c. Russ |
One of the arguments used to
support the nuclear industry is that it is clean. Leaving aside what happens
when nuclear goes wrong (and everyone always promises that it is perfectly
safe, except for those few times, that could never possibly happen here, which
we are to believe...) and leaving aside the issue of having radioactive waste
that will have to be stored securely for thousands of years, is there any merit
to the ‘carbon neutral’ claim?
Those of us who lived near
Berkley and Oldbury stations when they were running, know that they did not
belch smoke into the air in the manner of a traditionally ‘dirty’ fossil fuels
station. However, there is more to the life, and carbon impact of a nuclear
power station than what it does in the moment of producing energy.
If this is something you’d like
to know more about, do please have a read of Dr Iain Fairle’s recent piece in
The Ecologist – nuclear power is no answer to global warming
No comments:
Post a Comment