were over 25 of us at the meeting and I can't do the many points justice here - first up was the issue of Downton Road - an area that has seen houses flood regularly - one of the residents there has had his home flooded 6 times in 3 years.

Photo: Downton Road (Brigend) - a lidar of the flood area showing how the road increases flooding - see more here.

Downton Road acts as a dam across the Bridgend flood plain - it’s height stops the flood water flowing freely into the western meadow causing water to back up the valley and flood the houses on the upstream side of the road. Furthermore the camber of the road directs the floodwater into the small meadow in front of Albion Terrace. Water 21 have surveyed the road and found that it is considerably higher than the surrounding meadows. The EA have now modelled this area and they presented findings of their three models using District Council data - basically the only option worth pursuing was possibly lowering the road for 40metres in one place and raising the road in another. This would have no impact further down but will lessen the risks of regular flooding.

The good news is that both the EA and County will now further investigate this and cost this to see if possible.

Another issue is one of the key sets of sluice gates. A number of years ago the EA repaired these gates but access remains difficult. The EA are pursuing this and hopefully some solutions can be found. One issue I am already looking at is how we can establish better communication between sluice gate operators - at the moment nobody downstream knows if a gate is opened upstream - an issue for our Stroud Valleys Water Forum next week.

There was also discussion about the role of watercourse wardens - who are not meant to deal with emergencies but identify issues along the brooks and rivers and report these - there is clearly confusion about their role and this will now hopefully be addressed.

Lastly we looked at how we can move forward a fully integrated 5 valleys wide water management approach - looking at all aspects of water attenuation, management, and storage. This is an issue we have been pursuing for a long while locally - Cllr Sarah Lunnon and myself have been in conversations with the District as to how that can be included in the Core Strategy so that SDC have powers to act - at the moment if a landowner says no to attenuation there is nothing we can do about it - yet that is the approach we must take if we are to reduce flooding downstream.

At this meeting there was progress with two students from Water 21 and Cranfield to work towards a plan with SDC and EA. More on all this in future blogs.

12 Dec 2009

Flooding ramble: Bridgend, Water Bill, Foxes Field and more

This blog is a bit of a ramble from Bridgend to the new Water Bill...it starts with a questionnaire I completed from a civil engineering student in his final year of a degree at Nottingham Trent University.

Photos: nothing to do with floods but met these two great horses up in Randwick Woods the otherday

This blog means I get quite a few students contact me - two last month on Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems - anyhow this guy is writing his dissertation on the role of Flood Forums in Flood Management. A useful project indeed - however too often people don't have a voice on those forums or on flooding issues.

The recent Flood and Water Management Bill is a start and notes that the 2007 floods caused major disruption, particularly in Hull, Doncaster, Leeds and the Severn Valley causing £3 billion worth of damage, affecting 55,000 properties and the loss of 13 lives. Since then we've seen Morpeth, Cumbria and others. However I fear the Bill may not go far enough - the way we manage our land and increasingly climate change means we are set for many more problems.

Indeed Gloucestershire Councils all wrote a joint letter last month pointing to some of their concerns - here is some of what it said:
We note with great interest the recently published Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Paper (23 September 2009) reporting its views on progress to date on the new Flood and Water Management Bill. We are therefore disappointed to read that the Committee identifies that the current Draft Bill is a “confusing mix of measures many of them poorly drafted”.

We are profoundly concerned that the proposals in this Bill would bring about an over centralised model which, if introduced would significantly reduce the role of Local Government as a Community Leader, and place excessive power and influence with the Environment Agency. If enacted this Bill, based on the current EA flood risk investment strategy, would place the responsibility on the Environment Agency for 40% of the 5.2 million properties that are at risk of flooding and give them 90% of the resources. Local Government will pick up responsibility for 60% of the properties at risk from flooding with less than 10% of the resources. This at best can be described as perverse.


The joint model we have been operating in Gloucestershire was presented to the Select Committee by colleagues from Gloucestershire County Council putting forward the proposal of a Joint Catchment Flood Management Board, which has been identified by the Select Committee as having “much to recommend it”; yet to date this has been ignored by DeFRA.

Our principle concern (and that clearly reflected by the Select Committee) is that the Bill is being rushed and there is a likelihood that the outcome of such a Bill may well offer no significant improvement to where we are already.

It also has the potential to be an overcentralised model, which is likely to result in reduced value for money and greater remoteness from local communities. We ask that you explore our concerns and seek to ensure that any future Flood Bill is fit for purpose.

Bridgend flooding again

The local press reported flooding again at Brigend on the 29th/30th - one house was flooded and pumped out by the Fire Brigade, and the residents of a further 8 properties spent the night pumping flood water away from their homes desperately trying to stop the water getting in. This time they managed to avert serious damage to their homes and property, but clearly all suffered a great deal of stress and anxiety alongside a very busy and sleepless night.

The rainfall that weekend was not exceptional by any fashion, and yet Bridgend suffered again - moves are being made by agencies to look at the problems and now early January a meeting has been set up with Councils and the EA - I hope that comes up with a useful strategy.

Flooding in Severn Vale

The Potsdam Institute in Germany say their best guess is a one metre sea level rise this century, assuming three degrees warming, and up to five metres over the next 300 years - see more here. With figures like that it does mean we need to seriously look at any future developements - and existing flood plains.

The District planners already are talking to County colleagues about how to produce better climate change projections for the County/Stroud. This will hopefully lead to a better understanding of issues locally and help provide better evidence to support new policy approaches.

The immediate impact from tidal flooding is not likely to be great as the existing defences will largely cope with that and no development is likely to be promoted in those areas at risk alongside the River Severn in any case. The coastal defences issue is currently being considered via the Shoreline Management Plan currently being prepared by Halcrow (see here).

The impact of fluvial flooding arising from the backing up of rivers flowing into the Severn is less well understood and this could increase the risk of flooding from our 'main' rivers (Frome, Cam/Ewelme, Little Avon), but the extent of that impact is not known as far as I am aware. It is that sort of thing that the Council's work will help us understand.

Foxes Field

I've blogged before on this absurd plan to develop this last green field between Stroud and Stonehouse with over a 100 homes - see here - well the inquiry is over and we await the results. Graham Williams, a member of Fox’s Field Action Group, kicked off the inquiry, by setting out some of the reasons why not to develop the site - a key reason he gave was the risk of flooding on the field, which he said, would be greatly heightened by the proposed development.

Of course there are many other reasons that this site should not be developed like it would create a major change in the form, style and mass compared with the ‘ribbon’ development which has so far been built along this stretch of Ebley Road in a countryside setting close to the Cotswold AONB and the Cotswold Way. As the CPRE guy said: "It is clear that the development would be unsympathetic to the surrounding houses and would damage to some extent, arguably substantial or significant, this part of the countryside."

However of concern relating to this blog was the failure to make more of the flooding issue in the original objections. It seems the EA did not object for a number of reasons but did state that any flood risks arising from the development were to be outlined in a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA), for consideration solely of SDC and any resulting increase in flood risk be determined by SDC.

The action groups claim that the actual FRA as prepared for this proposed development was deficient in following respects like: it pays no regard to the large volumes of rainfall runoff entering the site from farmland further up Doverow Hill and actually attempts to infer that there is no drainage into the site; it therefore also fails to account for the additional runoff that presently attenuates within the topsoil where the proposed development is to be located; the FRA does propose a (partial) SuDS approach, only addressing some of the rainfall falling on part of the development area; the proposed (partial) SuDS approach will only capture approx 1/100 year rainfall event (the recent Cumbria event was 1/1000 - we have had 5 x 1/100+ events locally in last 3 years, and barely 100 years of meanful rainfall data exist for UK); the proposed (partial) SuDS here will attempt to soakaway into the deeper strata some of the captured rainfall, which will very quickly enter the River Frome as the site is only 120 m distant at 10 m elevation and thought to be free draining here; a new drain is proposed as a part of this proposal for excess drainage, where there was none before; this can only contribute further to the regular damage of property and critical risk of flooding downstream, arising solely as a result of this development; the FRA makes no attempt to account for the effects of additional drainage downstream - like the impact on Brigend.

SDC appear to have accepted the FRA from Barratts - despite the various concerns mentioned - this makes countering it difficult - but I hope the inquiry took on board these concerns.

Lastly two bits of good news

The Slad brook scheme to reduce flooding is set to start in January and the EA have rejected the plans at the Nailsworth Railway Hotel due to concerns re flooding.

21 Sept 2009

Ruscombe Brook Action Group AGM

5The Ruscombe Brook Action Group AGM was on 15th Sept 7.30 at Randwick Village Hall - over 20 people turned up which wasn't bad considering we had 5 apologies and hadn't really advertised much - anyhow the photos here are a bit of a record of some of the two presentations by Water 21 and below there is als a summary of the AGM for local press.

We also had the Water for Life exhibition which has been touring the County - a Vision 21 project with Severn Trent Water.

The evening started by Zarin Hainsworth, our Chair (pictured here with her daughter) giving a brief review of work of RBAG - what has been achieved over the last year - including the setting up of the new water forum.

I said a few additional words the Treasurer gave a report and then we went staright to appointment of officers - Chair, Zarin Hainsworth, Secretary, Jo Botterill and me as Treasurer - I was delighted by this as I have been Secretary for over 4 years and with being so busy was doing a less good job - Jo has already been helping lots and will be great.

However that does mean I am now in charge of the dosh - I think we have all of £100 - anyway we then had the Water 21 student presentations followed by a preview of a new Aussie 'Land & Water Microbial' film - very exciting stuff that I mentioned briefly at one of our previous meetings - see here.

Report on Ruscombe Brook Action Group AGM for local press

The Ruscombe Brook Action Group (RBAG) formed in January 2005 to end the flooding at Puckshole and the repeated incidents of sewage getting into the Ruscombe brook. Since then the group has met monthly and learnt lots about water, sewage, biodiversity and more. We've worked with various agencies and seen some significant improvements: sewage pipes replaced, roots cut from inside pipes and a plan for further work.

Photos: These next two photos are of Downton Road (Brigend) - a lidar of the flood area showing how the road increases flooding - the second slide is ofe some of the solutions being considered.

We've also organised three seminars and held other public meetings, met with agencies to see improvements at The Lawns and Hamwell Leaze, initiated projects with University students and school children to look at water quality, produced information leaflets and much more.

At our AGM in Randwick Village Hall, Chair, Zarin Hainsworth, outlined work this year. It included a walk along the 2 mile brook to identify problems, one day digging out silt from near a culvert and one day removing a vast amount of rubbish including two sofas, a tent, waste bins and of course a shopping trolley. Apart from work to improve the sewage system we are also delighted to have finally got agreement and funding for a grill and clearing out of the culvert at Puckshole. This initial measure will reduce flooding of the lane but there are further improvements planned for the site. We're also producing information on how to reduce our water use.

Photos: the next three are re Slad showing where attenuation ponds could be, using the map and lidar and then a picture showing attenuation capabilities increasing when heavier rainfall

Another exciting development this year is Stroud Valleys Water Forum that RBAG helped set up with the four other water action groups in the area. We are together seeking a water management strategy in the Stroud area that will give greater protection from floods and drought.

At the AGM after Officers reports and elections, we heard from Adam Broadhead and Julian Jones from Water 21. They talked about how Stroud Valleys’ complex hydrogeology has been disrupted by artificial modification, urbanisation and intensification of agriculture. Infiltration zones such as fields and woodlands have been covered with paved, impermeable surfaces.

We also heard about specific problems at Brigend and what solutions might be possible, the work in the Slad Valley and more. The evening concluded with a DVD preview of work in Australia around soils and water. We are now looking forward to another year of improvements along the brook.

Philip Booth, Ruscombe Brook Action Group

6 Jun 2009

Flood group seeks holistic strategy

The Stroud News and Journal reported this week the positive talks between BARFF (Bridgend Against River Frome Flooding) and the District Council. This is good news - BARFF are a member of the recently set up Stroud Valleys Water Forum and we had a discussion about how we can all work more closely together to find solutions for the flooding problems in the Five Valleys. See more re Forum below.

Photo: Rainbow over Ruscombe Brook

I suspect there are few, who have looked into this issue seriously, who still see that the solutions lie in the old approach that only seems to add to the problems - but there is still much work to be done to get that understanding across to all the various agencies and embedded into policies. BARFF (Bridgend Against River Frome Flooding) like many of us in the Ruscombe Brook Action Group and others see that this old approach of tackling flooding, valley by valley, only leads to more problems.

Members of BARFF met Jon Beckett, Environmental Health Chief, and Maria Hickman, Housing Renewal Manager, to discuss flooding in the Stonehouse area - and by all accounts it sounded like a positive meeting with the District keen to find holistic solutions - that has also been my experience of the District.

However BARFF are understandably concerned that flood money is being spent on schemes like in Painswick which some consider might speed up flows of water and add to flooding further downstream. District Council officers note that they have been given assurances that this is not the case but for me there are still questions around the whole process - clearing a stream and culverts will speed up water - that is not to say those measures should not go ahead but the impacts need to be more clearly researched - I don't consider what I have seen so far to be satisfactory - but I am open-minded that that may have been the case - but for me it highlights that we urgently need a strategy that covers the whole catchment and clearly seeks to assess the impact of any works.

BARFF secretary Tim Davies is quoted in the BARFF press release saying: "It was a positive meeting and we feel that they were behind the main points of our campaign". Here is the rest of their news release:

Mr Davies said BARFF wanted to lower part of the road between Stonehouse and Stanley Downton to prevent water backing up in some meadows while others remained comparatively free of flooding. He also stressed that the group was disappointed that £89,000 had been spent in a survey and remedial works in the Painswick valley without adequately considering the effect it would have downstream.

"It is ridiculous to have a piecemeal approach. We need to consider the Frome catchment area as a whole" Mr Davies said. "It is essential that Local Authorities and the Environment Agency back a survey looking at the whole area before any more money is spent on work upstream of Stonehouse; after all, all the water falling in the valleys flows past our homes. At our meeting the District Council officers seemed happy to support this point of view. BARFF have been told the County Council has a pot of money for flood defence works, and we believe that it could be best used on schemes that benefit the entire Stroud area. It does seem strange that money is being given to areas which are threatened with flooding far less frequently than Bridgend. Every time there is a severe weather warning we fear for our homes."

Stroud Valleys Water Forum

We had our first meeting a while back - see here - and since then a second meeting which I've not had a chance to note here. We were able to feed back activities from each of the groups like Slad making progress on attenuation and Ruscombe's walk up the valley and attempts to get problems sorted at Puckshole - still on-going - indeed had more calls this week - hopefully more news soon!

We are also looking at meeting with District Officers to see how best to integrate ideas into the Core Strategy so that flooding becomes a more key issue to be addressed in a more holistic way in developments - I already have had a provisional meeting and am hoping the next will be a chance to lay out more clearly what evidence we need to provide for the District.

And don't forget the Communiversity Conference on water - see more here. Plus Dirty weekend tomorrow at The Lawns.

2 Mar 2009

Brook and Flood Forum created

At a meeting last week on 24th February residents from local brook and flood groups came together for the first time to create a Forum to look at local water, sewage and flooding issues. I helped set up the meeting and was delighted by the positive input from so many people. Below are some quotes I just sent out this week re the meeting and below them some of the issues we discussed.

Photo: Electronic noticeboard in Ebley Mill where we held the meeting

Cllr Sarah Lunnon, who helped found the Slad Brook Action Group and chaired the meeting said: "We need a wider water management strategy in the District that seeks to store and infiltrate water and protect us from floods and drought. That means a joined up approach that includes changes to our planning, farming, house building and more. In short an end to those of us upstream dumping on those downstream."

Tim Davies, of the BARFF (What does that stand for again!!) said: "We are a new group concerned about flooding of our homes and I came away feeling positive about the potential of this forum to help prevent some of that flooding. We also want to ensure that when the canal is developed the problems are not made worse. It is positive that the Environment Agency are looking to spend £500,000 on slowing water down in the Slad valley: this is a step in the right direction to help reduce peak water flows that end up flooding homes in Brigend."

Philip Booth, from the Ruscombe Brook Action Group said: "It was great to have at the meeting people representing the Ruscombe, Slad, Stonehouse and Brigend action groups plus representatives from Stroud Valleys Project and Water 21. We would welcome other interested individuals or groups at our next meeting on 30th March where we will be looking further at what role we can play in ensuring the most sustainable solutions are found for the problems we face. If anyone is interested please call me on 01453 755451."

Well the meeting started with brief introductions then more detail about what each of the groups had been doing. We then moved onto a discussion about what we might gain from working more closely together. Discussions were many and various (!!) and included:
- How groups could support each other on an overall plan and possibly on more localised issues eg BARFF have a set of projects that include sluice gates that are not operated properly, flood meadows that don't flood and a road that acts as a dam.
- The group agreed we need to end those of us upstream dumping on those downstream.
- Is there a role to help ensure EA develop the most sustainable solutions for the Slad Valley with their £0.5m
- The role of small scale hydro
- Biomass crops that might encourage more participation from landowners
- Returning areas to original landscapes/wilderness
- The canal: opportunities and challenges
- Using expertise in the group to be more effective eg issues re planning permission, surface water flooding maps
- Role of giving support and advice to others not in the group re flooding, sewage etc
- Making a submission to the Core Strategy
- Funding opportunities and whether we should seek funding for a project worker to help put plans together. SVP offered to help apply for a grant while Water 21 said there maybe some private funding to help.
- Communiversity are planning a day with Water 21 possibly in June about water.
- Brook and Flood Forum could seek advice from various people at any future Forum meetings like Severn Trent, the EA, District Council etc

We agreed a number of useful steps forward including another meeting scheduled for 30th March. More info if you give me a ring!