13 Feb 2008

Transition Towns crucial role to play

GWonlineThere are many ways of changing the world - the wave of interest in Transition Towns has, in my view, been one of the most positive recent developments - see here one view about Transition Towns from Dr Rupert Read - see his article here in GreenWorld - a briefer summary is below taken from his blog - and is followed by Nailsworth's Fi Macmillans' reply.

Rupert writes: More and more people are talking about how 'Transition Towns' (www.transitionculture.org) might change the world and save us from oil depletion and climate catastrophe. But there is I am afraid one critically important respect in which this bold hope could not possibly come true. It is this: The Transition Towns movement alone cannot save us, because, within the existing economic system, some communities reducing their use of fossil fuels is received by everyone else as a price signal that it is OK to use even more fossil fuels. I.e. For every litre of petrol that (say) Totnes does not use, everyone else in Britain is very slightly incentivised to use more petrol, by the price not going up as much as it otherwise would.
Transition Towns alone can only function as demonstration projects. They show what is possible. But in order for them to be part of a movement of movements that actually reduces overall use of fossil fuels, legislation is needed. Legislation that enforces lower overall use of fossil fuels (e.g. through carbon rationing), and/or that forces everyone to try to become a transition town.

That is why I believe that both local action and political commitment are required. Unless we force political change, then Rob Hopkins's 'Transition Towns' vision of how why might make a transition to a saner future will remain a fantasy or a myth, rather than the reality we absolutely desperately need it to become.

Fi writes: As Rupert says, one of the important functions of Transition Towns is to enable demonstration projects for a more sustainable future. The success of the Transition Town initiative, both here in Stroud and nationally, has been that it enables a grassroots response to concern about Peak Oil and climate change. As a grassroots organisation, with real people, we can develop projects and change our behaviour, supported by fellow Transitioners. We can be working examples of the low-carbon life that will be the future for all of us. Economic systems and legislation are theoretical frameworks which guide our behavioural choices. Yes, they are important, but action is where it is at.

In Transition Stroud we are now working with the District Council and Local Strategic Partnership to develop co-operation, raise awareness of the issues and to change policy. This is not a 'fantasy'. It is real engagement with politicians and the community. Our last sesssion on planning issues identified how the Planning Department can support the decentralisation of energy production.

Last year, we arranged for Richard Heinberg ('The Party's Over' - Peak Oil expert) to speak here in Stroud. We engaged the District Council around the issues, and Heinberg made a special presentation to the Council. On the back of this, we started dialogue with key council officers, using the Portland, Oregon Transition Plan as a working model for change. Jointly this led to the creation of a Think Tank to develop a district-wide adaptation plan to Peak Oil and climate change. Transition Towns and the Green Party. Ideal bedmates.

2 comments:

Dorothea said...

You may have promoted Dr Read here, Philip, but he does seem to have a good point about supply and demand, and free-riders.

http://transitionculture.org/2008/02/12/rupert-read-misses-the-point-about-transition-initiatives/

Philip said...

Thanks - I have corrected Rupert Read back to a Dr - I know another Professor Read and was clearly typing without care - a terrible affliction of some bloggers - incl myself - thanks for link to dabate - I have added a brief comment....