Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Stroudies to join The Wave on 5th December

Join the UK's biggest ever demonstration in support of action on climate change.

On Saturday 5 December 2009, ahead of the crucial UN climate summit in Copenhagen, tens of thousands of people, all dressed in blue, will flow through the streets of London to demonstrate their support for a safe climate future for all......and Stroud is sending a coach to take part in the demonstration called 'The Wave'. Starting in Grosvenor Square at midday and encircling Parliament three hours later, it is to be the biggest ever demonstration in support of action on climate change.

The Stroud bus will leave at 9am from the Bell Hotel, near Stroud Train Station. It is £12 per person and to book please contact John Marjoram (01453 750962) as soon as possible.

And if you can't make it to London, there is nothing to stop all the Stroud groups joining the online wave by making video's. You can use a normal digital camera and at teh Woodcraft Venturers group it only took up 5mins of the session. See them on the wave website: http://www.the-wave.org.uk/with/284/ )

Meanwhile here's a quote from Green Parliamentary candidate Martin Whiteside said, "The Stroud Green Party is joining with other organisations such as Transition Stroud to fill coaches to London. We need as many people as possible to join us. All of us going to London are also there to support the three amazing young people from Stroud who have been chosen as youth delegates to Copenhagen and will hand in a petition from the people of Stroud. The world's future is in our hands; we must act now."

Lastly download the petition we are getting signed from www.glosgreenparty.org and get all your neighbours to sign. See here The Ecologist's Copenhagen in a minute or was it two minutes?

If you want stuff on how the climate talks are going - alot of it makes grim reading - see here for Indymedia report and here for The Independent. However it is wonderful to see the vast numbers of people participating in demonstrations and actions - I still see some hope - yes we're in for some difficult times and poorer countries are going to face even worse times ahead - but all these actions are helping push our politicians to make the decisions we need....what other choices do we have than to make these stands?

Monday, November 09, 2009

Join the Tricorn Picnic demo

A picnic is being planned to be held at Tricorn House on Tuesday 17th November at 12 noon. This is to draw attention to the misguided decision to allow the rights of a Guernsey-based property company to prevail over those of a local business. See more here. It was also good to see that Ecotricity are still game to go for the Compulsory Purshase Order - see Citizen here. Join us for the picnic!

Pic: 'Godzilla' courtesy of Stroud artist Simon aka Vietnamthemovie - this time the full-size image!

Resilience Thinking article

'Resilience Thinking' is an article I read while in Wales these last couple of days from the latest issue of ‘Resurgence’ - I have cheekily copied the article below from the author, Rob Hopkin's excellent blog - see here.

It is a useful article - and an issue Greens have been pushing locally - one previous suggestion was instead of a Regeneration Department at SDC we need a Department of to build Resilient Communities - I'm sure a catchier title can be found but basically shifting the focus away from looking at economic growth to ways of ensuring more resillient communities. Anyhow here's that article from Rob and if you go to the link above you can engage in discussions on that item:

The latest edition of Resurgence is timed to coincide with the Copenhagen talks, and looks at resilience as a key aspect of the climate change debates. Here is the article I wrote for it.

Resilience Thinking. Why ‘resilience thinking’ is a crucial missing piece of the climate-change jigsaw and why resilience is a more useful concept than sustainability: by Rob Hopkins.

Resilience; “the capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganise while undergoing change, so as to retain essentially the same function, structure, identity and feedbacks”

In July 2009, UK Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Ed Miliband unveiled the government’s UK Low Carbon Transition Plan, a bold and powerful statement of intent for a low-carbon economy in the UK. It stated that by 2020 there would be a five-fold increase in wind generation, feed-in tariffs for domestic energy generation, and an unprecedented scheme to retrofit every house in the country for energy efficiency. In view of the extraordinary scale of the challenge presented by climate change, I hesitate to criticise steps in the right direction taken by government. There is, though, a key flaw in the document, which also appears in much of the wider societal thinking about climate change. This flaw is the attempt to address the issue of climate change without also addressing a second, equally important issue: that of resilience.

The term ‘resilience’ is appearing more frequently in discussions about environmental concerns, and it has a strong claim to actually being a more useful concept than that of sustainability. Sustainability and its oxymoronic offspring sustainable development are commonly held to be a sufficient response to the scale of the climate challenge we face: to reduce the inputs at one end of the globalised economic growth model (energy, resources, and so on) while reducing the outputs at the other end (pollution, carbon emissions, etc.). However, responses to climate change that do not also address the imminent, or quite possibly already passed, peak in world oil production do not adequately address the nature of the challenge we face.

Let’s take a supermarket as an example. It may be possible to increase its sustainability and to reduce its carbon emissions by using less packaging, putting photovoltaics on the roof and installing more energy-efficient fridges. However, resilience thinking would argue that the closure of local food shops and networks that resulted from the opening of the supermarket, as well as the fact that the store itself only contains two days’ worth of food at any moment – the majority of which has been transported great distances to get there – has massively reduced the resilience of community food security, as well as increasing its oil vulnerability. One extreme, but relevant, example of where sustainability thinking falls short was Tesco’s recent ‘Flights for Lights’ promotion, where people were able to gain air miles when they purchased low-energy light bulbs!

Some people believe that we can move from our current ‘high carbon’ model, where goods are transported at great distances, to a ‘low carbon’ information economy, where it is ideas that are exchanged rather than goods, and where we operate in a virtual world with few impacts. Yet such an economy still depends on fossil fuels: to power the vast internet servers as we check our morning emails, not to mention the breakfast we eat and the coffee we drink that continue to be sourced from far and wide, often with a disastrous impact on the local food systems that would have supported us in the past. Despite the temptation to believe otherwise, we still operate in the physical world with very real and pressing energy and resource constraints.

The concept of resilience emerged from within the ecological sciences as a way of looking at why some systems collapse when they encounter shock, and some don’t. The insights gleaned now offer a very useful overview for determining how systems can adapt and thrive in changing circumstances. Resilience within communities, for example, depends upon;”

Diversity: a broader base of livelihoods, land use, enterprise and energy systems than at present Modularity: not advocating self-sufficiency, but rather an increased self-reliance; with ‘surge protectors’ for the local economy, such as local food production and decentralised energy systems Tightness of feedbacks: bringing the results of our actions closer to home, so that we cannot ignore them

A recent report by the think tank DEMOS, Resilient Nation, raised the question, “Resilient to what?” Are we building resilience in the face of peak oil and climate change, or of terrorism and pandemics? While it is clearly not an either/or situation, I would argue strongly that peak oil and climate change are so far-reaching and destabilising that we really must give them precedence, the solutions that arise being markedly different from addressing terrorism or pandemics. But what would this kind of resilience thinking look like in practice?

For many years, those writing and campaigning on relocalisation have argued that it is a good idea because it produces a better, more equitable economy. Now, as the potential impacts of peak oil and climate change become clearer, an additional and very strong argument has emerged: that as the net energy underpinning society inevitably contracts, so the focus of our economies and our daily lives will inexorably shift, at least in terms of manufacturing and trade, from the global to the local.

It requires a huge amount of cheap oil thundering around the superhighways and shipping lanes of the world to bring to our shops the things we now feel we need, much of which we would have grown or made ourselves not all that long ago. But creating a different way of doing things takes time, resources and proactive and creative design.

Often, climate-change thinking doesn’t question the notion that higher rates of consumption lead to individual happiness – it focuses rather on low-carbon ways of making the same consumer goods. Yet as we enter the world of volatile oil prices, resource constraints, and the need to situate ourselves more within the local economy than the global one, we will need to link satisfaction and happiness to other less tangible things like community, meaningful work, skills and friendships.

When I give talks on this subject, there are always some who interpret the concept of increasing localisation to mean that building resilience in the West – increasing national food security, rebuilding local manufacturing and so on – will by necessity lead to increased impoverishment in the developing world. I don’t believe this to be the case. Will the developing world be lifted out of poverty by continuing to dismantle its own food resilience and becoming increasingly dependent on global trade, which is itself massively dependent on the cheap oil we can no longer rely on? Is the way out of poverty really an increasing reliance on the utterly unreliable? Rather than communities meeting each other as unskilled, unproductive, dependent and vulnerable settlements, they would meet as skilled, abundantly productive, self-reliant and resilient communities. It is a very different quality of relationship, and one that could be hugely beneficial to both.

In any event, work by people such as Mike Davis in his book Late Victorian Holocausts shows how the impact of famine was enormously magnified by the forced introduction of India into the international money/cash-crop nexus. As Amartya Sen has shown, famine occurs more from the way in which food is distributed, and inequality, than from food shortage. Even that analysis now needs to be revisited from a ‘resilience’ perspective. Over the last few years we’ve started to see clear impacts of tying the developing world into global commercial food webs, as food prices rose in step with oil and fertiliser prices. In fact, I’d argue that tying developing-world food producers into the globalised system leads to their exposure to both food and money shortages.

The need to cut carbon emissions is even more urgent than the government’s Transition Plan acknowledges. NASA scientist James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, now argues that we have already passed the climate tipping point at our current level of 387ppm, when the safe level of carbon in the atmosphere is at most 350ppm. While the UK government argues that we need to stay below 450ppm, it is clear that even that is a huge ask. If you were to step outside your front door today and ask the first ten people you met what your town or city might look like in ten years’ time if it began today to cut its emissions by 9% a year starting today, I imagine most people would say something between the Flintstones and Mad Max! We have a paucity of stories that articulate what a lower-energy world might sound like, smell like, feel like and look like. What is hard, but important, is to be able to articulate a vision of a post-carbon world so enticing that people leap out of bed every morning and put their shoulders to the wheel of making it happen.

Resilience thinking can inspire a degree of creative thinking that might actually take us closer to solutions that will succeed in the longer term. Resilient solutions to climate change might include community-owned energy companies that install renewable energy systems in such a way as to generate revenue to resource the wider relocalisation process; the building of highly energy-efficient homes that use mainly local materials (clay, straw, hemp), thereby stimulating a range of potential local businesses and industries; the installation of a range of urban food production models; and the re-linking of farmers with their local markets. By seeing resilience as a key ingredient of the economic strategies that will enable communities to thrive beyond the current economic turmoil the world is seeing, huge creativity, reskilling and entrepreneurship are unleashed.

The Transition Movement is a rapidly growing, ‘viral’ movement, which began in Ireland and is now under way in thousands of communities around the world. Its fundamental premise is that a response to climate change and peak oil will require action globally, nationally, and at the scale of local government, but it also needs vibrant communities driving the process, making unelectable policies electable, creating the groundswell for practical change at the local level.

It explores the practicalities of building resilience across all aspects of daily life. It catalyses communities to ask, “How are we going to significantly rebuild resilience in response to peak oil and drastically reduce carbon emissions in response to climate change?”

By putting resilience alongside the need to reduce carbon emissions, it is catalysing a broad range of initiatives, from Community Supported Agriculture and garden-share schemes to local food directories and new Farmers’ Markets. Some places, such as Lewes and Totnes, have set up their own energy companies, in order to resource the installation of renewable energy. The Lewes Pound, the local currency that can only be spent in Lewes, recently expanded with the issuing of new £5, £10 and £20 notes. Stroud and Brixton are set to do the same soon.

The Scottish government is using its Climate Challenge Fund to fund Transition Scotland Support, seeing Transition initiatives as a key component of the country’s push on climate change (and thanks also to that fund, a number of Transition initiatives have received substantial financial support: for example, Transition Forres received £184,000 and has become a real force for local resilience-building). In England, Somerset and Leicestershire County Councils have both passed resolutions committing themselves to support local Transition initiatives. What underpins these responses is the idea that meeting our climate emissions responsibilities and preparing proactively for the end of the age of cheap oil can either be seen as enormous crises, or as tremendous opportunities.

It is clear, as Jonathon Porritt argues in Living Within Our Means, that attempting to get out of the current recession with the thinking that got us into it in the first place (unregulated banking, high levels of debt, high-carbon lifestyles) will get us into a situation that we simply cannot win. A friend of mine who works as a sustainability consultant in the North West talks of a meeting he had with a leading local authority there. Having read their development plan for the next twenty years, he told them, “Your Plan is based on three things: building cars, building aeroplanes and the financial services sector. Do you have anything else up your sleeves?” As John Michael Greer says, we’re in danger of turning what could still be a soluble problem into an insoluble predicament. Transition is an exploration of what we need to have ‘up those sleeves’, an optimistic exploration of the practicalities of relocalisation, creating, as Jeremy Leggett puts it, “scaleable microcosms of hope”.

However, resilience is not just an outer process: it is also an inner one, of becoming more flexible, robust and skilled. Transition initiatives try to promote this through offering skills-sharing, building social networks and creating a shared sense of this being a historic opportunity to build the world anew.

Navigating a successful way through climate change and peak oil will require a journey of such bravery, commitment and vision that future generations will doubtless tell stories and sing great songs about it. But as with any journey, having a clear idea of where you are headed and the resources that you have at your disposal is essential in order to most skilfully maximise your chances of success. If we leave resilience thinking out, we may well end up an extremely long way from where we initially thought we were headed.

Rob Hopkins is co-founder of the Transition Network and is the author of The Transition Handbook. You can download the pdf (with wonderful illustrations) of this article here . There is also a great booklet which is a mini version of the latest edition, which you can download as a pdf. here.

Badger and TB site


I've just had a few days in Wales - wonderful break - but it does mean I am a little behind with emails - please bear with me - as for the blog well I'm back with a post to highlight Martin Hancox's new website about badgers which now has more information on - Martin is Stroud-based and has a huge wealth of knowledge on this issue - see more about him on the website.

Photo: Tony Meeuwissen has kindly given permission for use of this on Ruscombe Green

As I've covered here on this blog the current cattle TB crisis is being blamed by farmers and vets as all due to badgers, but Martin has provided very convincing evidence that it is explicable in terms of the huge hidden infectious reservoir of cattle TB. Anyone with an interest in this emotive and controversial subject would do well to look at Martin's work. Indeed to date despite letters asking questions I have not seen evidence to refute it. For me it is certainly a significant part of the debate that seems to be being ignored.

See his website at: www.badgersandtb.com/

Saturday, November 07, 2009

Another meeting with Wessex Water: panorama's sewage and more

A couple of weeks ago I was in Bath for the Wessex Water Joint Customer Liaison Panel meeting on which I sit on behalf of Stroud District Council - you will see stuff re previous meetings by putting Wessex into the search facility.

Photo: diatoms - read on to see why they are here.

I will come to the four key questions I raised at the meeting in a mo but also wanted to cover some of the other stuff - apols if this is a bit of a ramble but I've been interrupted several times - as always we are made very welcomed at Wessex and the quality of info given is always high with proper presentations on key issues. There is loads discussed and I can't poss cover all like the state of reservoirs, the new standards re customer care, that the 2011 date for private sewers transfer is looking more doubtful as no draft regulations yet, the aim of Wessex to develop a grid (if they are allowed) to ensure better distribution of water supplies when they are under pressure and stuff on the draft Water Management Bill like it's encouragement of SUDs, more legal support for misconnections and better management of surface water.

Panorama programme on sewage

Many of these issues I've discussed here before, one issue that I was particularly interested in was the Bathing Water Quality Standards. Bathing water has certainly improved but a dip in performance last year due to rainfall - recent failures are attributed mainly to agricultural and urban run-off - however there is also the issue of combined sewage overflows.

Some folks might have seen the Panorama programme looking at our dirty beaches - see BBC site here. It is also on Youtube for 4th September - this link might work here. They found that of all the beaches tested for water quality in the UK, 43% present at least a one in 20 chance of getting gastroenteritis after a swim, according to a calculation by the Marine Conservation Society (MCS). They went on to highlight that when sewage treatment plants are overwhelmed by heavy storms, water companies are allowed to employ - combined sewer overflow pipes - or CSOs.

As this blog has noted before there are more than 20,000 CSOs around the UK, all owned and operated by UK water companies. In theory, they are meant to act as safety valves for the system during periods of intense and heavy rainfall. They combine storm water with raw sewage and spill out of CSOs into rivers and eventually into the sea.

It is worth noting that the Environment Agency recommends that people avoid bathing for 24 hours after heavy rain.

As Panorama showed the Good Beach Guide indicates that 45% of the 1,134 beaches they list have a CSO close enough to affect them and that they are spilling more often than they are meant to.

Well I have to say Wessex gave a robust defence of their approach - they note their programme to tackle CSOs that cause problems - and it is certainly true that the Panorama programme was sadly sensational and not giving a fair picture. Wessex claim that the risks are exaggerated - certainly re illness - the figure of one in seven at risk of gastric illness when bathing is a fifteen year old paper - much has changed - yes a risk but not significant enough to go to doctors and even in the control group one in ten had it.

It is true that Climate change is creating a wetter environment meaning CSOs are operating more often while it also adds to the run off from agricultural land. There are many other contributing factors, down to the non-permeable flagstones used on home driveways which are generating concentrated masses of water which are affecting the country’s drainage system and as noted agricultural run-off.

One other factor mentioned is animal fouling - amazingly coliform loads of a starling are equivalent to a human, one cow is equal to 2.8 humans, one pig, 5.7 humans and one sheep 9.5 humans. I do seem to remember in the Bourne stream in Poole a serious issue is all the seagulls doing their business on a bridge over the river that led to the beach.

Anyway the problem stems from the Victorian sewage system which is the basis of the network which combines sewage and surface water.

Here is a quote from an Environment Agency spokesperson: “We want to see the separation of sewage and surface water in future developments, rather than combined sewer overflows, and we are working with farmers to prevent chemicals and manure from running off their land and into the sea. Bathing water samples are collected by us at every one of our 495 designated bathing waters once a week – 20 times during the bathing season. They are then tested at our accredited laboratory within 24 hours and we give the information to councils and local organisations on a weekly basis.”

Indeed the EA while recognising that it was right to raise the issue they were nevertheless so concerned by the programme's bias that they issued a Youtube video - see here - it notes for example that 97 per cent of beaches in England and Wales meet minimum European Bathing Water Standards and that improvements are on-going. Interestingly the EA have also since the programme called for a Cleaner Seas Forum - see here.

Certainly the issue is not as straight forward as Panorama have said but I would like to see more work going into tackling CSOs. We need to get the water out of the sewers rather than just building larger sewage treatment plants. We need to stop the wholesale destruction of trees in urban centres (Trees reduce urban humidity and attenuate rainfall impact). We need Sustainable Urban Drainage systems ("SUDS") a condition of planning applications. I know I've said that a dozen times or more. We also need to see water utilities being statutory consultees on all major planning applications. Beating up water companies is an entertaining blood sport, but remember that they are the tail end Charlie of the impact of new developments: councils approve them, and the utility has an obligation to hook them up to the system: no-one asks the utility if there is enough sewer treatment capacity. They just have to deal with it. We have to plan developments in the context of the ability of the infrastructure to deal with their impact.

The water regulator OFWAT is also answerable here - and indeed I was somewhat baffled why Panorama picked on the EA - The EA does not tell water utilities what to invest in - OFWAT does that. One commentator, not at Wessex, said to me: "well water utilities love huge capex projects like sewage plants, because that's how they make money - the regulator grants them an allowed rate of return (8-9%) every 5 years, when utilities present their forward investment plans, so the more the invest, the more money they make. OFWAT doesn't like that of course, as that rate of return comes out of higher water bills. The EA is largely toothless in this process."

Well if it makes you feel any better, Britain is not the worst off. A recent internal Govt report suggested that only 22% of Italy's coastal water meets the quality stipulations of the EU water and waste water treatment Directive about to come in force. Utilities there are facing billions in fines in consequence.

Anyway I have to say as I noted on this blog a couple of years ago, the very fact that CSOs exist was shocking to me - raw sewage in our waterways and seas is just not right!! Yet with our Victorian sewage system there is little option in many cases until we sort out that infrastructure. Certainly improvements can be made - some of which I've noted - but they will come at a cost. Will folk be prepared to pay? Do others have views on this? I'd welcome more info.

Questions sent before meeting

While Wessex are happy to answer while we are there they ask that questions be sent before the meeting so that more comprehensive answers can be given. Here are the questions I sent ahead of the next meeting (answers in blue):

1. I wonder whether Wessex would consider signing up to the national 10:10 campaign. Stroud District Council is signed up (initiated by Green councillor Fi MacMillan) and so are all Stroud's Green District councillors. Many others like B&Q, Royal Mail, Aviva and Microsoft are also signed up. More info at:
http://www.1010uk.org/business#what_is_1010
And: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/10-10

They are still considering although their targets are above what 10:10 are seeking to achieve.

2. Would it be possible to have an update on redundancies – the press reported earlier that 200 jobs were at risk?

Just under 200 jobs went and apparently virtually all staff were helped to find new jobs.

3. Is any more news re OFWAT prices? See my previous report on this here.

Early November.

4. Do you have any comments re the Environment Agencys report that only 33% of SW’s rivers, lakes and coastal waters received ‘good’ or ‘high’ ecological status – better than country average but still a very long way from EU targets of 95% getting good or very good by 2015. At current investment would you not agree there is no hope to reach the target? What needs to happen? See my comment on this blog here about no pristine rivers in SW.

I've received a very detailed report on this. In short I do agree with their comments that the investment needed to achieve the standards is required through the agricultural and industrial sectors and increased awareness of the general public rather than the water industry. In terms of investment to achieve good ecological status, many waterbodies fail this target on only one specific element e.g. diatoms, fish or phosphorus. However the standards uses a 'one out all out' technique for determining status so actually the waterbody could be at excellent status for all but one determinand. The main factors preventing waterbodies from achieving good status in the SW are:

• diatoms (a type of algae) c. 60% of waterbodies not at good status for this indicator
• fish c. 55% of waterbodies not at good status for this indicator

• phosphate c. 35% of waterbodies not at good status for this indicator


There are a number of reasons why these levels are so low, which may not be related to the level of recent investment. Firstly, many waterbodies have yet to be monitored for diatoms, so this figure is more of a risk based estimate; also, there is debate as to whether diatoms are an appropriate indicator to represent the biological response to eutrophication. Further work is needed in both of these areas to identify the sound science behind this and a much more realistic level of status. In many ways, it's a similar story for fish. However with phosphate is an area for caution there are calls to change the level.
Indeed Wessex note that one way we can achieve the level of good status is by changing the standards - they would argue some are over cautious and some possibly not based on sound science. There is evidence to support this, but I am seeking further info.

Friday, November 06, 2009

Tories want more government support for arms exports

The Conservative Party's Shadow Defence Secretary, Liam Fox, made a speech in September where he promised that a Conservative government would increase government support for arms exports. They are barmy - already the Government gives very generous and completely unwarranted support to arms exports. Apart from the moral arguments against the arms trade, government subsidies are a huge waste of taxpayers' money.

Photo: Poster spotted in Rodborough

The Campaign Against the Arms Trade consider that there is still time to change Conservative policy on this issue, and with a general election next year, it's important to put pressure on all the political parties. They are urging us to write to David Cameron, Leader of the Conservative Party, explaining why this is a bad policy and urging the Conservative Party not to adopt it. You can email from the CAAT website here: www.caat.org.uk/issues/ukti/emailcameron/

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Nature Makes Us Nicer

I just picked up an article about new research from the University of Rochester suggests that nature-connection makes us less selfish and helps us care more for each other - plus another about how cities hurt you and what to do about it.

Photos: Randwick woods two weeks ago

First the Rochester research - here is what ecotherapist Linda Buzzell says:

Journalist Tom Jacobs, on the Miller McCune website, reports that a new series of studies by a research team led by psychologist Netta Weinstein suggests that immersion in nature "brings individuals closer to others, whereas human-made environments orient goals toward more selfish or self-interested ends."

Jacobs believes "This appears to be the first research to examine the impact of the natural world on people's values and aspirations, and its findings have intriguing implications for architects, designers and urban planners."

I believe this research may have much wider implications!

The researchers tell us that "these findings suggest that full contact with nature can have humanizing effects... Our results suggest that, to the extent our links with nature are disrupted, we may also lose some connection with each other."

This makes sense to me. In modern life humans are like caged animals in the zoo, stressed and unhappy in our nature-disconnected cubicles, tethered to our screens. Our temperaments suffer for it. We become selfish and quarrelsome.

Multiple studies now reveal that once we're reconnected with nature and the natural, slower-paced ways of living that we were evolved to enjoy .... Ahhhhh! This reconnection feels like coming home and can deliver a delicious pleasure that mellows us out. We relax enough to look around, enjoy our surroundings and have kinder, gentler feelings for our fellow humans and the rest of nature. The implications of this research are profound: modern humans need to consciously re-connect with the rest of nature both for our own health and the health and peace of our communities and our planet.

Read more here and more about the research here.

How The City Hurts Your Brain

The second piece of research that I wanted to touch on has been highlighted by Jonah Lehrer, author of "How The City Hurts Your Brain...and What You Can Do About It" - he calls cities "deeply unnatural and overwhelming places." This research is particularly timely as for the first time in history, the majority of people now live in cities.

Read more here.

Here is some of what Lehrer reports: "For a species that evolved to live in small, primate tribes on the African savannah, such a migration marks a dramatic shift. Instead of inhabiting wide-open spaces, we're crowded into concrete jungles, surrounded by taxis, traffic, and millions of strangers. In recent years, it's become clear that such unnatural surroundings have important implications for our mental and physical health, and can powerfully alter how we think. This research is also leading some scientists to dabble in urban design, as they look for ways to make the metropolis less damaging to the brain. The good news is that even slight alterations, such as planting more trees in the inner city or creating urban parks with a greater variety of plants, can significantly reduce the negative side effects of city life. The mind needs nature, and even a little bit can be a big help."

None of this is new to readers of this blog but all adds to the evidence that our green spaces are vastly more important than many give them credit. Read more here.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Challenge to MEPs to act on Toxic Dump Case

Updated 9th November 2009

Activists from the South West Green Party including myself have been writing to the Members of the European Parliament elected in June of this year asking them to press the European Commission to prosecute an international oil company for breaking European laws in dumping toxic waste in Africa. Many got ill - an illness that was clearly more serious than a short bout of influenza-like illness.

Photo: Ruscombe view

The company, Trafigura, made national front page news recently when they attempted to prevent the Guardian newspaper from reporting an MPs question about the affair. The super-injunction by the libel lawyers, blew up in their faces in a spectacular way when Twitter, the internet messaging service, publicised the forbidden information.

The text of the letter, setting out the background information, is printed at the foot of this blog entry.

The aim of this campaign is to bring people pressure to bear on the people elected to be our voice in Europe.

The European Parliament has a pretty low public profile between elections - we need to make them more accountable.

MEPs are handsomely rewarded, so it is right that we should make them earn their salaries by doing what they are supposed to - represent the best interests of the people. This Trafigura issue is very important, because it appears that a European law was broken, and the health of many people was affected. Dr Lawson, who is leading this campaign, is trying to find out how many people are still getting symptoms.

Here is what he has said: "So far Trafigura has reacted by firing off injunctions in a multiplicity of directions, trying to gag media sources as far afield as Norway, where they are currently under investigation by Norwegian police for alleged illegal import of toxic waste. Their efforts to hide information about the incident has been overcome by the power of thousands of people using Twitter".

Dr Lawson, who was one of the Green Party's candidates in the Euro-election, has also been asked by the Campaigns Department of the Green Party to convene a conference of NGOs to draft laws designed to restrict and regulate the power of Trans-National Corporations. In particular, they will be called to account in an orderly, legal way for any damage their operations may cause to health, wealth, or environment.

Others may also wish to write - the addresses of SW MEPs can be found here: http://bit.ly/f9SHK
South West MEPs emails:
giles@gileschichestermep.org.uk
trevor.colman@btconnect.com
euro_office@cix.co.uk
julie@juliegirling.com
ukswcoord@aol.com
ashley.fox@europarl.europa.eu

Letter to MEPs

Dear xxxx

As you know, in 2006 the oil company Trafigura dumped 500 tonnes of toxic waste from the Probo Koala in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire, Africa, which was followed by a wave of illness affecting many in the city. Trafigura has been agressively trying to quash all debate over this matter, culminating in the imposition of a super-injunction on the Guardian to stop it reporting on an MPs question regarding an internal Trafigura report detailing the possible serious health consequences of their action. You will recall that the injunction failed in a spectacular due to people-power using Twitter.

In 2006, Stavros Dimas, European Commissioner for the environment, made a tough speech in Estonia (where the Probo Koala was docked) about the Abidjan affair, stating that European Law (Article 26 REGULATION (EC) No 1013/2006) had been broken by Trafigura, and undertaking to tighten the regulations to prevent a repeat of such dumping. It is not clear whether he has followed up on this promise.

As your constituent, I would be most grateful if you would take this matter up with Commissioner Dimas, asking him whether the EU will be bringing a case against Trafigura for their breach of European Law, and what measures he intends to take to make such dumping of toxic waste less likely in the future.

I would also appreciate your assurances that you take a serious view of the action of Trafigura in this matter, and whether you are satisfied that Trans-National Corperations are sufficiently regulated by national and international law.

Many thanks for your help with this important matter

Sincerely, Philip Booth

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

The Ecologist's Copenhagen in 60 seconds

copenhagen-petition-stallCopenhagen in 60 seconds: key facts and figures from The Ecologist - see here. As Greens have been out and about collecting signatures for the petition - see more here (incl Issy going to Copenhagen) - I thought it could be useful to say a bit more about what it is all about...I hope the current pre-talks continue to progress - some encouraging noises....

Do you know your COP15 from your CDM? Your UNFCCC from your REDD? If not, you need our 60 second guide to Copenhagen

What are the dates?

7th-18th December 2009.

Where exactly is it?

The Bella Exhibition and Conference Centre, Ørestad, Copenhagen, Denmark.

How many people will attend the conference?

Traditionally, the COP/CMP attracts several thousand participants. At least 10,000 are expected this year. Included in this number are government representatives, observer organizations, government officials, representatives of UN bodies and agencies, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, and accredited members of the media.

From how many countries?

Officials and ministers from 192 countries are expected to attend.

How big is the press contingent likely to be?

Previous COPs have attracted nearly 1,500 accredited members of the media. There will be a significant number of press conferences held during COP15. The program for these press conferences will be put together by the UNFCCC, and will be available during the conference.

What’s on the agenda?

The climate agreement for the period from 2012; specifically obtaining an agreement that combines respect for the environment (a reduction in man-made greenhouse gases that have a negative effect on our climate system), living standards and long-term security of energy supply in the best way possible. Concrete proposals will be set out for action by the EU and the rest of the international community.

What predictions have been made for the outcome?

Björn Stigson, President of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, has neatly summarised six very different possible outcomes:

1. A 'real deal': the US and China provide the driver for a new, ambitious and comprehensive agreement.
2. Business as usual: the various countries follow current national targets.
3. A limited deal: headed by for example the Group of Eight (G8) a deal outside the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is found.
4. A mere prolonging of the present agreement, the Kyoto Protocol.
5. A stretching of the Copenhagen conference (COP15) into 2010.
6. 'Window dressing': a grand declaration but no real deal.

What are the key discussion points?

* The 'baseline year' against which specified reduction targets will be measured, the duration of the second commitment period, ie. 2012 til when?
* The proposed greenhouse gas reduction targets themselves for both the second commitment period and beyond.
* Whether the agreement will be expanded to include greenhouse gases that are currently excluded from the Kyoto Protocol, for example the international maritime industry and the international aviation industry.
* Whether the rules governing the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) will be tightened to ensure environmental integrity and avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions, or whether they will be relaxed to encourage more investment.
* Whether the CDM will include as-yet-unproven Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology to receive funding as a way of allowing coal-fired power stations to continue operating and new ones to be built.
* An agreement to include measures to curb the rate of deforestation, especially of tropical rainforests in developing countries – otherwise known as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD).
* Discussing a framework to help countries adapt to inevitable climate change. All developed and developing countries should be required to develop comprehensive national adaptation strategies. Financial and technological support should be provided to the most vulnerable developing countries.
* Boost to research, development and demonstration (RD&D) of low-carbon and adaptation technologies.

Source: sourcewatch.org and europa.eu

What are the likely stumbling blocks?

The United States in particular has refused to make binding commitments unless major developing economies, such as China, are included in an agreement. Developing countries – most actively represented by the G-77 block – have indicated a willingness to cut emissions, but only if developed countries take a leadership role.

Developing countries are reluctant to accept hard carbon emissions targets as they struggle to grow their economies. Richer countries don't want to accept hard targets, or be responsible for funding mitigation, if developing economies won't also accept limits.

Everyone is waiting for the other to act on how deeply to cut their emissions of gases that contribute to climate change. No one wants to standalone.

What key objections/proposals do nations have?

The United States in particular has refused to make binding commitments unless major developing economies, such as China, are included in an agreement.

South Africa won't consider the next round of climate change talks successful unless rich nations set aside money to help them address global warming. It is calling for financial and technological support.

Mexico has tabled a proposal for aid to be made available to poor countries in their struggle to cope with climate change.

UK proposes each of the G-20 nations find their own way of funding their efforts to control climate change. The position is opposed by India, China, South Africa and Brazil. UK also suggests that all national plans, such as the Five-Year Plans for India, shoudl would be open to international examination. Again, India opposes the idea.

Norway proposes to use funding from industrialised countries’ emissions budgets to generate revenue for international cooperation.

Members of the Alliance for Small Island Developing States (AOSIS) propose increased risk management and risk reduction strategies, including risk sharing and transfer mechanisms such as insurance.

What greenhouse gas reduction target could we consider a success?

NGOs in many industrialised countries are calling for at least 40 per cent emission cuts by 2020, in line with the scientific evidence of the reductions needed to keep below a 2C rise in average global temperature.

Monday, November 02, 2009

Postal workers deserve our support

I was asked recently re my views regarding the postal strike - well it is clear that Royal Mail workers and management have been on a collision course since the private sector has been forced on the service. I have to say the more I learn about this the more angry I get about how this is being handled. The Green party have been supporting the strike although I have not had time to join any of the local picket lines.

Photo: Time to Support Postman Pat and the rest of Royal Mail workers

Royal Mail management are using the 10% fall in postal communication relative to digital to force through cuts to postal workers earnings often using threats and intimidation and wrecking conditions of service. This is a difficult time to be a postal worker, but postal workers continue to deliver a vital public service. They are through their Union willing to negotiate reforms but are not prepared to be bullied and bullying is what they are getting.

The national agreement that resolved the 2007 dispute stipulates the continuing provision of reasonable local earnings levels and that to assist development of a fourth Phase of Royal Mail modernisation, consultation and negotiation will take place. Management are not currently complying. See a postal worker's view here.

Here is what Caroline Lucas said recently in a letter to the Communication Workers Union: "By removing profitable parts of the business for the benefit of speculators and investors, the Government has created an environment in which the interests of the population of the UK as a whole have been ill-served, none more so than your members. It is shameful that a Labour Government should have played such a role in the privatisation of public services, and in a way which has increased marginalisation and inequalities in terms of access to services. It is especially concerning that this Labour Government is not content with overseeing the dismantling of this vital service, but now appears to be colluding with Royal Mail management to undermine the rights of the Union and its representatives, and condoning the side-lining of the CWU in working towards the completion of the agreement from the last period of industrial action."

See more of Green party leader Caroline Lucas comment here.

Sunday, November 01, 2009

Average family throws out £400 of food each year

It's World Vegan Day - more of that in a mo - plus more about Tesco burning 5,000 tons of meat - but first an astonishing £10 billion of food is thrown away in Britain every year - that's 6 million tonnes of food wasted - £400 per year for the average family and a huge impact on the environment - indeed if we all stopped that would be like taking 0ne in five cars off our roads. It is no wonder local authorities across the south west are supporting Love Food Hate Waste to encourage residents to pledge to reduce their food waste.

Photos; recent Apple Day in Stroud - wonderful selection and below two apples - the red one looked great but was floury and imported and the other a local tasted great - of course not always like that!!

Their aim is to collect 25,000 pledges from across the South West area. Simply by pledging to reduce your food waste, you will not only be doing your bit to help the environment, but could win some prizes. Go and make your pledge before 20th November at:
www.lovefoodhatewaste.com/southwest

This campaign is great but a pity their blog is not up-to-date - far better they link to My Zero Waste blog - indeed I've sent them an email suggesting that!

World Vegan Day

So to World Vegan Day - the day is about highlighting all the issues relating to meat and let's face it we all need to do our bit to cut meat consumption - it has been lots in the news recently - and it is good that we are starting to recognise the vast damage done by our high meat diets. Initiatives like Meat Free Mondays are good but I don't think they go far enough - it is time we started to also pay for the damage our habits do to the environment - a carbon tax is long overdue - The Telegraph raised this issue on Friday - see here their article re green taxes.

I should however dispel the myth that all Greens are veggies - The Green Party does not advocate that people become vegetarians or vegans. As noted before on this blog I was a vegetarian for years but I do eat some organic meat now.

It is clear our diets impact on climate change, and also on the countries that produce so much of our animal feed. Indeed before on this blog I've also covered the impact of meat eating on water resources - see here. With pressure on land from growing populations, and with world food prices increasing, the price of meat will inevitably increase too. In future years people who choose to eat meat will probably find themselves eating less of it, but hopefully of a better quality. Indeed if folk end up saving money on food as a result of this campaign maybe some will choose to buy better quality?

However it is also important that we do much more in terms of teaching nutrition in schools, including vegetarian and vegan nutrition, as well as making sure the full range of options are available in school meals and on the menus of other public institutions. Everyone should have the right not only to choose, but to have good information on which to base their choice.

Green or Gross?

Anyway now to that news re Tesco - I was sent a link to the news item here from the Cincinnati Vegetarian Examiner - Tesco is apparently “recycling all meat waste into heat and electricity”.

Tesco says their company is producing more than 5,000 tons of wasted meat each year which they then convert in to enough energy to power more than 600 homes for a year. While it is admirable that the company is trying to be green with efforts such as diverting 100% of the waste produced by their UK business from landfills, it is a tad sickening that they are allowing their stores to over-order so much meat that more than 5,000 tons are “wasted” yearly.

Viva’s press statement said; “To turn this wasted meat into power might seem like a good idea at first, but you have to ask yourself why is so much left over and why are so many animals dying to provide this excess? Surely killing fewer animals in the first place should be the aim.”

Indeed we do have to think - what an incredibly wasteful society we've become. So to finish this blog try The Ecologist film re meat here.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Tricorn House - still a way to go

Latest news is that plans to compulsory purchase Tricorn House by Stroud District Council appear to have got a hitch - the inspector has laid out more evidence required - personally it appears to be a straight forward case - there are no other suitable sites for Ecotricity within a community - and we must sort this monstrosity out - there are few within the community who don't want to see this site developed - indeed when I was interviewing residents as part of a local Parish Plan it was overwhelmingly the main issue that came up. Let's hope this does not delay what surely must be the inevitable?

Photo: Clover the busker in Stroud courtesy of Stroud artist Simon aka Vietnamthemovie - although I had intended to use his great image of 'Save Tricorn House' but it appears to have been removed from the web - anyhow catch Simon at Stroud Farmer Market.

Update 1st Nov

A blog reader sent this pic in they found on the web - a thumbnail of original from Vietnamthemovie - big thanks.

Ruscombe photographer exhibits

Last night I was delighted to attend the opening of an exhibition of five local photographers in The Space - "Made To Look" - including Mike Gallagher, a Ruscombe resident - well worth a look before it closes on Thursday.

Photos: Pics from preview incl Rainy Stroud by Mike and great one of this 90plus year old guy from one of the other photographers

I really enjoyed seeing this quality work - always like Henri Kyriacou's work - well the stuff I've seen so far - this was a little different to her previous work like the wonderful Middle Street garage - see links to that here. Anyhow here's how the advert describes the artists:

John Daniell: Film and digital monochrome and colour photography. Mainly interested in light, atmosphereand patterns in landscape and seascape. Also expert in stereo photography.

David Murray: Traditional monochrome silverprint photography with a particular emphasis on toning. Local Landscapes and portraits.An obsessive interest in the transfiguring effects of light.

Henri Kyriacou:
Film and digitalcolour and monochrome photography, interested in people and their environment.

Gary Canning: Digital colour and monochrome photography. Has a vast stock of railway photography but produces an eclectic body of work.

Mike Gallagher:
Digital colour and monochrome photography. Photoartistry if you like. Loves the Cotswolds.

Friday, October 30, 2009

Incinerator article featured on My Zero Waste

Today I have an article featured on My Zero Waste about Gloucestershire County Council’s Waste Core Strategy Site Options Consultation and large incinerators - you can read it here. It also covers the recent controversy over the previous consultation.

Photos: Marchwood Incinerator, Hampshire 2007 - photo by Green party Waste expert Chris Harmer

The My Zero Waste website which is based in Gloucestershire has grown since I first came across it - indeed last month it saw 100,000 page views - my blog only manages around 7,000 with over 3,000 unique visitors. Anyhow their numbers are well deserved - it is an excellent resource.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Bee photo exhibition

This blog has seen plenty on bees - like last weekend's successful efforts to get 350 beehouses made here in Stroud - see latest here.

Cartoon: from Russ - his take on bees and
Halloween


Well this blog is to advertise the Foto Forum Photography Exhibition in the Sub Rooms - only until Saturday - and the pics below are from the exhibition - one section by Margaret Lister is on bee keeping - worth a visit - also great pics of cheese making and a very moving pic of a dead deer - beautifully portrayed by Carlos Ordonez.

Meanwhile below here are a couple of interesting articles on bees:

Organic beekeeping in the US - from urban rooftops to backyard hives, the world is abuzz with interest in homemade honey. An interview in Grist with the former president of the Vermont Beekeepers Association, Ross Conrad. He’s sold bee stuff and led organic beekeeping workshops throughout North America for many years. See article here about pesticides and more.

Honey is not made toxic in hot water - see here.

Agri-chemical companies are both breeding and killing bees - See here my blog a few days ago on this.