Molly Scott Cato's view on the creeping threat from privatisation:
The word privatisation is rarely used in our debates these days but the process is rushing ahead, often without people even noticing. Under the cover of an extension in service hours the job of transporting vulnerable people to their hospital appointments has been sold to a train company. As a local councillor I heard nothing of this, so who is representing the views of local people. And who is guaranteeing that the company that won the contract – Arriva Passenger Services – will do a better job here than Arriva does with its rail franchise?
The word privatisation is rarely used in our debates these days but the process is rushing ahead, often without people even noticing. Under the cover of an extension in service hours the job of transporting vulnerable people to their hospital appointments has been sold to a train company. As a local councillor I heard nothing of this, so who is representing the views of local people. And who is guaranteeing that the company that won the contract – Arriva Passenger Services – will do a better job here than Arriva does with its rail franchise?
There is no
shortage of disasters that demonstrate how the attempt to have public services
run by private companies just does not work. The most embarrassing recent
example was the failure of the G4S contract to provide security at the Olympics,
but there was also the failure of the Southern Cross care homes and the collapse
of the rail franchise for the West Coast mainline. Earlier this month both G4S
and Serco were found to have been having a laugh at public expense by charging
for tagging prisoners who were no longer restricted or had actually died. It is
growing ever more obvious that was well as unreliability there may also be
corruption in the contracting out system. And I can't be the only person who is
wondering whether the appalling revelations from some of our hospitals is the
marketisation of health coming home to roost.
The problem is
that you cannot write the need to be signed up to an ethos of public service
into a contract. It is impossible to require people to sign up to behave in a
caring way, or to enforce kindness through a system of targets. This is the
reason why the most vital services like health and education were first taken
into the public sector: they are just too important to be left to companies that
are driven by profit. When something goes wrong lives are at stake and so we
need a sense of personal responsibility rather than the profit motive as the
central motivation.
As Greens we are not
committed to public ownership as an article of faith, but we do think that it is
sometimes the appropriate way to run things, especially when there cannot really
be any sort of genuine market competition. Since there will only be one postal
service or one railway service then you cannot have competition. The railways
are a good example of what goes wrong: service standards do not improve, there
is no real competition for franchises and we end up spending more public money:
this is why Green MP Caroline Lucas has tabled a private member’s bill to
renationalise the railways.
No comments:
Post a Comment