data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa168/fa1681b802a0f753776642e845307048623f6cae" alt=""
Brewery windows.
Several people raised with me that they were surprised to see that the windows had not been cleared of rubble or plants before the water was returned to the canal (see photo attached). I have asked the Canal Manager as surely the water will make any future work more difficult? It would be slightly strange if the brewery part of the new 'Brewery Bridge' was the only part not to be restored.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1167/c1167480de761f76d6dd9259f04e042d874d0665" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/069e0/069e0adc509d55b97a181242f8eb7c90a1c8ecf6" alt=""
I recently covered the issue of the new Brewery Bridge on this blog and have to say I am still very frustrated by the developments there. My comments based on the work by the campaign group and County councillor Sarah Lunnon, include:
The Stroud Pedestrian and Cycle Forum and others have long raised concerns about the lack of improvement for pedestrians using the junction - the new underpass is one route but not sufficient. I have to say I am also concerned that this key entrance into Stroud seems to be designed for cars and not other users in mind. The road outside the Stroud and Swindon building has also been extended to take up an even bigger area. Can we be reassured that there will be real consultation over the road outside the Visitors Centre: as noted by many this could be a useful cycle and pedestrian entrance that is far more welcoming. Traffic going through there either way would be a disaster. In a brief poll at the visitors Centre and a few people at the cafe there was not one person in favour. It was also mentioned that the disabled access to the Visitors Centre that is planned will not be much use without disabled parking outside - again that huge area of tarmac near the roundabout has potential.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6a16/e6a1643c1e2de688d1776c5d6f3c796d332b1c8a" alt=""
The District have noted the issues are highway matters in which the canal team cannot become involved, though they note that they understand the issues raised. I have also raised the issue with GCC but am still waiting a reply.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96d47/96d47d176d9f6d4d689e613f928a6353b021c0e4" alt=""
Lastly for this blog I've had comments regarding the replacement path being not straight and therefore feeling less safe to people walking it. The Canal Manager at Stroud District Council notes that their understanding is that the 'wiggly' path, being longer, is DDA compliant. Reprofiling of the site at this point and replanting should mean that it is not as heavily overgrown as at present - but they have asked the project engineer to recheck these assumptions and to look at any simpler alternatives. They will come back to me when they have some better information.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66297/66297a3d795180c86571f0038454071084eb577e" alt=""
Lastly if you have not been down the the Canal Visitors Centre then do go - it has a wealth of information - andgreat knowledgeable people to talk to plus a a walk around the area that includes peeping through a hole into the Millikens factory.
1 comment:
Re: the altering of the path below Dr.Newton's Way.
I don't see how this path has anything to do with the canal alterations for this site.
This section of path was put in place twenty years ago, when the bypass was built, and some of the trees on the slop below the bypass are quite mature. And according to the plans, it looks like the whole slop is going to be redone!!
It is a lovely path, and I can't really see why they can't leave well alone.
Post a Comment