Monday, December 31, 2007

Two events: Rachel Carson play and Vandana Shiva talk

A play about Rachel Carson will be at The Space on Friday 8th February - 'Breaking the Silence' - a one woman one hour play on the life of Rachel Carson at 7pm

Photo: Rachel Carson with kind permission of Stanley Freeman Junior

See www.rachelcarson.co.uk for show details. 2007 was the centenary of her birth and as the play advertising says: "it is time to listen as if for the first time to what she has to say." Rachel Carson wrote "Silent Spring" in 1962 overcoming the opposition of government, industry and her own failing personal health in order to alert the world to the careless use of chemicals in our environment. "This show is not a history lesson. It is not about fear and despair. It is a love story and we are all part of the story." Door open at 7 pm for 7.30 pm Tickets £8 and £5 concessions from Jo Bousfield 01453 762361

Vandana Shiva and Satish Kumar

The other event I am helping to publicise is that Vandana and Satish are returning to Abbey Home Farm near Cirencester to raise money for Vandana's projects in India - come and hear them talk - 7pm on 14th March - cost - all to her work: £15 each which includes a thali - see www.theorganicfarmshop.co.uk/news for details and booking.

Tricorn trees chopped but not Vicarage trees yet

I was disappointed to see the loss of trees at Tricorn House just before Christmas and followed up with the Parish as to why...

Photo: Above - Tricorn House with the trees in front of it cut down and below with trees helping to conceal the monster

...the Parish presume the owners cut them down and that the trees were not protected - very sad as they hid and softened part of the building - but perhaps it is a good sign that things are moving on that site - scroll down to blog entry on 21st December re the hopes of Ecotricity to purshase the site?

For all too long local residents have seen this empty building as a blight - most I met when I was interviewing residents for their Parish Plan wanted it torn down and removed - others were happy to see it occupied and the facade to be changed. Recently however I met someone who was a 'fan' of the building and its architecture - in mentioning this to someone else I found they too were a fan - are there others out there? Does this building really have any merit?

Vicarage trees

Anyhow while on trees I also followed up on a resident who reports trees cut down at Vicarage - however it seems from my look and words with the Parish that they have not been chopped - scroll down to my blog on 17th December 2007 for background info on this.

There has apparently been a second application regarding the Vicarage trees, which include replanting with silver birches - the Parish have opposed - It's on the SDC website S.07/2516 - see it here.

Plans to delay inspections at Oldbury nuke condemned

What with Christmas, work and other bits I've had a wee break from blogging - 8 days - the longest since I started this nearly 20 months ago - anyhow I'm back - and back with a letter I sent off yesterday to local press regarding inspections of our local nuclear power station - 16 miles from Stroud...

Photo: Christmas tree

Regular blog readers will know that this 39 year old nuke is, well, to say the least struggling...here's some of what I wrote and more....In May Reactor 2 was restarted after two years of inspections and closed almost immediately after a large explosion in the generator/ transformer that was heard in Oldbury village - indeed they could also see a plume of smoke.

A second attempt to restart failed in July when a turbine began vibrating. The reactor was eventually started in August and was due for an inspection shut-down in November but this was then delayed until January. Now the industry wants to delay that until after the reactor's permanent closure at the end of 2008.

These are very serious and worrying incidents but of greater concern is the state of the oldest and most corroded reactor core in the country. The Nuclear Installations Inspectorate writing to the Shut Oldbury Campaign state that "a key aspect of the NII decision regarding deferment of the outage is the graphite core safety case." Yet without shutting down the reactor it's impossible to gauge whether cracks have developed in the core - video cameras need to be inserted down the hundreds of fuel channels.

The only other method for guaging the strength or weakness of the graphite material is to drill out samples and test them. But this is a much more generalised technique from which information is extrapolated. It is not specific enough to pin-point crucial areas of damage.

The regulators said in June they couldn't licence the reactor till the end of 2008. For Oldbury to now make this request is outrageous and could have unthinkable consequences especially as they still haven't fitted a key extra safety system.

Meanwhile Reactor 1, that is even more damaged, has been out of service since August 2006 awaiting similar test results. Shutting Oldbury finally now is the only safe option.

largePhotos: talk earlier this year to hear John Large - pictured here with a fuel rod

You can see the letter sent here with extra notes - indeed the Glos Green party website has lots more re the graphite problem...

audience....also see my blog (10th Oct 2007) and Green party site re the recent talk in Stroud from Independent nuclear engineer John Large - he showed why he and others considered there were serious risks and gave a detailed description as to why an accident at Oldbury could be comparable to Chernobyl.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Christmas: skating, woods, shopping and madness

I do like Christmas and this year it has been less stress-free than many - I did get a glimpse of the hectic madness that some face - when at the recent Climate Change march (see blog & photos on 10th Dec) I caught the tube from Oxford Circus and saw folk shopping - it was madness - do people enjoy that?

Photo: Shopping in Oxford Circus

On Saturday I went to Gloucester and came across the same madness - the Mall so solid with people and shopping bags that you could hardly move - the same with the High Street - a frenzy of consumption - I thankfully wasn't there for the shops but the ice skating - my partner is Norwegian and I was taking her grand daughter to experience the ice for the first time. Now I don't know about the carbon footprint of the temporary outdoor ice rink there but it was cold enough I'm sure not to need to do much freezing of the ice.

Photo: Skating in Gloucester

As a child my Mum took me to Queens Skating rink in London each Christmas holidays - it was such a treat and I have v fond memories - sadly my skating abilities have gone a little rusty in the intervening 30 years - or perhaps they were never as good as I remembered??

I only fell over twice yesterday - both times caught on camera by people filming from the edge - not sure what for....anyhow we both enjoyed the skating very much indeed - and the coffee and choc milkshake afterwards on the terrace.

Photos; 'Enchanted Christmas'

The other recent delight as a special Christmas treat was the 'Enchanted Christmas' at Westonbirt Arboretum - this is when the trees are lit up with coloured lights - photos don't do justice - much of the lighting enhanced the trees and allowed us to see them in different ways - some was much to 'Disney' for my taste - I was also not expecting such a huge area to be lit - I thought there might be a few different groups of trees but there was one and a half miles of lit woodland and one and a half miles of people walking the route! It apparently finished today - I was unable to find out if the lights were powered by renewable energy...

So it seems I am not having a totally 'green Christmas' whatever that might be - indeed I've seen some dodgy claims about how to have a green Christmas that still seems to be about consuming...

Bill McKibben said: "The problem with Christmas is not the batteries." He writes about Christmas and whether folk are "brave enough to say no to a high-stress holiday?" Read him here - he makes some basic but important points like "replacing regular stuff with green stuff isn't getting very close to the root of the problem....that our environmental problem, at root, isn't that the stuff we're buying uses too much energy or too much plastic, or that its paint has lead in it, or that it's been shipped too far. Our environmental problem is that we consume way too much because we've agreed to try and meet basic human needs - status, respect, affection - with material ends."

The tradition of giving presents in winter dates back at least to Roman times, when officials presented the emperor with evergreen branches and, later, honey, cakes and gold. Christmas presents, by one account, date back to the medieval legend that Jesus gave presents, though they started modestly with cakes, fruit, nuts and clothes. Later the tradition was linked to the Bible story of the kings who visited Jesus shortly after his birth.

A survey last year for the auction website Ebay estimated that £4bn of gifts are unwanted - £92 per person - and with the country throwing away 100m tonnes of waste a year, it is great that we have websites like freecycle (see my blog 20th June for more info) as an environmentally friendly way to cut down on often toxic rubbish and the energy needed to recycle or manufacture more goods.

I've not used Freecycle for presents - infact at moment frustratingly can't get on the site - however finding free Christmas presents is as old as the tradition itself - there are few who will not confess to stealthily passing on last year's unwanted socks or bath salts as presents this year. Certainly I welcome anything that moves away from the mad consumerism that Christmas has become - simple presents are great- if they are made then even more special.

Photo: Randwick woods today

In fact my walk this afternoon in Randwick woods could not have been better - beautiful - not sure I'll need to see all those lights at Westonbirt again!

See a great poem on my blog on 14th July 2007 that sums up much about shopping - Danny Chivers, the author has kindly given me permission to reproduce it... see it here.

Anyhow I've run out of steam now - and this ramble has probably gone on too long already - however you spend Christmas, alone or with family, I hope you have a good one - seasonal greetings to all and all the best for 2008.

Ruscombe Brook mini-projects - the way forward

We had a good Ruscombe Brook Action Group meeting on Saturday morning - all very positive indeed and a good plan to move forward - below are the notes I have just written for the minutes - would love to explain more but Christmas is creeping up rapidly...

Photos: Helen with her flipchart presentation, the meeting and after the meeting clearing out a householders flowforms!

Minutes of mini RBAG meeting at 10.00am on Sat 22nd December 2007 at Stefans house.

Present: Stefan, Zarin, Philip (minutes). Keith, Simon. Helen
Apols: Julia C

These notes are very brief and will be discussed at more length at the next RBAG meeting on Tues 22nd Dec at Zarins house. The purpose of the meeting was to present a possible way forward for the group. Helen Patrick kindly kicked us off with a very useful presentation of what we had achieved and a summary of some of the issues. Philip also noted some very issues raised by Julia Currie in a memo to the meeting.

The group suggested the following as a way forward. The wider RBAG group at the next meeting can consider the plan; those present at this mini-meeting may also have some further thoughts.

We first discussed the role of RBAG in getting improvements. Agreed to lead others on the project but that we were not in a position at present to take on a more significant role as suggested by Water 21s recent report. The group agreed to keep an open mind on this and would also look at others if such proposals were put.

After discussion we agreed to identify smaller projects that sub-groups or individuals could take forward. Some suggestions to lead those projects have been made but need further discussion - indeed the group would welcome other RBAG members or even those outside the immediate group to help. Another key issue was the level of priority - what work will have most effect?

1. Draft plans for brook (hopefully by mid-Feb)
- particularly the upper reaches in Ruscombe where we will need to start first

2. Householders engagement project
- this would include at least two elements:
(a) Consultation
(b) An info pack for householders to include: how to get rebate from Severn Trent Water (poss draft letter), what householders can do (eg water butts at a reduced price from Stroud District Council? Green Shop info on more extensive measures? Info to homes re permeable drives?). Funding from who?

3. Further work on SUDs
- Highways run-off
- Yellow Fish
- 'Puckshole project' - is culvert too small? What else?

4. On-going work to improve existing sewage system
- liaison with Severn Trent

5. Grit bins
- make more vandalism proof

6. Landowners engagement project
- consult with local landowners about how they want to move forward eg manure, cattle etc
- what support can we provide?

7. Wider political issues
- correspondence re SUDs
- Ruscombe water quality Standard
- Rainfall measures

8. Getting to know our stream
- walk length - involve others
- District Council's initiative re Watercourse wardens

Other issues discussed included poss Water 21 conference later in year and our next AGM

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Global Challenges Think Tank and more

On Thursday the Transition Stroud Business and Government group met in Nailsworth.

Photo: Coffee break at meeting - plus mince pie

I nearly didn't make the meeting as I lost one page of my diary - anyone who has seen my 2007 diary will have little sympathy with me and understand totally how this could have happened (see update below) - it is a poor excuse for a diary but it is at least small enough to fit in the back pocket of a pair of jeans....anyhow I did send around an emergency email message re those dates of the missing page - but was confident that I had remembered all important events - it was only the day before when a reminder email came around about this meeting that I realised my mistake - fortunately I managed to change another meeting around to get to this one....

The meeting on Thursday was a chance to look at how the 'Global Challenges Think Tank' on Peak oil and climate change had progressed - this is one of the first in the country to look at both those issues and feed into the policy making Local Strategic Partnership - good stuff indeed - we also talked about various other aspects including the local Sustainable Community Strategy and more...see my report ramble of the meeting here. It is very nice to be part of a group where talk will turn into meaningful policy - plus lots of good ideas for more action - coming soon!

Update 31st December 2007: following an email query re my diary I have included here a photo of the state of my 2007 diary - it really doesn't show the glory of it's loose pages, my illegible scribbles that sometimes defy even my interpretation and the wonders of it managed to get me to meetings this last year....

Friday, December 21, 2007

Compulsory reading and writing for 3 year olds!

Three and four year-olds HAVING to learn to read and write - this is utter nonsense from the Government yet outrageously this becomes law in the UK in nine months time for ALL nurseries – not just state-funded nurseries.

Photos: Den-making this last summer

I would urge you please to sign the Downing Street petition - and read more below:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/OpenEYE/

The Government just haven’t got it. They think the sooner a child starts something, the better it will be; the notion of age appropriateness doesn’t seemed to have crossed their mind. There is masses of evidence (e.g. formal schooling in Scandinavia and Germany starting age 6/7, etc) demonstrating that delaying formal learning and letting children learn through just playing is no hindrance to later literacy. In fact it helps.

Here is the full petition to read: We, the undersigned, petition the Prime Minister to commission an urgent independent review of the compulsory Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) policy framework, and to reduce the status of its learning and development requirements to `professional guidelines'. We recognise the government's good intentions in its early-years policy-making, but are concerned about the EYFS legislation, which comes into force in England next September.

Our concerns focus on the learning and development requirements, as follows:

1. They may harm children's development

2. They will restrict parents' freedom of choice in childcare and education

3. Their assessment profile requirements may place an unnecessary bureaucratic burden on those who care for young children

4. Recent evidence suggests that government interventions in education generally may not be driving standards up and may be putting too much pressure on children

1. There is significant evidence to suggest that introducing formal education too early is damaging to some children in both the short and the long term, especially to boys. Consequences may include the development of unpredictable emotional and behavioural problems, unwarranted levels of stress, damage to children's self-esteem and erosion of their enthusiasm for learning. Research has shown that 5 year olds drilled in reading and writing were outstripped four years later by children whose first year at school was more socially interactive and stimulating. Such evidence suggests that in practice (notwithstanding the reassurances offered in the legislation) the approaches to teaching that will be encouraged by broad-brush EYFS targets - such as that by the age of 5 children should "begin to form simple sentences, sometimes using punctuation" - are likely to be those which may be harmful to young children.

2. The EYFS will be mandatory across all settings – childminders, nurseries, playgroups, schools (including independent schools). We appreciate that the Government's intention is to ensure the same high standards everywhere, but we believe that this could be better achieved by investing the necessary resources in comprehensive staff training across the field. We do not accept that the EYFS encapsulation of child development reflects the views of professionals worldwide, nor do we accept that it is acceptable to mix developmental milestones with aspirational outcomes.

We note that the law allows for the Government to make regulations regarding exemptions to EYFS. However such exceptions are to be made only at the request of individual parents, and it will therefore be impossible for parents to find a childcare or educational setting which takes a different approach to the EYFS and therefore does not teach to its learning and development requirements. This is an unprecedented restriction of parents' freedom to choose how their children are cared for and educated. It may actually increase the use of informal care, with accompanying lower standards in some cases.

3. The EYFS profile demands that carers assess children against 117 different assessment points. With less than a year to go until implementation, arrangements for carers to receive training and ongoing support are seriously inadequate. Without such training and support there is unlikely to be any consistency of assessments and random "box-ticking" is a real probability. Even once trained to do it, assessment and recording will add significantly to the workload of those who care for and work with young children. It may skew the way staff observe and interact with those children, and the paperwork required will certainly take up valuable time that could otherwise be spent with them.

4. Recent evidence – including the reports of the Cambridge Primary Review, and the latest OECD PISA report (the "international league tables") - suggests that government-driven changes in education have been largely ineffective in driving up standards and may at worst be adversely affecting both educational standards and the quality of children's educational experiences. We see no reason to believe that the EYFS learning and development requirements would break this pattern.

In conclusion we believe that this unprecedented legislation could lead to harmful long-term consequences and therefore contradicts the responsible "precautionary principle" which should surely be exercised in all early-year state policy-making.

See more: http://openeyecampaign.wordpress.com/

Nativity Play and Parish dos

A great evening yesterday started with a service in the church with Randwick Primary school....

Photo: Carol singing in Randwick Church

A modern version of the nativity play - and no nonsense about not taking photos - indeed at one point the Head Teacher, Mrs Montecute got the children lined up in their costumes and invited parents to take a photo.


Photo: Martin Rendall, Vice Chair of Parish and Richard Huxford, Chair.

After the Nativity it was on to the village hall for the shortest Randwick Parish meeting ever - with a presentation of cheques to local groups like Scouts - some photos then lots of nibbles and a glass of wine - very nice to chat and talk to folk - infact the first time I had properly talked to Martin, the Parish Handyman.

Photo: Randwick Parish meeting with the line up of representatives getting cheques for local groups from the Parish


The Parish has also appointed a new Clerk - Arthur Westward who has been in the post 25 years or so is retiring in March - he holds a wonderful knowledge of the Parish which hopefully we can draw on still as he has kindly written in his resignation letter his hopes to stay in touch - anyhow the interviews took place last week and the appointment has been made - Barry Parsons who lives in the village - looking forward to working with him!

Photo: New Clerk, Barry Parsons

I left the Parish meeting early to be at the Star in Whiteshill for an excellent buffet and celebration for the Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish Council - for councillors and partners - sorry no photos - strictly by order of Parish Chair!! Well not that strict but to be honest I was enjoying self too much to remember - very nice indeed to be able to chat - heard lots of great stories about Whiteshill many years ago - one about how the volunteers from the village to the Boer War were to parade down through the village - apparently only one chap went.

Photo: a cow that escaped into Bread Street earlier in the day - by the time I was about to report the farmer came to the rescue.

Anyhow it was late to bed.

Tricorn House news

In the last post I talked of the Rodborough Fort sale - sadly Tricorn House is still not happening - Dale Vince from Ecotricity wants to tear down the eyesore and replace it with an iconic headquarters for the world's first green electricity company. He is prepared to plough around £10 million into creating new offices for his growing company on the site at Cainscross.

Photos: Grafitti says 'Knock Me Down Please' - and bottom photo showing Tricorn at the end of the road almost makes it look OK

The Citizen reports: "Mr Vince, who was awarded the OBE for his services to the environment, said his dream was to develop an architect-designed landmark with the impact of the "Gherkin" in London but at the same time as zero-carbon as possible. But the snag is that Mr Vince said he had been trying unsuccessfully to buy Tricorn House for the past two years."

They quote him saying: "Our frustrations have reached such a level now we've decided to bring this into the public domain. We need space to grow into. Staff numbers now stand at 130 and will more than double in the next few years. We are looking for a chance to do something really 'out there' in terms of technology and design - something stunning. We are talking probably £10 million."

The four-storey Tricorn House was built in the 1970s and for years served as offices for the Department of Health and Social Security and as locals will know is on a gateway to Stroud - but has been empty for many years - and been vandalised and fallen into disrepair.

I've known of Ecotricity's interest in the site for a long time and find it hard to understand why developers wont sell the site. Is it greed? Can they really get a better offer by holding on? House prices are starting to fall....certainly when I helped with the Cainscross Parish Plan Tricorn House was the issue that was raised most by locals - they want it down or radically improved - it is an horrendous blot on the landscape. Good luck to Dale - and if those developers are reading this please act to help us improve our community.

Ruscombe musician hoping for Christmas hit with Save the Ice Bears

Musician Terry Mechan, who lives in Ruscombe, has written the lyrics to a song about polar bears - and is hoping for a hit this Christmas.

Photo: Terry in the SNJ

The Stroud News and Journal covered the story this week - apparently Terry downloaded the song which has German lyrics about an ice hockey team and then rewrote his own words - Save the Ice Bears with words about conservation and the environment. He then sent those to the German group, Sound Convoy, who sang the original - they liked the idea and recorded the version which is available below.

Photo: Sound Convoy

Terry is quoted saying: "It does get stuck in your head and I think it is as catchy as Slade's "Merry Christmas Everybody". I have to say I enjoyed it lots - and confess to a little air guitar...

See words, more about the band and download thesong from:
www.morgle.com/savetheicebears.htm

Rodborough Fort bought

From various points in Ruscombe, Whiteshill and Randwick Rodborough Fort can be seen. The Citizen reports today that self-made millionaires Ian and Mave Richens are delighted to have bought the unique, grade II listed folly on the top of Rodborough Common for just under £2 million.

Photos: View across to Whiteshill from the Fort and me outside the Fort

Here is the rest of the info from their article:

The insurance brokers, who sold their company last year, said they planned to create a comfortable family home while at the same time remaining sympathetic to the character of the building. Mr Richens, 59, said: "It looks like a fairytale castle. It's a schoolboy dream for me to own a place like this and I am just an old schoolboy now."

The couple plans to restore the fort and to move their two adoptees from Sidmouth Donkey Sanctuary and six alpacas into the grounds. Rodborough Fort has six bedrooms, five bathrooms, a chapel, outbuildings, a tower from which you can see the Black Mountains in Wales and nearly nine acres of land as well as outbuildings.

Mr Richens said: "I am seriously considering registering it as a location available for film shoots. "However it is very windy and we are told you lose at least one flag a month to the wind," he said. Both Mr Richens and his wife, who come Stow-on-the-Wold, said they had been touched by their welcome to the area. "Everybody who we have met have been so lovely," said Mrs Richens, 55.

The stunning fort was sold by the Lamplough family trust, which owned it for the past 12 years. Originally built as a folly for Captain Hawker in 1761, the crenellated property has been described by English Heritage as a "very important" landscape feature "in lofty eminence above Stroud town." It was home to former racing driver Peter Lamplough until his business interests took him to Botswana a few years ago. The Lamploughs bought the fort from the National Trust, which owns the surrounding common land, in 1995. Rodboro
ugh Fort was a thriving caravan and camping centre in the 1960s.

The paper could have also added that around 1994 I remember well that the local press was alive with stories about the then Fort's owner being charged with cruelty to 9 monkeys kept in small cages, another 6 that ran loose in the fort and dogs that were kept there in poor conditions - plus a peregrine falcon and a red- tailed buzzard that were allegedly kept without proper authority.

Update Friday 21st December: walked around Fort today and met Ian, the new owner - it was great to hear of his plans to improve the Fort - indeed he was there looking at all the Cotswold Stone walls and seeing how best to repair them.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

SUDS Policy panel

This evening we had a Policy Panel at Stroud District Council with Colin Knight talking about Shared Spaces and the plans for Stonehouse - very inspiring - I hope that the Town Council and partnership there can carry it forward as I am sure it will greatly enhance the town - see label below for more info on Shared Spaces.

Photo: SUDs scheme

The other topic of discussion was on Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems with Bob Bray - put on at my request as I felt things were not moving forward on this and I had heard some statements from councillors who sat on planning who clearly had little idea about what SUDs really are.

In fact we have an excellent SUDs scheme at Springhill Co-housing (see previous blogs for photos and details) - nationally recognised - but nothing has come forward since then - having said that the bigger schemes planned like Hunts Grove do have SUDs and awareness is growing but we are doing nothing like enough.

I was pleased to see David Drew MP raise the issue in a comment piece in The Citizen this week or was it last week and I wrote to him this evening - see below.

Dear David, I was very pleased to read your comment piece in The Citizen on Sustainable Urban Drainage systems. I hear the Lyons SUDs scheme is good but, we have, as I am sure you are aware, a nationally recognised scheme at the Springhill Co-housing in Stroud - in a high density housing scheme and on a steep slope that developers had claimed was impossible for SUDs. I have been frustrated that more SUDs schemes have not been forthcoming in the District - things have improved recently and more will come through with the larger developments. Last year, when I was on Development Control Committee I must have raised SUDs as an additional condition on planning applications in at least 40 cases even though it is a stated condition in the Local Plan. Stroud District have kindly put on a Policy Panel for councillors this evening at my request with Bob Bray talking more re SUDs. I hope this will lead to greater awareness but consider we need more action also from the Government - an issue I raised in my submission re the recent floods (i). Another issue is the shared responsibilities - and our County Council are, apparently, not helpful when it comes to SUDs - all sorts of myths abound like permeable hard surfaces need more maintenance or are more expense etc. There clearly are also issues around adoption of schemes. However some Councils seem to be getting around these very successfully. I have corresponded with OFWAT and Defra re SUDs and found there lack of urgency frustrating (ii) - I understand SUDs are mandatory in Scotland for example yet the SUDs Working Group here seems to move at a snails pace. I would love to see a better lead on this from Government. Your thoughts on how best to take the ideas forward would be very welcomed. All the best - Philip (i) See my flood report on 10th September 2007 blog.
(ii) See previous blogs for copies of correspondence - use search facility.

Chief Scientist's misleading GM claims

GM Freeze has rightly called for a public apology to retiring Government Chief Scientist Professor David King calling upon him to make a public apology after recently making a “grossly misleading” comment about GM crops on the BBC’s Today Programme.

Photo: Morning view from Bread Street

The GM Freeze press release note that Professor King finished the interview with the following; “I wonder if I could give you one example and this is the use of intercrop planting in Africa which has increased grain yields already around Lake Victoria very substantially. And this is done by discovering what the pheromone in the root of the grain plant that attracts root borers and destroys them. And if you snip that gene into the grass so that the grass attracts root borers , the root borers does not feed well on the grass and dies. You interplant the grass with the grain and it turns out the crop yield goes up 40-50%. Very big advantage.”

Infact the “push pull” project he described does not involve GM crops at all.....it is an excellent example of how scientists have found solutions to a major weed and a significant pest of maize in Kenya without the use of pesticides or GM crops.

In an article in the Independent on Sunday (16th December), Professor King is quoted as saying his comments were “an honest mistake”. Commenting Pete Riley of GM Freeze said: “We find it quite staggering that Professor King made such misleading comments on prime time radio. The “push pull” project in fact illustrates how the problem pest and weeds, which plague farmers in the Global South can be tackled by well researched crop management techniques. These have the advantage of being cheap to apply and being free of the potential environmental and health impacts of GM crops or pesticide usage. If Africa is to become more self reliant in food supply without locking farmer into very expensive GM seeds and their associated herbicides then the Government need to be funding more projects like “push pull”. In view of the grossly misleading nature of what he said we call upon Professor King to make a public apology”.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Stroud Valleys slide show

As someone who helped Stroud Valleys Project a couple of times this year at Hamwell Leaze - clearing the ground there and making a 'snake hotel' - I got an invite today to their Christmas buffet and slide show of their activities - it was inspiring to see so much going on in this organisation - and a good bit of chocolate cake (well two but they were small). If you are looking to volunteer in conservation work give them a look - they also have various events planned like coming up a Winter Solstice walk. See events and more here: www.stroudvalleysproject.org/

21 County groups condemn Staverton Airport plans

It is difficult to agree on the wording of a letter in a committee and then organise getting signatures - but it is now done and has gone out today to press and councilors - see below the news release and letter - and interestingly many more groups are now interested in signing....

In an unprecedented move, groups from across the County have come together to condemn plans to expand Staverton Airport. Their letter is enclosed below.

Philip Booth, who helped organise the letter and has campaigned for over five years against the airport expansion said: "The failures of the climate talks in Bali to come up with any real action is deeply worrying. Locally twenty-one groups have readily stepped forward to sign this letter: we could have found many more groups. A lot of us find it very hard to understand how we can allow an airport to increase emissions when we know that to avoid catastrophic climate change we all need to cut emissions by 90% or more. What other sectors will need to cut their emissions if we allow the airport to expand?"

Richard Conibere, Coordinator of Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth who lives in Cheltenham said: "Britains' emissions have risen by 19% since 1990. To reduce carbon consumption demands much more radical policies. Airport expansions are incompatible with tackling climate change."

Neil Marshall, of the campaigning group Concerned Residents against Staverton Expansion, said: "As residents we are very concerned about many aspects of the airport expansion like extra traffic, pollution and noise. We welcome the support shown in this letter from groups across the County raising the issue of climate change."

The letter:


Dear Sir/Madam

The undersigned organisations write this open letter to councilors of Gloucester City, Tewkesbury Borough and Cheltenham Borough in response to the disturbing Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report released on the 17th November and the enormous implications it must have on policy making.

The new report evidences an extraordinary position: CO2 levels in the atmosphere are now higher than at any time over the available 650,000 years of ice core records. The report confirms the worst fears of irreversible changes to the environment, such as massive species loss, collapse of the ice sheets and tropical rainforests and rising sea levels. Such horrors and their impact on communities in all countries are hard to contemplate, but must spur us to action.

We need cuts of 90% or more in CO2 emissions to avoid runaway global warming. Councils have taken a lead by signing the Nottingham Declaration to cut emissions, but a significant step change is needed in policies and actions. This year's floods should be wake up call to all of us.

Staverton Airports' plan to intensify operations and increase CO2 emissions is one example which is completely counter to what is needed. If councils support this they will be ignoring one of the most critical and clear warnings that have ever been given on the perils that the planet faces. Furthermore, this will be done in the face of a deteriorating situation where our country will be struggling to handle the combined economic shocks of climate change and significant oil price increases.

We call on councillors to take a lead to significantly cut our emissions and help build the necessary economic and community resilience to cope with the challenges ahead. We urge you not to support the expansion of Staverton airport.

Yours sincerely.

Neil Marshall, Concerned Residents against Staverton Expansion
Richard Conibere, Cheltenham Friends of the Earth,
Robert Irving, Cirencester Friends of the Earth
Martin Rudland, Forest of Dean Friends of the Earth
Sophie Franklin, Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth Network
Steve Goodchild, Tewkesbury Friends of the Earth
Rene Meek, Gloucestershire Greenpeace
Kevin Lister, Camp Hope Organising Committee
Philip Booth, Gloucestershire Airport Action Group
Ian Lander, Cheltenham Environment Forum
Jimmy Garlick, Plane Stupid, Gloucestershire
Roger Creagh-Osborne, South West Air Action
Carol Mathews, Transition Stroud Transport Group
Sue Clarke, Transition Forest of Dean
Sheila Booth - Stroud Valleys Cycle Campaign
John Mallows, Cheltenham Cycling Campaign
James Beecher, Bicycology
Angela Paine, Shut Oldbury Campaign
Julian Jones, Water 21
Cathy Green, One Tonners
Kate Perkins, People and Planet

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Bank at Ash Lane

Thursday last week action and drama came to the streets of Randwick. I only picked up a load of messages after getting back from work that evening and then ended up in many phone calls myself. I understand that due to the quick thinking of one local resident in particular the bank beside the road was not dug out - I am told that some 15 residents turned out at various times to help try and stop the action - certainly Parish Chair Richard Huxford was very active all day in seeking to clarify the situation and prevent actions that seem not to have had permission.

Photos; the bank in question marked out for removal by contractors

So what is this all about? I understand the contractor and resident wanting the bank removed said that they had paperwork that allowed them to remove the bank near the entrance to Ash Lane. However when the paperwork was requested they were unable to produce it but still considered they had been given permission. The contractor was there much of day with a digger and Stroud District Compliance Officers were excellent in that they turned up immediately and were back and forth on the scene trying to clarify the situation.

Why this bank? It is suggested that Highways have said that removing the bank would improve safety at the Ash Lane junction. This safety measure has been much discussed relating to a planning application for an additional house at Ash Lane. There has been very strong opposition from locals to the plan - not so much for the house but for measures like the digging out the bank. Indeed I have to agree and wrote my own letter of objection to the bank removal earlier in the year.

Bank removal would increase speed A number of local residents note, and I agree with them, that the cutting away the bank will lead to a perception that the road is wider and will also give longer views: this will lead to increased speeds and consequently more dangers. The junction is not good at present but cars slow considerably at that point (maybe not enough but increasing views will only make it worse). I am told there have been no accidents there and, if they were to occur, then cars are generally traveling at lower speeds so would cause less damage.

Bank removal not attractive? Residents are also concerned that any replacement of the bank would look ugly: stone gabions have been discussed in the past although I understand these were discounted as they needed planning applications. This work on Thursday day was only meant to be a 'shaving' of the bank although looking at the white lines it looked very severe. It will certainly change the look of the entrance road to the village in a way that in my view reduces the attractiveness of that part of the village. The banks removal could also lead to more likely landslips from the field above: indeed the removal of trees recently from the bank was meant to be due to it being 'unstable' - something many local residents have disputed saying that the trees held the bank in place.

Concerns contractor would return? Some residents were concerned that the contractor would return the following day and start removing the bank. However it seems the Compliance Officers were able to make the position clear and several people including myself left urgent messages at Highways. I also contacted the Cabinet member, Stan Waddington who was helpful in ensuring a message from him was also left - plus I let our local County Councillor Len Tomlins know as this is a County Council matter more so than a District.

Where are we now? It is clear that Stroud District Council knew nothing of the proposed works - however it was Highways land and the nature of works meant apparently that no planning permission would be needed. I am not yet clear how the confusion has arisen so that the resident and contractor believed they had permission to remove part of the bank. It does seems to be the case that Highways have not objected to some shaving back of a section of the bank as long as the is gradient maintained, and the grass bank is reinstated. But Highways do not appear to have given permission for the work to happen: indeed I understand that normally Highways would do it themselves and bill the customer rather than letting them proceed doing the works.

Consultation? It is noted that Highways would not normally expect to carry out any public consultation on minor changes. To me this is wrong in most cases but particularly in the light of the number of key letters and objections to the previous proposed work on the bank. Some 40% of public space is roads and it seems they can get away with almost anything - witness in my view the ugly and unneccessary road paint applied recently in the area - like for example the centre of Randwick village and outside Whiteshill School. Anyhow in the light of the strong feelings around this case in Ash Lane I have written to Highways and Stroud District Council urging that consultation needs to take place and requested that myself, the Parish Council, residents and others are able to make representations. I have not heard back yet but understand a site meeting is planned.

I have not seen the plans for the work but as noted I have seen the white lines marked out on the bank - still there today and just visible in the photos - it maybe that some attractive plan can be found but I would like to reiterate my concerns that any improvements of visibility on that stretch will lead to traffic traveling faster. Indeed if anything I would be arguing for the road to be made to look more narrow - this would in my view be far more useful as a traffic calming measure.

Do leave comments on this site or email me if you have any queries. I hope this is a useful summary as I've had three further people contact me over the weekend asking for an update.

Friday, December 14, 2007

Gordon Brown in the dock?

put Gordon in the dockThree cheers for Mark Thomas and his ingenuity - see his comment and the full story in the Guardian yesterday - he is attempting to get Gordon Brown into the dock. He alleges that the prime minister broke the law by demonstrating unlawfully in Parliament Square when he participated in the unveiling of the statue of Nelson Mandela. The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 means that anyone wishing to demonstrate within an area around parliament must get police approval. This is the law that Maya Evans was arrested and convicted under, for reading out the names of the British and Iraqi war dead. Mark Thomas put forward plans to the police re the same speeches made by Gordon Brown and gathering around the statue: he was assured he needed permission yet it seems Gordon Brown did not get permission. This absurd law needs overhauling - see earlier Green party comment here.

Puckshole reopens

Nearly five months after the lane through Puckshole closed due to a landslip it is now open again - many are delighted although some residents of the lane are very sorry to be loosing their peace.

I have to say I am a little surprised by how it looks - as you will see from the photos, a bowling green has been installed on the side of the mud slope - the slope makes it a little difficult for the game but I am sure we will manage....I am also unclear as to how such grass will be maintained? Indeed already it is falling off and coming loose - I replaced a small bit but more has now come off - see photo.

I would have thought small native shrubs might have made the bank more stable? I am also unclear about how the drainage has been improved - it looks like the mud has just been put back yet there was a spring in the bank - where is this now??

Update 17th Dec: I hear from Highways that the gabion baskets they used are free draining and are 'the ideal solution to this type of problem'.

Waste decision deferred

WastetruckI have just spoken with the author of the letter below - Mary Newton from Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth - I've only recently been in contact with her over waste matters and she has kindly given me permission to copy the letter here - it was sent to Stroud District Councillors ahead of the Cabinet meeting last night that was looking at waste.

In fact the decision to approve or not the County waste plans was rightly deferred - the issues raised below are serious - you will note that I have also raised some of these points earlier in this blog and also raised it with key Cabinet members - however I have also spoken with the County Council's Cabinet member re waste this evening and he assures me no decision has been taken re waste and they are seeking to maximise recycling and composting - there are also a few points I would like to raise re the letter below - hopefully in next few days.

It is vital we get this right or we could be landing tax payers with serious problems in the future - to say nothing of the impact on the environment......

Dear Councillor,

In approving the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy (JMWMS) the Stroud District Council is also approving five other volumes they may not have viewed which are part of the JMWMS . As set out in the Headline Strategy Vol. 1, 3.3 the strategy consists of 6 volumes.

In Volume 2 “High Level Action Plan”

4.5 Residual Waste states that the Gloucestershire County Council is developing a residual waste management project for a preferred technology on a preferred location.

4.6 Risks states “The affordability of the selected waste treatment technology is a huge risk. These are large scale, specialist and capital intensive facilities” and “If waste growth is less than forecast we might have new facilities that are not operating to capacity”

Why should Stroud District Council be concerned?

1) There is a risk that in committing to the development of a large scale facility that is capital intensive and accompanied with a long term contract the Waste Disposal Authority is also committing itself to ensuring that the facility has priority in supplies of residual waste.

It could mean:-

• the transportation of waste over distances within the County to the one large facility conflicting with the proximity principle
• may lead to the importation of waste to the County to keep it supplied.

It could also deflect efforts from;-

• the reduction of waste at source
• increase in waste separation for recycling at kerbside
• and thereby the development of new businesses from dry and wet recyclables

because why invest in reduction and separation when investment at great risk is being undertaken by the development of this large long term project to take residual waste? These are all matters that the Stroud District Council has the right to consider as a Waste Collection Authority and a partner with the Waste Disposal Authority.

2) In St. Arvans, Monmouthshire a “0” Waste project which promotes waste separation kerbside collections of paper, glass, cans, foil, textiles, plastics, tetrapak cartons, green waste and food waste, has diverted from landfill 73% of household waste and achieved 95% participation rate of residents in just over one year. The Consultation on the JMWMS revealed an overwhelming support from residents and Parish Councils for greater separation of waste streams for kerbside collection. The Consultants recommended in their Report on the JMWMS Consultation that Objective 3 should be reworded “to reflect the intention of maximising the range and quantity of materials separately collected.” Objective 3 has not been reworded.

3) In Gloucestershire recent planning applications and planning permissions for in vessel composting (IVC) facilities will remove from the wet biodegradable residual waste stream about 100,000 tons per annum (tpa) :-

• 30,000tpa at Sharpness, Stroud District,
• 32000 tpa at Wingmore Farm, Tewkesbury District (S106 to be agreed)
• 20,000 tpa at Dymock, Forest of Dean
• 22,000 tpa at Sunhill Farm, Cotswolds (if granted planning permission).

these new businesses also need a guaranteed residual waste supply.

4) Before the Stroud District Council has even had the opportunity to consider all the volumes of the JMWMS the Gloucestershire Waste Programme Board registered an Expression of Interest on the 30th September 2007 to DEFRA for PFI funding for a facility at Javelin Park to process 130,000 – 200,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of residual waste requiring a long term contract likely to be for 25 years. The County Council is actively seeking to purchase 12 acres of Javelin Park.

Normally, an Expression of Interest should be based on a unanimous decision from all the District Councils on the JMWMS. As far as we can ascertain to date Gloucester City Council, Cotswold District Council, and Stroud District Council have not made a decision on the JMWMS.

5) The Minerals and Waste Development Framework is under review and the Waste Core Strategy for the Plan is likely to go out for public consultation in January 2008 leading to a Pubic Inquiry. It is premature to make the important decision of registering an Expression of Interest for a large, long term facility before the process of the Review of the Waste Core Strategy is completed at least to the stage of the Inspectors Report.

This Expression of Interest has been registered without the impartial testing through Public Inquiry all the material on which the expression of interest is based, particularly:-

· the methodology in examining alternative options
· the soundness of their choice of technologies
· the soundness of data used and projections of tonnages
· the choice of site, 12 acres at Javelin Park

The Expression of Interest is likely in practice to have a very significant effect on the policies to be brought forward by the Gloucestershire County Council in the Inquiry and plan-making consultations in 2008. These policies should be open to development through the testing of methodologies, technologies, data and choice of site in the Waste Core Strategy Public Inquiry.

For example, the Expression of Interest is formulated on the basis of several key waste policies:-

• it states that a strategic facility is required which implies a long term contract likely to be for at least 25 years for the handling of residual waste of 130,000tpa – 200,000 tpa
• it has selected a shortlist of technologies
• it has selected a site
• it is thereby proscribing the possibility of developing flexible, small scale facilities serving local communities whilst dealing with the residual waste arising from within those communities and thereby limiting the transport of waste
• it is thereby proscribing the development of possible new approaches such more reduction of waste at source, more separation of waste at the kerbside and the development of new recycling businesses

Climate change has become a central principle issue for the Government in the maintenance of sustainable communities underlined with the imminent publishing of Planning and Climate Change which will supplement Planning Policy Statement 1. In January 2008 the South West Regional Spatial Strategy Panel of Inspectors Report is likely to be released. These are two of many important documents which should provide the backdrop by which the future of waste in Gloucestershire is decided until 2020 in the Core Waste Public Inquiry.

6) For the reasons stated above the Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth Network request the Cabinet of Stroud District Council not to approve the JMWMS at their meeting of 13th December 2007 to enable:-

1. the Stroud District Council to discuss amendments to the JMWMS by adding a clause for greater separation of waste streams at kerbside collection to Objective 3
2. not to approve any procurement plan or outline business case for one large facility for residual waste accompanied by a long term contract
3. the Stroud District Council to request that the premature Expression of Interest be put on hold until at least the Inspectors Report on the Waste Core Strategy is publicly released, to enable the impartial testing through Public Inquiry all the material on which the Expression of Interest is based

Yours sincerely,

Mary Newton, Planning Officer, Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth Network

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Bus shelter success for Stratford Road

Success at last - a bus shelter will happen - for some time I have been pushing for a bus shelter outside Tesco on the Stratford Park Road - see various blogs in past like 28th May, 11th January and last year 19th September.

Photos: people waiting in rain outside Tesco

I have been surprised that this little campaign has produced so much correspondence with various people including the County Highways folk, bus shelter people, Town Council, manager at Tesco and even several to the company planning the Tesco refurbishment plus of course local residents.

Yes I know the shelter is not in my ward and it is more a County Council matter but I started writing to Tesco as it seemed an obvious benefit to all, an anonymous comment was also left on this blog after I was elected and since then two residents from Whiteshill have lobbied me. Tesco have no responsibility to build a shelter - that should be the County but they claim no money - to my mind 90% of people using that stop are using it to go to the store and therefore it would be good for Tesco to help their customers.

As you will see I took photos to show the need - the manager at Tesco when I did get to speak to him was enormously helpful and I am sure has done lots to make this happen. My view is that it was a mistake not to have insisted on this as part of the agreement of building the store in the first place - it is ridiculous not to have made it a condition of building the store.

Anyhow Stroud Town Council have also written various letters to Tesco and on Monday night agreed to adopt the maintenance of the shelter if Tesco built it - so at last it can all go-ahead.

Creator of Cotswold Way steps down

The Cotswold Way runs along the edge of Randwick Parish - last month the Cotswold Way founder and renowned footpath pioneer, Tony Drake MBE, stepped down after 58 years service for walkers.

Photos: View from Cotswold Way

Tony in his various roles at the Ramblers' Association, has been instrumental in mapping the region's footpaths, pioneered a footpath waymarking scheme, helped develop the Cotswold Way, and campaigned tirelessly for better access to the countryside. Tony's motto was apparently: "Look about you when you walk". Great stuff - huge thanks to him for all his work.

The 102 miles of the Cotswold Way only became an official 'National Trail' in May although the plans date back to 1950 and for over 35 years walkers have used the route. The status gained this year means it now has a manager to ensure its upkeep. A couple of years ago I met Jo Roland, the Cotswold Way warden (although not sure what her official title was!) and learnt much about this route - one item that stuck in my mind particularly was the care being given to restore stiles appropriate to each locality - each local area had it's own style of stile! Anyhow read more re the walk here:
www.nationaltrail.co.uk/Cotswold

See my blog on 10th November re the new info board showing the ancient monuments.

Tony Drake MBE was interviewed for the Citizen - here is some of it below:

How did the Cotswold Way start?
I took over as footpaths secretary for Gloucestershire Ramblers in 1949. In December that year the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act came in. There were no maps showing rights of way so the main provisions were for a survey of them. Scrutinising the maps was a big job and we claimed an additional 300 paths in Gloucestershire. We looked at long distance routes and came up with the idea of the Cotswold Way.

What happened next?
Having produced a rough plan in 1950 it sat in a pigeon hole at the Countryside Commission for a long time. Gloucestershire County Council decided to open a route which contained a lot of road walking. The walk became popular in the Seventies and the Government decided to make it into a National Trail in 1998.

What's your favourite part of the Cotswold Way?
I think it's all interesting. Painswick is probably the most attractive. I enjoy the scenery there. At many points you get a wonderful view across the vale and you can see Gloucester Cathedral, the Black Mountains and the Brecon Beacons.

Have you walked all 102 miles?
I have walked it all but not in sequence. Lots of people do, it makes a good week's holiday.

How did you get into walking?
I was always interested in walking so after the Second World War I joined the Cotswold Rambling Club. I got into mountaineering and spent a lot of time in Wales where I devised a route between Cardiff and Conwy called the Cambrian Way. I'm currently working on the sixth edition of the guide book.

What do you particularly enjoy about walking?
It's the scenery that attracts me and getting some exercise. I like to go places I haven't been before. I'm 84 now and my walks are shorter at the moment, I'm too slow for the organised parties now but I still potter about.

How do you feel about retiring from the Ramblers' Association?
I'm giving up as footpaths secretary for the Ramblers' Association but it's always interesting to see what's been done and if I find a problem I feel obliged to report it.

Were you surprised to get an MBE for your work in 2001?
I don't know anybody else that's had a citation for services to public rights of way, it's most unusual. It was a pleasant surprise but I'm not sure I deserve it.

GM email action

Have you ever received more than 80,000 emails from people all over Europe in just three weeks, all about just one issue?

Photo: View of Ruscombe valley

Not me - the 80 or so that arrive each day are more than plenty....however European Commissioners have: campaigners sent them emails showing massive support for Environment Commissioner Dimas, and warnings to the flip flopping Commissioners who
would just roll over for the agro-chemical industry. Dimas enraged genetic engineering (GE) companies last month when he refused to allow the cultivation of two varieties of genetically modified (GM) maize (Bt 11 and 1507) in the EU.

Apparently some Commissioners did not get your messages, because of "technical
problems". Commissioner Margot Wallstrom now apologies for the rejection of many thousand of messages by the EU server on her blog. She is also ensuring that the concerns you expressed through the cyber activity will be passed on to all EU Commissioners. Campaigners are now being invited to post a comment on her blog to remind her of this promise and to provide her again with the arguments to reject these two GM maizes.

TAKE ACTION

It is now expected that the key decision to approve or not to approve the genetically modified maizes will be taken in the second or third week of January by the 27 European Commissioners. In order to get Dimas' proposal through the Commissioners meeting, a majority of at least 14 Commissioners needs to support him.

We are well on track with approaching the key Commissioners. However, as you're reading this email Syngenta and friends are ferociously lobbying in Brussels to derail Dimas' proposal not to approve these GM crops. Which is why we need to keep up the pressure - urging the Commissioners to vote in favour of the proposal by the Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas to reject the authorization of two GM maizes.

Write a personalized comment on the blog of key Commissioners who will decide about the authorisation of the GM maizes and who's position is not clear yet - or send them an email from their blogsite:
Commissioner Margot Wallstrom:
http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/wallstrom/
Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development Mariann Fischer Boel: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/fischer-boel/
Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potočnik
http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/potocnik/
Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Vladimír Špidla:
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/spidla/blog_en.cfm

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Emergency climate petition

The climate summit in Bali has reached crisis point. Here is stuff from Avaaz.org:

Working late, negotiators were nearing consensus that developed countries should pledge post-Kyoto emissions cuts by 2020 - a step which the scientists say is needed to avert the worst ravages of global warming, and which will help to bring China and the developing world onboard. But then the news broke: the US, Canada and Japan rejected any mention of such cuts. Every few hours the draft changes.

We can't let three governments hold the world to ransom: so we're launching a global emergency petition before the summit climax in 48 hours. We'll deliver our message every way we can - a stark full-page advertisement in the Financial Times Asia, stunts at the conference gates, direct to country delegations - telling Canada, Japan and the US to accept the option of post-Kyoto targets, and the rest of the world to settle for nothing less.

Please take a moment right now to sign the new global emergency petition -- the text is in the box above, so click this link to sign automatically if you've taken action with us before - then tell all your friends: www.avaaz.org/bali_emergency/5.php

This article here explains a bit of what's going on. The New Scientist has more detail here. It could also be worth revisiting Al Gores speech here.

28 days too much

The UK Government is proposing to extend the time for which police can hold terrorism suspects without charge to 42 days. The current 28 days period is already far too long. We believe no extension to pre-charge detention limits for terrorism suspects is acceptable. Granting the power to detain suspects for 42 days without charge would rob people of their basic rights.

Sign the Amnesty International supported petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/notadaylonger/

Ten good reasons why extending pre-charge detention is a bad idea:
www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=17563

Destruction of Saami homeland forests started again

The long lasting forestry conflict in Finnish Lappland is in an urgent state. The Finnish state owned company, Forest and Park Service, has started large scale logging operations in the home area of indigenious Saami people earlier this year. These loggings can't be accepted for the following reasons:

-there is no solution yet for the landownership conflict between Saami people and the Finnish state
-the Finnish state has not proven to be the actual owner of the forests it is logging right now.

-the clear-cutting style of logging ancient forests in the extreme north of Europe cannot be accepted from an ecological and micro-climatical point of view

-the loggings destroy the very basis of the culturally important Saami free browsing reindeer herding tradition

-the loggings waste the ancient forests and its wood and leave less possibilities for future truly sustainable continuous cover forestry without destructive clear cutting


By these arguments among others Union of Ecoforestry urged Finnish parliament to stop the logging immediately and gave for parliament groups the documentary movie "Last yoik in Saami forests" (link to online film below). The director of the movie, Hannu Hyvönen, expressed his feelings about the on-going loggings recently: "It is quite easy for us to update this sad turn-up in the documentary movie, but we cannot update these forests which are now again cutted down."

Finnish state own tv-company seems not to be able to broadcast the documentary which accuses Finnish state human rights violations, Union of Ecoforestry supports campaigning for Saami forests and invites all friends of Saami now for actions. In this situation Finns and foreigners are being asked to view the movie actions to understand what is really happening in Lappland, in Saami forests. The online documentary is worth a view and opened my eyes ro what is happening in the last natural forests of Europe.
The documentary movie can be loaded here: http://video.elonmerkki.net/last_yoik.mp4

If you want to order the dvd and/or join in friends of Saami: info@elonmerkki.net

More information:
www.elonmerkki.net/en/index
www.mehta.fi/en/index

Please take action:
http://weblog.greenpeace.org/forestrescue/
http://mehta.fi

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Update re Staverton Airport campaign

Below is a quick round-up:

- The Ecologist on Staverton (see pic left)

- Innuit action
- Petition launch coming soon
- Stop Heathrow Expansion campaign
- Staverton Airport Survey
- Letters to press

The Ecologist - last month ran a piece about Staverton Airport and a bit I sent them re their denial of climate change - in fact since then the Airport have accepted climate change exists - now all we need to do is to get them to take responsibility for cutting their emissions by 90% like all of us.

Innuit action - Aqqaluk Lynge - Head of Greenland's Innuits - pleads for the people of the UK to consider the plight of his people and stop the expansion of Stansted and Heathrow Airports. Read more and write to Gordon Brown from this website:
www.enoughsenough.org/inuit.html

Petition launch coming soon - we are launching a petition against Staverton airport - here is the wording - hopefully on the Glos Green party site to download very soon.

PETITION TO STOP GLOUCESTERSHIRE AIRPORTS EXPANSION PLANS

We, the undersigned, are opposed to the expansion of air travel at Staverton Airport as proposed in their current Business plan and planning applications. This will lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions when the evidence is that we need to make 90% cuts in CO2 to avoid runaway global warming. We are also opposed to the developments as they will lead to a deterioration in the local environment by increasing noise, traffic and local air pollution.

Please return this petition by 12th February 2008 to:
Gloucestershire FoE c/o Rendezvous Society, 16 Portland Street, Cheltenham, GL52 2PB


Stop Heathrow Expansion campaign - The government has launched its consultation into plans for a third runway and sixth terminal at Heathrow. Already the
busiest airport in Europe, the plan would mean a 70 per cent increase in flight numbers and a corresponding rise in climate change pollution. It's crazy to be paving the way for such big increases in greenhouse gases when we should be doing all we can to reduce emissions. What's particularly shortsighted about this proposal is that a third runway at Heathrow really isn't needed. Well over a fifth of flights from Heathrow are to short-haul destinations such as Edinburgh, Paris, Manchester and Newcastle - already well served by trains which cause ten times or more less damage to the climate than flying. The real reason BAA wants a third runway is to increase its profits.

Gordon Brown cannot possibly justify a third Heathrow runway. Yet the indications are that the government has been planning for some time to do exactly that. Documents recently obtained by Greenpeace under the Freedom of Information Act show that airports operator BAA and the Department for Transport have been working closely together to ensure that the third runway gets built - so closely that they've even set up a joint body - the Heathrow Delivery Group - to steer the plan through the consultation process. All the calculations relating to noise and pollution in the consultation document have been supplied by BAA - data no opposition groups have been allowed to challenge!!

One further piece of evidence about where the government's sympathies really lie - the DfT and BAA have drawn up a 'risk list' of threats to the building of the third runway. The list includes the 2M campaign, the group comprising local London councils representing 2 million people opposed to the plans. Flying is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in the UK, responsible for 13 per cent of our climate inpact. Unless we bring it under control we'll stand no chance of meeting the CO2 reduction targets that the PM pledged to reach, or even exceed. And Heathrow is only one of more than 20 airports around the country in the process of submitting expansion plans. The Tyndall climate research centre has calculated that if aviation continues to expand as projected, Britain will have to totally decarbonise the rest of its economy by 2050 to effectively tackle climate change. And we all know that just isn't going to happen.

What you can do - Greenpeace action

Let Gordon Brown know that he's a public servant and that we expect him to act in our interests, not help big business maximise its profits.
- Join the thousands who want to stop Heathrow expansion by adding comments to Greenpeaces' video wall. Make your voice heard here.
- Write to Gordon Brown and tell him that minimising the effects of climate change is more important than increasing British Airways' profits! See here.

Watch the recent Newsnight debate about Heathrow between Greenpeace's John Sauven and energy minister Malcolm Wickes here:
www.email.greenpeace.org/euhbrhm_pxxeoexk.html

Staverton Airport Survey - the Cheltenham Centre for Change will be conducting a survey to properly articulate the views of the residents living near to the Airport. If you can donate a couple of hours of your time to help with the survey distribution, please email centreforchange@mac.com or call 01242 570111

Letters to press - The Citizen has covered less of the Staverton story than the Echo - although the Echo seems to print many more letters in favour - the one below is a response to letters about the clothing of some protesters! In some sense this is a complete red herring and in many ways I applaud the pro-airport folk for the divertion - the papers have still not pushed the Airport to answer the questions of responsibilities for cutting CO2...

Why can't the Council stop waste being produced?

I've been writing lots re waste recently - see back on the blog - but wanted to explore this question some more...

Copyrighted photo reprinted here with permission of Seattle-based photographer Chris Jordan. See more photos.

Well it is my view that local authorities could be doing considerably more in terms of reducing waste - some years ago I asked if they would contact supermarkets locally - as far as I know they didn't moves are afoot now to look at such strategies but I am not sure they will be making the bold statements they could - supermarkets are also making tentative moves - the Coop for example have launched 'naked cucumbers' - what will we do without that plastic sleeve?!!!


It is ridiculous how much packaging is wasted - and let us not forget people pay for that packaging to be produced then pay in their Council tax for collection and disposal of that waste and the environment also pays - it also seems unfair that those who don't purshase products with excess packaging are penalised by having to pay for it anyway in their Council Tax....

Other measures could also be taken - Furniture recycling, charity shops, car boots and real nappies have all had mentions before on this blog - indeed I initiated meetings to try and get the Stroud Furniture Recycling reopened last year.
See the excellent video on waste: http://www.storyofstuff.com
However the main problem does lie with Government - not only for the absurd situation where a District Council is responsible for collection and a County for disposal but also for their total lack of vision - it is no wonder we are considered the 'dirty man' of Europe. This is one view sent by a Green recently in response to a question about Councils reducing our waste...

1. Waste minimisation is really too high up the hierarchy for the actions of the collection and disposal authorities to really have an impact on them. The statutory duty to implement waste minimisation does not lie with these authorities - it's a central government task, with some input from the EA [ie the Producer Packaging Regs etc] in relation to the larger packaging producers. The reason for this is that, short of agreements with the major retailers [and we are seeing these appear now - WRAP are doing a lot of work here], all that is available are legislative controls - which would have to be applied on an EU basis, given the global nature of retailing nowadays.

2. Much of the increase comes from the national increase in consumerism. Whilst Stroud District Council can do their bit to promote local trading and the reduction of packaging at a local level, they have no power to prevent this at a national level. Therefore, setting a reducing target in an area where people import a lot of consumer items [these in themselves usually overpackaged] is unfair on the collection authority and on the disposal authority. They can only really deal with what is in front of them.


3. One of the biggest consumers out there is local government - so they can apply quite a bit of leverage by optimising their procurement regimes.


4. Most modelling doesn't assume a flat 3% increase anyway. It assumes this sort of rate until about 2010, then decreasing to 1% at about 2015, and then starting to reduce beyond this date. It's a given that the minimisation part of the hierarchy is the hardest goal to attain.


5. The County Strategy at the moment is largely fixed on residual waste management, and rightly so as this is the most important part of their job. However, we could apply pressure to ensure that the recycling infrastructure is optimised as much as possible in order to ensure that the residual is as small as possible. For example, 20% of the municipal waste is kitchen derived organic - if you can collect as much of this as possible, you're making big inroads into tonnages as a result. That's the sort of area that should be concentrated on in my opinion.
So a lot of complicating factors.

Interestingly - most areas seem to accept the 3% rise in waste mentioned above - indeed in the 'Stroud facts' below re waste (taken from their website) they also repeat the figure - however we need to get to a greater understanding of this as in Stroud it would appear the rise is not due to more consumerism but more people living in the area - individually the waste stream seems to have stayed about the same - this is not so for all - however it is clear Government action - when they finally wake up to waste - is likely to reduce excess packaging - and oil price rises will significantly impact on all waste - to me it seems no way that waste will continue to rise at this rate.

In order to make decisions about the size of waste facilities we need to have a much better understanding of these figures - these are some of the areas that need exploring more.

Waste, Recycling and Street Cleaning Facts and figures


How many tonnes of waste does the UK produce each year?
434 Million – This is enough waste to fill the Albert Hall every 2 hours
What percentage of this figure do you think goes to landfill?
73% - even though 90% of this is recyclable
How many years worth of space do you think is left in Gloucestershire’s landfill sites?
12 Years – but this is decreasing rapidly as more waste is being produced
Household waste is on the increase each year, by what percentage?
3% - this may not sound like much but it means our waste will double by 2020
How much waste does each household in the Stroud District produce each year?
1 tonne – the size of a small elephant
How many tonnes of litter does the average person drop each year in the UK?
0.5 Tonnes of litter dropped by average person & most littering occur with in 5 meters of litterbin
What percentage of refuse in the average bin in the UK is Food Waste?
26% of waste in bin is food waste
How much energy is saved when recycling aluminium can?
95% energy is saved – can
Approximately, how many kilometres of road are cleaned by Stroud District Council?
2200Km of highway is swept in Stroud District – which is the equivalent distance from Stroud to Rome

Ruscombe Brook meeting

Last week - infact last Tuesday - time flies - I am not being able to keep this blog as comprehensively up to date as in the past - no matter alot of the stuff still makes it into this blog in some shape.....

Photo: Some of RBAG at meeting last week

...anyway I've already covered our discussion re Hamwell Leaze and Dudbridge Playing Fields yesterday...what else?

Julian Jones of Water 21 reported to the group from his work ‘Options for Developing the Ruscombe Brook Partnership – Report for RBAG’. It is not huge but would swamp this blog so if folk are interested please get in touch...it looks at one way of moving forward to develop a comprehensive plan for the brook.

The two other documents also in current circulation to RBAG members are a summary report to RBAG from Ismaila Emahi of his MSc study ‘Environmental Quality, Stakeholder Perceptions and Sustainable Solutions – the case of Sewage Pollution in Ruscombe Brook, Stroud’ and Julian Jones original report from some years ago entitled, ‘Developing and Demonstrating an Exemplar of Innovative, Holistic, Least Cost Alleviation of Flooding Consequences’ – a DEFRA pilot. Again interested parties should get in touch - we hope to also have a full paper copy of Ismailas' report available.

There was much discussion at the meeting of a number of topics relating to these reports including the following - do contact for further info as these notes may not be sufficient if you are less familiar with the project:
· the question of permission to carry out any works that might be required from SDC and/or EA
· The need for reed beds to be higher up the brook than Hamwell Leaze
· Sending out the MSc study report to a wider audience
· RBAG does still not have a plan of what works are required and where. ‘Something’ needed further up the brook
· What is the role of the Group at this point? Does RBAG want to be just commissioners, or direct managers of a system? Is RBAG in a position to take on major responsibilities in relation to sewage management? What does the group want to do?
· RBAG now has some excellent tools to hand, including the MSc study, the Memorandum of Co-operation, the DEFRA pilot, Julian’s Report etc. The problems with the Brook that were originally identified are still the same, but now the group has the evidence to prove that they were right.
· Water 21 has given the group the big overview, but there are many small common-sense solutions that can be put in place simply and cheaply – some of these can be the responsibility of STW

The group agreed to go back to the original strategy document that listed all the problems and the range of possible solutions. and update that in the light of the new information from reports. A mini-group of us will meet before Christmas but we also plan to research more the model of Social Entrepreneurship - I have to confess a little frustration at the speed of things - in some ways we seem to be where we were a year ago - however that is not true - much has been achieved and we also now have the info necessary to move forward to the next stage.

Also only one major sewage incident in over 6 months plus Severn Trent Water are still working to improve the situation further:
· Flow monitoring to establish pipe capacity especially in heavy rainfall
· Manhole survey to show where the surcharges are occurring
· Computer modelling
· Relining the sewer in key places

Although the group was very disappointed to get further feedback re the serious incident in September when raw sewage ran into the Randwick tributary for 3 days. The land owner had been working independently with STW to get procedures in place for dealing with incidents on her land. It appears these procedures completely broke down: a meeting was arranged to discuss this but has had to be rearranged to the new year - I hope at that meeting we can ensure that break down does not occur again.

The land owner noted that she had put in a cattle drinking area to address the poaching problem (use search facility to see photos of this and more details), but this had been washed away in the summer floods. It was also noted that members and others had delivered most of the 3,500 – 4,000 RBAG leaflets to people locally.

Next meeting: Tuesday 22nd January. 7.30 pm. Contact me for details.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Support your local farms and food

Just to let you know that - contrary to popular rumour - both Stroud's Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) projects are still accepting new veg-share members. CSAs produce local organic veg & meat, hence reducing food miles and oil-inputs to agriculture, as well as supporting local agricultural employment.

Photo: Stonehouse allotments

Stroud Community Agriculture (SCA) charges £35 per month for one weekly veg share (including membership). You can collect veg from one of the two farms (Wick Street or Brookthorpe) or from a pick-up point (one in Stroud and one in Nailsworth). Details from info@stroudcommunityagriculture.org

Stroud Slad Farm Community (SSFC) charges £42 per month for one weekly veg box(including membership). The extra cost over SCA goes some way to covering packing and delivery the veg to your door or to one of several local pick up points. Details from ssfc@cooptel.net or 01453 766519

What else? Meanwhile there is some limited interest locally in Ruscombe, Randwick and Whiteshill about a similar scheme? Is anyone interested? Plus phone me if you are interested in joining a very local coop of health food and eco products - the group is after about 30 interested people. Plus anyone for a local allotment - I have several interested people - but need more if we are to make it happen. Plus of course grow your own, support local farmers and our wonderful farmers market.

Another mobile phone mast for Cashes Green

Last week the SNJ reported that local councillors are fighting plans for a second telephone mast in Cashes Green just metres away from an existing antenna. A 3G mast already stands in Cashes Green Road outside the Prince of Wales pub but plans have now been drawn up for a 15 metre T-Mobile mast on the other side of the road in front of Sunny Hill bungalows which house 37 elderly people.

Local councillor Karon Cross has started a petition against the mast after residents raised concerns. She is quoted as saying: "The feeling from residents is quite strong as the mast will be almost level with their front room living space. I have urged people to write to Stroud District Council because many people are happy to talk about it but not many will put it in writing. I find it quite a concern that this is going ahead without much consultation. Why does there have to be two opposite each other. It's a eyesore so instead of putting it in the middle of houses it should be hidden more."

Lynne Edmunds, Gloucestershire representative of the nationwide organisation Mast Sanity, was quoted saying: "I think it's ludicrous to site a mast for another mobile phone company so close to an existing one. I don't think there should be any masts in such a densely populated area as Cashes Green. The only preferable alternative is for mast sharing."

I rang both Karon and Lynne as I am also concerned by the placing of these masts seemingly without consultation with the community - the District Council has little room to manoeuvre as the mast is under the height needed to have to apply for planning permission. However there are actions they can take.

In the past I have had little success in raising such concerns with the District Council - I have spoken with various independent organisations who argue that perceived health risks can be taken into account when looking at masts in planning applications - in Manchester concerns re loss of sleep were used to refused a planning application - some people I have spoken with have been so concerned re masts that they note they can't sleep.

Several comments were left on the SNJ website - here is one view there re being a NIMBY and one re the health risks with some comments from me:

(i) "So if you object to phone masts confirm you do not own or use a mobile phone, else just admit you're a NIMBY." Well I have a mobile which I share with my partner and use for work - it would therefore be hypocritical to argue against all masts but there are several quick comments to make here...
- because of the way the government has tried to maximise dosh from the mobile phone companies we have ended up with several networks - in other countries there is often only one or two networks and far far fewer masts
- mast companies seem reluctant in cases like this to share existing masts
- government has ignored the research indicating health risks and refuses to adopt a precautionary approach in terms of siting masts

(ii) "T-Mobile are again misleading the public. The only research alleging these harmful masts are safe is that funded by the phone operators. The truth is that over 1000 independent studies, linking phone mast electro magnetic radiation with serious ill health including cancer, confirm that phone masts should not be sited within 350 metres of schools or housing. Numerous studies have proved that melatonin, the cancer fighting hormone, is suppressed by this pulsing radiation. That's why the cancer clusters continue to increase in the vicinity of phone masts. Phone operators dismiss such research, alleging that their own studies suggests no health risk. However recently the national press revealed that T-Mobile covered up the damaging results of their own research. The Ecolog Institute, a research organisation which examines the health effects of mobile phones, was commissioned by T-Mobile to investigate the possible health risks of mobile phone masts. The 2003 Ecolog report confirmed: [quote]'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'[/quote] So come on T-Mobile, we are not falling for your multi £million publicity machine rhetoric this time. The idea that unelected bodies (the mobile phone companies) have a right to expose people to the very real harm caused by phone mast electro magnetic radiation, amounts to enrolling the population in a giant biological experiment without their consent."

We need to adopt a precautionary principle re these masts. When I attended a mast conference in Dorset it was clear that much evidence was being ignored. We urgently need more research into them. We have been told in the past asbestos, DDT, Thalidomide and much more were safe and we've regretted it. Certainly we should not be putting up any mast near where people live and work. See more here and here.

Energy efficiency measures for your home

Our District Council has a number of schemes in place to help improve energy efficiency - many of these could be expanded as I've noted in the past - Kirkless Council for example offers all 40,000 residents free insulation - but we are working on that...for now I thought I ought to push some of what is available locally....

Photo: view from top of Stroud

A good starting point for general energy efficiency advice and guidance is the Gloucestershire Energy Efficiency Advice Centre FREEPHONE 0800 512 012

Levels of grant can change within a given year or between years, and amounts offered depend on age, personal circumstances and source and availability of funding.

Gloucestershire Warm and Well - This award-winning scheme started in 2001 is aimed at homeowners and private tenants. The Warm and Well scheme can refer clients to the most appropriate sources of funding including the Gloucestershire Energy Efficiency Grant (GEEG). GEEG grants can help people over 60 years old with less then £16,000 in savings and a weekly income of between £166-£215 (single person) or £244-£297 (for a couple). Free insulation measures may be available to people over 65 regardless of income and savings. The GEEG grant is subject to a survey and funding being available.

Measures available from the Warm and Well scheme include loft and cavity wall insulation, draught proofing, heating controls, replacement of an old or broken down gas boiler with an efficient condensing boiler and low energy light bulbs. Home visits and energy efficiency advice are also available. For more details call Warm and Well on 0800 512 012

Rent Warm, Rent Well - available for private landlords to improve the energy efficiency of their rented properties. There is up to £100 per measure for loft and cavity wall insulation

Warm Front Grant - This scheme is managed by EAGA Ltd and is funded by the Government. It gives grants up to £2,700 to make houses warmer and more energy efficient (up to £4,000 for oil heating). It is available across the UK to homeowners and private tenants. To qualify you must receive one of the qualifying income related benefits, and be over 60 or have children under 16, be pregnant (with a MAT B1 certificate) or receive a disability benefit. Measures include loft insulation, cavity wall insulation, draught proofing, gas or oil central heating, heating repairs, cylinder jackets and low energy light bulbs. For more information call Gloucestershire Energy Efficiency Advice Centre on 0800 512 012 or the Warm Front Team on 0800 316 2814 or 0800 072 0151

Stroud District Council’s WISE Homes Grant - The WISE Homes scheme (Well Insulated Saving Energy) is intended to provide assistance for owner occupiers and private tenants in homes which are “hard to treat” as a result of having solid walls, and/or sloping ceilings, and/or off the gas mains. Eligibility is determined by an individual home energy survey and income assessment. The scheme offers measures such as insulation of sloping ceilings, floors, internal and external solid walls, and heating systems. Grant contributions are also available towards renewable energy technologies such as solar water heating panels and wood pellet stoves and heating systems. For more information call 0800 512 012 or Stroud District Council direct on 01453 754464

Fuel Supplier Schemes - Many of the gas and electricity supply companies offer energy efficiency discounts. In most cases you don’t have to buy your fuel from a particular company to take advantage of their offers, as they are available to all home owners. Check your bill to see if an energy efficiency helpline number is given.

Winter Fuel Payments - For advice on any aspect of Winter Fuel Payments, call the helpline: 08459 15 15 15 (8.30am-4.30pm Mon-Fri). Please have your national insurance number ready when you call. You can also visit the website here.

The Home Heat Helpline - The Home Heat Helpline is an independent telephone service that helps people who are struggling to pay their energy bills keep warm in winter. Contact the helpline: 0800 33 66 99 or visit the website here.

Sewage Pollution: Hamwell Leaze and Dudbridge

One issue the Ruscombe Brook Action Group has discussed regularly is sewage pollution - at our meeting last week we considered Hamwell Leaze and Dudbridge Playing Field - I will do a blog on the meeting later today if I get chance - but wanted to say more on this topic as I've had several queries - and Julian Jones from Water 21 recently spoke to a sub-committee at Cainscross Parish Council.

Photo: ornamental reeds

Basically there is an overlap of issues relating to these two sites; particularly in respect of the periodic sewage pollution they suffer, as well as the likely solutions. The main cause of this contamination is insufficient sewer capacity at times of rainfall causing surcharges through sewer manholes.

Julian Jones has noted in the past that our local sewer has incapacity and poor integrity since well before the water industry privatisation (1989) and some may recall that for many years, until the construction of the Ebley by-pass, replacement sewer pipes intended to remedy this situation were stored on the old railway at Ebley. Unfortunately these were never installed.

Instead of increasing sewer capacity locally, a programme of closing off storm overflows (70 in number) was commenced in 1990 with the provision of small underground stormwater retention tanks (intended to store rainwater until sewer flows reduced after rainfall to enable the tanks to drain down). These tanks have proven to be inadequate (and apparently poorly maintained) - indeed in Puckshole there is one that has never worked - it is dry as a bone!!!

At the time this programme was commenced the Regional Manager of the National Rivers Authority described this procedure as “dangerous”. His view was that the closure of such a large numbers of overflows, on a sewer network of high head (height) differential and insufficient capacity, was likely to cause sudden surcharging of sewage from the sewer, exiting through manhole covers both onto and into both public and private property. Such events have now been occurring with increasing frequency, in line with the growing local population and new connections to the sewer network. Several such locations, at Dudbridge Bowling Club for example, exist within the parish.

As a response to the surcharging of manholes an ad hoc practice of bolting down manhole covers commenced. The Ruscombe Brook Action Group has expressed concerns to Severn Trent about this - some experts have told us this practice is 'irresponsible'. This passes the surcharge problem on to the next weak point on the network (usually in an unpredictable manner) either causing further surcharging and/or may cause fracturing of sewers leading to long term seepage of sewage into the ground and where watercourses are adjacent, into these also - as found in the Ruscombe Brook - indeed we have many photos of sewage.

As the sewer network in the area includes the main trunk sewer serving much of the Five Valleys, you are in effect - particularly at Dudbridge - suffering the effects of overloading from many points 'upstream', ultimately as far as Cranham.

The proposals for Hamwell Leaze include a small fenced reed bed construction (one of 25 or more proposed throughout the District) that would safely capture, control and treat such sewer surcharges.

One suggestion made by the sub-committee was that there should be a moratorium on new connections to the District sewer network. This seems an excellent idea but I don't think the Parish have taken it forward at this point - certainly they only have powers to recommend so could not stop a planning application. Another suggestion made by the Parish was apparently in those areas prone to sewer floods there should be fencing and signage to warn the public. I am not sure if this idea will go-ahead but again it seems very sensible.

Julian Jones has noted that any areas already prone to sewer floods, like the land at Dudbridge, would be ideal locations for reedbeds, and were the Parish Council the owners of such sites some financial income could in the longterm be derived from providing these important wastewater treatment services - at costs to consumers that are considerably less than the present poorly performing methods.

Get 'Guardians Of Power' on why our media is biased

I have only just got around to reading the excellent 'Guardians Of Power:The Myth of the Liberal Media' by David Edwards and David Cromwell(Pluto Press, 2006).

I also came across this list of press reactions that the book got - see here - but despite all the positive comments the book has yet to receive a single mention in any national British newspaper!! The authors write: "We can hardly conceive of a greater back-handed compliment!"
"The most important book about journalism I can remember”
John Pilger
Blurb from the book: Can a corporate media system be expected to tell the truth about a world dominated by corporations? Can newspapers, including the 'liberal' "Guardian" and the "Independent," tell the truth about catastrophic climate change - about its roots in mass consumerism and corporate obstructionism - when they are themselves profit-oriented businesses dependent on advertisers for 75 per cent of their revenues? Can the BBC tell the truth about UK government crimes in Iraq when its senior managers are appointed by the government? Has anything fundamentally changed since BBC founder Lord Reith wrote of the establishment: "They know they can trust us not to be really impartial"? Why did the British and American mass media fail to challenge even the most obvious government lies on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction before the invasion in March 2003? Why did the media ignore the claims of UN weapons inspectors that Iraq had been 90-95 per cent "fundamentally disarmed" as early as 1998? This book answers these questions, and more.

The fact that this book didn't get reviewed is perhaps not surprising - in 2002 Medialens invited readers to ask journalists why they had failed to review John Pilger’s book, The New Rulers of the World. They were sent a response by Fiona Price at Verso, the publisher of Pilger’s book. Significantly, the email was copied to Susie Feay, the literary editor of the Independent on Sunday:

“Please could you ask the people who visit your website to refrain from emailing the literary editors of national newspapers questioning why they have not reviewed John Pilger's book, The New Rulers of the World. The Independent has a review waiting to be published but after receiving a number of unpleasant emails, all copied in to your email address, they are seriously thinking of pulling the review...I am working hard to get other national newspapers to review the book and do not appreciate having my efforts undermined by people who do not understand the pressure of space for reviews in newspapers. A paper's failure to review a title is not always politically motivated.”


It apparently turned out that Feay had received a grand total of two emails from their readers! Suffice to say, Pilger did not share Price’s view (his book was eventually reviewed by the Independent on Sunday, on April 20, 2003). Verso’s reaction gave a small indication of how thought is controlled in modern society - not by force or physical intimidation, but by the sheer power of corporations to enable or deny access to a mass audience. Verso, recall, is one of the more courageous and radical of publishers.

Medialens write: "The control is silent, the rules unwritten, undiscussed - it is simply understood that behaviour potentially or actually damaging to corporate interests will be punished. People are not disappeared in our society, but careers +are+ stalled, contracts are lost, professional relationships are soured. The net result is that important ideas are prevented from appearing, they are drowned out by ideas deemed safe and suitable based on priorities other than honesty and compassion. "

In his book,
Disciplined Minds, American physicist and writer Jeff Schmidt points out that professionals are trusted to run organisations in the interests of their employers. The key word is ’trust’. Because employers cannot be on hand to manage every decision, professionals are trained to “ensure that each and every detail of their work favours the right interests – or skewers the disfavoured ones” in the absence of overt control. Schmidt continues: 'The resulting professional is an obedient thinker, an intellectual property whom employers can trust to experiment, theorise, innovate and create safely within the confines of an assigned ideology.'

"Even to have this discussion, even to talk about the problem of corporate control, is to be ‘untrustworthy’, to be judged beyond the pale. As ever, the rationalisation revolves round the idea that it is somehow impolite, disrespectful, unreasonable and even disgraceful to bring to light what is ‘simply understood’ and cannot be challenged. The ‘gentleman’s agreements’ that so often lie at the heart of modern systems of thought control really are deemed to be just that - to challenge them is to be deemed something less than a “gentleman”."

Read the book and this will all make even more sense - they have not taken on soft targets, like Murdoch’s Sun, but instead have concentrated on that sector of the media which prides itself on its ‘objectivity’, ‘impartiality’ and ‘balance’ - like the BBC - and on its liberalism and fairness - like the Guardian. I agree with Pilger when he says: "Guardians of Power ought to be required reading in every media college."

Sign petition to decriminalise prostitution

A while back Siân Berry, Green Party Mayoral Candidate for London, and Jean Lambert, Green MEP for London, signed the Safety First! Petition, which calls for the complete decriminalisation of sex work, so that the focus of official efforts can be on protecting the most basic human rights of prostitutes, life and health. I've only just got around to this and would urge others to also sign the petition here:
www.petitiononline.com/swsafety/petition.html

Green Party policy calls for the complete decriminalisation of prostitution on the “New Zealand model”, so that the focus for sex workers moved on to their safety and wellbeing. Although it is the so-called ‘Swedish model’ of criminalisation of the customers of prostitutesis receiving much attention at present. However this approach drives sex work, and particularly street sex workers, further into the twilight, further from traditional areas, further into danger.

At our most recent Green party conference, we heard from a speaker from the Safety First! campaign about how criminalisation of actions associated with prostitution left workers vulnerable to violent clients, and encouraged police and other authorities to treat them as criminals even when they are in fact victims of serious crimes.

Siân Berry said “Decriminalisation could mean that instead of hearing about prostitutes being murdered or battered by their clients, we would instead be talking about health and safety in sex work premises (which are already 10 times safer than working on the street).”

Siân has also deplored Clause 72 of the Labour government’s Criminal Justice Bill which proposed introducing a new “order to promote rehabilitation” for the offence of “loitering or
soliciting for the purposes of prostitution”. This would effectively re-introduce imprisonment for the offence of soliciting, which was abolished by a Tory government in 1982.

Siân is also quoted saying: “The government with this Bill is treating prostitution as though it were an illness, and one for which women and men should be punished. Of course we would hope that sex workers who want to get out of the industry, and who need help with that, should find it immediately – and for that the government needs to provide greatly improved funding for, for example, drug addiction treatment programmes. But women and men arrested for soliciting should not be forced into ‘treatment’ against their will. And the government should note that it is often its own policies - inadequate support for women with children, the withdrawal of recourse to public funds for failed asylum-seekers, that is forcing women and men into the industry....Centuries of criminalisation have not wiped out, have not even reduced, the level of prostitution – instead it has left on our streets, and our consciences, the bodies of many murdered women and men.”

Glos Green party have commented on this issue in past - see for example here, here and Coffee House discussion on People Trafficking here. I would urge people to consider signing the petition mentioned above.

Sustainable waste policy is possible

Over the last couple of months I have been working more on our waste policy - see draft earlier on this blog for 9th November with photos of a monster incinerator - we are getting closer to completion. Today I helped draft a letter that Greens sent out to local press outlining our position - see it here and below.

Photo: Compact waste pyrolysis - General view including internal view showing that half the building is just dry storage for the clinical waste which it "feeds" on.

One Green party member has recently visited the Compact Power pyrolysis plant in Avonmouth - pictured here - the feedback was very interesting - certainly this could be part of the solution.

Interestingly no one has yet raised conecrns re the County's support for the discredited Private Finance Initiative (PFI) funding - perhaps not surprising as it seems only Greens are raising concerns about this - it is privatisation by stealth: public money being transferred into already bloated private wallets. To use PFI for waste facilities would be a serious mistake - in my view we need to seek alternative funding streams - the Government makes this difficult as noted in previous blogs.


Greens welcome Gloucester City Council's cross-party support to oppose a monster incinerator (5/12/07). However the target to recycle or compost 60% of household waste by 2020 is grossly inadequate.

Some areas of Europe like Flanders are already achieving 70% diversion from landfill across the region. St. Arvans in Monmouthshire is being piloted as a “zero waste village” and is achieving 80%, the Stanleys near Stroud in a pilot has reached 57% in a very sort time. To look at anything less than 70% would be a serious mistake.

Greens welcome that the County Council are still open to a range of strategies. Instead of one massive incinerator that would need 'feeding' for its contract period of many years, the emphasis must be on 'reduce, reuse and recycle' and three or four small waste-to-energy facilities for the residual waste. These facilities would cut heavy lorry movements, be virtually free of dioxins, allow flexibility as waste levels fall in the future, would fit with the scale of buildings on our industrial estates and most importantly the heat from these plants can be used for local industry leading to money saved and less CO2 emissions.

This would be the most sustainable way towards a zero waste Gloucestershire. A small waste-to-energy facility at Javelin Park, Haresfield would no doubt still be unwelcomed by some but would be less likely to face the rightly massive opposition from many quarters if a large incinerator was proposed. Working together we can and must find local solutions to cutting and managing our waste.

Cllr Sarah Lunnon, Stroud District Green party

Climate Change march in London: wet but inspiring

On Saturday I joined the Climate Change march in London with well over 6,000 others - amazingly I managed to meet up with many of those travelling in the two coaches from Gloucestershire - they carried some 75 Green party, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace members along with other climate change campaigners from Gloucestershire.


Photos above and below: mostly mine but a couple from Bryan Meloy (incl one of Derek Wall, Green party Principal Speaker)- this set has one of the police filming the crowd - as most campaigners will know this is something they do at all such events - one older woman I spoke to was shocked by this asking what on earth they want with film of thousands of peaceful protesters.

It was wet - very wet - indeed my the time marchers had reached the end a large percentage of the posters had collapsed and disintegrated along the way.

This march is the third organised in London - see my news release just sent off here - the march was part of hundreds of other actions across the world in over fifty countries. Indeed many towns and cities also held actions - back in Stroud some twenty five Green party members held an action in the High Street using an enormous balloon to highlight our use of CO2 (see release here). Infact the huge six foot balloon they use is using a similar to a short film using elephants to illustrate the amount of CO2 - in fact the film won an award in the "60 Seconds to Save the Earth" Ecospot Contest - see Dave Schlafman for his video entitled 'Sky is Falling' here.

See news releases of Climate march in 2006 here and 2005 here. See photos from various other sources of Saturday's march here.

As always there are some great banners and costumes - one of the ones that tickled me was the polar bear in the background of the photo with some Glos Greens who had a banner reading - 'Unless our home stops melting we'll have to eat Santa' - I have to say it is a worry with Christmas approaching.

Anyway one of the very blurred photos next to the one of me smiling is of George Monbiot who spoke soon after Caroline Lucas Green MEP - have to confess to missing Caroline as was in pub getting warm after being very soaked by the rain (see her on-street video here) - Caroline is usually very inspiring so a pity...anyhow George Monbiot talked about the failure of the Kyoto Protocol, whose replacement the Bali meeting is meant to be discussing. Indeed since it was signed, there has been an acceleration in global emissions - I read in yesterdays paper that new research shows that since 1990 our emissions have risen by 19% rather than the claimed 15% drop (all of which was before Labour due to the switch to gas).

It does seem extraordinary that our government still plans new coal plants, new roads and airport expansions. Perhaps one of the most frightening bits of research shows that if our economy grows at 3% between now and 2030, we will consume in that time economic resources equivalent to all those we have consumed since humans first stood on two legs!!!!

As I noted in my press release "The real issues in Bali are not technical or economic: this crisis demands a much deeper discussion about who we are and what progress means. We cannot and must not continue on our current course: it was inspiring to be with so many others who also know we need radical changes now."

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Latest re Cashes Green Hospital site

I received a response from Marlene Rodney (Department for Communities and Local Government) re my letter to Yvette Cooper and Hazel Blears re the Cashes Green Hospital site.

Photo: two weeks ago leaves still on trees - now none!

See earlier letter to Ministers on blog by using search engine - Ms Rodney replied stating that English Partnerships "have not reversed their decision as no decision has yet been made" and that the "English Partnerships board refused to approve the scheme because the model does not offer value for money" and "We are considering the options about how the scheme might progress."

Here is my response:

Dear Ms Blears and Ms Cooper,

Re Cashes Green Community Land Trust Pilot Project

Thank you for your reply dated 30th November from Marlene Rodney. I hugely welcome your continued interest in this project and wondered whether you would be able to answer the following questions that are being asked locally by constituents in the area of this proposed project.

There has been much enthusiasm locally following the extensive consultations over the last couple of years and people are now finding it hard to understand why there is a hold up on this project despite the widespread support.

1. I understand a 'value for money' report was requested for the community despite the original reports containing considerable information regarding the community value of the proposals. I can understand that you need to be sure but I would now welcome confirmation that the community interest in this site has raised its value?

2. In June 2007 English Partnerships were quoted in a press release that David Warburton, English Partnerships' Director for South West England, said; "We welcome this approach for a Community Land Trust pilot project. It provides for significantly lower entry prices for home ownership in perpetuity by utilising what is known as a Mutual Home Ownership model and it will help us achieve high quality, well designed, sustainable and affordable places for people to live." We are still unclear as to why they may have changed their mind. We would welcome a view on why?

3. One local resident posed the question: "Is it not the case that this site, an old hospital site, is in effect already owned by the community?" I would welcome your comments to feed back on this and also concerns expressed locally that the Government (English Partnerships) is trying to make money out of community assets?

4. Hazel Blears has said much about the value of community engagement, urging local authorities to seize the chance to transfer power to residents. One quote from last month notes: "One of my worries is that community empowerment ends up as so much blah, and our task is to put some flesh on the bones. It’s a challenge because if you give people power other people have to give it up. The top message I have given to my department is that I want community empowerment to be one of our top priorities. If we can’t use the resources we have got to make a difference on this agenda, I don’t know when there will be a better time. Our task is to try to change the system so people can do things and the system can help them do it rather than stand in their way. That will require a massive shift in local government and certainly in central government as well." Another quote condemns councils that involved residents in regeneration only to push them aside when policies changed: "If there’s one lesson we have to learn, wasting that kind of capacity of people at local level is a sin. We have to think again and again and again about how we keep people involved."

How can the Housing Minister the Rt Hon Yvette Cooper best build upon this in the Cashes Green case?

I look forward to hearing from you,

Yours Sincerely,

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward,

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Voluntary group looking for funding in Glos?

I was recently pointed to this excellent online free searchable database for voluntary and community groups in Gloucestershire - it is updated regularly and has lots of good info:
www.open4community.info/gloucestershire/Default.aspx

West Papua action in Stroud

Saturday saw me join a number of Green party people in Stroud High Street to highlight the situation in West Papua. It was bucketing down rain and cold - and I admire Elinor who had been there since 10.30 in the morning until nearly 2pm collecting signatures and talking to anyone who would stop under an umbrella to talk.

Photos: Mayor John Marjoram, Martin Whiteside, Elinor Croxall and other Green party members

We were campaigning for West Papua's right to independence - it was on the same day in 1961 that the Dutch left West Papua and granted its people independence. West Papuans were able to celebrate their independence by raising their flag and singing their national anthem for only three months until Indonesia invaded and occupied the country. It then became illegal to fly the flag which can be seen in the photos of our action in Stroud.

Under Indonesian occupation between 100,000 and 300,000 West Papuans have been killed, and many others tortured raped and imprisoned. Despite this oppression West Papuans continue to campaign for their right to self determinations. This year the Indonesian military opened fire on a peaceful ceremony in a church and eight people remain in prison for raising the flag. In 2004 events on the 1st December resulted in the arrest of Filep Karma & Yusak Pakage who raised the Morning Star flag on a sports field in the grounds of Cenderwasih (Bird of Paradise) University as part of a peaceful prayer ceremony. For this “crime”, Filep & Yusak are now serving 15 & 10 year prison sentences and are suffering torture. Both are recognised by Amnesty International as prisoners of conscience.

Elinor Croxall who organised the event in Stroud (see news releaseand another photo here) said: “We are raising the Morning Star here in Stroud in solidarity with those in West Papua who face arrest, torture and indefinite imprisonment for doing the same in their home country.”

Elinor has also joined demonstrations in London outside the Indonesian Embassy and the offices of BP and Rio Tinto on Friday 31st December and said “There are a number of multinationals, including UK based companies, who are complicit in the forceful removal of West Papuans from their land and the brutality of the Indonesian military. I hope next year Stroud District Council will support the event and fly the Morning Star”.

Oxford Town Hall flew the flag this year in support of West Papua. Further information, including urgent actions following events in West Papua on the 1st December, can be found at www.freewestpapua.org

See Indonesian TV news of the attack on Kwamki Baru village here and here. Also look at photos here which show how many Indonesian police and military they sent to the church compound to break up the flag ceremony. Benny Wenda, a West Papuan Independence Leader who had been to Stroud last month for a public meeting (see more re that here), said: "This TV film and these photos show the truth of life for Papuans under Indonesian occupation. Is this what the Indonesians call "democracy"?! We have heard that the Indonesians are still holding 8 Papuans who raised the flag in Timika police station. Please pass on this news as much as possible and call for the Indonesians to release these peaceful protesters immediately. "

URGENT ACTION!

Please e-mail the Indonesian Embassy in London to express concerns: kbri@btconnect.com &/or phone: 020 74997661 (or from outside UK +44 (0) 20 74997661)

Monday, December 03, 2007

Junk mail gets smelly and noisy: sign a petition

No/Yes Junk Mail StickerNo/No Junk Mail Sticker
You will probably have seen the reports that our junk mail is about to become smelly and noisy in a marketing bid to reach more people to advertise products. This sort of advertising gets my goat - an outrageous waste of the planets resources. It is bad enough having to put up with the quantity of junk mail that comes through the doors at the moment even though I am registered with the Mail Preference Service which is meant to reduce that type of mailing - infact I read it stops 95% of junk mail (see below how you can also register).

I only recently came across the fact that you can also register to cut the amount of junk mail even further - by opting out of the Royal Mail's 'Door-to-Door' service that delivers unaddressed mail. This type of unsolicited mail will not be covered by the MPS. It still wont include all such mailings. You can opt out of the service by calling 08457 950 950, or by emailing opt.out@royalmail.com.

Register now with MPS

You can also register the name of anyone that used to live at your address, although you cannot register the address itself, so junk mail to 'The Occupier' is likely to still get through. For junk mail addressed to the occupier, you should inform the company that you do not wish to be sent any further mail, and that you will report any further instances of mail to the MPS and to Postwatch, the independent postal services watchdog.

You can register with the MPS online at www.mpsonline.org.uk. You can also register by calling 08457 034 599, by emailing mps@dma.org.uk, or by writing to Freepost 29, LON 20771, London W1E 0ZT.

Visit Stop Junk Mail

I used to have one of their stickers on my door but it did virtually nothing to stop mail - having been a postie several Christmases, when I was young, I do have sympathy for them - and it is not always easy to see notices when you are moving quickly in the dark - then again a lot of junk mail doesn't come from Royal Mail. Sign the petition:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/go-dutch/

I don't think the petition has been well advertised - as not many signatures - then again I think it should be the other way around - rather than opt out of junk mail, all junk mail should be banned unless people say they are happy to receive it!

Stitch and Bitch, Knit and Knatter - a rhyme helps!

Hey with the last blog entry all about Transition Sroud I could have also have mentioned that the Textile Transition group is looking at everything from reuse to making your own clothes - even to the extent that they have grown some hemp - sadly the deer had most - anyhow knitting is one area of interest - and Stroud seems to have some serious knitters...

Some of the most impressive I've seen have shown their wares at the Farmers Market (see photo) - that was the Stroud Knitters group - some knitters do it alone, some in studios and some in the pub - there used to be a group at the Fleece in Nelson Street - and I've heard of several 'Stitch and Bitch' groups planned - see one lot of details here - maybe even up and running somewhere - and apparently a Stroud Hip-Knit group meet at Prema - see details here. The Made in Stroud shop has lots re textiles plus knitting kits....and of course there is that great shop Sewing machine in Lansdown that has had Knit and Knatter sessions.....

Some countries knit lots - in Norway for example it is not unusual to take your knitting wherever you go - I've only ever done a couple of stitches in the past but at a recent Woodcraft folk was helping to run a knitting session for 6 and 7 year olds - a scary prospect and still most of them are better than me but what saved me was this rhyme...

In through the front door
Running around the back
Peeping through the window
And off jumps Jack!

Happy knitting!

Update on Transition Stroud

Over a week ago Transition Stroud met for drinks and chat in Nailsworth - haven't managed to mention it in this blog yet but it did get a mention here.

Photos: Transition Stroud members in the pub - and below a graph showing peak oil may have been reached last year.

Quite a crowd turned out and much discussed - some felt that the Transition movement here in Stroud was losing it's way a bit but while some of the sub-groups are struggling to get a focus some are achieving real results - see for example progress on influencing the District Council here and the amazing fashion show put on recently plus progress in the Transport group - there is also now a bookable room in Lansdown given free to us for a year to use for meetings and more...and recent posts on the Transition Stroud email list show a renewed enthusiasm - plus a new website is on it's way....

None of this can come too soon - the more I read on Peak Oil the more it is worrying - the price rise forecasts for oil are seriously high - and prices look set to rise seriously quick - we are in for an economic crash if we don't start to take serious action - yet Government is still in denial that there is even a problem - all the more reason for the need for the Transition movement - transition sounds alot more attractive than a crash.....get involved now!!

Market crisis?

There is certainly the beginning of talk in the papers about how sound our economy really is...but it seems to me a reluctance to look seriously....the recent £27billion loss on pension funds is a 'market correction' - US debt has now reached $9 trillion - 'not a problem' - and the UK has around 80% of all credit card spending in the EU as well as the highest over-exposure to mortgage borrowing...

See blog comment here on peak oil:
www.theecologist.org/blog_comments.asp?blog_detail_id=206

Good article in The Ecologist re Transition Totnes:
www.theecologist.org/archive_detail.asp?content_id=1139

Another call for 20 mph

I wrote this morning to the Local Government Association magazine which goes to all councillors in response to a letter in the magazine re 20 mph - see my letter here. A letter from a councillor responded to the letter below from Professor Whitelegg. The councillor was seeking to justify 30 and 40 mph limits - to my mind there is no justification in our towns and villages.

Photo: 20 mph zone in Springhill, Stroud - a waste of money as I defy anyone to travel faster than 15 mph on that road - instead money should have been spent on slowing traffic elsewhere rather than on making this area ugly with unnecessary signs and road paint.

Letter from
Cllr John Whitelegg (Green) Lancaster CC to First magazine: Cllr Warriner (first 360) raised the problem of speeding traffic. Every councillor I have ever spoken to has been concerned about this, especially in the context of schools and children, and yet progress towards a safe road transport system is painfully slow. The UK has a poor record for child pedestrian and cyclist safety, and 2,661 children were killed or seriously injured in 2005. The Parliamentary advisory council on traffic safety recommends a general 20mph speed limit in urban areas: a child hit by a car at this speed has a 95% chance of survival. At 30mph, this falls to 45%, and at 40mph to only 5%. High quality research and science points to the urgent need to adopt a general 20mph limit on every residential road in every urban area. Portsmouth city council has taken the lead on this, and in January a proposal to a joint committee of city and county councillors in Lancashire and Lancaster unanimously adopted a general 20mph limit. This was supported by all political parties. Local government has always taken the lead in adopting policies that bring about a substantial improvement in the quality of life of everyone. We need to send the clearest signal that this is still our core business. I ask every councillor in England and Wales to do whatever needs to be done to establish a general system-wide default speed limit of 20mph.

Sunday, December 02, 2007

US interfering with Venezuelan Referendum

A mural depicting Hugo Chavez
Green Party leaders called last week on President Bush to cancel an order directing the CIA to interfere with todays voters' referendum in Venezuela and to cease actions intended to stabilize the Chavez government (ooohps that should read destabilise as noted in 'Comment' left below).

Photo:
Man stands under a mural depicting Venezuela's president Hugo Chavez in Caracas (sent to me so sorry I can't credit original source)

Jill Bussiere, Wisconsin representative to the Green Party's International Committee said: "President Chavez and the people of Venezuela are not America's enemy. We demand that the White House respect the sovereignty of other countries and the democratic will of the Venezuelan people, who have repeatedly affirmed their support for President Chavez and his policies."

The memo describes secret US-supported actions against the Chavez government that constitute acts of war against a nation at peace with the US (see more here). These operations are consistent with other US acts of aggression against Venezuela, including the failed 2002 coup attempt, to which the Bush Administration lent active support. The Venezuelan government uncovered an alleged confidential memo on November 26 from US embassy official Michael Middleton Steere to the CIA director Michael Hayden which reveals clandestine operations to influence the referendum and to coordinate a military overthrow of the elected Chavez government.

The referendum will measure public approval for constitutional amendments proposed by Chavez and the National Assembly; polls show 60% support for the amendments. Greens note that the Bush Administration has targeted President Chavez for numerous reasons: his nationalization of several industries, especially oil, which has angered US corporate interests; provision of financial security, jobs, and health care for Venezuela's severely impoverished multiracial majority; and expansion of democracy in a nation formerly ruled by a small white elite. President Chavez has refused to take Washington's orders to make his country a source of cheap oil and other resources for US corporate profits.

Clifford W, Thornton, Jr., co-chair of the Green Party of the United States commented: "That's why the CIA's 'Operation Tenaza' has been authorized - to reopen markets for the benefit of corporations, and to teach Venezuela and all of Latin America a lesson. The US media blackout on the uncovered memo recalls the blackout by most media on the revelation of Republican operations to manipulate the US election in Ohio and other states in 2004."

Yesterday there was a demo in London in support against a coup in Caracas - there was also a good letter in The Guardian (www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,,2220120,00.html) from various MPs and others including Green MEP Caroline Lucas celebrating Venezuelas democratic system - he has certainly made some extraordinary changes that are and will bring very tangible benefits to the many - public services have improved masses and what other leader seeks to develop a fair trade system that aims to counter poverty rather than the free trade system being pushed by the WTO? It is no wonder he has come up against the establishment and opposition. Chavez is by no means perfect - indeed it is important that we voice concerns - but he shines out as a wonderful exception to virtually all other world leaders whose policies are concentrating power and wealth with the few.

Staverton Airport cancels presentation

Campaigners set off to meet the Airport staff at Staverton yesterday - Saturday - well it is Sunday morning now - anyhow when they got there they found that the planned presentation was cancelled at short notice - it had been the Airports intentions to look at misconceptions about the Airport - that would have been interesting as they do seem to have been confusing the picture - one minute denying climate change then the next accepting it - one minute denying expansion but some new flights have already started and the Business Plan talks about more flights to Europe.....I have to say they will need to do a lot to restore my confidence that they know what they are doing - cancelling this presentation at such short notice doesn't help....

Read one campaigners letter to airport authorities here. Here is the leaflet the campaigners planned to give out:

Saturday, December 01, 2007

Why Labour backed away from supermarket parking charges?


Greg Pallast writes some good stuff - see his website here - you can also get his regular mailings - anyhow here he writes below reminding us of Mendelsohn.....Labour's chief fundraiser who admitted this week he was aware that a millionaire property developer was disguising his donations - but insisted he was trying to stop the practice....

Brown’s Fixer Explains How It’s Done: Jon Mendelsohn and the Secret Tape

Boasted £11 million donated by Tesco cut tax bill by £20 million by Greg Palast
For the Guardian On Line/

It was a stunning admission. Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s crony explained to the U.S. businessman, in evil detail, exactly how the fix is done in Britain. Unfortunately, for Jon Mendelsohn and his partners, the “businessman” was, in fact, an undercover reporter for The Observer of London.

Today, Brown’s foes are calling for Mendelsohn’s resignation as chief fundraiser of the Labour Party for his admitted knowledge of £630,000 ($1.2 million) in dodgy, possibly illegal, campaign contributions to Labour.

What’s odd here are the protestations of shock at the behavior of Mendelsohn, described in the Guardian as an “ethical” lobbyist. “Ethical” my arse. It was exactly nine years ago that Mendelsohn and his lobby firm partners were caught trading cash for access. How this Mendelsohn character ended up heading Labour Party fundraising and how he obtained the sobriquet ‘ethical’ is the real shocker.

I know a few things about this Mendelsohn. The “businessman” with the hidden recorder was me. In June 1998, joined by my recorder and a real US businessman, Mark Swedlund, who designed my elaborate corporate front, I met Mr. Mendelsohn at his tony Soho London office. There Mendelsohn confirmed what was already on tape from his partners in the lobby firm he founded, LLM.

I explained my corporate needs: some environmental rules needed bending. I hinted I was with Enron. Mendelsohn’s partner Neil Lawson told my recorder that, if I paid LLM £5,000 to £20,000 per month, “We can go to/anyone/. We can go to Gordon Brown if we have to.” Brown was at the time Chancellor of the Exchequer. Could the lobbyist provide concrete examples of a fix?

Easily. Here is a short list of LLM claimed accomplishments:
- Inside information on then-Chancellor Gordon Brown’s budgets.
- Tax avoided by a supermarket chain following millions donated to a New Labour pet project.
- A pass on anti-trust action against client Rupert Murdoch’s media empire.
- And/ for/ Gordon Brown, a favor that the Mendelsohn team expected to redeem.

Tesco Goes Tax-Free
LLM, which stands for the founders Lucas, Neil Lawson and Mendelsohn, were about to derail Brown’s plan for a tax on car parks (”parking lots” as we say in the States). This would cost Tesco, the supermarket chain, an LLM client, £20 million annually. LLM was holding secret meetings that week in June 1998 with Tony Blair’s Downing Street Policy Unit to get Tesco exempted from the proposed tax. The tax threat went away after LLM advised Tesco to drop £11 million into funding for Blair’s odd Millennium Dome project. [To my US readers: The Dome is a gargantuan tent costing $100 million - no kidding.]

“This government likes to do deals,” Lucas told me. But this deal was complex, Mendelsohn said, not so simple as cash paid for a tax break. “Tony is very anxious to be seen as ‘green’,” Mendelsohn explained to me and my confederate. “Everything has to be couched in environmental language - even if it’s slightly Orwellian.” So LLM devised a set of cockamamie gimmicks for Tesco, like offering bus services to the elderly, which would paint the retailer green. It worked. Tesco was spared the tax - though the company denies categorically that its cash dumped into the Dome bought any favors.

Message for Murdoch
The year of my paper’s original investigation (dubbed, “Lobbygate”), anti-trust authorities were looking into Rupert Murdoch’s companies’ alleged predatory pricing practices. LLM carried the word from Downing Street, according to Lucas, that, if Murdoch’s tabloids toned down criticism of new antitrust legislation, the law’s final language would reflect the government’s appreciation. On the other hand, harsh coverage in Murdoch’s papers could provoke problems for the media group in Parliament’s union-recognition bill.

The message to muzzle journalists was not, said Lucas, “an easy one in their culture” - journalists being a trying lot. However, the outcome pleased LLM clientele.

A Peek at the Budget
It also happened that on one of the days I recorded Mendelsohn’s partners, they boasted of informing an LLM client about details of Gordon Brown’s budget plans before the Chancellor’s announcement went public. A lobbyist competing for my “business,” when asked to match the offer of inside information and deal-making held out by LLM and another New Labour firm said, “It’s appalling. It’s disturbing,” and added that he would refuse to match LLM’s services at any price.

If LLM appeared favored by Brown’s operation, Brown himself received favors from LLM. “Gordon Brown asked us to have our client KPMG [the consultancy] host a breakfast for him where it was pre-arranged that they would praise him for his prudent budgets.” Brown basked in this Potemkin praise-fest - a favor that would be returned with special access (for my own clients, if I paid the retainer).

Whether Mendelsohn, Lawson and Lucas actually pulled off all they claimed, I can’t say. Though just kids in their twenties, LLM had garnered millions in revenue, a lot of loot if for mere advice. No one seriously investigated; no one asked uncomfortable questions of Mr. Brown, Mr. Blair or the man at the center of several of these supposed “deals,” Mr. Peter Mandelson, now an EU Commissioner. However, that Mendelsohn made these tawdry claims (or grinned at me while his partner made them), and that they were published on page one of every newspaper in the realm - part of an LLM tape broadcast on BBC’s Newsnight - one would think that perspicacious Mr. Brown would have avoided Mendelsohn like the plague.

But the PM embraced Mr. Let’s-Make-A-Deal. The reason was made clear to me by Mendelsohn himself, a man as brainy as he is cynical and wealthy. Those many years ago, at the dawn of the Blair regime, Mendelsohn handed me a confidential manifesto he’d penned for LLM clients only. It was a map of the soul of New Labour.

Here was a chilling combination of Mendelsohn, Mandelson and Nietzsche. “AN OLD WORLD IS DISAPPEARING AND A NEW ONE EMERGING,” he announced in upper case. In the “Passing World” were “ideology” and “conviction” - which would now be replaced by “Pragmatism” and “Consumption.” “Buying” would replace “Belief.” And ultimately, in this Brave New Labour World, style was all: “WHAT YOU DO,” wrote Mendelsohn, was passé, replaced by, “HOW YOU DO IT.”

So why demand Mendelsohn’s head now? Gordon Brown is a prudent man whom, I suspect, reads a newspaper or two - and knew exactly whom he had positioned to fill his party’s coin sacks. Mendelsohn is just a gun for hire, a forgettable factotum. I wouldn’t place the blame on the hired gun, but on the man whose finger is on the trigger.

A million signatures wanted to stop whaling

help save the whales at Whales Revenge
Go to petition here:
www.whalesrevenge.com/

Foie Gras off the menu at Bearlands


A Gloucester restaurant says it has been 'bullied' into taking foie gras off the menu after a series of protests by a local animal rights group, Gloucestershire Animal Action. Bearlands Restaurant and Wine bar used to serve up Foie Gras - but no more - and I for one am very pleased.

Ducks and geese raised for foie gras are treated in ways that would be illegal if dogs or cats were the victims. Foie gras is produced by ramming pipes down the throats of ducks and geese and force-feeding them until their livers become painfully diseased and enlarged and, in some cases, their organs rupture. This force-feeding through a tube can be for up to 18 days before slaughter.

Foie gras is French for "fatty liver". Hepatic lipidosis is Greek for "fatty liver disease". According to veterinarians, they are one and the same. Foie gras, the liver of a duck or goose swollen to many times normal size by force-feeding to make an expensive "gourmet" appetizer, is the very painful liver disease hepatic lipidosis. It is "the food of the pharaohs", according to some promoters. Of course, the pharaohs are not remembered mainly for their compassion.

Such cruelty is wholly unacceptable in my view - one campaigner was quoted saying: "The torture of small innocent animals should not be a matter of personal dietary choice."

Bearlands could have turned this more into an opportunity - taking foie gras off the menu would be welcomed by most people - yet the restaurant is quoted saying they felt bullied into the decision and felt the police should have done more especially as customers had cancelled meals. I'm all for non-violent action and by all accounts this is what these protesters were doing - in fact from reports I had the protestors were polite and at no time made threats.

A spokesman from Gloucestershire Animal Action quoted in The Citizen said that their protests were lawful and say their campaigners felt intimidated by restaurant staff at times. He said: "We would like to thank caring members of the public who supported our activists and wrote polite letters of protest to the Bearlands restaurant. Now we would ask that people do not contact the restaurant unless to congratulate them."

Email the restaurant here to say well done.

Infact in York after a letter-writing campaign by activists a motion was tabled at the Council and the so-called 'delicacy of despair' is now banned from the council's premises (see Green councillors comment on 5th October blog at: www.readmyday.co.uk/andydag). However a Green party amendment to ask stall holders not to sell the stuff was not passed - infact all but Greens voted against it.

Greens had wanted to see York follow the city of Chicago, USA, who have banned foie gras in its shops and restaurants.

The council's chief executive will however write to Lord Rooker, the minister for sustainable food and farming and animal health, to relay the council's concerns about the sale of foie gras and to request a review of central government policies on animal welfare issues. Peta has an action to email Lord Rooker here - see also at that site a video of 007 Roger Moore joining the campaign.

Here is my hurried email to The Citizen:

Disease, not a delicacy - Ducks and geese raised for foie gras are treated in ways that would be illegal if dogs or cats were the victims. Foie gras is produced by ramming pipes down their throats and force-feeding them until their livers become painfully diseased and enlarged and, in some cases, their organs rupture. York Council have just banned this so-called 'delicacy of despair' from their premises and Chicago in the US has banned foie gras in its shops and restaurants. Many of us are very pleased to see Foie Gras removed by head chef Robert Sinyard from his Bearlands restaurant. 007 Roger Moore has even made a video calling for an end to this cruel practice. I hope as letter-writer Steve Haines notes that Robert Sinyard will now become 'a beacon to other restaurants to do likewise'.

'Dentistry' magazine talking nonsense

The November edition of the magazine called 'Dentistry' has an extraodinary editorial comment which was sent to the Safe Water Campaign, of which I am Secretary, by a dentist who opposes water fluoridation.

In it, the magazine argues in its editorial that "the anti-fluoridation lobby has been silenced. It must have conceded that consumer water fluoridation is entirely beneficial to the health of the public."

Julian English, the editor, even wants to see health authorities penalised if they don't fluoridate - here is our response from the Chair of our group Rob Mehta:

Fluoridation- “It delivers results every time”

I wholeheartedly agree with Julian English [Editorial Comment
15.11.2007] that fluoridation of water supplies delivers results every time! Quoting evidence from the York Review {the definitive treatise for Government bodies} fluoridation delivers 48% dental fluorosis, 12.5% of serious aesthetic concern, which would require cosmetic dentistry to remedy, (probably at considerable cost to the sufferers family}. The York Review suggested an overall benefit to the incidence of dental caries of 15% but admitted that the evidence was unreliable and that higher quality studies should be undertaken.

There is also emerging evidence in the U.S. that in fluoridated areas there is an increased incidence of osteosarcoma {bone cancer} in teenage boys which has a 50% mortality in the first five years. The “delivery” might also include brittle bones, thyroid damage et alia!!

Mr. English makes a comparison with flu’ jabs, mass inoculation and smoking bans but omits to notice that thinking people have a free choice in those matters!!


I would also like to refer Mr. English to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics “Public Health- ethical issues”, published 13.11.07 ISBN 978-1-904384-17-5, in which the benefits and harms of fluorodation are considered in a very balanced way. The study publishes a graph which shows the decrease in dental caries in 14 European countries between 1965 and 2003 for 12 year olds. Each country shows a marked decrease. the only countries with fluoride are Spain 3%, Portugal 1%, U.K.9%, Ireland 74%.

In the U.K. between 1973 and 2003 there has been a decrease in decayed, missing or filled teeth from 5 to1 in this age group. The study advises that given the general improvement in children`s teeth the possible harm caused by fluoridation, the low quality of research and the alternative methods available for delivering fluoride to those who want it, at best a “precautionary approach” should be taken on any further fluoridation of our water supplies.

I would therefore like to suggest that the “anti- fluoridation “lobby, far from being “silenced” is alive and well and being supported in its aims by the academics of today.

Stroud Council tenants pay government £5m

Last week I had the joy and total pleasure of being able to immerse myself in learning more about the Housing Revenue Account - a training session for councillors - it was something I had requested at a Scrutiny meeting so dare not be there!

In fact it was very useful and gave me a much clearer understanding of how it all works - not easy to explain here - but suffice to say I now have a better understanding of the formula that the Government uses to claim £4.6m this year £5m next year and probably more in coming years from Stroud District Council - this is a proportion of the Council tenants rents - now I'm all for redistribution - and Stroud after all is a more wealthy area than some - but this is taking money raised from tenants - some of the poorest in the District - and the money has not been used to make more housing yet homeless waiting lists grow. Not right and it is high time the government reviewed this - it seems at last they are at least looking at it.....

Latest re Cotswold canal

The Inland Waterways Association give a useful summary (in blue):

Photo: Canal near Brimscombe from train

The bid to The Big Lottery Fund for an award under the Living Landmarks programme to restore the Stroudwater Navigation from Stonehouse to Saul Junction was announced as being
unsuccessful on 14th November.

The bid, made by British Waterways and Stroud District Council on behalf of the Cotswold Canals Partnership, sought £19 million towards the £24.5 million restoration of a four-mile stretch of the Stroudwater Navigation. However, the project did benefit from £250,000 bid-development funding, which enabled many of the essential studies to promote restoration to be undertaken, and will greatly assist future funding bids.


Further east on the Stroudwater Navigation, work to remove the infill from the waterway between Ryeford Double Lock and Oil Mills Bridge started in November. So far, 8,420 tons of earth and domestic waste have already been removed from 240 metres of canal; a mains gas pipe has been diverted; alternative access to houses and business built; over 300 slow worms and grass snakes relocated; vegetation cleared; and archaeological investigation carried out. Work to Oil Mills Bridge has started, and is due to be complete by March 2008.


On the Thames & Severn Canal, WRG regional groups have undertaken work to clear the canal around Gough’s Orchard Lock, close to Brimscombe Port, removing trees and overgrowth. British Waterways has arranged training courses at nearby colleges for volunteers, offering training on the canals in archaeology, aquatic plant identification, brush-cutter and strimmer use; masonry repairs and use of chippers.
Regeneration of the area around Brimscombe Port is being led by Stroud District Council. This is to include the development of the site around the Port and the restoration of the water-space, and is closely linked in with the Area Action Plan being developed by the Council for Brimscombe. Further information on the restoration of the Cotswold Canals is available at www.cotswoldcanalsproject.org

Freight on canals - contact your MP

Mike Hancock MP for Portsmouth South, has launched an Early Day Motion that notes the environmental benefits and calls on both Government and major retailers to support the movement of freight by water. Early Day Motion 67 states:
“That this House notes that moving freight by water is several times more environmentally sustainable than doing so by road and takes lorries off the congested road network; further notes that water freight makes a major contribution to the UK's economy and employs more than 200,000 people; welcomes the role played by Sea and Water in promoting water freight; calls on major retailers and others to do more to make their supply chains more green by making use of inland waterways and short sea shipping; and urges the Government to continue to support the water freight industry with policies to develop and maintain the inland waterway network and by ensuring that planning policies in particular encourage rather than hinder access to the waterways.”

There is also Early Day Motion 169 which states:“That this House congratulates Tesco's for switching from lorry to water the transport of its new world wine over the 32 miles from Liverpool to its bottling plant in Irlam saving 50 lorry trips a week and cutting carbon emissions by 80 per cent.; notes Sainsbury's has recently conducted similar trials in London; believes the Department for Transport should create a dedicated unit to encourage greater use of our inland and coastal waterways as recommended by the recent Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee report on British Waterways recommending fiscal incentives to stimulate greater waterways use; and believes much can be learnt from other countries in Europe on using British waterways to reduce noise, pollution and traffic congestion”.

IWA is encouraging members and other waterways supporters to contact their MP and to lobby them to sign and support both Early Day Motion 67 (51 signatures by 30th November) and 169 (60 signatories by 30th November), as the Association wishes as many MPs as possible to be made aware of some of the wider environmental benefits of the waterways to society as a whole, especially at a time of funding pressures and increased costs to users. David Drew has signed both. The following link can be used to find the MP for any area and contact them to register support for the motions: www.writetothem.com

Greens leadership motion

Link to Green Party Home page
Most of the world has gone on oblivious to the debate that has raged within the Green party about whether or not to vote for one leader rather than our current two Principal Speakers. Yesterday the leadership motion was passed by more than the 2/3rd majority required:
Votes against 27%
Votes for 73%
The turnout was 48.3%

The arguments are set out here:
Yes to Green leadership:
www.greenyes.org/
Yes to Green Empowerment:
www.greenempowerment.org.uk

Green Party Principal Speaker Caroline Lucas who supported the Yes to Leadership campaign, said: "This is a fantastic day for the Green Party and will help ensure we have a party that is understandable, recognisable and effective. But we now need to demonstrate to all our members, regardless of which way they voted, that this is not about weakening our principles, it's about strengthening our effectiveness."

Green Party Principal Speaker Derek Wall, who supported the Empowerment campaign, said:
"We need a Green Party which is effective and empowering, doing things differently from the top down traditional politics that turns voters off. The result of this referendum challenges the Party to create a leadership structure that is true to green ideals. It has put our future leaders on notice that the membership expects a more focussed, more effective party, with a leadership team that is truly accountable to the membership in a real and effective manner."

My own view is that the change will not make very much difference - I did not vote in favour of the change although I would like to see some improvements to the current structure - we are by no means perfect - what party is? However our status of two speakers marks us out as a different party - indeed I know of no other with such an effective internal grassroots democracy...it just wouldn't be possible for example for the party to manipulate voting like Labour did in the London Mayoral elections to bar Ken Livingston from standing as a Labour candidate the first time around.

Conventional leadership with a single leader almost always comes with commitments to water down the message, to remove real debate and participation - to advocate the participation of all in a party without hierarchical structures is a key base on which to develop the politics of the present and future. As Ron Bailey, Parliamentary and community campaigner said: "The 'leader' issue is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between people taking initiative and having 'a leader'. It is both inevitable and inherently healthy that people take initiative (and so give a lead) whenever they feel able: that is good Green politics and we should encourage and enable it as much as possible. But the concept of 'a leader' is the very opposite of this: it is about institutionalising the philosophy on which our current destructive and centralist society is based - leave it to 'the leader'. However 'answerable' we make that leader by appointing such a person we continue the mystique that it's OK to leave it to our (so-called) 'betters'. That is the very antithesis of Green politics and is the very concept that has got our world into the mess it is in. Having 'a leader' may (possibly!) at best get a few short term gains - but it won't lead to a Green society."

However the way the leadership role will be does have some safe guards built in, in a way that other parties do not - we will have to see how this works in practice - and I am more than happy to be proved wrong if we start getting loads more media coverage, more votes etc - as the Yes camp note time is running out - we need to get our message across more than ever - but we mustn't loose sight of the need to change politics....

GM wheat and Prof King

Professor King was interviewed on the BBC's Today programme this week and said that GM crops were needed to cope with a growing population and climate change. At the same time he went on to defend Europe's rigorous safety assessment for GM crops and foods. Scroll to bottom for two polls re GM.

Photo: Taken last week on the edge of Stroud on the way to Bisley

It is clear however that he greatly exaggerated the progress made in developing new GM crops around the world and of ignoring the other ways to tackle global climate and poverty challenges - see the two quotes below - there are still a huge number of reasons as to why we need a Moratorium on GMOs - indeed evidence seems to only accumulate about the risks. Yet as we've seen the Government is set on pushing Gm at every opportunity and giving vast amounts of public money to it - see recent local Green party letter here.

Money instead should be invested in developing non-GM like Drysdale a semi-dwarf strain of high-grade wheat capable of increasing grain yields in drought-affected areas by up to 10 per cent - utilising available soil moisture more efficiently than other dry-area wheat varieties - however we also need to look at all the other issues about why food doesn't reach the poor, why instead of developing more sustainable farming we are destroying soils etc.

Commenting on the BBC interview Pete Riley of GM Freeze said: “Listening to David King you would think that there is a GM magic wand that will enable farmers to overcome all challenges facing them – drought, pests, poor soil. He is guilty of exaggerating the progress that has been made in developing GM crops for extreme conditions. GM drought resistant crops have been talked about for well over a decade and are still not close to being available to poor farmers, who rarely get asked what they think or want from plant breeding or agricultural development. Professor King studiously avoided the socio-economic and political blockages to progress. We wish Professor King well in his retirement. We hope his successor will take exaggerated claims about GM crops with a large pinch of salt and that the UK research is directed to the right solutions that the people in the Global South actually want.”

King's views also contrast markedly with those of Ossama El-Tayeb, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Industrial Biotechnology at Cairo University: “I wish to add that transgenicity for drought tolerance and other environmental stresses (or, for that matter, biological nitrogen fixation) are too complex to be attainable in the foreseeable future, taking into consideration our extremely limited knowledge of biological systems and how genetic/metabolic functions operate. Those who propagate the ideas that any biological function could be genetically manipulated are optimists who are probably victims of a consortium of ‘arrogant’ scientists and greedy business who have strong control on policy making and the media. Having said that, I feel we should not lose hope of reaching such noble goals and should continue to fund such research whose fruits may be reaped by a future generation. These goals have been used by the proponents of currently available genetically modified organisms (GMOs) under the control of big business, who propose that GM crops will alleviate poverty soon while in fact currently available ones mostly contribute negatively to poverty alleviation and food security and positively to the stock market. The holders of intellectual property rights for present day GM crops keep teasing us about the potential of GMOs resistant to abiotic stresses and the like while doing nothing about developing such crops for this generation. These are simply not easily exploitable in a business market and are accordingly not on their agenda. Basic research in this area is being funded almost exclusively by public funds.”

There is lots more we could write re wheat - in fact as I've mentioned before wheat prices are rising to record levels (see also 29th Sept 2007 blog entry re view of IPCC) - passing $9 a bushel in Asian trading - are we reaching peak wheat? Reserves of the grain in Canada, the world's second-largest wheat exporter, plunged 29 percent at the end of July from a year earlier while the forecast for the crop in Australia maybe revised to 18 million tons, from 23 million metric tons. Wheat prices have more than doubled in the past year....and no time in this post for a discussion of all this and biofuels....another time...

Two GM polls:

Farmers Weekly is running a poll on their website "Is it the right time
to grow GM crops": www.fwi.co.uk

And another poll here:
http://www.foodmanufacture.co.uk/