15 Nov 2007

Graffiti: art or vandalism?

There was some controversy recently re the famous graffiti artist Banksy - the elusive artist was caught in the act by a passer-by using a mobile phone. I've long admired his work which covers many political issues (see some here as well as his website) as well as the photo reproduced here.

Photos: Banksy, then below vandalism (?) of Labour Party office and art behind Blockbusters in Stroud and bin in Stroud

So is it art or vandalism?

Many agree that the best policy is to remove graffiti immediately - but when does graffiti become art? Banksy is surely art? But to some it is also vandalism....to my mind ‘graffiti’ on pavements by traffic engineers - markings often left for months - often devalues the streetscape far more. If we are going to tackle graffiti then we must look broader...

Bus shelters decorated by school children can be a mess or wonderful - we have examples locally in Whiteshill - then there are the great other works - Stroud to my mind is particularly fortunate - see the walls down from Mother Nature and the roundabout opposite the station.

I also love some of the political graffiti like“Official Polling Station” printed on the rubbish bins - see photo below - but then some is perhaps more overtly vandalism like the painting of the Labour party's office in Stroud.

Stroud also have poems in many places - often beautifully printed. Love them!

Anyhow the news is that a Stroud grotspot - the pedestrian underpass at Wallbridge looks set to be improved - the town council will be commissioning an artist to paint a mural there - the hope being to discourage tagging - studies have shown that street art tends to be left alone by youngsters - Stroud District Council spends an average of £8,000 to £10,000 a year cleaning up graffiti.

Vote wastedOliver Jelf, who runs the Illustration Gallery in Stroud, has been asked to oversee the project and he is looking for an artist to come up with a design. Oliver has worked with graffiti-style artists before and says there is a place for street art. He is quoted in The Citizen saying: "A lot of graffiti is about tagging and indiscriminate scribbling and what we want to do is bring forward a proper co-ordinated approach. We felt that we could enhance that location by having proper street art." Work will not begin until Spring next year at the earliest but I am sure it can only improve that walk way.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

man this bs how they call graffiti vandalism im fuckin pissed bout that how else can us graffers express our feeling bout this fucked up gov. we dont have enough money to fucking but a billboard wtf

Anonymous said...

By saying graffiti is vandalism you are turning it into a crime. Sure no one likes their houses and shit tagged on but graffiti has a culture and a history behind it. All the councils and police are seeing it as a crime and locking up kids for doing it? If you lock up a graffiti artist you are 1. wasting government money.2.destroying an artistic outlet or expression and more importantly having a little CRYYY! Why doesn't the local councils put up more and bigger legal spots for graffiti instead of just cleaning the whole city. Wouldn't that be more easier and take the degree of crime out of graffiti.

Anonymous said...

this is all too controversial to make any real definitive statements.

but in my opinion, tagging, is vandalism