Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Vote Green 1st May

It was wet canvassing this evening in Rodborough - despite waterproofs the rain seemed to still manage to get in - anyhow here's a last appeal to vote Green tomorrow - see more re the 17 Stroud District candidates here.

Photo: a drier moment - Phil Blomberg, candidate for Rodborough and Dr Carol Kambites, former Town Councillor earlier this evening

And see blog on 28th April about The Observer saying vote Green in the Mayoral elections and 20th March about the Livingstone-Berry pact in London.

Anyhow I'm not writing more here otherthan to quote part of a letter by Phil Blomberg to the local press last year - it seems appropriate to re-quote as Tories in Nailsworth send out another leaflet saying 'Vote Blue, Go Green'....can they really be serious????

Nationally Tories and Labour both support more road building, doubling airports, Trident, the war in Iraq, GM crops, nuclear power, blocking key EU Environmental legislation and the insanity of ever more economic growth. Scottish Friends of the Earth recently researched all the parties 'green' policies and found the Tories have the least firm commitment to environmental policies and that only Greens have policies to address the issues like Climate Change. Market bases policies that are so enthusiastically endorsed by the three main parties will continue to drive climate chaos: markets work when we consume more yet this is what we need to change.

The Green Party has long called for a return to more redistribution and greener taxes by simply replacing VAT with green taxes. We also need an end to road building and airports expansions. Local production for local need, a huge expansion of public transport and renewables, zero waste and the rest are possible. The most important part of change will be the demand that policy is governed not by the needs of more economic growth but on the basis of what is good for humanity and the rest of nature.

Phil Blomberg, Stroud District Green party

Shelter, NUT and PCS industrial actions all need our support

The last few weeks we've seen several strikes and industrial actions - I write in this blog about the Shelter strike today and tomorrow - see more below - but also last week the National Union of Teachers strike at many schools across the County and the recent walk out by 200 staff at the Land Registry in Gloucester organised by the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) Union.

Picture; May Day tomorrow.

Both NUT and PCS groups have been offered a below-inflation settlement that represents a real-terms salary cut - just as the credit crunch is biting and the cost of living is going through the roof. Labour have presided over a tax and pay structure for the public services that has seen the gap between the richest and the least well-off stretch even more wide than it was under a Tory government. It must surely now ensure that teachers and other public servants, are given pay rises that reflect the work they do and the current level of inflation.

Of course to do so would cost money, but not doing so calls into question the very future of high quality local public services - but there are plenty of ways to find the dosh - like end the war in Iraq, ditch the ID card nonsense, tax those earning £100.000 more and scrap plans for a Trident replacement.

Indeed at the heart of these actions is the extent to which we value the work of our public servants. Forcing another pay cut on them can only make future recruitment and retention harder and in the case of teachers it will threaten to reverse recent improvements in local schools' performance. See more here re my statement re PCS.

Shelter actions

Green Party Principal Speaker Dr. Derek Wall has pledged in the previous months Green Party support for the workers of the housing charity Shelter, who have taken industrial action after rejecting out of hand a revised contract offer from Shelter managers.

The original dispute erupted earlier in the year, after Shelter managers demanded staff work an extra two and a half hours a week without additional pay - lost income worth an average of £1,700 per person over a year, despite Shelter's 2007 annual report revealing an annual income of £49.1m, with staff costs of £27.7m. I am aware that at least one of those effected lives in Stroud.

The charity's Chief Executive Adam Sampson emailed Shelter employees informing them: 'Those who decide that they are not prepared to work under the new arrangements will, with regret, be issued with notices of dismissal.' Staff are being told that if they want to continue in their jobs, they have to sign the new inferior contracts, on poorer pay and conditions. Union members were recently balloted on whether to accept or reject the new offer. Members voted to reject this, which further escalated the industrial dispute and led to this weeks strike.

Dr. Wall, who was a founder of the Green Party Trade Union, said "There are a number of industrial disputes in the news at present, but I don't think we should forget the demand of Shelter workers for fair pay and conditions. Workers at Shelter originally took industrial action because they were told by the homeless charity managers that their wages must be cut. The Green Party of England and Wales supported the staff strikes then, and we support them now. It is very sad that a charity which tries to tackle social injustice is treating its workers in this manner, and we call on Shelter to reject pay cuts for its hard working staff."

This Shelter dispute is deeply disappointing from a charity that I have supported financially - but the dispute effectively arises out of the government policy of commissioning out of public services to the voluntary or "Third" sector. This was a policy pursued very consiously and vigorously by New Labour as a way of getting public services on the cheap. Voluntary sector organisations are now in competition with the private sector in a race to the bottom to provide the cheapest service. Management at many voluntary sector organisations have have chosen to cheapen their bids by reducing their workers' wages and conditions - this appears to be happening at Shelter. As one commentator wrote: "This government policy is forcing a situation in the voluntary sector of 'survival of those most prepared to slash workers' wages and conditions'."

Get GM rice out of the food chain

I have just asked the following two questions off Gloucestershire Trading Standards regarding GM products. Use the search engine on this blog to find previous correspondence on this matter.

Photo: Ruscombe valley

1. You will probably be aware that the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has finally declared that illegal and potentially dangerous GM rice found in the UK food chain eighteen months ago is "unsafe". They have now issued a food alert for local authorities to take action on the Bt63 rice from China. As you will know it is now up to local authorities to carry out food testing. I would welcome information about what action you are planning to carry out.

2. Again, as you know, it is illegal for caterers to use GM ingredients unless they are clearly labelled on their menus or displayed on a prominent notice. I wrote to you about 18 months ago on this issue, in particular GM cooking oils, and received assurances that you would look into this. However I understand from Friends of the Earth that still many cafes, restaurants, takeaways and pubs are routinely using GM oil in their cooking without letting their customers know. In fact, they might not even know they are doing it themselves. I would welcome information on what steps you are taking to ensure that caterers stick to the rules, and make them aware of their legal responsibilities.

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward

Glos Trading Standards can be emailed: tradstds@gloucestershire.gov.uk

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

World food crisis: take action

I just got this message below on a Transition Stroud email list. It is full of passion about the need for action - and certainly the message further below from Avaaz should make us all think - a world food crisis is hitting - do please follow the link and sign the petition.

Grangemouth has shown us we are also enormously vulnerable to oil prices and availability - see my letter to local press copied on this blog on Saturday 26th April and the comment re £10 a gallon on my blog on 5th April and the 13th Feb about why the price of peak oil is famine - indeed it is an issue I've returned to regularly - and an issue our Government has completely failed to grasp. Let us hope all this tragedy will awake them...

as you can see from the message below, everything we have talked about is becoming more and more our daily reality. a world wide food crisis is happening out there and is imminent everywhere else. still there are so many folk that brush it off thinking anything they could do would make little difference anyway, that one more shopper in the local supermarket is but a drop in the ocean, that eating out of season veg is normal, that a quick trip to the video store in the car won't hurt much, that government will someday do something... it is this apathy that stifles movements for change. we need to take action and to believe that every act builds the collective act. here in Stroud we have huge potential to create a sustainable local economy. there are so many ideas and projects being developed but we must support them in every way to make them a reality. this is really a plea (and a rant) to get out there whenever you can to join all the positive efforts and events, workshops and talks, and most importantly to bring these messages back into your own home where you can make the most difference... eat seasonal veg (join a CSA)!! (your kids will learn to love it and your bellies and wallets will feel better for it!); dig up part of your lawn; change where your electricity comes from; switch off things you don't need; share your bath water or take a shower!; make your own conserves, preserves and booze; buy local; walk and cycle more; join the car club; rediscover charity shops and swap stuff with friends; carry cloth shopping bags and refuse plastic; get an allotment... and please get yourselves out there to any proactive event you have time for!! xx

Avaaz write: "We're plunging headlong into a world food crisis. Rocketing prices are squeezing billions and triggering food riots from Bangladesh to South Africa. Aid agencies say 100 million more people are at risk of starvation right now. In Sierra Leone alone the price of a bag of rice has doubled, becoming unaffordable for 90% of citizens. Fears of inflation stalk the whole world, and the worst could be yet to come. We need to act now - before it's too late. As Ban Ki-Moon holds a high-level UN meeting on the crisis, we're launching an urgent campaign with African foreign minister and human rights campaigner Zainab Bangura. Click below to see Zainab's video message and add your name to the food crisis petition - we need to raise 200,000 signatures by the end of this week to deliver a massive global outcry to leaders at the UN, G8 and EU. The prices of staple foods like wheat, corn and rice have almost doubled, and the crisis is slipping out of control - so we're calling for immediate action on emergency food aid, speculation and biofuels policy, while asking forthcoming summits to tackle deeper problems of investment and trade."

Please sign:
www.avaaz.org/en/world_food_crisis/9.php

The impacts of climate change are clearly going to make the situation worse. Today Green MEP Jean Lambert was speaking at a major event investigating the impact of climate change on mass migration will bring together key environment and population experts tomorrow to discuss how climate change will affect migration patterns and how policy-makers should respond. The conference organised by the IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research) was at The British Librar and included Secretary of State for the Environment, Hilary Benn, the Minister for Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Kim Howells, and Lord Nicholas Stern, former Chief Economist and Senior Vice President of the World Bank.

As the conference I am sure showed, one of the greatest impacts of climate change that we are going to see in the near future will be widespread human displacement as changing weather patterns cause crops to fail and create food and water shortages. What is unknown is when and where these human crises will unfold and how best to cope with the resulting migration. There are already an estimated 25 million environmental refugees in the world, but they are not recognised as such by the international community and thus have no legal protection. Closing borders is not a long-term solution. Countries that have the greatest responsibility for creating climate change also have a responsibility to deal with the casualties.

See useful analysis here and Paul Rogers good article on the subject here:
www.opendemocracy.net/article/conflicts/global_security/the_worlds_food_problem

Monday, April 28, 2008

No 46 bus partially saved

Gloucestershire County Council has offered to partly reintroduce the number 46 evening bus service between Stroud and Cheltenham. The BBC phoned today about this news as I had been one of those to highlight this issue locally. I gave them a local residents number who had complained to me about the cuts - hopefully her pre-recorded interview will be on the morning news tomorrow.

The no 46 service, which travels from Nailsworth through Stroud and Painswick and onto Cheltenham will be reinstated on Friday and Saturday nights on a five-month trial basis. This service may be extended if passenger use improves significantly - but equally if demand does not increase we are told the service will stop.

This is seen as a victory of common sense by many, but I have to still doubt the wisdom of cutting the evening services - this will impact on the whole service - I would far rather see priorities of the Council shift to put emphasis on public transport - and where is the proper promotion of such services - as I said to the press (and in my blog on 27th March): "Our countryside is increasingly becoming a ghetto for the rich, completely inaccessible for those without cars. Good rural buses need to be an alternative for people with cars as well as a lifeline for those without."

See also blogs on this bus service on 31st March plus 2nd and 21st April - of course what we really need is public ownership of our buses - see here.

2,200 monthly visits to this blog

Regular blog readers will notice I am using a different template/layout. This is at a request from several people to be able to see recent posts more easily. This is great but I messed up on transferring the blog and lost the links. I will be adding them back again but it will take time as need to add one at a time.

Cartoon: ' Local Scribbler Russ' does one of me

Meanwhile a recent check on this blogs statistics shows over 2,200 unique visits to this blog per month - about 600 are people returning to the site and some 200 plus return almost weekly to view site.

300 visitors directly came to the site, 560 plus came directly from other sites - the rest from search engines. Nearly 1,200 of the monthly visitors are from the UK while 550 come from the States - many of the latter no doubt picked up from sources like the Politics Blog listing where I come in at position 126 in an international listing of nearly 900 blogs. The rest of the statistics makes interesting reading - 72 countries - with 3o from Australia, 80 from Spain, 10 from Indonesia, 3 from Russia. I wonder what they pick up on to look at this blog?

Glos bee colony numbers drop by 30% in one year

A year and two days ago on this blog I raised the issue of "AIDS for the bee industry" (by clicking on the 'bees' label below you will see all the other entries on this topic). In conversations with a local beekeeper there was concern re dying colonies but not the level of concern that I hear in the article below...I find the figures this article quotes are shocking - but I am also concerned that varroa may not be the only cause - see Pat Thomas' article in The Ecologist:
www.theecologist.org/archive_detail.asp?content_id=1170

Photo: Randwick woods last year - bluebells are just as glorious now

As previous blogs note there is a lack of urgency over this issue - we need more research and discussion of this topic. Indeed please consider signing this petition here:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/BeeResearch/
"If honey bees become extinct, human society will follow in four years." Albert Einstein
Article in The Citizen today:

Beekeepers across Gloucestershire are demanding urgent action to save their dying colonies. Last year's wet summer, this year's mild winter and a thriving killer bug means bee numbers are down to the lowest levels for years. As honey makers across the county see their profits dwindle, many are calling for more government investment, particularly to tackle the plague of varroa mite which is tearing through hives.

The number of colonies across Gloucestershire has been declining steadily for more than a decade, but last year dropped by 25 to 30 per cent. There are 275 registered beekeepers in Gloucestershire. In 1994 there were about 5,000 colonies in the county. Last year the figure was between 1,500 to 2,000.

The main cause is the spread of the varroa which feeds on adult bees and larvae and spreads viruses. Defra spends £200,000 a year on bee research, which includes investigating ways to deal with parasites.

Cheltenham beekeeper Michael Hunt said this needed to increase dramatically or the entire British honey industry could be wiped out in 15 years. He has 35 hives in and around the town, down five on last year, and supplies Gloucestershire honey to health shops and garden centres.

"We're fighting a losing battle," he said. "We're having to spend more time and more money to keep our bees healthy and try to combat varroa but really the Government needs to invest much more money. The problem used to be keeping the number of bee colonies down, now it's a struggle to keep the ones you've got. Honey is a luxury food. It's not like petrol where you can just put up prices to cover costs. I used to make £3,000 profit a year. Last year I made £1,500."

Varroa came to England in 1992 and is rapidly spreading. Fears are now rife that global warming might drive other exotic parasites to Britain, such as the small hive beetle, parasitic brood mites and the Asian hornet. The British Bee Keepers Association wants a government research programme of £7.7 million, £2 million of which would fund a project on control of varroa.

A Defra spokesperson said: "There are currently significant pressures on financing across all areas of the Department's work. The fact that funding for bee health has been maintained at the same level over a number of years is a positive indication of the importance government attaches to this area of work."

St George's Day should be a national holiday?

St George's Day should be a national holiday in England? Here are some words from human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell. He said: "We should celebrate St George as a symbol of freedom, dissent and multiculturalism. It is time we ditched the myths surrounding St George and celebrated the reality of his courageous life. He doesn't belong to the far right. He represents multiculturalism and rebellion against tyranny. St George wasn't white or English. He was a rebel from the Middle East. His father was Turkish and his mother probably Palestinian. He rebelled against the Roman Emperor Diocletian and was executed for opposing the persecution of Christians by the Romans. An early defender human rights, he is a heroic symbol of protest and the right to freedom of belief and expression. St George's parentage embodies multiculturalism and his life expresses the values of English liberalism and dissent."

Picture: Saint George oil painting by Raphael


Great stuff if we really can get that message across - last night I saw the DVD of the award winning 2006 film "This is England" - a look back at the early eighties of British working-class life through the eyes of young Shaun and his new gang, and dealing with the bitterness of outside influences such as racism and xenophobia, of mass unemployment and the fall out of the Falkland's War - Thatcher's Britain - great acting but heavy stuff - dealing with the appeal of gangs and the National Front - indeed in the past this historical linking of the 'English flag' with racism has made me reluctant to show support for a St George's Day holiday - it is shocking that the BNP are standing locally in Nailsworth in this weeks elections - see my comment yesterday here - but the good news is that times are changing - Lancaster University's Susan Condor commenting on the recent upsurge in flying of the flag at sports events said it "is reappropriating it and stripping it of political associations."

It is clear however problems still persist - in Bradford a St George's Day march was canceled on police advice - I'm not sure that was the best way to handle the event. Then again in many areas I wonder how many people are really interested in celebrating? There is a campaign website to make St George's day a holiday - see here - a holiday is hardly something people will vote against! See also the comment in Guardian here from Ian Williams. In contrast to that view English Heritage have launched a campaign to dispel apathy - see here - and a guide on how to celebrate the day....

Aerial survey to include Randwick area

I came across 'The Cotswold Lion' - a free newspaper from the Cotswolds AONB (a Cotswold Lion is a sheep!) - it gives some useful info about the area and various projects - it also had an update on the lidar project (see previous blog on this - click here and scroll down)...

Photo: earlier photo comparing lidar and google on computer in Randwick

....this is lidar is a very exciting project and I was hoping action could be taken to include Randwick - things looked pretty hopeless when we learnt about the sums of money needed to raise in a short time - however I heard last week that the project has gone ahead and includes parts of our locality - anyhow read on to learn more...

Unveiling Mysteries of ancient landscape

- taken from 'The Cotswold Lion' newspaper (free at various points incl Stroud library).

A LIGHT plane with some sophisticated survey equipment on board has taken to the sky to unearth ancient secrets that lie beneath the beech woods covering a large swathe of the Cotswolds AONB. Airborne laser technology has been harnessed to produce images that, with pinpoint accuracy, will ‘draw’ a map of the archaeological features on the surface of the Cotswold Escarpment over an area stretching from Leckhampton Hill in the north to Stroud in the south.

The Cranham LiDAR Survey is being undertaken in order to broaden the understanding and knowledge of historical features previously hidden beneath the dense canopy of trees that covers much of the Escarpment. LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) uses a scanning radar range finder that bypasses obstructions like foliage to measure the height of the ground surface and other features in large areas of landscape with a resolution and accuracy that provides highly detailed and accurate models of the land surface.

The aerial survey, carried out by specialists Precision Terrain Surveys, was originally commissioned by Cranham Local History Society to chart the Escarpment in their area. However, the scope of the project widened beyond anyone’s expectation as other groups like Crickley Hill Archaeological Trust, Leckhampton Local History Society, Cotteswold Naturalists Field Club and Randwick Historical Society all wanted to become involved because they wanted to know more about their own part of the Escarpment. It did not take long for the total size of the survey to extend to 100 square kilometres. The area was flown over in 400 metre strips in a grid pattern.

The Cotswolds Conservation Board is meeting 70 per cent of the cost of the survey, expected to be around £30,000, while other groups and organisations have pledged to fund the balance. The resulting digital ‘map’ will be put on disc to be made available free of charge to anyone who needs the information, as long as it is not for commercial purposes. Cranham Local History Society have already found previously undiscovered archaeological features as a result of a trial LiDAR flight in 2005. This revealed, for instance, that the fort at Cooper’s Hill was much larger than originally thought.

Also the preliminary survey showed clearly the triangular earthworks of the Witts Enclosure – built in that shape to minimise the number of vulnerable corners. Now it is hoped to discover more about the Roman forts and Iron Age hill settlements scattered along the Escarpment. It is also hoped to find remains of conflicts as far apart as the Cromwellian Civil War and the Second World War, during which anti-aircraft gun emplacements were positioned in the area.

Will Handley, treasurer of Cranham Local History Society, said: “There has been a tremendous amount of interest from organisations in other areas, and their pledges of support enabled us to extend the survey area.

“Local schools have expressed great interest in using the survey to teach young people about local history and local geography.”

Information gathered by the survey will help other ongoing projects, such as the management of the Cooper’s Hill Local Nature Reserve by Gloucestershire County Council and the restoration of the Painswick Rococo Garden. Martin Whitaker, chairman of Cranham Local History Society, said: “The last public meeting about the survey was very well attended by about 80 people of all ages, some as young as six.

“That shows how this project has captured the imagination of so many people.”

The Society has created an informative website about the LiDAR survey. Log on to
www.cranhamsurvey.org.uk

Download The Cotswold Lion here. And also more info on LiDAR here.

Woodruffs Organic Cafe: 10th birthday

I've made all sorts of positive comments in the past about this wonderful cafe - their food is amazing - and that comes from the brother of the guy who set up the countries leading vegetarian restaurant, Cafe Maitreya.

Woodruffs was the countries first fully organic restaurant - open during the day and occasionally for evening meals - on Saturday they celebrated 10 years of being open - sadly I was too exhausted after Nailstock to get to their party - but sent a card and strongly recommend folk to catch one of their evening openings as you will not be disappointed. Congrats to Holly and her team - brilliant job!

Photo: Green party secondhand books on sale at Woodruffs here.

See the restaurant near the top of the High Street - 24 High Street - Telephone: 01453 759195

Bread oven making

I covered the wonderful Nailstock in a blog entry on Saturday - a great event indeed - but didn't mention there much of the other exhibitions going on in the town...all sorts of crafts and more...one I wanted to highlight was the fun going on in the Somerfield carpark....

Making a bread oven - Sam Mukumba (see photos) talked onlookers through the process - and some helped mash the clay, straw and sand then mould the oven over wet sand...love it all...have wanted to build one for a long while - maybe later this year!

Also found this website on building ovens:
www.traditionaloven.com/

Photo: more crafts in Somerfield carpark on Saturday

The Bread Oven was part of the Ruskin Mill Exhibition 'Transition' which runs for three weeks - and offers a great opportunity to dig deep in your closets for fragments and stories to contribute towards a growing collective creation through the familar lenses of clothing (Thu1st-Sat3rd May), shelter (Thu8th-Sat10th May) & food (Sun11th-Tue13th May) - there is also a wheel of ideas to be added to throughout the next three weeks so they ask folk to bring any leaflets or pictures you might have that spread the word about positive and proactive projects...

Ash Lane mast planning application has gone in

I've just spoken with Planning, Orange, Parish Council chair and others re this mast application which has now gone in - see my letter to the Randwick Runner below.

Cartoon: from "local scribbler, Russ"

Proposed Radio Base Station, Land Adjacent Ash Lane, Stroud: S.08/0862/FUL


Orange have now put in a planning application for a 15 metre high mast at land adjacent to Ash Lane. By the time the Runner goes to press, the District Council should have put full details on their website. I have requested that this planning application is withdrawn from the delegated schedule as this will allow more scrutiny of this planning application.

To make comments or objections on the application, quote the reference number and get them to the District Council within four weeks.

It is my view that the mast could have a serious negative visual impact on our beautiful countryside from some key angles. This, is also, in my view the strongest grounds for objecting to the mast. Several residents have already contacted me to express strong opposition to this location.

The need for a mast in the area has apparently arisen due to Stroud College not re-siting an Orange mast from their old building to their new one. However many people report reasonable Orange coverage despite the lack of a mast. Apart from questioning the need I am also concerned that Orange have not done enough to find alternative sites. I am told by Orange's agent that the mast within Standish Wood already has an Orange connection and that the Prince of Wales mast is not suitable. Is there an alternative site that will not impact on people or our countryside?

A health risk?

Planning regulations make it very difficult to challenge masts on health risks: indeed I have been told by some planners that it is not worthwhile raising health concerns. The Government's Stewart Report sets out that the maximum beam of intensity should not fall on any part of a school premises. However, as I've discussed on my blog, the Government guidelines fudge this by leaving loop holes that allow masts to be built on schools. In my view if there is concern about schools then we should also be concerned about homes.

We should at the very least see the precautionary principle applied - the Precautionary principle states that in the event of doubt, risk should be avoided or minimised. In a telephone call with Orange's agent I have sought more information regarding the beam intensity of this proposed mast. My initial information would indicate that the beam is away from people's homes, but I await confirmation.

Other concerns raised

Additional traffic on Ash Lane: Orange note that they make only six maintenance visits a year.

Access to the mast: the proposed access track area could become a place for cars to park at night listening to loud music like in other local areas.

Visual impact: the Parish Council noted that they would wish Orange to use one of the masts designed to resemble a tree. They have done this in other areas but only when insisted upon by Planning.

New nuclear power station for Gloucestershire

Words nearly failed me when I read the news this morning that proposals are going forward for a new nuke at Oldbury - yes I know it is at 'high risk of flooding' and makes no sense on many, many counts - see my hurried news release this morning here.

Green party endorsed by The Observer

The Observer came out yesterday endorsing the Green party's campaign for Siân Berry to become Mayor: Siân 1, Ken 2 recommendation is the Greens first ever national newspaper endorsement. Following Siân's own recommendation, they are also asking their readers to give their second vote to Ken Livingstone.

Photo: Sian launching policies in free insulation that have been tried and tested in Kirklees

This historic endorsement is the first from a national newspaper for any Green candidate, and comes after a Siân met with the Observer political staff last week for a 90-minute grilling on her policies. The paper says: "A respectable score for Ms Berry, an intelligent and articulate advocate of her cause, would send a clear signal to whoever wins the mayoralty that London cares about environmental policy. It would also deprive the British National Party of fourth place, a small but notable step towards the mainstream."

Read the full leader article in The Observer's online edition.

The Observer also praises the work of the Green members of the London Assembly, saying: "The party has already used its toehold on the London Assembly to wring green concessions worth millions of pounds out of the mayoral budget."

Polls show Green numbers on the Assembly could be set to double from two to four - putting Siân in City Hall. To do that, you have to vote GREEN on the PEACH ballot paper. The peach paper is for the proportional representation Londonwide constituency, and it's marked "Election of the London Assembly - London Member".

Bread Street slippage and temporary road closures

Bread Street slippage: The road leading out of Bread Street towards Stroud has noticeably slipped especially near one of the cottages. Locals may recall a little further up the road collapsed into a garden some years ago. There are clearly concerns that the same could occur - this time the road could also slip direct into the house. In my conversations with Highways they tell me they are monitoring the slip with pins in the road and an engineer is due to look at it - may have even done so already. Let us hope it does not entail closing the road like they did with Lower Street in Ruscombe for some many, many months...clearly this is different in that a home is also threatened by the slippage.

Photo: Not a great photo of the slippage - other angles would show it better!

Temporary road closures:
- Randwick Main Road - 27th to 30th May - at last essential drainage repairs
Call John Roberts at Glos Highways if you need further info: 08000 514514.
- Roads between The Ryelands and The Vine Tree and The Lane and Ocker Hill will be closed for the Wap on 10th May Noon to 3pm. Queries re this to 759116 (daytime only)
- Bread Street - closing for party hopefully 1pm to 11 pm on 28th June.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Greenshop opening

The Greenshop in Bisley started out 20 years ago from a garage forecourt and has now become a multi-million pound business. Yesterday saw it's official opening of it's new £700,000 green HQ - congrats and more to them all working there.

Bisley garage owner Roger Budgeon said in the press: "It reflects the way we believe we must all interact with our environment. It's designed to be as close to carbon neutral as possible, which businesses across the county need to work towards. We all have to be less energy-demanding."

The Greenshop group employs 55 people and has a turnover of £3.75 million. It commissioned the new HQ from eco-architects Architype in order to bring together the five branches of its business - Greenshop, Auro Paints, Consolar UK, Greenshop Solar and Rainharvesting Systems Ltd. A major part of each branch's work is assisting local businesses to 'green' their own HQs, with eco-paints, solar panels and water systems. It features log and solar thermal heating, photovoltaic solar panels on the roof producing electricity, wonderful green and brown roofs, with plants and miniature 'bio-systems' for wildlife, a rainwater harvesting system, natural insulation, natural paints and finishes, natural lighting and ventilation, oak, bamboo and recycled tyre carpet and flooring.

Outside, the Greenshop has landscaped grounds featuring natural ponds and flow-forms. The building needs no air conditioning in summer and is heated by sustainable wood and solar power and super insulated. It also needs almost no artificial lighting, so it is much less reliant on non-renewable energy. The wood-burning boiler will cost £200 a year to run and solar panels on the roof will provide electricity.

More info and photos at: www.greenshopgroup.co.uk

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Nailstock: amazing free festival

Nailstock is a community-run free music festival, celebrating local bands and musicians. This year I went for most of the afternoon - what a great atmosphere.


Huge thanks to all the organisers for an amazing event - the procession was great and loved the bands, dancing and cafes and more...

....and the events continue all week with the Nailsworth Festival.

See more photos of Transition Stroud Folk hard at work recycling and giving out info to festival goers here.

For more details see:
http://www.nailstock.com/

Transition Stroud Library

Yesterday I met with Library staff and Transition folk to help set up a special 'Transition' section in Stroud library - I've been collecting donated books for the last few months and it looks like we will be able to launch the project in June. See more here.

Do let me know if you have any possible books - and especially DVDs - we are still collecting.

To me this is great - as I've noted before to library bosses at County - I think rather than being increasingly commercial libraries should be promoting more of Council policies - like tackling climate change....thanks to all donations so far.

Oil strike: Government failure on energy security

It is increasingly looking like we will go from oil strike to oil shock to oil famine before Green solutions are adopted - and they must - see below my letter to the press last night - and also below an answer to a query on a new oil find.

Photo: Bakken oil field (see discussion below)

Before all that I must mention the fascinating and at times heated Coffee House Discussion at Star Anise last night on biofuels - Colin Hygate from Green Fuels (Europes largest biodiesel equipment supplier) in Stonehouse, Dave Cockcroft, a Green party Town councillor who has been researching energy and John Meadley all talked. Plus there was input from Biofuelwatch and many others - there seemed to be general agreement about the damage that palm oil is doing - and indeed a majority of the people there also were totally against the corn being used in the states - and against the Government's recent targets - See my recent comment on that here. However the role biofuels played should not be underestimated - a third of the world uses biofuels of one sort or another (incl wood etc) - and new technologies are looking at algae or crops that could only be grown in certain arid conditions.

But could we feed ourselves and drive cars (see my recent posts on this by clicking on label below)? Dave Cockcroft had calculated if all Stroud District was put down to rapeseed it would still only provide 25% of our current use - and there is clearly no way rapeseed could grow across the whole District - and of course that would leave nothing for food. Biofuels have a place - only a small place - extreme caution is needed before considering their use (except of course waste oils like chip fat etc). Anyhow to the letter....

The strike at the Grangemouth oil refinery, with it's possible month long fuel shortage in Scotland and the north of England, highlights our Governments inability to ensure energy provision. In 2006, Green MEPs failed to get sensible answers from Government ministries, when they asked what steps were being taken to prepare for a decrease in national fuel supplies. It seems clear now that the Government have no serious plans.

This week, oil reached its highest price ever. Some oil traders are betting on it doubling by the end of the year. Even if this doesn't occur, many recognise that oil production is probably nearing its peak. Some consider it has peaked. If so, we are in for a rough ride. If producers start keeping their fast-dwindling resources for their own economies then the forecast oil shock will become an energy famine.

The need to tackle our energy use has never been greater. Yet it is still only Greens that have the initiatives to protect us from the consequences of a sudden decrease in fuel supplies. Policies like free insulation and sustainable energy would mean that our homes would be increasingly off-grid and not dependent on fossil fuel supply. While locally sourced food production would ensure food security for communities is not dependent on long haul transport and the whims of the fuel market.

We must surely wake up to this issue and act. We can only do this together.

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward

And what of the new oil find?

The US imported about 14 million barrels of Oil per day in 2007 , which means US consumers sent about $340 Billion Dollars over seas building palaces in Dubai and propping up unfriendly regimes around the World....I read with some interest that: "America is sitting on top of a super massive 200 billion barrel Oil Field that could potentially make America Energy Independent and until now has largely gone unnoticed. Thanks to new technology the Bakken Formation in North Dakota could boost America’s Oil reserves by an incredible 10 times, giving western economies the trump card against OPEC’s short squeeze on oil supply and making Iranian and Venezuelan threats of disrupted supply irrelevant."

Some gave the figures even higher and talked of a 25% increase in oil for the states...

A 25-fold increase? That's huge – or so it sounds. But then you start comparing numbers. Assuming all 4.3 billion barrels could be retrieved, it would represent nine months of oil consumption in the United States. Here is one report: "...let's consider the nature of the Bakken oil. It doesn't sit in big underground pools where you can just pop in a metal straw and suck it out. This oil is trapped in layers of shale – a sedimentary rock – up to 3,000 metres deep. Getting at it is expensive and difficult, and certainly damaging to the surrounding landscape and environment. You thought the oil sands were messy and energy-intensive? Bakken is tough oil. You have to drill down and then horizontally through rock, which has to be fractured to release the oil that is tucked away in small pores....Now, with oil at $110 (U.S.) a barrel, some of those Bakken reserves just might make it into our vehicles one day. What's perplexing, however, is the oil industry's determination to go after this expensive, dirty stuff when other, cleaner alternatives do exist."

Hermann Scheer, president of the World Council for Renewable Energy commented: "The reason is very simple. The oil companies have tied all of their investments to transportation, refineries and distribution. That means they're prisoners of their own energy supply chain."

So all in all while it maybe nice oil, but it is still difficult to extract and no serious delay to any peak oil...

Woodcraft in Randwick Woods

I've mentioned a fair few times Stroud District Woodcraft Folk - I am currently one of the leaders of the Willow Elfin group - and on Thursday I led a group of 14 children through Randwick woods - the bluebells and wood anenome are amazing - and it was a glorious evening,

We had the quiz you see in the photo - the answers have been filled in although not easy to read or view!! It was part of identifying some flowers and trees and more for a badge - indeed we have a fun programme of events this term that include den-making, learning about animal tracks, swimming, raft-making, a sausage sizzle on Selsey common and bugs, flowers and ice cream on Rodborough Common.

There are possibly some spaces for children as several have moved up but we do need some more adult help - CRB checked etc. Do get in touch if interested.

Porsche: an emblem of all our environmental crimes?

Porsche has founded its business on the promotion and supply of highly polluting vehicles. Along with the rest of the German car industry they are desperately resisting the strong measures needed to tackle the car industry’s contribution to climate change. According to FoE figures, 44 of the 46 models in Porsche's range would face the £25 charge. Its most polluting model, the Cayenne Turbo S (see photo), emits 378g of CO2 per kilometre, about four times as much as the most fuel efficient vehicles on the market.

Here is my letter to their Customer Service department prompted by a letter by local campaigner Matt Archibald:

I was horrified to read that you are mounting a legal challenge to the decision to raise the London congestion charge from £8 to £25 for the highest-polluting vehicles.

Drivers of more environmentally damaging vehicles should pay proportionately more for the privelege of owning and driving such vehicles, especially within an urban environment. Why should Londoners face unnecessary levels of pollution and greenhouse gases from a tiny minority? No-one is allowed to throw their rubbish in the street and Porsche should not be allowed to impose gas-guzzling, polluting cars on Londoners who do not want them.


Have you not read the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that spells out in no uncertain terms that we need to massively cut our emissions? Even Nicholas Stern said last week: "We badly underestimated the degree of damages and the risks of climate change. All of the links in the chain are on average worse than we thought a couple of years ago." Our Government and even Ken Livingstone (who is better than most) are failing dismally to understand the enormity of what the scientists are saying. We need much greater moves than a pitiful £25 charge if we are to make a future for ourselves and future generations.


I urge you to read those reports: already we see the impacts of our CO2 emissions are impacting on the world's poor. All the forecasts indicate this will get much worse and impact severely on our own economy.

The congestion charge is one of the few measures to actually help reduce congestion. It is no wonder that climate activists are starting to target your showrooms. Instead of spending time on trying to reduce the charge, it would be more appropriate for Porsche to put its effort into making a new generation of much less polluting vehicles. If not Porsche will become forever seen as a dinosaur of the car industry: as one commentator put it "an emblem of all our environmental crimes".

I look forward to hearing your views.
Cllr. Philip Booth, Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward,

Others can write to: customer.assistance@porsche.co.uk

Friday, April 25, 2008

Obama and Clinton condemn Brown over human rights deportations

I'll come to Obama and Clinton's condemnation of Gordon Brown, but first I want to express outrage at the European Commission's decision to scale back anti-discrimination. They have indicated that discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, age and race or belief will no longer be covered and that they will now only focus only on disability.

Photo: Gloucestershire Pride (previously known as 'Rainbow Day') will be on Saturday 9th August this year with march, bands, stalls and more.

Green MEP Jean Lambert, who has been working with the Commission and other MEPs to develop a wide anti-discrimination directive says the Commission is concerned that such a policy would not be supported by all member states. Jean said: "Age and LGBT campaigners are sorely disappointed by the lack of leadership that the UK has taken, instead having chosen to develop its own legislation outside of the European process. This now leaves UK citizens open to discrimination across Europe and little hope of a horizontal directive coming back to the table in the short-term. I will continue to demand that this situation is reviewed with the intention of developing a directive covering all types of discrimination as soon as possible."

Meanwhile Gordon Brown has been condemned by Democrats - the Hillary Clinton's campaign team has condemned him for the UK governments policy to deport LGBT people to countries where they face persecution. This is an issue I have raised several times in the local press and wider, so I am delighted Clinton and Obama have also picked up on it (although we wont discuss here why, if I had to choose in the Democrats, I'd be going for Obama).

Malcolm Lazin, head of American gay rights group, Equality Forum, has urged the prospective presidential candidates to write letters to Gordon Brown to urge him to change his stance: "Equality Forum calls on Senators Clinton, McCain and Obama to send letters to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown opposing the deportation gay and lesbian Iranians in the UK to Iran. The Kazemi deportation is an opportunity for the presidential candidates to affirm their administration’s commitment to a policy opposing human rights deportations."

Hillary Clinton's campaign national security director said that it was tracking the case of Mehdi Kazemi, a 19-year-old gay man living in Britain who faces execution if returned to Iran. See some of the Green party actions on the Kazemi case here. At present the deportation order for Mr. Kazemi has been deferred and is now "under review."

Obama's campaign team have also spoken out - they said: "The United States and countries around the world have both a legal and a moral obligation to protect victims of persecution based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Under an Obama administration, the United States will lead by setting a strong example, which includes making clear that asylum for persecuted people is a bedrock principle of American and international law. Moreover, Obama will exert diplomatic pressure and employ other foreign policy tools to encourage other nations to address human rights abuses and atrocities committed against LGBT men and women."

The British government needs this wake up call and others - they seem more inclined to believe
Iran than human rights groups on the issue of how gay people are treated in that country. In March Lord West of Spithead, Home Office minister in the Lords, said: "We are not aware of any individual who has been executed in Iran in recent years solely on the grounds of homosexuality, and we do not consider that there is systematic persecution of gay men in Iran."

Yet in 2005 Iran sparked international outrage when it publicly executed two teenage boys. Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni were hanged because according to the regime they were rapists, however gay campaigners insist the boys were killed under Sharia law for the crime of homosexuality.

Stern, Bush and why the number 350 needs to be stamped into every mind

After a look at Stern and Bush we come to why 350 is the number we all need to know about...

Photos and action postcard: from 350.org: see more below

Nicholas Stern at last has come out and said what Greens were thinking at the time - ie climate change is worse than he thought. Nicholas Stern is the British economist known for a major report in October 2006 in which he declared that combating climate change would cost less than ignoring it. Even though at the time he noted grave concerns, he now admits he was wrong about how bad the problem is.

He said last week: "We badly underestimated the degree of damages and the risks of climate change. All of the links in the chain are on average worse than we thought a couple of years ago." He went onto say that thawing permafrost is releasing methane, oceans are acidifying faster than expected, and carbon sinks are becoming less effective. He urges nations to come up with a stringent global climate treaty taking food production into account, and reiterated that the world should aim to produce zero-carbon electricity by 2050, saying: "This is about buying down risk. Starting now, that means it requires at least 1 percent of world GDP. That is small relative to a planetary catastrophe."

Meanwhile President George W. Bush took his unambitious views and goals on climate and stuck them into one mediocre speech last week - he called for U.S. emissions to "slow over the next decade, stop by 2025, and begin to reverse thereafter," an aim far short of what other developed countries are suggesting and what experts think is needed.

If Bush had any hopes at all of convincing other countries that he's working to attack climate change, they were dissuaded the day after at the meeting of major economies in Paris, where Germany said the speech was a step backward, South Africa declared the Bush administration "isolated," and an unnamed European official told Reuters, "This is disappointing. But Bush will be leaving office soon. What he says doesn't matter so much any more."

But on a much brighter note as a sign of things changing for the better - the great author, activist, and the mastermind behind the Step It Up marches, Bill McKibben kicks off 350.org - a new international grassroots climate campaign.
The aim is to stamp 350 into the minds of everyone on Earth, and McKibben wants you to help. The number 350 is the parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere that we must aim for if we want to keep the planet relatively safe and sane, according to climate scientist James Hansen and others.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Lib Dem confusion over airport plans

It seems we have Lib Dem councillors supporting and indeed pushing plans to expand the airport, we have a Lib Dem MP sort of on the fence and now at last a Lib Dem candidate against expansion. Read Cheltenham Green party's response to this here - the letter also calls into question the absurd York Aviation report commissioned by Tewkesbury Borough Council. This is a supposedly independent report yet as noted on my previous Staverton blog entry York Aviation are about promoting airport businesses not looking at how the site could be used or any environmental considerations. You can also see a report about Lib Dems supporting airport growth in many other airports around the country (scroll to bottom of link here).

Below I enclose Airport campaigner, Kevin Lister's initial look at the report which he sent to York Aviation. It easily could be expanded as the report is shocking in it's lack of real analysis of the longterm economics and environmental considerations. Anyhow here is what Kevin wrote:

I have taken a quick read through your report which was commissioned by Tewkesbury Borough Council. Given the evident bias of your report to the aviation industry and the complete omission from your analysis of the climate change impacts from the development, can you confirm that the council has actually paid for this work. My comments follow below against extracts in bold italic from your report which I trust illustrate the ill-considered and ill-informed position of your report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 1.1“York Aviation LLP has been commissioned by Tewkesbury Borough Council to undertake a technical appraisal of four planning applications submitted to the Local Authority by Gloucestershire Airport.”


How does Tewkesbury Council expect to receive an unbiased report from an aviation consultant? As Cheltenham and Gloucester Council have already commissioned reports analysing the airport proposals, why did Tewkesbury not refer to these rather than wasting further council tax payer’s money.

Section 1.2 “A view as to whether there is a genuine need”

The report does not define what a genuine need is. Instead, the report takes the default position that a genuine need is based around compliance with CAA regulations. However, many of the flights operating from the airport are for weekend breaks in the Chanel Islands and Isle of Man, as well as private jets being used by the ultra wealth of this area for skiing holidays in the continent. None of this can be described as a genuine need.
Section 2.3 “These scheduled services are currently operated by 19-seater turbo-prop aircraft1, though this type of operation forms only a small element of the Airport s business.”

It is the intention of the airport and Manx to expand schedule service operations and the introduction of ILS will provide an important facility to enable them to do this. The initial business plan that was submitted with the planning applications talked of building a new terminal building as part of the long term strategy for the airport. Put simply, there is no way the airport will be able to make a return on its investment with out expanding service operations.

Section 2.4 “In 2007, the Airport handled 80,855 movements, which represents a decrease over 2006, in which the Airport handled around 88,000 movements. Much of this reduction has come from fewer training and private flights. The increasing costs of fuel have made these sectors of the market increasingly expensive.”

It is welcomed to see an aviation report finally stating the obvious and recognising that increasing fuel prices are reducing the demand for flights. However the report has not considered that the fuel prices are continuing their rise and this will lead to further falls in demand and thereby undermine the business case for the airports plans. Many medium to small airlines in the US, similar to the types of companies that will use these facilities, have now filed for bankruptcy.

Section 2.8 “In terms of possible commercial scheduled services, the facility would be limited to smaller regional aircraft, such as those 19-seaters already seen, but also some larger aircraft such asDHC Dash-8 aircraft (36-78 seats dependent upon variable), ATR-42 aircraft (50 seats) and a small variety of regional jets (Avro RJ70/85 and Embraer ERJ170/190) seating from around 70 to 90 passengers.”

Use of planes in this size range is seen by the aviation industry as a major growth sector, see here for example. This section will thus become a major emitter of greenhouse gases, despite the higher fuel efficiency of the planes.
Section 2.9 “Overall this is a small facility and unlikely to be capable of handling more than 50 passengers comfortably at any one time”

A crude estimate would suggest that given a 15 minute departure frequency, the 50 passenger capacity limit of the airport’s terminal building would be sufficient. Thus the facilities could probably support in the order of 4 planes per hour at a maximum which is a signifiicant increase on todays operations.Thus, there is clearly significant capacity within the terminal building to accommodate more passengers and planes. Furthermore, the airport has already suggested that if growth materialises they will seek to extend the terminal capacity. This can also be done quickly and cheaply in the short term with additional portacabins. Thus to say that airport will not expand operations due to limitations on terminal capacity is false.

Section 3.20 “As with the restrictions on runway 27, this can lead to some operators having to reduce the weight of their aircraft on departure, either through offloading passengers or fuel. Again this, in our view, appears to be a legitimate problem for the Airport.”

This is only an issue if the airport decides to operate and schedule larger planes from the runway. If the airports operations were restricted to only small general aviation, this would not be a problem.
Section 3.26 “The first is the provision of traffic controls on Bamfurlong Lane. These controls will be used to prevent vehicles of a height greater than 2m from travelling past the runway end when an aircraft is de parting or landing at the eastern end of runway 09/27.”

The proposed works will significantly increase the risk of an incident on Bamfurlong lane. As such, it is hard to understand how the airport’s proposals can be called safety related.
Section 4.7 “The LDA(Landing Distance Available) is also highlighted as being restrictive to other existing operators, although they are continuing to use the facility in the short term in the hope that the LDA will be increased further.”

This statement sums up the strategy of the airport and its operators. They are prepared to push operational and safety envelops to the limit so they can then say that they needfurther facilities to continue safe operations. The only reason why this debate is happening is because airliners want to increase the number of passengers using the airport.
Environmental section 5 – general comment

It is outrageous that this section of the report has not considered the climate change impact from the airport when this is the main focus of many objectors. This was a principle objection that the Gloucester Scrutiny committee made against the airports plans. If cuts in emissions are going to be made and if the aviation is subsequently included in the climate change bill the only possible result is that aviation activities will be significantly reduced. If aviation is not included in climate change bill in a way that reduced emissions, the only way to curtain its further damage to the environement is to curtail airport expansion.

In fact the reports statement in section 5.14 “Typically, much of the environmental impact of Airports is associated with surface access rather than aircraft operations,” is simply wrong and misleading.

It is vitally that this repport recongnises the IPCC conclusion that we need to make cuts in the order of 80% in our CO2 emissions to reduce the risk of runaway climate change.

Section 6.9 “There is also a risk that any annual movement level imposed today might in the fullness of time restrict important business generating movements in the future from operating once the annual movement rate reaches any imposed limit.”

It is a predictable response from an aviation consultancy to oppose any operating restrictions that will prevent the maximisation of profit. It again makes a mockery of the airport’s posit ion that they are not planning to expand and that the investment is simply targeted at improving safety.

Section 7.5 “Future airport operations will then likely remain similar in type to those of today with environmental benefits attained, over time, from the evolution of new technology as new and improved engines and air frames are introduced by operators.”

It seems to have escaped the reasoning of the authors of this report that despite a continual improvement in engine and aerodynamic efficiency of planes over the past 40 years, the total emissions have continued to rise as the expansion in the aviation industry totally outweighs any improvements made. Furthermore there is a plateau beyond which further improvements become more and more difficult. Basic science and mathematics shows that are planes are currently almost as efficient as they ever will be.

The fundemental position that we need to grapple with is that what we are doing today is far from sustainable, so it makes no sense to suggest that in the fullness of time it is acceptable for emissions to stay the same as today.

Wap, Shop, Archway, Tricorn and more

Here's another handful of local news:

Stan to be Mayor: Stan Giles will take over from Sheila Bliss as Mayor of Randwick - not an official Council Mayor but one voted on by local folk who register with the Wap. He will step down after 12 years as chair of the Wap committee to take over the post. Good luck to him!

Photo: Great photo of Stan in Stroud Life

Whiteshill Village Shop: Whiteshill Primary School children have raised £166.00 towards the £3,000 needed to replace the burnt toilet - they produced a great picture in the playground made from pennies. The Playgroup had earlier raised £400.00 from a welly walk and local Shop volunteer Damian is hoping to encourage support from local builders to help with the rebuilding of the loo.

Photo: View of Vine Tree, Randwick from Laggers last night

Bread Street Street party: Last night more residents met in the Vine Tree to make further plans - we have at least one band sorted and a road closure has been submitted. More coming soon.

Archway revamp: A further £1.5 million is going to Archway School for a new accommodation unit for the school's Learning Support Department and Inclusion Centre, further new teaching spaces and increased music, office and admin - this all comes on top of the much needed £5 million first phase which included a new technology block, new student entrance area and biomass boiler.

Tricorn House: Stroud district councillors voted unanimously to approve a move to wrest the building from its owners - they would then sell it on to wind power market leader Dale Vince of Ecotricity. About time too - as regular blog readers will know this is something I asked for some years ago - the building has been empty for 10 years. However I don't expect the fight is over - Wellfair Property Investment Holdings Ltd say SDC's attempt to force it to sell for £1.3 million is not enough - and a fence has gone up around the former DHSS building in Cainscross Road. But as Councillor John Marjoram (Green, Trinity) said at the meeting: "People have put in offers for this building and every time the price goes up. To my mind this is the only route we can follow, if we are not bullied by the person who has put the fence round. It's a prime site." Dale Vince said to the press: "We'd like to build something special here. It would probably involve knocking down the old building but we haven't written off yet using what's here. What we would like to end up with is something special, a zero carbon building that's somewhere great for our people to work and something that looks beautiful as well."

Whiteshill Plant Sale: 17th May at the Village Shop 9am to 1pm.

Wap stalls wanted: Book your stall now for Saturday 10th May - call Steve on 752478.

Planning Appeal in Randwick

On Tuesday the Planning Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government made their decision on the proposals for a house at Glenfield, Ash Lane, Townsend, Randwick. The Inspector in Bristol dismissed the appeal on Tuesday. Their full report is available but basically they agreed with Stroud District Council's decision - and confirmed my objections noted in my letter (enclosed below).

Photo: Ash Lane - See discussion over the plans for the bank on this blog 16th December 2007 and how this site was saved by quick action of residents.

I cannot go into all the issues here, but my main objections were to works that Highways wanted. I think the land might support another house although I would wish to see more sensitive designs and a smaller home. I am delighted that this appeal has been dismissed as it will preserve the rural nature of Randwick and also sets clear guidance to those wishing to develop in the future.

The Inspector noted: "I consider the main issue to be the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area." He then went on to outline reasons:

Reasons
4. The appeal relates to the site of an existing residential property situated towards the periphery of the built-up area of Randwick. I saw on my visit that this part of the settlement has a strong semi-rural character, being less densely developed than the central area, such that the dwellings tend to be arranged informally around characteristically narrow streets.
5. It seems to me that these qualities help to create a distinctive and most attractive local character. The site is also within the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), which should be afforded the highest level of protection in relation to landscape and natural beauty, and is adjacent to the Randwick Conservation Area.
6. In broad terms, I concur with the Council’s assessment that the site is of sufficient size to accommodate an additional dwelling, without leading to a Appeal Decision APP/C1625/A/08/20647632 cramped or unduly urban form of development. Moreover, the moderate scale and tradition design and form of the proposed dwelling would harmonise with the local vernacular.
7. However, I am concerned about the extent of the highway works that are proposed to accommodate the requirements of the highway authority, in terms of visibility, etc. These include the realignment of the existing boundary wall and substantial regrading of the earth bank fronting the main road, adjacent to the junction with Ash Lane. I am not concerned about the works to realign the boundary wall, because it would not be difficult to rebuild the wall much as it was, behind a new grass verge. I am satisfied that these works could be carried out without fundamentally changing the rural character of the lane.
8. However, the works to the bank are substantial. A large part of the bank would be removed and regraded to provide the requisite visibility splay. I am concerned that these works would remove a large part of a local landscape feature and reduce the characteristic sense of enclosure, which is a feature of the local roads. I am also concerned about the use of a gabion wall to retain the bank. This would fundamentally alter the character and appearance of the bank, from a natural-looking traditional landscape feature, to something altogether more urban and artificial in appearance.
9. In my opinion, the effect of these works would be to erode the semi-rural character of the road. Particularly as only limited details have been provided about the works to the bank, the treatment of the retaining wall and any associated landscaping, I do not consider that the appellants have demonstrated that this adverse effect could be adequately ameliorated by a scheme of soft landscape works. That being so, my concern could not be overcome by means of a condition, requiring the submission of further details and/or a landscaping scheme.
10. This leads me to conclude that the proposed development, by reason of the works to the bank, would harm the character and appearance of the area. To the extent that the development would harm the semi-rural character of this part of the settlement, I am of the opinion that the character and appearance of the adjacent conservation area, based on the traditional street pattern and building forms, would not be preserved. Furthermore, I consider that the scheme would be detrimental to the form and setting of the settlement in the surrounding AONB, a fine pastoral landscape of gently rolling hills and copse woodland.
11. For the reasons given above, I therefore find the proposal to be contrary to Policies BE5, NE8 and NE13 of the adopted Stroud District Local Plan, which seek, amongst other things, to preserve the natural beauty of the landscape of the AONB and to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of conservation areas, including their setting, with reference to such matters as design and landscaping. I do not consider that this objection is outweighed by the general thrust of national policy, in terms of the need to make full and effective use of previously developed land, because national policy also seeks to create high quality residential environments and to protect designated areas, such as the AONB, for their special quality.

Appeal Decision APP/C1625/A/08/20647633
12. In other respects, I consider the siting and orientation of the development in relation to neighbouring properties to be such that no significant harm would be caused to the living conditions of local residents. Neither do I consider that the development would have a significant effect on traffic conditions on local roads. However, the lack of harm on these points is not sufficient to overcome my concern on the main issue, which is significant and over-riding. Accordingly, the appeal fails.

My objection to this application

S.07/0870/ Land at Glenfield, Townsend, Randwick
Appeal Start Date: 4th February 2008

I would like to add to my original objection to this development on grounds of highway safety and visual impact. I agree that the bank re-grading is contrary to policies BE5, NE13 and NE8 of the adopted Local Plan (2005). I also consider that it contravenes policy GE5.

I would also like to note the very strong opposition to this move from all the local residence I have spoken to. Indeed when there was a threat to the bank being re-graded by a developer who mistakenly thought he had permission residents turned out to protect it from diggers for a whole day.

Re GE5: The proposed changes to the boundary walls will, I consider, lead to a potentially dangerous increase in traffic speeds. It is well established that when cars have good visibility they increase their speeds. It is my considered opinion that by cutting back the bank this will lead to faster speeds and more dangers at the corner where Ash Lane meets the road.

At the moment the reduced visibility of the existing road encourages drivers to slow down on this stretch. The visibility splays will tend to lead to faster traffic speeds at a crucial point where the footpath ends. The changes as outlined are likely to improve safety for any emerging traffic from the proposed property but this will I consider be at the expense of other road users. This is a very busy part of the road which continues with no pavement and is used by many pedestrians particularly young children and parents walking to local schools and the church.

If there are concerns from Highways I consider that other measures including a 20 mph might be a more useful way of slowing traffic and increasing safety on that stretch of the road. I am disappointed that Highways have not sought advice from the community in their considerations of how best to address this issue.

Re: BE5, NE13 and NE8: The changes to the bank will have a significant negative effect on the local environment. The gabion is particularly bad but any cutting away of the bank would also be seriously detrimental to how this area looks. This is in the AONB and adjacent to the Conservation Area: it is also the 'Gateway' road leading into the village. It is my view that currently the bank forms a comfortable lie to the land and cutting into it would alter that.

The appellants note that the bank is untidy: it is true that it is not looking as good as in the past due to the removal of several trees last year that were allegedly making the bank unstable. This view about the bank being unstable is strongly disputed by some residents but even with the trees removed the bank is in my view an attractive natural feature.

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward,

Tesco libel action condemned

The National Union of Journalists
The NUJ is calling on folk to write to the Chief Executive of Tesco to condemn a $33m libel action against two Thai journalists and The Guardian. Such actions appear to be designed to silence critics of Tesco’s business policies and are a potential threat to freedom of expression. There is a legitimate public interest in investigating business practices and if corporations like Tesco believes such investigations reach the wrong conclusions then there is ample opportunity to make a case publicly. However by seeking to bankrupt individuals in such a way, Tesco is clearly seeking to warn off others from such investigations and to pull a cloak over its activities.

In a democratic society robust investigation and questioning of the activities of politicians and corporations is vital if citizens are to be able to make informed choices. You can join me and many others in sending a standard letter from here to Tesco.

Recycling comes to Randwick Village Hall soon

Waste from village halls is classified under current regulations as household waste for which the Council can make a charge for its collection. Stroud District Council chose to make a charge approx 15 years ago. This matter was taken back to Council since then only to have the original decision supported. I suspect that the decision was made on the basis of the waste going to landfill.

Photo: Whiteshill Village Hall: Let us hope all halls will be seeking this recycling offer from SDC

The Randwick Village Hall Committee raised the issue of recycling with me - as Ruscombe Green blog readers will know, they are installing lots of green energy this year and would like to be "a complete green village hall". This is some of what they wrote: "We like to recycle as much waste as we can – bottles, plastic bottles, paper, cardboard – but I understand that SDC will not collect recycled items from us....In your position as District Councillor could I ask you to raise this issue with SDC."

They have already started tackling the issue in the hall - but want, like many, to do more. I have contacted several officers at the District Council - and as the waste in this case is being recycled they are happy to provide the Council's kerbside scheme or bring on-site recycling schemes - this is apparently a good will gesture - the Government have news of new policies due in 6 weeks although it seems unlikely that those policies will effect village halls - there will however still be a charge for waste being sent to landfill - but then that is an encouragement to recycle more.

Randwick will also look at a composting bin (available from SDC at a subsidised cost). Let us hope Randwick's move will encourage other local village halls to take action.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

BP goes back to its roots as a big, dirty oil major

Trans Alaska pipeline

Apparently security was tight for BP's 99th Annual General Meeting. Groups of protesters dressed as pirates harangued shareholders as they made their way into the sprawling Excel Conference Centre in London's Docklands. Inside BP faced a bewildering array of questions on everything from the group's decision to invest in Canada's tar sands to the plight of grizzly bears in the Northern US and the war in Iraq.

Photo: BPs Trans Alaska pipeline

The Times reported that: "But for all BP's high-flown talk of an ongoing commitment to moving Beyond Petroleum and an undeniable, though comparatively small-scale, commitment to renewable energy, it was very hard to avoid the sense that this is a company that is returning to its roots as a big, dirty oil major....This is depressing. Against a background of increasingly dire warnings about the rapid pace of climate change and the urgent need to reduce emissions, one of the world's biggest oil companies seems to be headed in completely the wrong direction. Instead of showing leadership, its solution appears to be an investment of $3bn in the Canadian oil sands. Forget serious investments in innovative, clean technology, BP seems to be talking about selling its renewables business off. In spite of everything, its approach seems to be less progressive than it was five years ago. Next year's AGM will be the company's 100th anniversary. By then, Peter Sutherland will have been replaced. Whoever his successor is, I hope he drives a fresh approach at BP. As Sutherland mentioned today, around $100bn is being invested globally every year into renewable energy but the UN believes four times that is required to have a significant impact on emissions. Companies like BP need to play a profoundly greater role in this process."

I couldn't resist leaving a comment on the website: "BP's slogan "Beyond Petroleum" (or was that "Beyond Preposterous"?) was never more than greenwash - indeed for the climate, natural gas is at best an incremental improvement over oil, and at worst a distraction from the real challenge of moving our societies away from fossil fuels - of course BP must play their part - we all have to cut emissions by 90% - this "Back to Petroleum" is economically, environmentally and morally wrong."

Monday, April 21, 2008

Africansuccess.org launched

African Success - Back to the homepage
I just wanted to give a plug to this new project: Africansuccess.org - it is a new web site that wants to get people to look at Africa in a different and positive way according to its creator Kadija Traoré Bush, who is of is Malian / Beninoise heritage. See www.africansuccess.org

Kadija Traoré Bush says: "We want to inspire the young, give hope and ambition to Africans and change the way the world sees Africa. Our aim is to create a website that will inspire a continent. If we can show the world where Africans are successful, we can change the way in which we are perceived. It is an interactive community website, which encourages the people who visit the website to add the names and biographies of people that they know and consider worthy of being included. The site is free access and it is free to add names, biographies and other historical information. We are still building the site, and we welcome contributions to add to our growing data base. We hope that people from all countries and all walks of life are going to put up the biographies of people they feel proud of, the role models for today's children and tomorrows leaders. Any African who has achieved something of merit has a place on the site. It is a community site, free to use, open to all. By promoting success we wish to encourage development, freedom of expression and democratic and human rights."

Good luck to them in correcting the media bias - too much of the news we get about Africa focuses on the negative like famine, war, HIV, corruption and dictatorship - the extraordinary success stories of people in Africa rarely make the news. Let us hope this site will changes things.

Local Transport Bill is going wrong

Local transport is in disarray - this blog has had many examples of poor local services like the Randwick bus stopping going through the village and most recently the threatened cuts to No 46 evening services. Here is a copy of my email to David Drew MP and copied to County Council Cabinet member and local party leaders:

The Local Transport Bill currently going through its parliamentary stages is sadly going very wrong. We all want much improved bus services and a bigger say for local authorities in the pattern/quality of bus services, especially as bus companies make huge profits from a heavily subsidised industry. We currently subsidise buses to the tune of about £1.5 billion pa.

As I am sure you are aware, the LGA is lobbying hard to get three crucial amendments incorporated into this bill. They are proposing three key areas where the bill must be improved and should be amended to achieve these objectives:

* The provision for operators to veto frequencies, timings and fares specified by councils within Quality Partnership Schemes should be removed.

* The decision about whether to implement a Quality Contract should be delegated to councils as elected representatives of their communities. An appointed approvals board with no democratic mandate should not be able to overturn these proposals.

* It should be for constituent councils alone to determine membership, roles and voting rights of members of the new Integrated Transport Authorities.


I hope very much that you will be able to give your support for these key changes,as without them, the Bill will be largely ineffectual in enabling councils to make use of Quality Partnership Schemes or Quality Contracts to improve bus services in their areas.
Cllr. Philip Booth

Sunday, April 20, 2008

GM will not feed the world - and stop GM Human Embryos

This post has a great open letter below to the Prime Minister copied here from Dr Brian John of GM Free Cymru. He shows why GM will not feed the world - I also recommend The Ecologist who have compiled 10 reasons why GM won't feed the world - but before we get to that I wanted to cover our last chance to shut the door on GM human beings.

British MPs will soon decide whether to allow scientists to start research on the ultimate step in human genetics: the creation of GM ‘designer’ human beings. In the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, now going through Parliament, the Government wants to allow the creation of GM human embryos. Most governments view the creation of GM babies in the same way as human cloning, and many have banned it – Britain would be the first to break this consensus. Because of this strong opposition to human genetic modification (HGM), the EU has banned any funding for the type of research Britain wants to allow, in its last two Framework research funding programmes.

There is no medical need for HGM, but once it is used for medical purposes, it will soon be used for cosmetic and 'enhancement' purposes, just as drugs and surgery are being used today. Is this a path to designing children to compete better where the rich will be able to purchase genetic advantages for their children over those of the rest of us? Human beings will become just another commodity, subject to market forces. I urge folk to read more and take actions at:
www.hgalert.org/Stop_GM_Embryos.html

OPEN LETTER from GM Free Cymru to Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP, Prime Minister, 10 Downing Street, London SW1A 2AA. 16th April 2008

Dear Prime Minister

GM CROPS WILL NOT FEED THE WORLD
We have been intrigued to see recent press coverage of your remarks relating to GM crops and foods. It is reported that you believe that GM crops have a considerable role to play in the alleviation of global food shortages in the future. Possibly you have succumbed to the deluge of recent pro-GM propaganda from the biotechnology multinationals and trade organizations (1). But we also fear that you have been given partisan, unscientific and out-dated information by your advisors, and we ask you urgently to reconsider your position on this.

GM lobbyists have been promising the miracles of GM technology for over 2 decades. These people are in possession of a solution in search of a problem. To date they have seriously failed to deliver on all of their promises relating to enhanced farm incomes, improved nutrition, increased yields, better pest control etc. Billions of euros have been invested across Europe, and millions of pounds in the UK, and still this technology is rejected by consumers, farmers, and policy makers all over the world. That is because there are NO consumer benefits: food made from GM crops is not cheaper, healthier, tastier or more attractive to look at, and neither does it extend shelf life (2). So why should anybody bother with it? Has anybody ever asked for GM food in preference to non-GM food?

It is true that the era of cheap food is over - on account of rising production and fuel costs, and the diversion of huge quantities of food crops into the biofuels market. However, this also shows that we should be moving away from oil and chemical based food production such as GM and embracing sustainable methods like organic and low- input farming - based on renewable energy use and carbon reduction strategies.

From a farming/food standpoint, international experience of GM cultivation has demonstrated the following:

1. Yields have not increased as promised (3). In fact, since the hybrids used for GM breeding programmes are not necessarily the highest-yielding varieties, GM crops often perform worse than their non-GM counterparts. Many studies from around the world have shown that apparent yield increases are short-lived and are based upon carefully selected comparisons with less effective non-GM lines.

2. Reliance on pesticides, herbicides, and fertilisers has increased - not decreased as promised (4). This is now confirmed by abundant studies, in spite of a constant stream of lies from the GM industry. The great majority of GM crops in the market place are designed for herbicide tolerance and for "chemical management" scenarios; it is through sales of complete seed / herbicide packages that the GM corporations make their money.

3. Weeds and pests have developed resistance to GM crops and pesticides resulting in 'superweeds' and 'superbugs' that need even larger amounts (and an increased range) of herbicides and pesticides for their control (5). The "toxic chemical farming" scenario is thus reinforced, with unforseen ecological consequences.
4. There have been problems with cross contamination and cross fertilisation between GM and non-GM crops. These have led to sometimes lengthy law suits and are a potentially explosive problem if more GM crops are planted (6). It is now recognized that the coexistence of non-GM and GM crops is impossible. GM canola, which has many wild relatives, is impossible to contain (7).

5. This technology is expensive and costly for farmers and makes them more dependent on the agribusiness giants in order to sustain a livelihood. They are "tied in" to corporate dependence by strict patent laws and "technology use agreements." They cannot save seed, and they cannot dispose of their harvests except through approved channels. Monsanto and other corporations employ quite brutal patent enforcement methods in all neighbourhoods where their GM crops are grown (8).

6. There are proven health risks associated with GM technology (9). There are many instances of domestic animal deaths following consumption of GM crops. Many independent studies have found damage to the internal organs of animals fed on GM components, and they demonstrate that the public is rightly very seriously concerned about GM food safety. Advisory bodies such as ACRE, FSA and EFSA still refuse to acknowledge the serious nature of these findings, and stand widely accused of gross negligence.

7. GM technology has not reduced levels of world hunger as promised. In fact, it has made poor farmers more indebted and less self sufficient, and consequently more vulnerable than ever before. Bankruptcies associated with BT cotton in India have caused many thousands of suicides (10).

8. Consumers throughout Europe have consistently voted against growing GM crops. There are now thousands of "GM Free regions" across Europe, and a growing GM resistance movement (11). Consumers are aware of the failure of the GM industry to deliver on its promises, and they know that GM crops and foods bring them no benefits whatsoever. For many years the UK government has been telling people that GM crops and foods are safe and essential; now it is time for the government to start listening instead.

9. It is seldom acknowledged that one part of the "global food control" strategy employed by the GM multinationals is the purchasing of seed companies and their catalogues and the phasing out of locally adapted varieties (12). This means that
biodiversity is irreparably damaged, and that vast swathes of countryside are planted with GM crop monocultures and with GM varieties that are ill-suited to local environmental conditions. This endangers food security and increases the risk of future famine (13).

10. The GM corporations and the trade associations seeking to extol the virtues of GM crops are adept at
spreading disinformation, practicing corrupt science in the approvals process, and vilifying scientists who seek to undertake independent research into GM crop safety and environmental impacts (14). They have shown over and again that they cannot be trusted, and yet governments unaccountably continue to accord them respect, and seek to "enable" their corporate global ambitions.

11. It is not just hydrocarbon prices that are rocketing upwards in the "peak oil" scenario. Petrochemical and feedstock prices are also rising inexorably, and Roundup (the weedkiller for which most GM crops are engineered) has doubled in price in the last twelve months (15).
GM farming will soon be seen as an expensive luxury, if not an absurd aberration, caught up in an inexorable inflationary spiral.

12. The GM industry, aided and abetted by the Government, has been partly responsible for a decline in scientific ethics and a disastrous decline in the public acceptance of science. Sir David King claims that Britain has "lost" inward investment worth £2-3 billion because of our failure to adopt GM technology (16); on the contrary, because of the GM industry's strategy of
"contamination by stealth" the UK taxpayer has already had to pay a substantial bill for the monitoring and remediation of contamination incidents involving failed and unauthorised GM varieties found in the food chain.

13. Those who own GM crop and agrochemical patents
refuse absolutely to accept liability for damage that might be caused to farming neighbours and members of the public, arising out of genetic trespass and contamination. Such risks are also uninsurable, as no insurance companies will provide cover (17). It must be concluded that in their view the risks of damage and litigation far outweigh any possible benefits that might come from GM crop plantings. In that context, it would be an act of sheer madness for any government to permit any commercial GM planting in the UK to go ahead.

In short, there is not the slightest chance that GM crops and foods will do anything to alleviate future problems associated with water shortages, famine and unrest and instability in the Developing Nations. If GM crops are forced on unwilling or reluctant recipients, there will be strongly negative consequences for public health, biodiversity and sustainable agriculture. Corporate feudalism will be extended, and there will be dramatic social, political and economic consequences for all of us.

We urge you to accept the points made in the recent IAASTD report and to endorse a pattern of agriculture which is sustainable, independent of high chemical and energy inputs, and responsive to local needs and aspirations. This means that GM technology will have to be consigned to the scrap heap, where it properly belongs, even if Monsanto and the other biotechnology corporations squeal about their global ambitions being thwarted and even if a few GM technologists are forced to do something more worthwhile with their time.

Yours sincerely, Dr Brian John, GM Free Cymru

NOTES

(1) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?
in_article_id=559965&in_page_id=1770
(2) www.foodethicscouncil.org/files/SUcostsandbenefit02-03.pdf
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3057431.stm
www.foe.co.uk/pubsinfo/briefings/html/20021107114407.html
http://eapi.admu.edu.ph/eapr006/mcdonagh.htm
(3) www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/
gm_crops_increase_pesticid_13022008.html
http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/gmlemmings.htm
http://www.soilassociation.org/Web/SA/saweb.nsf/848d689047cb466780256a6b00298980/3cacfd251aab6d318025742700407f02!OpenDocument
(4) http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GMCIPU.php
http://wwww.biotech-info.net/technicalpaper6.html
http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ EIB11/
(5) www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2005/aug/18/food.gm
www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/Monsantosuperweeds.htm
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4159/is_20030629/ai_n12741503
(6) www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jan/22/pollution.gmcrops
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews11-15.php
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805
(7) www.i-sis.org.uk/STGMfree.php
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/jul/18/gm.food1
http://www.gmfreecymru.org/documents.htm
(8) http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805
http://www.opendemocracy.net/ecology-foodwithoutfrontiers/article_1817.jsp
(9) www.seedsofdeception.com/
www.geneticroulette.com/
www.i-sis.org.uk/GM_Free_Europe.php
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/gmFailuresContinue.php
(10) http://www.cathnews.com/news/409/doc/15colgm3.doc
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6594
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/gmFailuresContinue.php
(11) http://genet.iskra.net/en/node
(12) http://www.seedalliance.org/index.php?page=SeminisMonsanto
http://www.combat-monsanto.org/spip.php?article64
(13) www.i-sis.org.uk/AGMW.php
www.twnside.org.sg/title/service78.htm
(14) http://www.gmfreecymru.org/news/Press_Notice14March2007.htm
http://www.gmfreecymru.org/pivotal_papers/company.htm
http://www.gmfreecymru.org/pivotal_papers/exposed.htm
http://www.gmfreecymru.org/pivotal_papers/syngenta.htm
(15) http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/mar/30/farmers-feeling-roundup-spike/
(16) Sir David's figure, widely reported in the media, has no foundation in fact, and it has not been backed up by his office in spite of frequent requests. In any case, it is dishonest to use such a figure in the absence of a proper cost-benefit analysis.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=496681&in_page_id=1770
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8750
(17) www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/liability_gm_crops.pdf
http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/CSMgmo.htm
http://www.rics.org.uk/csm/

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Tim Beaumont dies

Tim Beaumont
Tim Beaumont, Lord Beaumont of Whitley (above) died on 8th April. I only met him a couple of times - I remember a very pleasant conversation with him about his Bill to prohibit piped music and the showing of television programmes in the public areas of hospitals - and to require the wearing of headphones by persons listening to music in the public areas of hospitals - a move to curb noise pollution that I fully support.

Green Party Principal Speakers Caroline Lucas MEP and Derek Wall paid tribute to his services to British politics and to the Green Party, calling him a "pioneering spirit" in green politics. More here. Sadly the Greens now have no peers in the House of Lords despite Blair claiming it is representative of the country - mind you if you believe Cameron on Thursday you only need to 'vote blue, go green.' See here Green party response re the local points he was making - in terms of the wider issues like Tory support for more road building, airports, economic growth etc - need we really say more??

Anyhow see here one of Lord Beaumont's speeches re embodied carbon.

Ruth Royall, Stroud photos, turbine repairs, bird ID, Climate course, Full Council and more


I've had two days away - half term and family - so now catching up on emails - here are a few bits of random news, campaigns, courses and why I missed Full Council on Thursday (first time)...

Local singer in regional finals:
Ruth Royall (above) from Ebley will sing for a place in the final of the Live and Unsigned 2008 competition for the under 18s tomorrow. Ruth, at 17, has already gained local acclaim as lead singer with popular band Sub Justice and with her powerful solo performances. Good luck to her - I already have her new EP, "Music in words" that was launched this week. Ruth is a self taught pianist and guitarist and her influences include Tracy Chapman, Nina Simone and Joni Mitchell. For more information visit www.myspace.com/ruthroyall

Whiteshill photographer catches Stroud: Stroud Life report a whacky audio visual slide show that depicts a week in the life of Stroud. They write: "Images of cows on the common, Stroud at night, Stroud half marathon and new born babies at Stroud Maternity Hospital are delighting visitors to the Stroud Apollo Cinema. The photographic project ,which took place between October 19-28, 2007 captures everyday life in the Five Valleys. Seven local photographers contributed in an idea born out of the town's first photography festival, Photo Stroud, also held in October. The brief was to capture and record life in Stroud, illustrating what a beautiful, vibrant and diverse area it is. Project co-ordinator Simon Pizzey of Whiteshill, and a senior photographer for Gloucestershire Media said: "The festival was a great platform for photographers to share ideas and work together, and with the community. This project is a natural extension of that creative melting pot." Two slide shows, each about five minutes long, will be shown for several weeks at the start of the film programme. Details can be found at www.apollocinemas.co.uk . They can also been seen at www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/stroud The photographers who contributed were: Matt Bigwood, Charlie Bryan, Jeremy Clifton-Gould, Cyril Laffort, Steve Mansfield, Roger May, and Simon Pizzey."

Nailsworth Turbine repaired: as reported earlier on this blog (see blog on 20th March 2008) the turbine has been awaiting repairs. See latest on the Nailsworth Discussion board with excellent photos - one of which I've pinched below - see more here.Picture


Bird ID session in Cainscross: Stroud Valleys Project has a session looking at the most common garden birds and learning to identify them by their singing on Tuesday 29th April 10am-12noon. Donations rather than charge. Bring binoculars and wellies - call 07876 050878 or 764746 for further info.

Anti-Vitamin lobby: Headlines around the world this last week claim that vitamin supplements can cause more harm than good. But see here why BAD SCIENCE + BAD MEDIA (+ VESTED INTERESTS) = CONFUSED CONSUMERS. See here previous blogs re a meeting in Painswick Inn on 15th May and EU legislation.

Walmart meetings on video:
apparently back in the 70's, Walmart hired a small video company in Kansas to record all the company's meetings for internal archival purposes - then, in 2006 it fired the firm, Flagler - but without checking the deal's small print, or lack of it. Flager asked for the cheeky sum of $150,000,000 for Walmart to buy the rights back, Wal-mart countered with $500,000, Flager agreed to go to a mere $145,000,000. Flager are now responding by making the footage available to all-comers. The archive offers a rare inside view of the workings of a multinational ethic-lite corporate profit-machine - and SchNEWS notes that it "makes interesting watching for people with a grudge against the mega-supermarket chain. Lawyers for unions and private cases like sexual discrimination have been first in the queue, eager for the damning candid camerawork of things like a senior manager parading around in drag, others mocking women and top executives in full'n'frank discussions about corporate strategy and hiring practices."

Nuke news: I get an excellent daily digest of nuclear news and wanted to urge others interested to join up - it covers all aspects reported in the news - here's a couple of items from 17th to give a flavour:
- Make uranium burn stronger, hotter and longer in nuclear reactors, and you'll need less fuel, and there'll be less waste to deal with when it has been exhausted. For decades, nuclear operators have done just that, but emerging safety and waste-disposal issues are raising questions about this approach. The latest high-efficiency fuel may prove to be unstable in an emergency, and so poses a greater risk of leakage of radioactive material into the environment. What's more, the waste fuel is more radioactive, meaning it could prove even more difficult than existing waste to store in underground repositories. Full article as published in New Scientist on 09 April 2008 is now available free here.
- Fuel poverty and climate campaigners are struggling to understand how exactly the Government thinks its new found enthusiasm for nuclear power will help. See Blog by Pete Roche.
- a Green Goddess fire engine that may have played a role in battle to put out the 1957 Windscale fire has been found buried deep in a trench on the Sellafield site. See here.
- Investigations are continuing into the discovery of a home made bomb found at the home of a Sellafield contractor. See here
.

Climate Bill and a local course: Here is a campaign website and video about the Bill with No Balls - see it here - plus how to email your MP. Meanwhile I'm helping to promote on Tues 20th May, 6-9pm the excellent course 'Climate Change Condensed' at Stroud College - The Climate Outreach & Information Network (COIN) returns to Gloucestershire with their fantastic new all you need to know course on climate change. With a sell-out evening in Cheltenham in March, the event is now coming to Stroud, promising a carefully-concocted recipe of expert knowledge, group discussion and more. The course covers the basic science of climate change; extreme weather and home impacts; what the opinion polls tell us about public feeling on climate change; what the politicians and leading experts are saying; feelings which climate change brings up for us all and much more. No previous knowledge required! Contact:Rebecca, Vision 21, office@vision21.org.uk, 01242 224321. Cost:£12 individuals; £10 students / unwaged; £24 charities & local authorities; £49 business

Gloucestershire FoE Network Incinerator Campaign:
A meeting to decide on tactics for challenging the County plans for an incinerator in Gloucester will be on Sat 26th April 2:00pm – Venue TBC. If you would like to attend the meeting please contact Sophie on 01242 512881 / sophie@lesberries.co.uk

Unintended consequences of solar panels: this news is a bit like the the unintended consequences of a rapid expansion of bio-fuels....here we have a report of unintended consquences of production of silicon for PV panels...See article here. Clearly not all producers are the same and let us hope this is a one off.

Full Council meeting: As noted above I missed Full Council on Thursday - once again the meeting falls on half term - every other time I have come back early from seeing family in Devon but this time due to starting a new job next week and other work commitments I chose to miss Full Council - many councillors do miss Full Council and other meetings - especially during school holidays - but it is something I rarely if ever do - anyhow here are my apologies email below - I will be pushing the County to release school holiday dates earlier so that SDC can fix their timetable better.....indeed I've already had a reply that SDC Officers are looking into it....

I unfortunately am giving my apologies for the Full Council meeting on Thursday despite there being several issues like post offices that I feel very strongly about. The meeting is at half term and having missed the opportunity to visit family in the past due to Council meetings falling in the school holidays I have decided not to this time. I understand one of the problems with the Council's timetable is that the County Council do not decide term times soon enough to plan the timetable. If this is the case I would urge that this matter is taken up with the County. How best to do that?

As noted in previous emails, the recent census of councillors showed that the average age of a councillor is 58, with more than half over 60, and fewer than 8 per cent under 40. Just under 30 per cent are women, and 96 per cent are white. Stroud would appear to be in a similar situation. The Governments' White Paper, 'Strong and Prosperous Communities', has been looking into barriers and incentives to becoming a councillor - it is clear that having meetings during school holidays impacts on councillors with families with school children.

While clearly all meetings cannot be held in term time it would be great if more could be timetabled then. All the best - Philip



More utter nonsense on Glos Airport

"Gloucestershire Airport will become unviable if its runway project doesn't get the go-ahead, an independent study has said."

So reads the first line of Citizen/Echo report on the airport - Tewkesbury Borough have commissioned a report to look at the Airport's plans for expanding - the Western Daily Press yesterday asked me for comments - then I only had some of the conclusions of the report - the papers website and article carries some of my comments...they write: "Philip Booth, a green warrior and Stroud district councillor, is incensed by the report. "It is deeply disappointing," he said. "If we are going to tackle climate change we need to cut CO2 emissions by 90 per cent and if we allow more aircraft to use the site then this is not going to happen. Many responsible companies are planning to reduce their flights by doing things like video conferencing, so why are we supporting companies who are not being responsible. The other argument is that the economics just do not stack up. It's basically business as usual and it's wrong. This report does not seem to be a real analysis. Even the most fuel-efficient flights are only a few per cent better. The technology is years away."

Today I've read more of the report - and indeed I've also just read the strap line of the consultants' website... "Welcome to York Aviation. We are a specialist firm of air transport consultants providing consultancy services for the airports business." This is not, in my view, the "independent endorsement" of proposals that the Airport claims - indeed I am concerned by what appears to be large amounts of tax-payers monies being spent on consultants that help airports???? This is surely an abuse of taxpayers money? Clearly further investigation is needed but I have grave concerns.....

Indeed I wonder if this York Aviation has ever recommended no expansion?

I will be looking further at the report, but on this first glance it completely fails to understand environmental considerations - indeed there seem to be serious factual mistakes.

The Airport is in Tewkesbury Borough but owned by Cheltenham Borough and Gloucester City councils - Cheltenham Borough supports the measures but Gloucester City has deferred its decision. It mainly handles business and training flights plus an increasing number of scheduled services - last year there were 80,855 flights - yet when a 100,000 cap on flights was proposed they protested - yet they say the improvements to the airport are not about expansion - we read also about more scheduled flights and more larger planes....

Friday, April 18, 2008

Rising food prices: at last people are waking up

The Good Life
The Daily Telegraph and Mail have just ran articles on the Hampshire village that is weaning itself off supermarkets and leading the 'Good Life' by growing its own meat and vegetables.

Photo pinched from web: In The Good Life, Tom and Barbara (played by Richard Briers and Felicity Kendal) try to live a self-sufficient lifestyle by converting their garden into allotments

Below is what they wrote in the press - it sounds like it is a scheme not dissimilar to Stroud Community Agriculture and Slad Farm (both have vacancies at the moment). These are part of the solutions we need - rising food prices means that at last are food is being looked at - George Monbiot had a good comment piece in The Guardian on Tuesday...he wrote: "the price of rice has risen by three-quarters over the past year, that of wheat by 130%. There are food crises in 37 countries. One hundred million people, according to the World Bank, could be pushed into deeper poverty by the high prices."

"But I bet that you have missed the most telling statistic. At 2.1bn tonnes, the global grain harvest broke all records last year - it beat the previous year's by almost 5%. The crisis, in other words, has begun before world food supplies are hit by climate change. If hunger can strike now, what will happen if harvests decline? There is plenty of food. It is just not reaching human stomachs. Of the 2.13bn tonnes likely to be consumed this year, only 1.01bn, according to the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organisation, will feed people."

Monbiot goes on to raise concerns re rising biofuel production - he notes that Ruth Kelly promises to adjust their biofuel policies if needed. What new evidence does she require?!!!! Monbiot puts it succinctly: "In the midst of a global humanitarian crisis, we have just become legally obliged to use food as fuel. It is a crime against humanity, in which every driver in this country has been forced to participate."

"the grain required to fill the tank of a sports utility vehicle with ethanol ... could feed one person for a year"
The World Bank

He also goes on to make the point that while 100m tonnes of food will be diverted this year to feed cars, 760m tonnes will be snatched from the mouths of humans to feed animals - which could cover the global food deficit 14 times. If you care about hunger, eat less meat - but how much less? Monbiot explores more on this....

Anyhow here is a good analysis of food prices in Africa:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200804150015.html
And Lester Brown has a comment piece here:
http://www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2008/Update72.htm

Lester Brown writes: "The world has not experienced anything quite like this before. In the face of rising food prices and spreading hunger, the social order is beginning to break down in some countries. In several provinces in Thailand, for instance, rustlers steal rice by harvesting fields during the night. In response, Thai villagers with distant fields have taken to guarding ripe rice fields at night with loaded shotguns."

We need to restore food security quickly, otherwise social unrest and political instability will spread and we will see the number of failing states increase dramatically. Locally many in Stroud are already looking to the solutions - there is even talk of another local food project - just last week Caroline Lucas MEP was talking to 300 people at the Sub Rooms about the wider solutions that are needed - but are those politicians listening - certainly Ruth Kelly is not - but at least now it is starting to be talked about in a way it was not when I started this blog nearly 2 years ago.

From Daily Telegraph: "Those involved liken themselves to the TV characters Tom and Barbara Good, who give up work to live off the land in the BBC comedy, The Good Life. Volunteers and paid staff produce chickens, pigs, lambs, honey, garlic, onions, chillis and green vegetables on several sites in Martin, Hants, which has a population of 405. The villagers gather every Saturday morning to sell their produce. Of Martin's 164 families, 101 have signed up to be members of Future Farms as well, but everyone can get involved because we have to sell the goods, do accounts and market the food to the village. The nearest supermarket is six miles away in for an annual £2 fee, but anyone can buy the produce. The farm sells 45 types of vegetables, 100 chickens a week, 20 pigs a year, 32 lambs a year and is starting to sell beef. Nick Snelgar, 58, who came up with the idea in 2003, said the project was gradually "weaning" villagers off supermarkets. He said: "I like to think of it as a large allotment in which there are lots of Barbaras and Toms working away. There are also MargosFordingbridge. Of course people still have to go there for things like loo roll and deodorants and fruit you can't grow in Britain. So we aren't boycotting supermarkets entirely but we are gradually weaning people off them and as a result are reducing our carbon footprint by not using carrier bags and packaging." Mr Snelgar, a horticulturalist, said the VAT-registered co-operative had grown so much that last year it had a turnover of £27,000 - most of which was ploughed back into the scheme.

8 out of 10 for this blog!

Ruscombe Green at Blogged
I've just made 60th equal out of nearly 700 international blogs in the Society/environment section. They've given me an 8 out of 10 saying: "We evaluated your blog based on the following criteria: Frequency of Updates, Relevance of Content, Site Design, and Writing Style. After carefully reviewing each of these criteria, your site was given its 8.0 score."

You'll see the score in the right-hand column and a link so that you can review my rating if you think it needs to go up or down!

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

The Citizen newspaper and climate change

The Citizen seems intent on publishing letters that call into question climate change - see another one below - such letters do nothing to help.

Photo: Whiteshill viewed from Stroud

As I said in an earlier letter: "No one is pretending that the science around climate change is fully understood or that every piece of bad weather is a sign of climate change. Indeed it is also important to note that our vulnerability to flooding is going up mainly due to flood plain developments. However the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and it's analysis by 2,500 of the world's top climate scientists shows our role in causing global warming and that our weather is set to become more extreme. They paint a scary future if we don't act. Furthermore not one of the 928 climate change-related articles published in peer-reviewed journals in ten years has doubted the cause of global warming, yet more than half of the published articles in the popular press have done just that. We need responsible journalism. Climate change is deadly serious and critically urgent. We can tackle it together, but the longer we leave it the more devastating are the consequences."

That letter led to Ian Mean, the editor, congratulating me on the words - but it seems not to have reached other editors of the letters page - indeed something similar is going on over Staverton where it is clear beyond any doubt that the Airport is expanding and intent on more expansion yet they are still trying to pretend the work is about safety - The Citizen, who recently came out in an editorial against the Airport's plans still uses the Airport's language of safety in over half it's articles....

Is this about, as one Green writes..."News paper editors publish letters that they think will provoke a response..." He goes onto say "suppose we stopped responding to the deniers then maybe there would be less letters like this published. I'm not sure we need to debate this stuff in the local press any more - there's a whole slew of films coming out soon (11th Hour for example) that explain and expound the extent and urgency of the environmental crisis. Most of the mass media is now overwhelmingly supportive of the fact that climate change is a serious problem needing urgent attention."

I'm not convinced - too many people I talk to about climate change would love to hear the science is wrong - indeed even doubts can stop people from acting - I think we still need to tackle such letters - and welcome ones like the letter at the bottom of this blog entry, which sets out the science again. We cannot afford to let people be in any doubt that we need action.

CLIMATE CHANGE: IS IT ALL HYPE? 12 April 2008
Further to Mr Booth's letter of March 22 about climate change - can he or his scientific friends please inform us of the percentage change in the carbon dioxide component of the atmosphere. I have yet to see a scientific figure for any investigation completed during the last few years. Some people would remark 'proof not hot air'. This remark may also be repeated by the considerable majority of scientists who question the hype. I understand that people who live in Bodiam Avenue would blame local brook flooding not on climate change but on irresponsible planning consent and negligence. G.Williams, Tuffley

RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER COPIED TO ME:
In response to Mr G Williams' letter bemoaning the lack of evidence of increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere I can only conclude that he has been wilfull in his desire to avoid such evidence. I would refer him to the website of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change (www.ipcc.ch) where he can read as many papers on the subject as he wishes. Or perhaps try www.nasa.gov or www.metoffice.gov.uk. In summary though carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have increased from 280 parts per million at the onset of the industrial revolution to 380 parts per million now with a continuing rise of between 1 and 2 parts per million per year. This is already the highest concentration of carbon dioxide seen for 650,000 years according to a recently concluded five year study of Antarctic ice core samples, and is a man made increase according to the IPCC who have peer reviewed over 600 scientific papers published on the subject for their latest nobel prize winning report. To therefore say that the "considerable majority of scientists question the hype" is also simply not true. Richard Bossons, Stroud

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Oldbury, elections, village shop and street surgery


Here's a few bits and bobs of interest from last couple of days....

Photo: still from Green party election broadcast - see link below

Oldbury: Gazette rang for a comment re decommissioning Oldbury but I didn't manage to talk to journalist so made a quick statement here. It is outrageous that it looks like the NDA are U-turning on plans for nuke waste.

Whiteshill Village Shop: I joined the meeting yesterday and was able to share the presentation that Coaley Shop made to Scrutiny a wee while ago - Coaley are an inspiring example with 43 volunteers and £70,000 turn over - they had ideas for how to make a shop work but we need more volunteers for our Whiteshill shop - lots of ideas and ways to move forward - organic box schemes, a trading cooperative etc etc. Anyone interested??

Whiteshill Street surgery: Tuesday 22nd April 12.30 to 15.00 at Whiteshill Playing Field carpark - a chance to meet your local Police Community Support Officer Tanya White and Ricky Pellatt, a Crime Reduction Advisor. Call them on 0845 0901234.

Elections broadcast: The Green Party's visually stunning broadcast for the local elections airs tonight: ITV - 18.25 and BBC - 18.55 and online at www.votegreenparty.org.uk.The film, produced by Contaminant Media and animated by sought-after Shroom Studios, uses no actors; instead real people were invited to discuss their concerns, making a compelling argument for Green solutions for a more affordable and fairer society. Stills at http://www.flickr.com/photos/votegreen/

Elections: Talking of elections that is also something I have been doing - our statement for one of the papers is now here. Leafetting and canvassing have begun - my ward is not up this time for election but Greens are standing in all 17 seats that are up this time. Any offers of help to John Marjoram please on 750962.

Biofools day today

http://hydrogencommerce.com/images/palmoil.jpg
Tuesday 15th April has been dubbed 'Biofools Day'. Today is the first day of the Government’s Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) - the controversial policy that sets a mandatory target to ensure that 2.5% of fuel used in transport derives from agrofuels. The social and environmental impacts of mass agrofuels have not been taken into account and this will lead to more problems than it seeks to solve - see photo above of palm oil plantation created by destroying the rainforest.

I give a huge welcome to the actions by Biofuelwatch and Campaign Against Climate Change, that will take place around the country (including in Gloucestershire) to highlight the absurdity of this new mandatory target - and because it is in all fuels we can't even choose not to have it. See lots more in my news release from yesterday here:
http://www.glosgreenparty.org.uk/content/view/2081/2/

Monday, April 14, 2008

Watch this: you'll never buy Round-Up or support GM

"The World according to Monsanto" was listed as film of the week by the Organic Consumers Association - Monsanto has forced PCBs, Agent Orange, biotech crops and rBGH on the world and has more control over global politics, laws and the future of food and water than most people realize. Watch this investigative video that analyzes the inner workings, history and scandalous secrets of one of the world's most powerful corporations.

Watch: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_11386.cfm

Meanwhile in the news I read that a private security company organized and managed by former Secret Service officers spied on environmental organizations like Greenpeace, the Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy and GE Food Alert, amongst a number of others, pilfering documents from trash bins, attempting to plant undercover operatives within groups, casing offices, collecting phone records of activists, and penetrating confidential meetings. Those listed among the firm's clients include PR firms representing biotech companies and major corporations, including Monsanto.
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8995

And talking GM....Order 81 was imposed on Iraq by the Americans after the US/UK invasion in order to favour patented seeds and multinational ag corporations. A recent article asks whether Iraq can rebuild its agricultural economy in the wake of Order 81.
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8987

Lastly Ann Clark, associate professor of plant agriculture at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, has written a telling response to a widely reported survey which suggested UK farmers wanted to grow GM crops. She writes, 'What I cannot fathom is how British academics can still be quoted as saying that GM crops allow farmers to grow "high-quality food profitably", in an 'environmentally sensitive way', and to attain "high yields while using less herbicide".' Clark points out that GM crops are engineered for herbicide tolerance and insect-killing, not for 'quality', and that 'objective evidence of profitability is equally sparse, particularly if one factors in the lemon effect of lost markets due to the global rejection of GM'. Regarding yield, Clark cites a recent USDA retrospective on GM in the US, which stated, 'Currently available GE crops do not increase the yield potential of a hybrid variety. In fact, yield may even decrease if the varieties used to carry the herbicide-tolerant or insect-resistant genes are not the highest yielding cultivars.'
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8972

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Glos economic strategy is business-as-usual

The provisional Gloucestershire Economic Strategy has been out for consultation, but unfortunately the County have not formally asked District councillors to contribute or those like ourselves who contributed to the initial consultation. I only learnt of the consultation late last week so have not been able to put together as comprehensive a document as I would have liked.

Photo: Glos Docks development: failures to address sustainability

Nevertheless you can see my comments here. Sadly the strategy is far too much business-as-usual and not the radical plan we need. My comments cover the inaccuracies of their forecasting, failures to recognise Peak Oil, canal employment not being researched, happiness and more including condemnation for their support for the Airport....talking of which a good letter below in the papers after one from a Parish Council supporting the airport after they had been given the tour there...

Madam - The chair and vice chair of Up Hatherley Parish Council should not be so hasty in backing the airport (Echo Letters, April 3), and they certainly do not speak for me, one of their constituents. They attended a briefing by the airport and believed it all - oh dear. The Up Hatherley councillors claim that the airport gives a substantial dividend to the two councils. This is nonsense - the airport's annual returns are pitiful, and in no way compensate for all its impacts. And the so called dividend is a piece of false accounting anyway - it takes no account of all the staff and councillor time devoted to the airport, and the additional fees paid to air-industry consultants. The airport has been desperately seeking support for its plans for two years now. Its proposals remain deeply divisive within Cheltenham borough, and now the plans have been rejected by Gloucester city the airport is trying to soften up parish councils. My parish councillors may wish to trot out the airport's propaganda, but they should not think the rest of us are falling for it. The airport should be judged by our daily experience not by a briefing from the spin-merchants. Alison Parfitt, Hatherley.

Government found unlawful over BAE corruption investigation: sign petition now


I am delighted with the news that Campaign Against Arms Trade and The Corner House have WON their Judicial Review! The High Court has ruled that the Government acted unlawfully when it curtailed a corruption investigation into BAE Systems' Al Yamamah arms deals with Saudi Arabia. Great news indeed - no one is entitled to interfere with the course of our justice - we have seen a gross failure of government - are we getting closer to the day when BAE doesn't call the shots??

The full text of the judgment, as well as the judges' summary and the CAAT press release is available on our website http://www.caat.org.uk

As a result of this judgment the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) will have to reconsider the decision to end the investigation. CAAT, Greens and many others are now calling on Gordon Brown to make a commitment that there will be NO FURTHER GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE.

Please sign the petition urging Gordon Brown to make a commitment that there will be no further government interference into the SFO's investigation into the Al Yamamah arms deals. The petition can be found at this link:
http://www.caat.org.uk/campaigns/controlBAE/petition/petition.php

Here is what Lord Justice Moses and Justice Sullivan said when they rejected the SFO's argument that it was powerless to resist the Saudi threats: "So bleak a picture of the impotence of the law invites at least dismay, if not outrage. Had such a threat been made by one who was subject to the criminal law of this country, he would risk being charged with an attempt to pervert the course of justice...(To give in so easily) merely encourages those with power, in a position of strategic and political importance, to repeat such threats, in the knowledge that the courts will not interfere with the decision of a prosecutor to surrender".

See The Guardian report here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/10/bae.armstrade
See previous blogs on this topic by clicking here and then scrolling down.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Caroline Lucas in Stroud

A good evening at the Sub Rooms - some 300 people on a Friday night is not bad - but then the topic was food - well "The Future of Food" to be exact - and I know that is of interest to many in this area.

Photos: snaps from last night of Caroline Lucas, Nick Weir, some of the audience and Martin Whiteside

See brief write-up here - I hope to add more - it was good to meet Caroline briefly again - and the evening inspired me - we must seek local solutions re food - already I have been talking to a local farmer who is very interested (see previous blogs) - we also have some excellent local examples where such projects are working - and a couple of folk from Whiteshill after the meeting said it is time we had a local food project - it is!

Anyhow I've been writing all morning and need a break and coffee - and indeed a bit of digging in the garden....

Parish Council meetings

Thursday saw a couple of parish meetings - one with the chair of Randwick as I will miss next week's Parish meeting and we wanted to catch up on stuff - then it was on to Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish where they had a presentation from Leyhill Prison Officers about the services they could provide to Parishes re the environment - fixing walls, clearing areas etc.

Photo: View of Highfield, Whiteshill

Here's some bits and pieces re those meetings:

- Parish councillor vacancies - Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish will have a vacancy for the Parish Council as Cllr Rob Walker is stepping down and Cllr Mark Rees is stepping down from Randwick Parish. The posts will be advertised soon.

- Lower Street repairs are completed and good - how many years did they take????!

- Concerns have been raised re a section of Bread Street where the road seems to have moved a bit. I have already written to Highways expressing concerns and requesting an investigation as part of the road slipped some years ago into a garden - it would be worse this time as it could be someone's living room.

- the Parish gave support to cover the road closure costs of the Bread Street party; many reasons but also it could be an opportunity to support the relaunch of the Neighbourhood Watch scheme.

- no further news on Orange's proposal for a mast at Ash Lane (see earlier blogs)

- Stroud Valleys Project - I alerted Parishes to the funding crisis and I think both will write letters of support to SVP (see earlier blog on this). I have also now also had conversations with SVP staff and others to see if other emergency funding can be found from the Town or District Council - the latter being more hopeful in that they have money that could make a difference - but both would be good - we cannot let this charity fold.

- I am still chasing up that boundary wall at Westrip Lane Hawthorne Rise / Red House Farm - it is leaning evermore dangerously and needs attention (see earlier blogs on this).

- The County's response re the footpath that comes out opposite the Randwick Scout Hut (next to Cashes Green School) on Cashes Green Road is unsatisfactory. They seem to imply that a route down that slope cannot be found - the alternative is to block it off with Colditz style fencing and force peopel around the long way - this is a route well used and could be made safer - I think the Parish are planning to push this more (see earlier blogs on this).

- The Right-of-way near the junction between Redhouse Lane and Westrip Lane has produced some anonymous comments on the previous entries regarding this - indeed most comments on the blog are anonymous as it is quickest and easiest to leave a comment like that - anyhow this writer makes some very useful points and having now spoken to the Parish Council about those points, they would be interested in still looking at ways an improvement can be found - I'm wondering if the anonymous comment may be able to phone or email me as I think it could be useful in progressing this: philip.booth2(at)virgin.net or 755451.

Anyway that is enough for now - minutes of the Parish meetings will be out soon.

Bread Street street party plans

Some residents of Bread Street have been talking for a while about how it would be good to have a street party to get to know each other better. A few of us met informally on Wednesday night in the Vine Tree - we are going for it on Saturday 28th June 2008.

Photos: snow a week or so ago in Ruscombe valley

Of course all residents in Bread Street (about 100 of us) will be invited - indeed it is 'our' party and we are hoping that many will want to help in the preparations and get to know newcomers and old, in the street. I've scribbled together a letter that another Bread Street resident has turned into a proper looking letter with a picture of bread and he will deliver this weekend.

The letter will also have details of our first proper planning meeting - exciting stuff - getting to know neighbours has become more difficult over the years with television, computers and busy lives - yet feeling a part of ones community has been shown to have enormous benefits to well being and more. Here's a list of benefits I came across re street parties:
* supporting social cohesion between age groups and backgrounds
* reducing fear of neighbours
* reducing fear of crime and promoting watchful neighbours
* getting to know young people
* giving children a chance to play together in their street for a day
* a chance to talk about local issues

Building more community resilience is going to be increasingly important - the loss of water for 2 weeks in our area during the floods was one example - and where people knew each other they were able to support each other much better - hey but who needs all this to justify a street party - already the planning meetings and getting to know neighbours better is turning out to be great fun!

Anyhow I've applied for a road closure and that will go out for consultation - the fee is around £40/£50 and we already have funding agreed to pay for that. We are also discovering all sorts like bunting used in the former Lower Street, Ruscombe parties can be borrowed - but more of plans in future for now I would urge others to also think about a street party - it doesn't have to be big - indeed I remember as a child badgering my parents into organising one for the Jubilee celebrations - no one else was doing anything in our neighbourhood - my parents eventually relented in having a party in our house - I remember how great it was to meet neighbours in a different way - and afterwards how it felt more friendly in the street....

When I arrived in Bread Street we have been lucky enough to have a close neighbour, David Tapp, who put on parties for his friends, families and close neighbours - they were amazing parties which included everything from fire eaters and live music to bouncey castles and a chillout zone....anyhow he has left the country so "Tapp Fest" is no more - so while I am not sure we can compete this summer with fire eaters we will certainly be having some fun...

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Staverton Airport: disappointment that press still quoting Airport's lie about expansion

Last weeks more than 500 Cherry and Whites fans – and the Munster players – used the County’s Airport making it a record-breaking day at Staverton. Head of Operations, Darren Lewington is quoted saying; “It was a very busy weekend. We handled more passengers on Saturday than ever before in a single day. On Saturday evening, it looked very much like the chaos at Heathrow’s Terminal 5, as coach loads of fans crammed into our tiny terminal. Operationally, the ATR72 is about the largest aeroplane that the Airport can accommodate, but four at once left us very short of parking space. We had to extend the opening hours to allow the aircraft to depart after the match and the Munster team’s flight was the last to take off at 1020pm.”

This is yet another example that contradicts the Airports claims about expansion - it seems that almost every month they are announcing a new service - and that is before the runway gets approved. If as they are claim the runway extension is not about expansion why wont they accept a cap on flights at their current levels? Indeed they are not even happy with a 100,000 flight cap - and on top of that the planes are set to get bigger. If that isn't expansion then they have a strange definition!!

I have to say I am deeply disappointed that some journalists are still reporting the airport lie that this is about safety and nothing to do with expansion.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Don't forget Caroline Lucas talk on Friday

Caroline Lucas MEP, ethical politician of the year is at the Sub Rooms on Friday at 7.30 talking about the Future of Food - more info here - in relation to this I saw this chart from the US Organic Consumers Association - since 2001, the top five oil companies have increased their annual profits by an average of 500%!!

Heres more on food prices which are now reaching an all time high in the US, since the average grocery store item has traveled 1500-3500 miles: over the past year, alone, consumers have been forced to pay significantly more for staples like eggs (25 percent), milk (17 percent), cheese (15 percent), bread (12 percent), and rice (13 percent). This is partially due to increased costs of transportation and partially due to massive amounts of cropland being converted to biofuel production. As a result, consumers are paying more for their food and paying $15 billion in increased taxes per year for biofuel subsidies. No doubt many of these issues Caroline will discuss....

Airport campaigners meet in Stroud

Last night around 9 of us met in Stroud to discuss the Staverton Airport expansion - it was a mix of folk from a variety of different organisations - only 2 of us from Stroud area so others had very kindly joined us here instead of our usual meet in Cheltenham.

Advert: from Sian Berry's London Mayor campaign

We hadn't met for a while so we so spent time catching up then looking at next steps - questions to Scrutiny, our meeting with Gloucester City plus lots of other ideas that I will share here as they develop - it was a good meeting.

It did bring home that this is a very much a David and Goliath fight - although the airport is small they are well resourced and can afford to pick Parish councillors up to take them for a jolly around the airport, provide a pack and afford paid staff to meet councillors - we campaigners are all doing it in our free time.....anyhow talking about the jolly...here below is a response from Kevin Lister....anyway more on all of this soon...

Dear Councillor,

You may have read the recent “Gloucestershire Airport Information Pack” that the airport has put on its web site. I would like to take the opportunity of making some brief comments on this report, section by section, to correct some of the misconceptions that the airport is again peddling.

History section

The report’s opening chapter discusses the past history of the airport, with the clear implication that its heritage should be justification for expansion and continuation. However, this overlooks the fact that the world has now changed. The historical pictures it shows of DC-3s operating from the airport are from a time of great optimism when we thought that the world could only get better, that everything would always get bigger and faster, and no one had heard of climate change or peak oil. Unfortunately, it is now absolutely clear that this nirvana is a thing of the past, and we must now be far more responsible in the maintenance of our planet.

We should therefore not look at old pictures of an airport as justification for expansion, but as a warning of the dangers of the naïve and incomplete thinking. Heritage is heritage, and it is something that should be confined to the past and viewed in museums.

If we need any further reminding of the fragility of the aviation industry in the new business climate that we are entering, we only need to see the bankruptcy of Skybus in the US and the recent collapse in share prices of similar companies such as Ryan Air and Easy Jet. It is inevitable that other companies that operate planes suitable for Gloucestershire Airport such as Flybe will also run into similar problems in the near future.

The Airport today

In this section, the report says “Over 10,000 passengers have used the services since September.” These flights equates to approximately 5200 tonnes of CO2 per year. Given that an “average tree” is able to lock up only about 1.5 kg of CO2 per year, then approximately 3.5 million trees are needed to absorb the amount of CO2 produced by these flights. Nowhere in the airports business plan or in Manx’s web site do I see that they have plans to grow any trees, let alone 3.5 million trees. The airport’s claim elsewhere in the report that they keep the grass length to 6-8 inches to help absorb CO2 are quite ridiculous in the context of amount of CO2 emissions from the airport.

The report goes on to say that “Manx2 have demonstrated the clear demand” for services from airport. This implies a “predict and provide” approach, which has been completely discredited by every industry sector, other than aviation. Working on this premise results in more motorways and more congestion, more building less green space, and more airports and more environmental damage.

Given the total fuel consumption and the “predict and provide” approach that the airport is advocating, their argument that “Turboprops are far more environmentally friendly than larger jets operating from major airports,” is merely green wash. All that can really be said is that turbo props are less environmentally damaging than larger jets. The simple fact is that flying is not environmentally friendly and never can be. Furthermore, the argument that turbo props are environmentally friendly totally misses the point that we need to make cuts in our CO2 emissions of over 80% to avoid runaway climate change. It is immoral to allow and facilitate additional discretionary activities resulting in large CO2 emissions when the science is so clear and the consequences for our children are so overwhelming. (See the last IPCC report which illustrates the magnitude of the problem).

The Airport’s Economic Contribution

The airport again continues to overstate its benefit to the business community. It says, “30 companies based in the area regularly use Gloucestershire Airport for corporate aircraft or air-taxi services.” This is the most carbon intensive and unsustainable way of doing business possible. It is not in our long-term interest to encourage business to operate in the manner. Also, if these resources are available, it is not a surprise that business and businessmen who do not care about the environment choose to use them. It does not mean that they are vital to local business; it merely means that they are easy to use. The frivolous use of executive airplanes is demonstrated by aviation data showing that the amongst their most frequent destinations are the holiday resorts of the Mediterranean!

Just this week an email from the airport confirmed that during Gloucester rugby Heineken cup matches they were expecting 5 commercial charter and 4 private flights. The 5 commercial charter planes being ATR2, 70 seat turboprops. They are flights for people that cannot be bothered using more efficient means of transport. Clearly, none of these flights are critical for Gloucestershire’s businesses and provide little if any economic benefit to the region.

The future

This section discusses the recent Heathrow incident and says, “Runway End Safety Areas (RESA) issues have been brought to the top of the agenda again recently, following the Boeing 777 crash at Heathrow,” as justification for the expansion works. The implication is that existing flights in and out of Gloucestershire airport are at risk and that they are operating a dangerous airport. This again does not justify an expansion. It merely demonstrates willingness by the airport management to push the safety envelope and accept bad management practises by introducing services that should not be operated. They are then using this bad management practise as a blackmail tool to argue for further expansion.

The recent flights for the Gloucester Rugby match support this case. The airport’s argument for a long time has been that they cannot operate fully laden planes in the 70-80 seat class. However, the flights for the Gloucester Rugby match have demonstrated that they are prepared to operate planes in this class. The airport is now faced with a series of serious questions to answer. Was it safe to allow these planes to operate and are these movements being used to justify the works on safety grounds, when any normally safety conscious management team would not have allowed the movements in the first place? If they have pushed the safety envelope to press their case, then they are playing with peoples lives in the pursuit of their aims.

Local residents have already lodged complaints about the exceptionally low height that these planes passed over their houses and have wondered that after the recent Biggin Hill, if they are going to be next.

The section goes on to say, “The Gloucester City Council s Overview Scrutiny Management committee recently recommended to cabinet that the project should not be supported, contrary to their own consultant’s advice.” This is incorrect. The consultants that Gloucester County Council engaged robustly analysed the business case and concluded that the proposal should not be supported. In addition, the Council also made clear that given the concerns about climate change, the airport expansion should not be supported, as this was not addressed in any robust way in the business plan.

By contrast the consultants engaged by Cheltenham Council were airport specialists and so it is no surprise that they supported the airport expansion. Their report demonstrated the necessity to substantially increase flights and operations to provide a return on investment.

The Environmental Concerns

This section starts with the comments “Gloucestershire Airport is fully committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions and understands the need to meet its environmental responsibilities.” Gloucestershire airport’s past history does not demonstrate they are fully committed to reducing greenhouse gases. Only last year they produced a report saying there was no such thing as climate change. There is absolutely no way that they will be able to support the cuts in emissions that are necessary by increasing the operations from the airport.

Despite the airports claims that airplanes are becoming more efficient, these improvements are completely negated by the increasing number of planes and expanding distance that planes are being flown.

The report goes on to say, “We fully support the emissions trading scheme and strongly believe that this is the most effective market mechanism for achieving improvements in the aviation industry.” The airport should explain what they mean by this. As yet the concept has not been verified as a mechanism for reducing CO2 emissions. However, if it is successful, it will mean a massive reduction in flights, thereby negating the business case for the investment.

This whole section is fundamentally flawed. As the above extract from the IPCC report shows, we need to be reducing emissions, not be trying to burn the existing fossil fuels more efficiently, which is what the airport’s report is arguing.

Conclusion

We are fortunate to have the Gloucester Scrutiny Committee that has been prepared to see through the lies that the airport and its supporters have been putting forward. Their forward thinking decision will be looked at by other councils and organisations around the country and demonstrates the type of leadership that is needed to address the combined problems of climate change and peak oil that we will soon all be faced with. Their stance should not be challenged on the basis of the airport's self interested publicity campaign.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Gloucestershire Pride 2008

The date for Pride this year is August 9th 2008. The committee has decided to change the name from Gloucestershire Rainbow Day to Gloucestershire Pride. Llanthony Priory is booked and I hear that act's are already booked for main stage including Bottlebag, Mrs Trixie and more!

A march is planned for the city like the first year. A couple of floats and street entertainers could be likely. Promotional nights lined up are Bottlebag 26th July - laid back easy listening local band great sounds!! WINGS(Women in Gloucestershire Lesbian Social group) are also putting on a promo night in aid of Pride on 28th June.

Like previous years I've been sending emails to seek support from Councils to fly the rainbow flag on the day - although sadly I will miss the event this year as I have something else planned.

Interesting article from leading Green Peter Tatchell 0n 'Straight male machismo underpins all tyranny' - see it here: http://www.petertatchell.net/

Call for ban on GE trees

Stroud District Green party have given their support of a ban on genetically engineered (GE) trees. If you represent an organisation then you can also give your support to this campaign. See my news release here:
http://www.glosgreenparty.org.uk/content/view/2073/2/

Interrogation centre opens in Cheltenham

See Henry Porter on the state of our civil liberties:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/09/constitution

ID Interrogation Centre networkPicture: Interrogation centres set up around UK

Under the National Identity Register, it seems that 49 pieces of information will still be required by the state and that every important transaction in the citizen's life recorded. And there is a new proposal to collect 19 pieces of information, including mobile phone and credit-card numbers from people travelling abroad, which the government plans to use for 'general public policy purposes' - that is, the mass surveillance of a free people.
'It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could some day facilitate a police state.'
Bruce Schneier, American cryptographer and computer expert
As Henry Porter points out the shocking part of the move by our Government to massively intrude into our private lives is that it has occurred with almost no coherent analysis, scrutiny or opposition in Parliament, no debate about the direction of our society and only a little understanding and exposition in the media. Shame on Labour and shame on David Drew for supporting the moves.

Anyhow the Cheltenham interrogation centre is now open - one of 50 open by the beginning of this year. From now onwards when people as young as 16 apply for their first adult passport, they will have to attend their nearest interrogation centre. There they will be subject to background checks, questioning to test their story against official records, photographs, and, before long, fingerprinting. Registration on the national ID database(s) - the 'National Identity Register' or NIR - will follow.

You might still be able to avoid it by applying now for your passport as it seems there is a delay in setting up the interviews - see more at:
http://www.no2id.net/getInvolved/idCentres.php#cheltenham

Organic Food and Natural Medicines under threat

Here is a talk that looks like it is worth going to - on the threat to our food and medicines - an issue I've raised before on this blog - sadly I'll miss the meeting as it is a Full Council night but it is great the issue is getting more coverage locally.

Photo: Crow in Ruscombe

Here are the details plus the press release from Transition Stroud and Biodynamic Association below:

Thursday 15th May 7.30 pm at Painswick Inn Project, Gloucester Street, Stroud - Cost £4/£3 conc.

Ian R Crane a self confessed truth campaigner is visiting Stroud to speak about the threat posed to organic foods and natural medicines by global regulations being drafted by this Commission behind closed doors on behalf of large corporate interests. The continued availability of natural, herbal and homeopathic medicines is being threatened throughout the world by carefully crafted legislation which is slowly but surely finding its way on to the statute book. Unless we wake up to what is going on it will be too late and the only medicines available in Europe and ultimately world wide will be products of the pharmaceutical companies.

Further proposals are being prepared that will require all imported food to be irradiated (ostensibly to prevent disease spread) while at the same time allowing unimpeded market access to unlabelled genetically modified products. "For many people this agenda is so outrageous, they cannot believe such goals are achievable" says Ian R Crane "Yet, this may be the reality as soon as December 31st 2009".

Codex Alimentarius is a global commission set up in 1963 by the WHO (World Health Organisation) and FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) to develop standards, guidelines and codes of practice in relation to foods and medicines. Its stated objective is to protect the health of consumers, ensure fair trading practices and promote the coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organisations.

It is now integrated within the WTO (World Trade Organisation) whose power is such that all signed up governments are required to implement its directives without need for parliamentary scrutiny. Working with and dominated by multinational interests, this strange creation is preparing global regulations that will negatively impact on the health and well being of the world's people. The EU Food Supplements Regulation introduced last year was conceived by Codex. It has been adopted by the EU and is already being implemented in several countries. As a result many effective and long used herbal remedies can no longer be sold. It will also be illegal soon to sell certain herbs as food - they are equated with illegal drugs. Fear of disease and contamination (from natural microbes) combined with a contradictory faith in new and untested technologies can only result in more massive and irreversible genetic, biological and pollution.
"If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of the U.S.A., writer of Declaration of Independence

Concern at funding crisis for Stroud Valleys Project

Stroud Valleys Project is being threatened by a funding withdrawl - my letter to them and District Council is below and at the bottom a petition that might interest:

Photo: Railway arches near Capel Mill where SVP have spoken out to protect the river cliff

I write a quick note regarding concerns over your current financial position. I am shocked to hear that such a hugely successful project as yours is threatened with closure.

SVP has played a vital and important role in raising awareness and participation in a whole host of environmental-related activities in Stroud District. In my local area I've witnessed involvement with the local Randwick Scouts, support for the Ruscombe Brook Action Group's improvements to water quality and biodiversity and involving the community in improvements to Hamwell Leaze.

I read that nearly 1,000 adults and children in 2006/7 across the District have learned about the environment and have got involved in local projects including planting 4 miles of hedgerows and more than 1,500 trees.

I am appalled that Natural England should withdraw it's funding when climate change means that we need all the more to increase our awareness and skills in working with our natural environment. Indeed research at Cornell University study shows that if you want children to grow up to actively care about the environment, then they need plenty of time in the 'wild' before they're 11 years old. While the benefits to mental health of adults working and volunteering in nature are also well recorded.

The staff and volunteers I have met at SVP are doing an amazing job. I hope that funding can be found and that you will be able to continue your important work. I wish you the very best in securing core-funding.

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward

Anyone wishing to make a donation or help call them on 01453 753358 or follow link above.

Sign petition re environment education

Plus please find below link to a petition calling for "the Prime Minister to put the Environment at the heart of the National Curriculum by introducing Environmental Education as a cross-curricular theme in the Foundation Stage and key stages 1 and 2; and as a statutory subject at key stage 3; and by raising awareness of Environmental Education as a vital dimension of the government's 'Sustainable Schools' strategy."

Sign here:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/env-ed/

Local issues: shop, wall and Rights-of-Way

Whiteshill Village shop - insurance wont pay for a loo to replace the one lost in the fire - many are making loads of effort to raise money to build a replacement - local guy, Damien seems to be working wonders in finding at least some of the labouring time to be donated.

Photo: view across to Whiteshill over Randwick playing field

Boundary Wall on Westrip Lane near Hawthorne Rise and opposite Red House Farm - I have made several calls over the issue re the wall since we met Highways on the site and it was raised at the recent Parish Council in the most strongest terms. Several residents believe the wall is now more dangerous and needs urgent attention. See my original blog entry on this here. I again raised it and the news is that it will be 'chased up'.

Right-of-way near the junction between Redhouse Lane and Westrip Lane - I asked a while back about the best way to proceed on this - we had a meeting on the site and we asked if we contacted residents in this area could we proceed at least with stabilising the site perhaps with gravel and make it less slippery for those many people that use it. Residents say it has been used as a unofficial footpath for at least 25 years. We dont want it blocked up only made safer. While I understand this is a low priority it is a well used route and we thought we could be taking more action to improve it. See my original blog entry on this here. Eventually the answer came back that we cannot act as it would need to become a footpath - in otherwords it needs to go through the process to get the path added to the Definitive Map before we can spend public money on it. It takes years to process a claim but if the Parish wishes to start this process we now have the way to do it - is it worth the energy?

Footpath that comes out opposite the Randwick Scout Hut (next to Cashes Green School) on Cashes Green Road - See my blog here for original post. Highways had still not drawn up plans for a safer footpath since their meeting last November - again I have made several calls and emails. A Parish councillor recently reported two children slipping into the road on that muddy bank. At last I have now heard back that Highways designers had a look, and apparently didn't come up with anything they could work with, as the gradient runs in the wrong direction. They did suggest a palisades (metal) fence which is much more resistant to vandals, and harder to take down. This seems absurd as a footpath could surely run the other way? And in my view vandal proof fencing is not really what is required. The Parish need to decide how best to proceed - but I still think a footpath could be made.

Green cartoon competition

The Ken Sprague Fund has launched its second International Political Cartoon Competition this year on the subject of the environment. Titled Earthworks 2008, cartoonists from around the world are invited to submit works on the subject of our threatened environment - particularly global warming. Caroline Lucas MEP will be one of the judges along with the Guardian cartoonist Martin Rowson. Deadline for entries is 1st June. See more at:
http://www.kenspraguefund.org/competition.html

Cartoons: Our local cartoonist Russ - his take on the number 46 bus service cuts - see earlier blogs for lots on that story - and below a couple of Ken's cartoons

I once heard a talk by Ken Sprague in The Space in Stroud - he is particularly known for his work as a 'political' cartoonist and poster designer - but his talk was more about the powerful use of drama - indeed he was in his 70s then and I remember being inspired by his enthusiasm for life and talk of spending the next 20 years developing the use of drama to heal.

His dedicated commitment to human rights, justice, peace and socialism shone through his work - and the Fund was set up to promote his vision and to encourage artists to use their art in the furtherance of social justice, peace and tolerance.

I think I've mentioned before that there is a lack of 'green' cartoons - this week I came across this site here but generally there seems to be a bit of a gap when compared to other topics....

Monday, April 07, 2008

Take action to postpone Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation

News that the government’s chief environmental scientist that the Government's biofuels policy should be delayed is welcomed. Next week a piece of legislation will come into effect that will have serious consequences for the environment and climate change.

Photo: Slide taken from Kevin Lister's excellent slide show highlighting dangers of the current policy by Tesco to use biofuels from unsustainable sources

From Tuesday 15 April 2008, the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) will force fuel companies to include biofuels as part of their fuel mix. From that date, 2.5 per cent of all petrol and diesel sold in the UK will come from crops such as palm oil and maize. The government hopes this will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions which are contributing towards climate change, but the RTFO is being pushed through without any sort of sustainability criteria attached which will lead to a host of environmental problems and human rights issues.

The Green party, Friends of the Earth, RSPB, Oxfam, Cafod, Greenpeace and many others are urging transport secretary Ruth Kelly, to postpone the compulsory use of biofuels until proper standards have been put in place. The EU Environment Commissioner to Defra's chief scientist, from the Royal Society to the Environmental Audit Committee - have also raised doubts.

You can take action here - email Ruth Kelly and tell her to postpone the RTFO until essential sustainability standards have been developed and implemented.

I've already highlighted on this blog the problems: how rainforests, savannahs and grasslands are being uprooted to make room for either biofuel crops like palm oil or food crops which are being diverted into biofuels production; how the price of food could soar as an increasing amount is diverted to produce biofuels instead of feeding people; and how many biofuels are increasing greenhouse gas emissions, not reducing them.

For the story so far on the RFTO check Greenpeace website here. See also info:
http://www.campaigncc.org/biofuels.shtml
http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/actionsapr08.php

Meanwhile I have been trying to find out more about recycled fats locally - there are a number of people looking at setting up a business but info is not really available - one project that looks good was covered by the BBC here.

Camden goes more veggie

News that Camden council wants to encourage its staff to help the environment by going vegetarian is interesting. I have raised the issue of less meat before with Stroud District but with little joy - it is interesting to see that Camden have actually taken steps - this will hopefully encourage others to follow - and I've used it as an excuse to send the info again.

Photo: Dragon fruit

The Camden Climate Change group recommended cutting meat and dairy products from canteen menus as it will reduce carbon emissions. The idea was developed by Camden's "eco champion" Alexis Rowell who said the idea of taking meat off the menu was based on United Nations data showing that the livestock industry is responsible for 18 per cent of the world's carbon emissions. He said: "At some point we have to get to grips with the Western diet, which contains so much meat and dairy and is part of the carbon problem and the obesity problem. We are not talking about turning everyone into vegetarians but about eating more vegetables and fewer pieces of meat, especially beef which is the most intensive. We are growing grain and manufacturing fertilisers using a lot of fossil fuel and water, which is a scarce resource, to feed cows to then feed humans. It would be better to grow vegetables and feed them straight to humans."

According to the Vegetarian Society, 70 per cent of the world's agricultural land is used for rearing farm animals, either as grazing land or to grow fodder. Far less land is used to grow crops to feed directly to humans. The animals themselves are said to emit more damaging gases than the world's entire transport system. Camden also wants to cut the amount of food flown in from abroad or driven across the country in lorries. It is looking at how to support local producers by using existing distribution networks to bring food from the South-East into a central hub. Meanwhile, residents will also be encouraged to turn open spaces - even roofs - into mini-allotments. Mr Rowell said: "In Camden, we have more green and potentially green spaces on housing estates than we have in parks. A third of Camden's roofs could be turned into green roofs without any structural changes. We also have a 10-year waiting list for allotments. This is a huge opportunity. We aren't pretending we can grow enough food to feed London but we can grow some and that's better than nothing. Such schemes will also improve residents' quality of life and the borough's biodiversity".

Glacier melting has doubled

News last month on the record glacier thinning means we must act now. What more do wewant before we act? The figures from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) from close to 30 reference glaciers in nine mountain ranges indicate that between the years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 the average rate of melting and thinning more than doubled.

Prof. Dr. Wilfried Haeberli, Director of the Service commented: "The latest figures are part of what appears to be an accelerating trend with no apparent end in sight. This continues the trend in accelerated ice loss during the past two and a half decades and brings the total loss since 1980 to more than 10.5 metres of water equivalent."

During 1980-1999, average loss rates had been 0.3 metres per year. Since the turn of the millennium, this rate had increased to about half a metre per year. The record loss during these two decades – 0.7 metres in 1998 – has now been exceeded by three out of the past six years: 2003, 2004 and 2006. On average, one metre water equivalent corresponds to 1.1 metres in ice thickness indicating a further shrinking in 2006 of 1.5 actual metres and since 1980 a total reduction in thickness of ice of just over 11.5 metres or almost 38 feet.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: "Millions if not billions of people depend directly or indirectly on these natural water storage facilities for drinking water, agriculture, industry and power generation during key parts of the year. There are many canaries emerging in the climate change coal mine. The glaciers are perhaps among those making the most noise and it is absolutely essential that everyone sits up and takes notice. The litmus test will come in late 2009 at the climate convention meeting in Copenhagen. Here governments must agree on a decisive new emissions reduction and adaptation-focused regime. Otherwise, and like the glaciers, our room for manoeuvre and the opportunity to act may simply melt away."

Some of the most dramatic shrinking has taken place in Europe with Norway's Breidalblikkbrea glacier thinning by close to 3.1 metres (2.9 metre water equivalent) during 2006 compared with a thinning of 0.3 metres (0.28 metres water equivalent) in the year 2005. See also The Ecologist and The Guardian 5th Feb 2008. And see Guardian here with the cross-party criticisms that not enough is being done to tackle climate change.

Walking the length of the Ruscombe Brook

On Saturday around 20 of us set off to walk the length of the brook from the Lawns opposite Tricorn House where the brook runs into the canal to the spring heads in the Ruscombe valley.

Photos 1 and 2 are the Lawns starting out and the Fire Officer explaining the precautions they take not to contaminate the brook.

The photos in this blog entry are a collection of shots along the way - we had a coffee at a house just by the roundabout near the beginning and also had various people tell stories along the way - we also met up along the way with the duty fire officer and several householders and land owners who gave us access to their gardens and the brook.

Photos 3, 4 and 5 tramping through jungle of Hamwell Leaze - crossing the brook and areas of very damp land.

It was a brilliant way to get to help folk understand this very varied watercourse - parts were inaccessible as they run through gardens and parts are culverted - we were also able to pick up on problem areas...

Photos 6 and 7: somebody washing car - soapy water goes direct into brook - and several places where garden clippings and grass cuttings are right close to the brook - heavy rain washes this into the brook and leads to blockages and poorer water quality.

Many places we stopped to discuss and learn more about everything from flow forms to road gullies.


Photos 8 and 9: Group looking at a possible blocked culvert leading to river on road at Puckshole and a talk about flowforms from Simon Charter at a site near Puckshole.

At the next RBAG meeting we will look more closely at what we have found - and also hope to organise some walks for members of the public - meanwhile I've written again in support of opening up the footpath access at the Fire Station - see part of letter below to the Town Council:

On Saturday over 20 of Ruscombe Brook Action Group members and others walked the length of Ruscombe Brook meeting various folk along the way including local landowners and the Fire service. We sadly wont be able to meet your deadline of 9th April for a route for the Walking Festival but do hope to organise a number of further walks.

One issue arose again: the access behind the fire station to Hamwell Leaze. I mentioned this to SDC and she said you are looking again at access and footpath issues - I would love it if this could be included.

While I am aware some residents further along have reservations about increased vandalism if the site was opened up, I consider that increased pedestrian traffic could in fact reduce crime. As I am sure you know Cainscross ward is the highest concentration of housing in the District and has the lowest number of green spaces. The site is on the edge of the Town and is very underused by local residents, many of whom I am surprised to learn, do not even know the space exists.

I would support a through route from the Fire Station under the arches through to Hamwell Leaze. This would also be a useful link for many who at the moment have a long route round. All the best - Philip

Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward,

Update on Randwick mast and Wi-Fi

I understand that the process for telecom masts under 15 m is that the company has to submit a prior notification. If the Council doesn't respond, or request a planning application within 28 days, then the mast has deemed consent. The companies are pretty hot on the 28 day rule however many Councils are not.

Cartoon: a repeat of this cartoon from local scribbler Russ

I spoke with Planning at Stroud District Council today and they have still not received an application for this mast - click on 'Masts' label below for background info - in my opinion this mast needs looking at properly as I consider this site is visually intrusive - indeed you will probably be able to see it from Ebley Mill and indeed from many places in the area.

Anyway Randwick Parish Council will be alerted if an application comes in - there does not appear to be a way for other Parishes to be alerted. Randwick will hopefully let us know of any developments. I will raise the issue of alerts for other Parishes as a separate issue with Planning in the hope that they might be able to introduce such a scheme. Planning have been very good in this area of information and are one of the lead Councils in making information available to the public.

Wi-Fi - unregulated and dangerous?

All the talk in previous blog entries of possible health risks has a parallel with Wi-Fi - again an issue I've covered before - but came across this good article:
http://www.theecologist.org/archive_detail.asp?content_id=1179

I think there are enough concerns for us to be more cautious about it's use - see Green party letter here. Basically Wi-Fi appeared on our shelves without having to undergo any tests or safety checks whatsoever. In May 2007 folk may remember that the BBC’s Panorama programme investigated the signal strengths used by Wi-Fi equipment. They measured the intensity of microwaves 150 metres away from a mobile phone transmitter mast, and half a metre away from a laptop computer – realistic distances at which everyday exposure might occur. They found that the radiation from the Wi-Fi-enabled laptop was at least as high, if not higher, than that measured in the main beam of the mast!!! Some Governments now give warnings about Wi-Fi use - ours does not.

Call for Town to rethink on considerate driver scheme

So far 76 Whiteshill and Ruscombe motorists who are plagued by speeding through traffic are keen to sign up to a new "considerate driver" scheme to try and combat the problem. The scheme would mean they'd promise to drive within the speed limit in their home area, therefore slowing down the visiting traffic behind them.

Photo: Headline about Whiteshill when A46 was closed


Chairman of Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish Council John Rogers has written to all the parish and town councils in the Stroud district, suggesting other places also try the idea. He wrote: "We suffer from a problem that I am sure you are familiar with - the common practice of people driving through communities at speeds just below the level where speeding tickets are issued. As most village layouts are not suitable for 30pmph traffic this practice is both dangerous and detrimental to the quality of life in our communities."

Everyone tends to see their streets as belonging to their community but visitors see the same streets as just part of the highway. The considerate driver scheme seeks to address that by reminding drivers that villages they drive through are just like their own communities - in effect considerate drivers would act as pace cars, slowing down traffic behind them.
Town Council not convinced

I read in the local press that Stroud Town Council had not supported the 'considerate driver' proposals put forward by Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish. I was not involved in putting those proposals together but fully support their initiative, so have written to them noting I would welcome an understanding about why the proposals were not accepted. Here is some of my letter:

The proposed scheme looks similar to the 'Pace Car pledge' that was originally developed by 'Mental Speed Bumps' author David Engwicht. In many other countries the 'Pace Car pledge' is used in cities and towns as a kind of treaty between neighborhoods; we will act as a guest in your neighborhood if you act as a guest in ours.

Comment from 'Less Traffic.com': "Pace Car drivers pledge to drive within the speed limit, stop to let pedestrians cross, walk when they can, and do something to their car to make others smile. They turn their car into a 'mobile speed bump'. (One that gets out of the way of emergency vehicles!). When enough people join, traffic is effectively calmed city-wide. Pace Cars calm drivers rather than streets. The Pace Car is now operative in many cities. To date it has not flourished in any (that we are aware of) because these program have lacked creative mechanisms for enlisting Pace Car drivers. A good product is useless unless you have good a 'product distribution network'."

Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish already have 76 people (around 10% of their ward) willing to sign up and I know of some areas that are working with schools to introduce a scheme. This would hopefully get around the problems of enlisting? See more on Traffic Tamers here.

The cost of just one speed bump is huge and does, in my view, little to help - this scheme is part of how we can change the way we think about communities. I would love to see a wider project looking at ideas like this - supporting local schools 'walking buses' and other ways of street 'reclaiming'. How can we engage communities? Maybe one way forward would be for Parishes to meet to discuss this issue as it seems to me each ward has very similar problems around traffic? Thoughts welcomed - all the best - Philip

See award winning article on Shared Spaces: "City planning as if people mattered" by Philip Parker:
http://www.theecologist.org/peopleplanning.asp
See more re Pace car concept here:
http://www.lesstraffic.com/Programs/Pace%20Car/Pace%20Car.htm
One example from Sustrans:
http://www.saferoutestoschools.org.uk/index.php?p=cs50


Frequently Asked Questions - Pace Car
Will my car really make a difference?
Yes. We only need a small percentage of vehicles acting as Pace Cars to slow traffic city-wide. This starts a positive cycle. People feel more comfortable walking or cycling, which reduces traffic levels, making streets even safer, meaning even more people can walk or cycle.
Does the Pace Car provoke road rage?
No. Many people who sign up to the Pace Car Program were already acting as unofficial Pace Cars. They report that incidents of road rage decrease when they badge their car as a Pace Car. Instead of the driver behind thinking they are stuck behind some 'idiot' who doesn't know how to drive, the Pace Car sticker lets them know that there is a purpose for why the car is being driven within the speed limit.
What happens if I accidentally speed?
Take a breath and slow down. The Pace Car pledge is a declaration of intent, not a legally binding contract or new religion where you will be stoned if you break the 'rules'! Kicking the speed habit can be hard work. Allow yourself more time to get places so you won't be so tempted to speed.
Do I only act as a Pace Car in my neighbourhood or on all streets?
On all city streets. The Pace Car is a kind of treaty between neighbourhoods: you respect the quality of life in our neighbourhood and we will do the same for you. The Pace Car promotes a new civility and mutual respect on our streets.

Questions taken from Less Traffic.Com

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Nominated for County Environmental hero award

It was very nice to be surprised this last week by news that I had been nominated for the Environmental section of the County's Pride of Gloucestershire Community award. However the article that covered the story made quite a few mistakes - I note some of those mistakes in brackets in green in the article which is printed below - but first I want to return to the whole issue of 'environmental heroes'.....

Many will remember the criticisms and pages of press coverage over Al Gore and Jonathon Porritts' air miles. It is easy to shoot down a 'green hero'. To me, as I said at the time, such debates are a distraction from focusing on the real need ie that our Government must grasp the urgency and need for radical changes.

I said in one news release: "Green campaigners constantly risk accusations of being hypocrites. Yet life is full of grey areas and being pure and virtuous is never as easy, nor perhaps even as desirable, as it might appear. We have seen climate change campaigners like Ken Livingstone and Al Gore similarly have their CO2 emissions challenged. It seems that if you can smear the person, then you can also undermine the message. Such smears can damage: prominent people who might support green causes don't speak out for fear of having their supermarket bills fished out of their bin. Indeed every time a 'green hero' is shot down in flames, we all feel that little bit more cynical about our politicians and leaders. Meanwhile greenhouse gas emissions continue to soar. As Climate Change author Mark Lynas wrote: 'Being a purist may be comforting, but it is unlikely to change the world.'"

I have said before that I could be living a greener lifestyle, but this misses a key point. For me, individual actions to tackle climate change are great but will never go far enough. We must have government action to help us change behaviours and ensure those on lower incomes don't loose out. Yes of course people need to take responsibility - but it is the Government that must take a real lead. Individual actions to tackle climate change are great but will never go far enough. The present rate of growth in air traffic is unsustainable - hence Green challenges to airport expansions like at Staverton and Bristol. The truth of it is that we must cancel all airport expansions: individuals stopping flying is great but will not be enough - but by stopping flying they are at least raising awareness.....we urgently need laws that make the polluter pay for their damage and 'green' choices to be made easier: travelling the same journey by train would have meant 17 times fewer CO2 emissions than flying. A weekend in Prague should not be cheaper than a weekend in Bournemouth.

As the IPCC and others have said we have only a matter of a handful of years in which to act. We need radical changes. All credit to Jonathan Porritt, Al Gore and others who are trying to get the message across to us. We can still avoid catastrophic climate change - but as I've said before this is a time for all of us to be heros. It's possible for each of us to dramatically reduce the emissions for which we are responsible without massively reducing our quality of life - indeed see my post earlier this morning that points out that it is our economic growth that is making us more unhealthy.

Here's something I wrote before: "What is needed is for individuals and communities to decide to act on the advice that is available and get the politicians to act as well. We need emissions cuts of 90 per cent by 2030, yet our emissions are still rising, £30 billion is being spent on more roads, aviation subsidises continue and massive airport expansions are planned. We can create a green, fairer future of greater employment, healthier food, stronger communities, warmer homes from better insulation and self-sufficiency in energy instead of fossil fuels from unstable countries. We must tackle climate change but also build resilient communities that will cope with the coming challenges. If enough people lead the way then the politicians will be forced to follow."

03 April 2008 The Citizen PHILIP'S A MAN WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT OUR ENVIRONMENT

When it comes to environment issues Philip Booth really puts his heart and soul into the matter. And now the Stroud district councillor and head of the local Green Party (I used to be leader of the District Council group but Cllr Sarah Lunnon has taken over after my work commitments meant a squeeze on time), has been nominated for a Pride of Gloucestershire Community award. Stroud parish councillor Jane Godsell has nominated Philip for an award in the environmental hero category which is sponsored by Cory Environmental and recognises people who work to change the damage caused to the environment by our modern society. Mrs Godsell said: "He is a real environmental hero!"

Originally a member of the Gloucester Airport Action Group
(I wrote a letter protesting at the Airport expansion 5 years ago and have campaigned since then but it is only in the last year that this Gloucestershire Airport campaign has got off the ground and while I have supported the campaign there are many others who deserve mention re the Airport) which aimed to reduce air pollution, Philip has continued to dedicate himself for many years now to the environmental campaign. (Not sure why they lead with the Airport that is just one campaign - they could equally have mentioned others like the Safe Water Campaign, Shut Oldbury, ID cards or whatever)

Mrs Godsell said: "Philip has done an amazing amount in the district to encourage environmental awareness, both as an individual and as district councillor."

Philip aims to set a good personal example by walking
(Not sure where that came from - yes I do walk a bit and more recently since my health has improved but I would not list this as the main example). He said: "We could all do more but we first need political change in order to make it easier for us to take individual action."

In this regard he has campaigned extensively for lower speed limits, better public transport systems and cleaner streams. And his tireless work has paid off. The Ruscombe Brook Action Group, which works in conjunction with Severn Trent Water, has dramatically reduced the incidents of sewage in the brook.

Philip has also raised the profile of local environmental concerns by putting up daily posts on his online blog. The blog now has more than 2,000 visitors a month. Mrs Godsell added: "He e-mails residents with information which he thinks may be of interest to them and is always willing to take up an environmental issue on behalf of residents."

Con Booth is currently promoting a 'Shared Spaces Scheme' which encourages car sharing in order to cut road congestion. He said: "There is a long way to go but the dramatic shift towards more environmentally friendly attitudes over the past two years is encouraging."

Last week: meetings and more

The last week or so has sped by and I've hardly touched on some of the meetings and news of this week....here's a quick round up of some stuff....

SW Press Officers meeting - was in Bristol for this meeting to start planning Euro elections - June next year - photo of me outside Cornurbia pub where we met.

Strategic and Overview Scrutiny meeting - I'm not on this committee but wanted to hear stuff re post offices as we are seeking ways to stop their closure - see previous blogs - there was a particularly useful discussion on what makes a successful village shop -from the Coaley Village Shop folk - very useful stuff that we could use locally in Whiteshill - I've offered to share my notes - the meeting also had a useful presentation on Systems thinking - see webcast for 1st April for all that - however I had a long arranged meeting later so had to leave well before end of Scrutiny to get to..

Willow Elfins - a planning session in the Clothiers pub to sort out next years programme for the children - we are lacking a leader who will run the sessions each week so need to ensure more of us are leaders - anyhow here below is our draft programme - we may have some spaces so if any local children aged 6 to 9 are interested contact the area Woodcraft membership organiser Helen White on 753687. Anyhow here's some of the draft prgramme that I've just typed up: Bluebell walk in Randwick woods, Den Making at Hawkwood, Swimming, Bugs, birds and ice cream on the Common (with bug expert available), Tracking animals and looking at the food chain (led by wildlife experts), Haresfield Treasure Hunt, Selsey Sausage Sizzle and
Raft making.

Stroud Green party meeting - coffee and cake at Star Anise Wednesday night - lots on elections - we have a full slate of candidates for the first time - my ward is not up for another two years - we also talked about arrangements for quite a number of public events we are organising like Caroline Lucas on this Friday - ethical politician of the year and great stuff (more here), a meeting on First Great Western trains on 15th, a Biofuels debate at the next Coffee House on 25th.

Green councillors - District councillors met up to plan next weeks particularly stuff around Post Office motion to Council, canal and regeneration - again in Star Anise - infact had quite a few coffees there recently.

Crunchy Dancing - Yes I know I had to ask - but it is what the children's country dancing is called by local schools - after last weeks Stratford Park dancing it was now there again for many parents for the country dancing - the hall was packed, live band and hundreds of children dancing - Randwick School were there and I had one child say: "This is the best day of my life".

They certainly had loads of fun - and I even managed to get a dance when parents were allowed to join the floor.

Performance and Audit Overview and Scrutiny Committee - I just love being a member of a committee with a title like that - anyhow we started at just after 6pm and didn't finish until way after 10.00pm. I was feeling tired at the beginning but by half way I was not living - chairing needs to improve if we are to be efficient - and also that evening the chair asked all the questions - he had done lots of good work but surely the job of the chair is to chair - and after other councillors raise issues then to ask questions. Of course with elections we have no idea who will be chair next year. Anyhow one issue I raised was re carbon audits - we are looking at finances but still no carbon audit - more of that in other blogs - I didn't get an answer to my question there but will pursue it. It was also Labour leader, Hilary Fowles' last Scrutiny - she is retiring after 10 years - I may not always agree with her views or style but her experience and knowledge of the Council will be sorely missed. Many is the time she has been spot on and picked up key issues.

More coming soon on the successful Ruscombe Brook walk on Saturday.

Does society make us mad?

I'm trying to catch up on this blog - last Friday week nearly 70 of us squeezed into hear 6 or 7 speakers on mental health at the monthly Coffee House Discussion in Stroud - each spoke for 5 mins on their own experiences as workers and/or users of mental health services - we don't normally get so many speakers but one dropped out so there was a rapid phone around to see if others could be found - several of them didn't confirm and then turned up!!

Photos: Cafe discussion

In fact it made it all the more interesting - some great discussions around the tables looking at many aspects from personal experiences, the prejudices and stigma around mental health to whether our society is making us mad. A particularly powerful talk was from a woman who experienced some 5 years in hospital and talked about her health now having moved back to Stroud - she talked particularly about the healing powers of walks - see a previous blog of mine on that here.

I've also quoted in the past on this blog the research at Cornell University study that shows that if you want your children to grow up to actively care about the environment, give them plenty of time to play in the *wild* before they're 11 years old. It is no wonder there is so little understanding about our environment...

One issue I raised was re Oliver James' work - see previous post on his book Affluenza here and his newer book goes into more detail - 'The Selfish Capitalist' is a devastatingly clear account of why our obsession with economic growth is leading to a huge increase in human misery.

Capitalism is based on increased consumption, increased work and increased inequality. Oliver in his book argues that the work of Mrs Thatcher, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, in removing barriers to capitalism, have created an epidemic of mental illness. They have privatised and deregulated, all three celebrating billionaires and worshipping corporations. Although this is supposed to raise standard of living it has made almost all of us poor when it comes to quality of life. In a dog eat dog society people, insecurity and unhappiness have risen to extraordinary degrees.

As Greens we know ever increasing economic growth is ecologically impossible - it is time others woke up to this - now we have a reminder us that economic growth is also no guarantee of a better life.

The book covers research that indicates that a society's increased Gross National Product (GDP) can actually lead to greater dissatisfaction. His powerful interpretation of 'To Have or to Be' by Erich Fromm, psychologist and grandfather of green politics, is great stuff - as blog readers may know I have worked as a social worker and have more recently been working as a Community Mental Health Worker so it is good to read something that really rings true.

I also just read that Derek Wall, one of the Principal Speakers of the Green party said: "If you read one book this year, read 'The Selfish Capitalist – it provides powerful food for thought and will be a vital campaigning tool for those who want to move to a new greener, gentler, people orientated economy."

Derek highlights as a flavour of the persuasiveness of Oliver James' critique this passage:

"We desperately need - and before long, I predict we will get – a passionate, charismatic, probably female leader who advocates the Unselfish Capitalism of our [Western European] neighbours. The pitch is simple. Not only would reduced consumerism and greater equality make us more ecologically sustainable, it would halve the prevalence of mental illness within a generation. With overstimulated aspirations and expectations, the entrepreneurial fantasy society fosters the delusion that anyone can be Alan Sugar or Bill Gates, never mind that the actual likelihood of this occurring has diminished since the 1970s. A Briton turning 20 in 1978 was more likely than one doing so in 1990 to achieve upward mobility through education.

"Nonetheless, in the Big Brother It Could Be You society, great swaths of the population believe they can become rich and famous, and that it is highly desirable. This is most damaging of all - the ideology that material affluence is the key to fulfilment and open to anyone willing to work hard enough. Selfish Capitalism stokes up relative materialism: unrealistic aspirations and the expectation that they can be fulfilled. It does so to stimulate consumerism in order to increase profits and promote short-term economic growth. Indeed, I maintain that high levels of mental illness are essential to Selfish Capitalism, because needy, miserable people make greedy consumers and can be more easily suckered into perfectionist, competitive workaholism."


Anyhow the fact that so many people turned up to the event that was not advertised at all well is an indication of interest and need for more on such topics - one other point I also made was a call for more street parties as a way of cutting isolation and building community - talking of which I must get thumb out re Bread Street Street party - provisional date 28th June - but need to talk to more neighbours - having said that, street parties will not deal with the very real challenges of living with a mental health problem....hey lots more to write on all this but need coffee and want to go out in snow...for my mental health...

Oliver on his latest book here and more on Coffee House Discussions here.

Saturday, April 05, 2008

£10 a gallon fuel?

The Stroud News Journal's motoring section notes that the UK could suffer more fuel price rises as a result of a shipping industry proposal to switch the world's merchant fleet to diesel, an environmental technology group warns. The increased demand for oil could send the price of a barrel of oil through the 150-dollar mark, impacting further on the price of fuel on UK forecourts.

The proposed shift by the shipping industry comes as it searches for a way to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions, which contribute to acid rain, respiratory illnesses and heart problems.
The independent tanker owners' organisation Intertanko, is calling for a ban on high-sulphur marine fuels in favour of lower sulphur diesels.

A switch to diesel by the shipping industry would be equivalent to one and a half times the annual diesel consumption by motorists in Europe, and would lead to higher prices at British petrol pumps. The Technology for Sustainable Shipping Group states: "The £10 gallon (would become) a distinct possibility as demand begins to outstrip supply. Refineries would need to produce an extra 250 million tonnes of distillate fuels a year to meet the new diesel at sea demand, requiring around one billion tonnes per annum of crude. That's more than double annual production of Saudi Arabia. The increase in the cost of crude oil is also likely to spell bad news for the economy as costs and prices rise."

Of course it doesn't look like they are even acknowledging the issue of peak oil - that will also impact on prices - indeed already is - when is our Government going to wake up??? They spent hours looking at MPs expenses yet only 3 MPs turn up to the meeting last week of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Peak Oil and Gas meeting on Food Security after Peak Oil. David Drew was one of those MPS - good on him.

A Transition Stroud member joined that meeting to hear presentations by Professor Tim Lang (member of the Sustainable Development Commission etc) and by Gundula Azeez of the Soil Association. Tim Lang's provides shorthand notes - see links below - they sometimes need some explanation - however it is well worth skimming through. Slide 6 shows what TESCO includes in its carbon footprint calculation - although the company has commissioned Manchester University through a £25 million contract to assess its carbon footprint, whilst slides 20-22 show 9 competing views of how to solve the problem - of which the "local food" approach is only one!

The presentations are downloadable at www.appgopo.org.uk or link directly to them here:
http://www.appgopo.org.uk/events/07_250308/timlang.ppt
and here:
http://www.appgopo.org.uk/events/07_250308/gundulaazeez.ppt

Friday, April 04, 2008

Call for action to help Ingrid Betancourt

I've just read that Ingrid Betancourt is near death and a French plane is on standby in French Guiana to take her away. I've followed news of her since her capture by rebels in 2002. See my letter to David Drew MP below.

Dear David,

I would be very grateful if you would ascertain as a matter of great urgency whether the Government has intervened on behalf of Ingrid Betancourt prisoner of the FARC guerrillas in Colombia? She is a former Colombian Presidential candidate, for the Green Party, whom President Sarkozy has been making representations for as she also has French citizenship.

Britain remains a very important trader with Colombia which gives us leverage to hopefully bring about a release. You will be aware that human rights across Colombia are in a poor state and that if President Uribe goes for a military solution it could have horrendous consequences.

We understand that Ingrid is now in very poor health according yesterday's report.

Regards, Philip Booth


See BBC report here - I notice she is exactly a month older than me. CORRECTION! As someone pointed out to me after reading this - she is infact 11 months younger - ah well that'll teach me to blog late at night,

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

No 46 bus: subsidies and history?

The proposed ending of the number 46 bus evening service - see several previous blogs for my correspondence with County and others - has led to much discussion. Several comments have been left on the previous blog entries but here is one useful comment:

"Subsidies are never easy - £60,000 could provide a lot of services in other areas of need. Assuming 3 people per journey and 4 journeys each way per night and operating for 300 days this comes to 7,200 individual journeys at a subsidy of £8.33 per journey. As Philip suggests in a later email there could be a case for leaving at least one of the buses operating in the evening rather than cutting the whole service."

The whole issue of public transport - particularly buses - is one that the Transition Stroud Transport group is trying to get its teeth into but it will take time to come up with a coherent response. The Green party have also done work on this in the past - many of the issues are made much harder by Government regulations as discussed previously - and by the current County Council shifting monies away from public transport.

Anyhow one Transition Stroud member, John Meadley circulated a summary made of a book (available in Stroud library) called "Stroud's Buses" by N P Daniels - looking at the history of the buses in Stroud since 1905. It is interesting to see that the No 46 (Stroud to Cheltenham) was taken out of service completely in 1985 when the subsidy was withdrawn. It seems that there is nothing new!

The summary by John Meadley was extremely useful and interesting - made we want to buy the book - I reproduce here:

STROUD’S BUSES

The first “bus” in the Stroud Valleys was a GWR “Rail motor” service that ran from Chalford to Stonehouse along the railway line – operating more frequently and stopping more frequently than the regular trains. In 1905 the first motor bus (also GWR) started service between Stroud and Painswick, in competition with a horse bus owned by Mr Ireland (which continued to operate until 1919 so must have been competitively priced). What ultimately stopped the horse bus was concern for the horses on the hills.

The motor buses had solid tyres and the roads were still gravelled, resulting in a lot of dust – for which water carts were used. They were also pretty unreliable. The GWR HQ at Painswick was The Falcon Inn. Bus stops were “tablets” mounted on the gas lamps. 1906 the buses started from Painswick to Cheltenham; in 1908 the first bus to Eastington; 1910 the first bus to Nailsworth (previously it involved the train to Dudbridge and then a small train (the Dudbridge Donkey) to Stroud Station. Framilode had buses (2 per week) in 1919. By 1911 there were already complaints about buses racing. During 1914-18 the buses were converted to run on gas.

During the 1914-18 war people saved money, such that after the war they wanted to travel and the era of the bus began. “Industrial”, urban, expanding Stroud was a key centre for the development of bus routes. The National Bus Company (NBC) started expanding from London to Stroud. The key routes were from Chalford to Stonehouse with spurs to Painswick and Nailsworth. The arrival of the buses significantly changed the social landscape of the Valleys (as the bicycle had done beforehand).

Great Western Railway (GWR) led the way (providing feeders to the railways) but was shadowed by NBC (which generally charged a penny less). Bristol Tramways and Carriage Company (BTC) moved into Stroud and in 1921 started an hourly service from Nailsworth to Painswick (then as now Number 46). All the companies started expanding – to Dursley, Wotton, Tetbury, Avening and Malmsbury – but NBC lacked the buses and had to withdraw into the Stroud area.

In 1920 a local courier called John Merrett set up a bus service to Minchinhampton and revolutionised life up in what had previously been known as the “Stroud Highlands”! The Bear at Rodborough also ran its own bus between Stroud station and Minch for those staying at the Bear. In 1926 a late night bus was introduced for those going to the cinema. Merrett was joined by Reyne to set up the Red Buses, and they became fierce competitors with the large companies because they were local people. They focused on minor roads, linking villages to the mills – even offering people credit until pay day. Their routes included Bussage, France Lynch, Eastington and Ruscombe. NBC responded with new routes – e.g. to Horsley. There was intense competition. On Saturdays in 1927, 270 buses left Stroud.

In 1926 there was a national rail strike and the buses moved in to move people around. Pneumatic tyres started to be seen in 1925-30 and weekend bus tours became popular (e.g. to Stratford and to Western super Mare).

In 1928 Reyne started an express bus service from Gloucester to London via Stroud taking 4 hours 40 minutes and costing 15 shillings. A heating apparatus was introduced into these buses. By 1930 there were 6 companies competing on the Gloucester to London route. Around this time the Road and Rail Transport Act allowed regional rail operators to invest in bus operations. GWR merged with NBC to form the Western National Omnibus Service (which operated until recently). The arrival of the buses completely changed village life.

1930-9. Competition between the companies became a problem and there were ugly scenes, addressed by the Road Traffic Act, which licensed operators and routes and regulated timetables. Many mergers took place. There was still concern about buses speeding to keep to timetables on steep hills. There were many interesting routes – e.g. Stroud to Summer Street via Horns Road! There was further rationalisation in 1934 when passenger numbers levelled off and the Depression took effect. Working conditions for drivers and conductors were harsh. There were many memories of buses breaking down and passengers being left in the pub whilst spare parts arrived. The buses’ engines were Leyland, Guy, Dennis and Albion. By the end of the decade buses were an essential part of the social fabric of the valleys – Western National (green), Red and White (red) and Bristol Tramways (blue).

1940-49 – Conflict and Climax. During the Second World War services were curtailed to save fuel and duplicate services were removed. But there was at least some service to all the small villages (such as Oakridge). Because of the war effort the mills and factories in Stroud were involved in munitions and in making uniforms – hence there was increased pressure on the reduced bus services – overcrowding was a problem, with buses grounding on some of the hilly bends, and punctuality suffered. Pressure was increased as people gave up their cars and as evacuees arrived. Barriers were installed at key boarding points (e.g. the Sub Rooms) to control the crowds boarding the buses. Staffing the buses was a problem as many men were called up – resulting in an increased number of conductresses. Buses aged as fewer buses were being manufactured and petrol engines were replaced with diesel ones, which required up to three people to crank start them! There was some bombing around Stroud in 1941, with Bisley steeple being used as the bombers’ navigation mark. It was difficult driving at night – since no lights were allowed either for the driver to see or the passengers or conductor to pay their fares.

After the war, when once again people had saved up, there was increased demand for buses for leisure and excursions and for going to the cinema. This was to be the golden age of the bus, before TV arrived and mass production of cars. Many new buses were brought into service in 1948 and many rural services were reintroduced.

1950-59 – Rise and fall. In 1953 41% of journeys were by bus, 29% by car and 17% by train. Subsequently bus use fell as car ownership increased. This was also the start of the process of nationalisation of the buses – as a prelude to which there were many mergers. A new breed of Lodekka buses was introduced in 1955, a radical design that was able to go under low bridges. Stroud drivers and conductors were highly respected at the time for their courtesy and reliability. The Suez crisis in 1957 brought further fuel shortages resulting in a 10% reduction in service. Following a dispute over a driver there was the first all-out strike on 9 February 1957. In July there was the first national bus strike for two weeks, which coincided with Stroud Show. Factories and schools closed – but it forced people to find other ways of getting round – by bike and by car share and this was the beginning of the decline. Passenger numbers started declining from 1959.
1960-69 – Easier to get to the moon. The buses had facilitated people getting to work and to the shops – since there were few cars. As car numbers increased so the bus companies responded by introducing one-man buses, cross-subsidising urban and rural buses and also increasing fares above inflation. 95% of services were retained. The first proper bus station was opened in 1960 at Merrywalks, which was then little more than a lane. The bus station was mainly the result of pressure from the traders who disliked the buses on the streets, although passengers felt that they were dropped too far from the town centre!

The focus was on using higher capacity (45 seats) single decker (SD) one-man-operated buses with Gardiner 5 cylinder engines. However, these heavy buses struggled on the steep hills in first gear and had to be replaced by 6 cylinder engines for the steeper hills. Two crew double deckers (6 cylinder engines) continued, using FLFs (flat floor, long and forward entrance). There follows several pages of technical information about which type of bus suited which routes!

The hourly Chalford to Stonehouse rail—motor service closed only in 1964. It had been running since 1903 and called at 11 halts, with every second service extended to Gloucester. One advantage was that it took prams and bicycles. However, with buses running every 10-20 minutes and with 26 bus stops it could not compete. BR then destroyed all the halt platforms – as happened at Coaley, but that was reinstated in 1995. In 1967, the first 36 ft SD arrived – with 53 seats, and a Leyland 6 cylinder 11 litre engine (which incidentally exceeded the length of the bus wash by 0.5m and so had to be washed by hand!). Agreement was reached with the TGWU on one man buses in 1969. An unaccompanied parcels service was introduced during the 1960s, which also took the newspapers to outlying villages. With the increased number of cars, Sunday services became less frequent and deeply rural services suffered.

1970-79 – Blame the buses. Bristol Omnibus Co (BOC) found it difficult to maintain rural services on the escarpment and became increasingly dependent upon grants from the County Council (GCC). Despite increasing fuel prices, and increased traffic congestion, car numbers increased. BOC was nationalised. Its response to increased costs was to move entirely to one man buses, mainly SDs, to reduce frequencies and to raise fares. Losses increased and services declined further – particularly at weekends. On the positive side, a Stroud to Bristol service (using the motorway) was introduced – some going on to Weston super Mare. In 1972 Merrywalks Shopping Centre was opened – with Fine Fare being opened by Ronnie Corbett. The bus station was then considered to be one of the most modern in the country. Bus tours remained popular, whilst the DDs used for the school run were available during holidays for tours.

By 1975 the number of buses serving Stroud had been cut by 19% since 1960. GCC was cash strapped and further cuts to services were made and losses mounted at BOC. Only 4 bus services covered their costs. These were Chalford to Stonehouse (421), Whiteshill (435), Foxmoor (442) and Nailsworth to Gloucester (556). More one-man services and shorter buses were introduced. The downward spiral of demand continued and some minibuses were introduced. Other services – such as Nailsworth to Horsley – became “hail and ride”.

1980-89 – Demand, deregulation and denationalisation. A “market analysis project” was introduced based on customer surveys. This led to a complete redesign of the services and buses based on demand. The Stroud-Bristol link was dropped and services cut back between Stroud and Cirencester. There was a move to smaller and more localised timetables. Integrated rail and bus timetables were distributed to every house – but bus services were now half what they were 30 years previously. There had been no compulsory redundancies in the whole process. New long distance services were introduced.

In 1985 the Tram Act led to deregulation and removal of the stage carriage licensing system. The management took over control of the local company and renamed it Bristol and Gloucester. Without GCC support 33 villages would have been without a bus service. The Stroud-Painswick-Cheltenham service was withdrawn until GCC put in a subsidy of £100,000. The Chalford to Stonehouse service now became two separate services for the first time since 1919. GCC also offered contracts to smaller bus companies to supply specific villages – such as Minchinhampton and Tetbury. GCC support was (and remains) vital. Stroud Valley buses re-branded themselves green with a yellow stripe. With deregulation owners could change routes at a whim so knowing timetables was difficult. In 1989 NO SMOKING was introduced.

1990 – 2003. The new decade dawned with much optimism amongst the yellow and green livery – but there were only 35 buses in the fleet. The management merged their interests with Cheltenham and Swindon. 6 minibuses were introduced. The urban services were re-branded as METRO – painted red, silver and blue - with increased frequencies on popular routes of up to 10 minutes. The bus stops moved back to the town centre because Merrywalks needed a new tarmac apron. Shoppers, traders and taxi drivers did not like the move. The bus station was purchased by SDC in 1997 and the buses returned to the bus station. The London Road garage was sold in 1992 and moved to Bowbridge, whilst Waitrose later built a supermarket on the site.

At the end of 1993 Western Travel sold its interests to Stagecoach and the re-branding was completed by 1996. By 1998 half of the fleet were mini-buses – with 30 minute services between Stroud and France Lynch and between Stroud and Gloucester. In 1997 Stagecoach relinquished the Bulk Scholars’ Agreement through which it provided school bus services – not least because of problems of maintaining discipline with the pupils – and this was taken over by smaller operators. The grant from GCC remained vital and was the major determinant of where buses went to – outside the major routes. Smaller operators continued to take minor routes.

In January 2001 Stagecoach reorganised itself as Stagecoach Wales and West with its HQ in Cheltenham. The 20-minute service (Number 20) Stroud to Stonehouse was introduced, resulting in increased business. In 2000 there were severe driver shortages and drivers were drafted from Scotland and the North of England – drivers being billeted at the Imperial. In 2001 it re-branded as Stagecoach in the Cotswolds and closed its Stroud office on Saturdays. In 2003 the bus station closed to make way for the cinema. GCC proposed an interchange at Stroud railway station but ………..watch this space. Stagecoach aimed to timetable services at the same time each hour. The book ends in January 2003, when there were 39 buses in Stroud, 60 staff and 2 million passenger miles per annum. Other local bus companies employed 7 drivers.

POSTSCRIPT – perhaps we will shortly see a renaissance of bus services in the valleys as fuel prices continue their inexorable rise. Summarised by John Meadley March 2008


Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Cardiff Passivhaus

Some might know from this blog that I have done occasional lectures for MSc students at Cardiff University - those studying sustainable architecture - anyhow the Architect their has been building a Passivhaus and I thought this might interest as there is a link to a news item of it below....

See also planning request for a Passivhaus in Randwick here.

What's that? Well some 6000 have been built in countries like Germany and the US but here only a few have been built....Paola Sassi's house in Cardiff (see photo) is built entirely from sustainable materials and uses insulation and a heat recovery and ventilation system to keep the temperature at 19C and solar panels to heat the water, half of which is harvested from rain - it requires no central heating. In fact, no heating at all.

The Passivhaus standard was established by the Passivhaus Institute in Darmstadt, Germany in 1996. What Passivhaus means, in broad terms, is that the building is insulated to a level that allows the sun and other passive heat gains to produce enough energy to heat the home. Passive gain is the heat from daily activity, given off by people cooking, using the shower, making toast and boiling the kettle. Pretty much everything we do produces heat that can be captured and circulated from warmer rooms (bathroom and kitchen) to cooler rooms (lounge and bedroom) by a heat recovery and ventilation system.

Paola is moving to Oxford for a new job so hopefully she will be able to inspire locals there. Meanwhile I have now submitted a proposal for some part-funding of the 'Open Homes for a Sustainable Future project' - see earlier blog - where folk will be able to visit homes in the Stroud area who have done stuff like solar thermal, hydro or whatever and talk to them - the hope is this will encourage more people down that route - more coming soon on that.

See loads more with pics here and see article plus photos in The Independent here and watch it on TV:
http://www.itvlocal.com/wales/news/?player=WAL_News_15&void=170027

Watercolour of local churches on sale

240 churches will be on sale in Gloucester Cathedral this April including the local Parishes. Retired chartered surveyor Alec Brown is reported in the local papers to have travelled the length and breadth of Gloucestershire to produce watercolours of more than half of the county's places of worship.

Photo: Randwick Church taken from SNJ

Nearly all of Alec's work has been turned into prints, postcards and Christmas cards, and sold to raise money for Gloucester Cathedral and the children's charity The James Hopkins Trust, but this entire collection of churches has never been displayed publicly before. Now, just over a year after Alec's death, his daughter, the Rev Helen Sammon, is organising an exhibition and sale of her father's work in the cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral from April 5 to 12. For more information log onto: www.RABwatercolours.co.uk

Latest on mast for Ash Lane

Below is the comprehensive letter from the Parish Council to Orange as their submission to the consultation. It is not strong enough in my view in rejecting the site although it raises many important points - this is an AONB area and we already have too many of these masts littering the countryside.

Photo: view of mast site

After another walk there I am more convinced than ever that this is not a good location. Anyhow I have today spoken with the National Trust to discuss this application and I know the AONB folk are also being contacted. I have also sought from SDC a guarantee that they will let us know of any application submitted by Orange locally - see previous blog entries for background as no application has yet been made.

Proposed Radio Base Station, Land Adjacent Ash Lane, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 6EX

I write on behalf of Randwick Parish Council in response to the consultation document sent to the Parish Clerk by Lambert Smith Hampton.

The council considered this matter at it’s monthly meeting on Thursday 20 March 2008. With the contentious nature of this proposal the council were pleased to welcome the largest turnout of parishioners to a monthly meeting for some considerable time. The council listened to the views expressed by parishioners, particularly those nearest to the proposed mast, and to those of the District Councillor present and took those views into consideration when formulating this response.

While the immediate reaction of many councillors was to object to the proposal to erect a 15-metre high telecommunication mast in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty the council recognises the benefit and public service served by having a good communication network. The council would therefore seek the following clarifications and would ask you to take onboard the suggestions, which are made in an attempt to make the proposal less unacceptable to the parish.

Clarifications. Purpose of mast - The letter from Lambert Smith Hampton states that the purpose of the mast is to improve mobile coverage for local and visiting people. It further states that the mast is needed to replace one decommissioned at Stroud College. The council are aware that the mast at Stroud College was removed at least one year ago. Not withstanding this, the council are also aware, from local enquires, that Orange coverage is still excellent in all areas of the parish. The council is also aware of an Orange base station within 1.5 km of this proposed mast. Could you therefore clarify why a new mast is required?

Traffic - Ash Lane is a steep, twisting single-track road that currently serves a few dwellings below the proposed entrance, two above it, a Guide Hut opposite the entrance and is used to access the National Trust woodland by both drivers and many walkers. The proposed entrance is at a blind spot where a footpath crosses the lane. The lane is accessed off of a rural road without footpaths that is used by pedestrians and particularly children to walk to the village school. Concerns have been expressed concerning the amount of new traffic generated by this proposal both during its construction and during its operation. Could you please give us your estimates of this increased traffic, both in number and size of vehicle?

Access to the mast - The proposal shows the entrance off Ash Lane but does not show any access track to the mast. Could you clarify if you intend to build a track to the mast and if so will this be permanent or just for the construction?

Cable routes - The drawings provided do not show the routes of any cables to the mast. Could you tell us if these will be over or underground? Do you have any proposed routes for these yet?

Mast usage - Will the mast be used solely for Orange mobile services? What power will the mast be transmitting at?

Suggestions - If the responses to these requests for clarifications were such as to lead The Council to support the proposal it would make the following suggestions to lessen the negative impact on our local environment.

Visual impact - The proposed site is within The Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; it will also be visible from the Randwick Conservation Area and the Cotswold Way National Trail and much of the surrounding area. The Council believes that the proposed installation should therefore be designed to the highest possible standards. To this end the Council would wish Orange to use one of the masts designed to resemble a tree. It would also request that the compound area is further disguised by planting of a hedge of native species outside of the security fence.

Entrance from Ash Lane - The Council, in response to the concerns of people living in Ash Lane, would like the details of the entrance from Ash Lane reconsidered. This location is currently a very rural area and this should be preserved. A stone access track and steel gates will not help in this aim. The Council would wish the track to be in some form of reinforced grass and the gates to be in treated timber. Concern has also been expressed about the creation of an area off the lane, which may lead to undesirable parking and associated noise and litter. The council would therefore want to see the gates placed at the side of the road in the same position as the existing gate and stile.

Footpath Access - The Council would wish to see the formalisation of the footpaths that have existed for many years parallel to Ash Lane and from the proposed access along the western boundary of the field to the Cotswold Way. Dog walkers and people wishing to access Randwick Woods without walking on the narrow road currently use both these paths extensively. The Council would be pleased to see this path either being dedicated as a public footpath or as a permissive path.

Conclusion - The Parish Council would prefer the proposal did not go ahead. However it recognises the public service provided by mobile communications. It therefore seeks clarification of the points raised. If the council were satisfied with the responses to these points it would support the proposal if the suggestions given were incorporated in the proposal.

Martin Rendell, Vice-chairman, Randwick Parish Council