Thursday, April 30, 2009

Comment re troops leaving Iraq

I got asked for a response to reports today of British troops leaving Iraq - trouble is I didn't get message until late as work then in Randwick Woods with nearly 20 Woodcraft Folk aged 6 to 9 (wow are those bluebells wonderful there) then another meeting...

In haste I wrote the comments below - but I would have wanted to spend more time on it - the Green party were the only main party to wholly oppose the war in Iraq - yet we never could have imagined the nightmare it became - how we have let down so many including our own troops - the prewar planning and indeed execution have been nothing short of criminal negligence.

Let us hope this is a genuine move for peace and not as some commentators have said due to troops being needed in Afghanistan.

Here is what I sent: "I welcome the troops leaving Iraq and Obama's plans to also pull out. Many millions of us opposed this futile, costly, unjust and damaging war that contravened international law, damaged important links with the region and increased terrorist risks. It led to chaos, devastation and the deaths of up to 650,000 Iraqis. Many British, US and others have also lost their lives. Our Government failed us and our troops. If the war in Iraq has proven anything, it is the utter ineffectiveness of using military power to counter terrorism. Greens have joined others in calling for Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to be tried for war crimes at the international court in the Hague.

"Western Governments must work towards tackling the root causes of conflict and violence. The war on terror can surely only ever be won when we replace a culture of fear with one of respect, engagement, vigilance and solidarity."

Journalist Robert Fisk said of the occupation: "One hundred and seventy-nine dead soldiers. For what? 179,000 dead Iraqis? Or is the real figure closer to a million? We don't know. And we don't care. We never cared about the Iraqis. That's why we don't know the figure. That's why we left Basra."

Peter Brierley, whose son Lance Corporal Shaun Brierley was killed in Iraq said:
"It was an illegal war. We were told we were going to find weapons of mass destruction but there were none. They have dragged the war out for 6 years. I have prayed for no other parent to suffer what we went though."

Meanwhile Gordon Brown declared, "Our task in Iraq is complete… it is a success story."

Endorphins, recycling, cold fusion, swine flu, permaculture and more

Here is a collection of all sorts that interested me:

Photo: Citizen reports teenager David Evans is back at Whiteshill Primary School as their lollypop man.

The Endorphin Effect. Monday night I was in Cheltenham to hear William Bloom give an inspiring talk about a set of easy-to-use strategies that support our health. Endorphins are natural chemicals produced in every cell of the body and are involved in the relaxation of tissue, the anaesthetizing of pain and the physical sensations of pleasure. All zoological creatures, including the single-celled, produce endorphins. A well-balanced state of health includes an ongoing production of endorphins. Babies, toddlers and children are naturally – given a non-violent family and culture – endorphinated. As adolescents and adults we tend to lose our natural wellbeing and tighten up. Adrenalin and cortisol – the hormones of tension and anxiety – begin to predominate. William Bloom is wonderfully authentic - he was talking about how we can trigger the production of these hormones - and I need them! Well worth a look - indeed essential reading - See more at: www.williambloom.com/endorphins.php

Green Nobel Prize. See more here.
Permaculture Principles at Work. I got sent this introduction to permaculture principles:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT_2VVXA7SY
Plus Connie Van Dyke’s inspirational urban garden in Portland, Oregon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YYZTw_xBBs&feature=channel

The Psychological Benefits of Gardening. There are numerous obvious benefits of growing at least a portion of your own organic food, but very little has been written about its psychological benefits. In Geoff Lawton's new DVD "Establishing a Food Forest the Permaculture Way", we learn how gardening provides food for the soul, as well as the body. See: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_17524.cfm

Cold Fusion - is this really a reality? New evidence could open up the whole scientific community to develop free safe abundant energy? See more at Nuclear Engineering International here. And a link to a Youtube here.

Electrical waste video. I was sent a link to the film "Printer Vs Bin" which has been unleashed by WRAP to highlight the need and facilities for recycling Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Hosted at <http://www.vimeo.com/3761095> the animation recreates a Tarantino-esque duel between an obsolete printer and a wheelie bin. The aim of the film is to remind people not just to bin their waste electrical goods, but instead to recycle them. The campaign is also being supported by the interactive Regeneration Game <http://snipurl.com/dnpm5> in which users put in their postcode before playing the game and then the game cleverly features details of their nearest recycling facilities. There is also a URL supplied at which people can find out where to recycle at http://www.dontbinitbringit.org

Nailsworth School Opts Out. An independent school in Gloucestershire, which Ofsted found 'Outstanding' in many areas when it was inspected has become the first in England to apply for exemption from parts of the EYFS. The Acorn School in Nailsworth, which is registered for 120 pupils aged three to 19, has applied for exemption from the reading, writing and assessment aspects of the EYFS around literacy, numeracy and the use of computers. See one of my previous blogs here. Headmaster Mr Whiting comments: "From nought to seven children have what we call a Kindergarten experience, which is developing the will. From seven to 14 our feeling, artistic and musical elements develop, so it's an artistic, musical, feeling education from age seven to 14. Only at 14 are the thinking processes coming in to the human being, so there we have a more academic and intellectual education here....There are no state exams, no SATs, and no state testing. I have managed to achieve what no other school has achieved in this country, and that is a 100 per cent success rate for students who have moved from the school to university."

Battery recycling. Given the recent EU Batteries Directive and imminent UK Regulations, you may be interested to know that inventors of the USBCELL re-usable battery format www.usbcell.com, just launched a new site www.SaveBatteryWaste.com to help consumers find battery collection points, nationwide council links and recycling advice. I'm not aware of the environmental credentials of the usbcell? Anyone out there help?

Eat the Suburbs. This good short film takes the oil debate to the backyard and follows everyday homeowners as they prepare for the end of the oil age... one garden at a time. See it here.

Could Food Shortages Bring Down Civilization? See article here.

Success re Nanomaterials. I've been concerned for some time re nanomaterials - Caroline Lucas reports the EU vote recently (see here) means there will be an overhaul of legislation in this area. While the use of nanomaterials comes with the promise of many (yet to be proven) benefits, they may also present significant new risks due to their minute size, such as increased reactivity and mobility, possibly leading to increased toxicity in combination with unrestricted access to the human body. It is right they will be looked at properly - let's hope we don't now see the Chemical industry leaning on the EU.

Swine flu. While attention is understandably focused on how to deal with the consequences of the current swine flu epidemic, it is vital that governments put serious resources into examining its causes as well. Evidence is mounting linking the increasing intensification of pig and poultry production, and the spread of these animal-based epidemics that can be lethal to humans. We need a comprehensive inquiry urgently. See more re Green party view here.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Are there any alternatives to road salt?

Some will remember my letter re alternatives to road salt for gritting our roads - see here.

Well it seems hard to find anything that doesn't have a downside. Certainly there is a growing concern about the use of salt on our roads: it can have a significant impact on local biodiversity (especially in sensitive areas) and on local water courses and indeed water supplies. Furthermore in addition to the public health and environmental problems associated with chloride deicers, the corrosivity of salt impacts on vehicles and infrastructure.

So bearing all that in mind I asked what consideration has Gloucestershire given to alternatives to salt like Calcium Magnesium Acetate and Potassium Acetate? I also noted that some Councils like York have switched to a product called 'Safecote' which is a combination of salt and sugar based food industry residue. Apparently the sugar coating makes it stick so that it is washed away more slowly and means that frequency can be reduced and the level of salt content is also reduced.

Glos County trial Safecote

In reply I learnt that Highways have already carried out a trial on Safecote from the Cannop Depot, and found that it had it's own problems. It seems the County found that the claimed reduction in spread rates do not recoup the extra costs of the material. Furthermore the material must be kept a lot drier than conventional rock salt, which requires extra storage buildings. The claims on reduced vehicle corrosion is based on not needing to wash out the Gritters after every run. This is however, conditional on them being stored inside in the dry, so not only would we need extra buildings for salt, we would need more for gritter storage as well.

The theoretical reduced spread rates are fine in theory, but by reducing the rate of spread to fine margins, the risk of a slight blockage (very common) could reduce the coverage to dangerously low rates. Other problems found relate to an unpleasant aroma from stock-piles, and that the taste/smell was attracting animals such as deer to the roads in the Forest of Dean.

So there are problems - but it cuts the salt. Is it worth the extra costs or are other options better?

Other options?

It seems many of the solutions sound fine in theory, and if dealing with mass/known controlled areas such as runways or motorways then they can produce recognisable savings. However in Gloucestershire with hilly, narrow roads, the theory doesn't always relate to reality. The County does not have a single specification for Gritters, due to the diverse needs, whereas the Highways Agency for example has hundreds of identical vehicles purely built for motorways.

The County have also tried in the past pre-wetting salt, which can also reduce spread rates, but they experienced problems with mixing brine in sufficient quantities, the vehicles needed brine tanks as well as salt which increased their payloads resulting in greater fuel costs, road and vehicle damage etc.

In response to my other possible alternatives here is what came back:

Calcium Magnesium Acetate is more suited to de-icing concrete or grass surfaces, apparently not so good on tarmac, which is what most of our network consists of. It's also much slower acting, 15-30 times longer than conventional rock salt and I suspect such delays would be unacceptable. I see this as great for runways for example where usage can be controlled but not on the public network.

Potassium Acetate is apparently quite corrosive, so apart from the potential damage to equipment, using it in the public domain may be an issue, but apparently it is used quite widespread in the States.

Both of these products are 'manufactured' and as far as we are aware, not available in sufficient quantities in this Country, whereas rock salt is a natural resource and is mainly sourced from Cheshire or Northern Ireland. I welcome that the County is giving consideration to alternatives - it seems much more work is needed to work out what the impacts are - and I have asked that they liaise with wildlife/biodiversity groups re sensitive sites. I have also asked that consideration be given to sites like Humphreys End where the barrel grit bin keeps getting tipped over and leading to salt in the local brook there. I am seeking additional funds for a better design at those sites.

I see Iowa have used garlic salt - see here. Apparently the US use 8 to 12 million tons of salt every year on roads! See a good article here where the alternatives are discussed.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Staverton Airport: decision time on Thursday

Well this blog has covered the twists and turns of plans to expand Staverton Airport - we are now reaching the final point. The four planning applications submitted by the Airport in 2006 will be considered by the Tewkesbury Borough Council (TBC) Planning Committee on Thursday, the 30th April 2009.

The good news is that the planning officer handling the applications has recommended that the Committee permit three of the applications and refuse the fourth. It is possible this could still scupper Airport expansion plans.

Campaigners will be there for the big day - Friends of the Earth and the residents group will both be there - I sadly can't be there for this momentous occasion. The discussion about the Airport application will commence at about 13:00, with the Committee visiting the Airport during the meeting. The agenda states that "The Committee will adjourn for a second time at 2.05pm for a site visit by all Members of the Planning Committee to the Gloucestershire Airport sites [Agenda Item 5c, applications 1-4 on the Planning Schedule]. The Committee will then reconvene, not before 3.30pm, to consider applications 1-4 at Agenda Item 5c)."

It has been reported in the Gloucestershire Echo that entry to the meeting will be by ticket only, and that tickets will be available from the Council offices on the morning of the meeting. The appendix containing the officers reports and recommendations for item 5c is currently at this address: http://tinyurl.com/c57fm6

I have emailed every councillor on that planning committee - see my letter below.

Nonsense over Green Policy

The Airport has recently finalised details of its 'Green Policy'. Instead of preventing expansion this will permit the number of aircraft movements to increase significantly:

* Annual total movements could increase from 80,000 (in 2008) to 95,000.
* The number of 'out of hours' movements will be permitted to increase from the current level of 708 to 1425 (1.5% of 95,000).
* The number of 'night time' (23:00-06:00) flights, which are currently fairly infrequent would be permitted to increase dramatically to 100 per year.

All of these figure do not include any of the Police and medical aircraft, which are excluded from the caps.

See my recent letter to press here - it was printed but without the Al Gore mention.

Flawed safety argument

It isn't just the failure to take into account Green issues there are also a host of economic arguments against expanding this airport. However one of the key reasons we continue to get thrown at us is that the expansion is on grounds of safety. This is bit is adapted from work on this by Richard Conibere from Gloucestershire FoE:

The Airport is based on Greenbelt land and to justify their expansion plan they must demonstrate 'very special circumstances'. A desire to expand the business is not enough. Therefore the Airport's planning applications argue that the development is necessary on safety grounds - to meet the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) safety regulations.

Currently the Airport enjoys agreed variations on the CAA rules allowing, for example, a 30
metre reduction in the runway end safety area. These variations are not inherently unsafe -
otherwise they would not be permitted by the CAA. Nor are they unusual - based on
conversations one campaigner had with the CAA. The Chief Executive of Gloucester City Council has stated that many other and larger airports enjoy similar variations. The only noticable effect of the variations is to ensure that larger passenger planes and private jets use the airport only infrequently - this restraint ensures that the variations don't compromise aircraft safety.

The case for the development being a 'safety project' rests on the Airport's insistence that the variations could be withdrawn, reducing the length of the runway and thereby sabotaging the business. Tewksebury Borough Council employed York Aviation as a consultant to look at such claims. Rather than scrutinising the safety claims York simply adopt them unchallenged. The CAA are the final arbiters on airport safety. So the real question is what do they think?

Fortunately the CAA were contacted by Gloucester City Council and their position is documented in various Council reports. The CAA have stated that they are "currently satisfied", "that in the absence of significant changes to the operations at, or any developments of, the airport, they are likely to remain satisfied" and that there is "no immediate time imperative" to remove the variations. In other words, the Airport's contension that the variations may be arbitrarily withdrawn are simply not true. Therefore there are no 'very special circumstances' to justify the Airport's expansion plans. The full CAA position is quoted below:
"14. CAA POSITION 14.1 Discussions with the CAA have confirmed that they are currently satisfied with the airport’s management of the variations to the aerodrome licensing criteria relating to the runway and Code 2 status at Gloucestershire Airport, and that in the absence of significant changes to the operations at, or any developments of the airport, they are likely to remain satisfied. 14.2 The CAA expects the airport company regularly to review the variations in accordance with the current regulations. While they are always keen to see variations removed wherever possible, there is no immediate time imperative in this instance. 14.3 The CAA does not normally remove variations itself but expects the airport management to ensure that variations do not compromise aircraft safety."

So basically a shorter runway means smaller aircraft and fewer types have access. If the status quo is retained it will be just as safe, but with smaller aircraft, or aircraft not going in due to the visability and cloud base minima dictated by the civil aviation authority for that particular airport - if it's not safe to operate today, you simply don't go in or take off - the level of risk of an incident doesn't change.

Noise complaints

These can now be submitted online using the Airport's website. Their home page is at :
www.gloucestershireairport.co.uk


If complaints are not made the airport will claim that their operations do not cause a noise nuisance. It only takes a moment to log a complaint, whether it is an out of hours incident, something particularly low or loud, or repeated circuits.

Email to Tewkesbury Development Control Committee members

As a District councillor and former Development Control Committee member I write regarding this application. I have been astonished by the misinformation put out regarding this application. Some factors in deciding whether or not this planning application should proceed are not part of your remit on this committee, but there are several key points that are worth noting:

1. Safety issue. I would urge councillors to see the view of the Civil Aviation Authority. They "are currently satisfied with the airport’s management of the variations to the aerodrome licensing criteria." This expansion is quite clearly not about safety. The Airport is based on Greenbelt land and to justify their expansion they are seeking to demonstrate 'very special circumstances'. However a desire to expand the business should not be enough to develop this site.

2. Business case. This, in the view of many, is flawed. Forecast oil price changes are not included. Responsible businesses are acting to cut emissions and find alternatives to air travel yet this proposal is about supporting expansion? Furthermore the Airport plan to replace the light aircraft that have traditionally used the airport with larger private jets and scheduled aircraft is surely a change of use?

3. Green Policy. Instead of preventing expansion the Airport's Green Policy will permit the number of aircraft movements to increase significantly from 80,000 (in 2008) to 95,000. The number of 'out of hours' movements will more than double plus there will be an increase in 'night time' flights. This means more noise, pollution and traffic. You may recall 21 local environmental groups wrote to all councillors 15 months ago calling for councillors to lead on cutting emissions not expanding them (i). Failure to act decisively now means, that it is no exaggeration to say, that we will face increasingly terrifying choices about who lives, who dies, who eats, who starves, who swims and who sinks. We must reduce emissions. It is unjust that this business should be allowed to expand emissions. What other businesses must cut emissions so that we can reach targets to tackle climate change?

I hope very much that you will reject these planning applications.

Yours sincerely,


Cllr. Philip Booth,
Stroud District councillor for the Randwick, Ruscombe and Whiteshill ward,

Notes:

(i) Copy of letter sent to all councillors on 8th Jan 2008:

Dear Sir/Madam

The undersigned organisations write this open letter to councillors of Gloucester City, Tewkesbury Borough and Cheltenham Borough in response to the disturbing Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report released on the 17th November and the enormous implications it must have on policy making.

The new report evidences an extraordinary position: CO2 levels in the atmosphere are now higher than at any time over the available 650,000 years of ice core records. The report confirms the worst fears of irreversible changes to the environment, such as massive species loss, collapse of the ice sheets and tropical rainforests and rising sea levels. Such horrors and their impact on communities in all countries are hard to contemplate, but must spur us to action.

We need cuts of 90% or more in CO2 emissions to avoid runaway global warming. Councils have taken a lead by signing the Nottingham Declaration to cut emissions, but a significant step change is needed in policies and actions. This year's floods should be wake up call to all of us.

Staverton Airports' plan to intensify operations and increase CO2 emissions is one example which is completely counter to what is needed. If councils support this they will be ignoring one of the most critical and clear warnings that have ever been given on the perils that the planet faces. Furthermore, this will be done in the face of a deteriorating situation where our country will be struggling to handle the combined economic shocks of climate change and significant oil price increases.

We call on councillors to take a lead to significantly cut our emissions and help build the necessary economic and community resilience to cope with the challenges ahead. We urge you not to support the expansion of Staverton airport.

Yours sincerely.

Neil Marshall, Concerned Residents against Staverton Expansion
Richard Conibere, Cheltenham Friends of the Earth,
Robert Irving, Cirencester Friends of the Earth
Martin Rudland, Forest of Dean Friends of the Earth
Sophie Franklin, Gloucestershire Friends of the Earth Network
Steve Goodchild, Tewkesbury Friends of the Earth
Rene Meek, Gloucestershire Greenpeace
Kevin Lister, Camp Hope Organising Committee
Philip Booth, Gloucestershire Airport Action Group
Ian Lander, Cheltenham Environment Forum
Jimmy Garlick, Plane Stupid, Gloucestershire
Roger Creagh-Osborne, South West Air Action
Carol Mathews, Transition Stroud Transport Group
Sue Clarke, Transition Forest of Dean
Sheila Booth - Stroud Valleys Cycle Campaign
John Mallows, Cheltenham Cycling Campaign
James Beecher, Bicycology
Angela Paine, Shut Oldbury Campaign
Julian Jones, Water 21
Cathy Green, One Tonners
Kate Perkins, People and Planet

Ideas for taking forward the Sustainable Communities Act?

The Sustainable Communities Bill was finally passed this month at the District Council - Greens put a motion in a while back - see here. So now how to use it?

Pic: By permission of Jaine Rose who still has some of her pics in Star Anise Cafe and cards for sale in Made in Stroud - see more at: http://www.jainerose.co.uk/

I started to draft a proposal for use of the Sustainable Communities Act below but following conversations with Transition Stroud and time and other commitments it seems such an idea will have to wait. It originally was adapted from other campaigners but it will need further research - for now we need a simpler, quicker suggestion for trying out the Act? Any thoughts? Anyone interested in taking forward?

Draft proposal: The economic downturn will have a huge impact on our local communities. Many of our local shops and businesses are being hit hard. We would like to consider how the Act could be used regarding parking at out-of-town supermarkets. Supermarkets don't pay non-domestic rates on their car parking spaces yet many local traders in our towns are affected by double yellow lines and parking costs. It is not a level playing field. The Act we consider could let non domestic rates be levied on those parking spaces. We could then waiver those charges if the supermarket agreed to a stated percentage of local goods for sale. This could be an important boost for local farms and businesses creating jobs and economic activity.

Grit bins, 20 is Plenty, Gullies and more

My internet connection is not working well today - I was going to write about a whole host of County Council related stuff that I have been chasing but quite frankly I would bore you if I gave all the details - so many emails and conversations but here is the gist of some of it...

Grit bins. Well once again this has absorbed lots of time from vandalised bins, missing bins and apparent differences in policy on bins between Parishes...do contact me if you want to know more! Suffice to say some bins in each Parish have been identified to be replaced and I have others that I think need action. Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parish are planning these nice wooden ones for some sites (see photo).

'20 is Plenty' in Whiteshill and Ruscombe. This has at last been approved by Highways despite apparent differences of policy by Highways to the Parish Councils. Again the details are too boring! Photo of our planning meeting touring the Parish to identify problems recently.

Safe Routes to School. See previous blog here. The details of Government policy are still not knbown and are unlikely to be for a while - sadly the County note to me that Safe Routes will still not be prioritised - this is not just about reducing accidents, but also increasing the number of people who feel happy walking and cycling to school and work. That can play a significant role in reducing traffic and consequent CO2 emissions - of course one of the most significant factors is getting 20 mph in residential areas - see the many, many previous blogs on that.

Gully clearance. There have been rumours of cuts to the Gully clearing programme - but I am assured it has not been cut and a new contract has been signed - I am still seeking info about what that might mean in practice for this area?

Consultation re Highways issues. There is no question that it is v difficult for Highways Officers who often have to repeat information several times to various people asking questions - we are fortunate that most respond well to the queries and questions from Councils and members of the public. It is not always an easy task. However there is always room to improve and get the balance right between consultation and action. Ideas would be welcomed from folk. Certainly I would like to see more public and local councillor involvement even if it is only once a year to raise issues and play a part in improving services.

Where have all the bees gone?

Over 70 people squeezed into the Star Anise Cafe on Friday night to hear three speakers on bees. See report here by Chair of the evening Miriam Yagud.

Photos: Star Anise then speakers Carlo, Tom and Sheila.

I very much enjoyed the evening - all the speakers were good - but loved hearing Carlo from the Global Bee Project - this is a locally based project - and his passion came through strongly -the website has good info but for me he really made me shift my thinking from just honeybees. In the UK there are some 256 variaties of bees and over 20,000 in the world - the honeybee is just one - take the Red Mason bee - a great pollinator as well - and maybe essential if we kill off the honeybee. Indeed already folk are thinking about how this bee can be encouraged - it only pollinated until June so there is talk of chilling bees and then letting them out later!

A fascinating fact was that I think some 80% of our bees live underground and now farming techniques and pesticides have led to their decline - it is not just the honeybee that is suffering. Anyhow one thing I will be doing in the next couple of weeks is making a bee house for those bees who like a hole to live in - the web is full of designs - see for example here and video here.

As regular blog readers will know there are a fair few blogs on bees - and various calls for action - well interestingly Carlo considered the most important issue to be pesticides. And one action that people could take is to call for a ban of a pesticide that is thought to be accelerating the decline of bees in this country. Farmers and other food producers, gardeners and allotment holders, as well as beekeepers, see this as a potential disaster as so many plants depend on bees for pollination. As this blog has noted there is much speculation as to what has caused the catastrophic decline or 'colony collapse disorder', although it has been accepted in parts of Europe that a group of pesticides known as Neonicotinoids are implicated in killing bees, and, as a result, they are banned in Germany, France, Italy and Slovenia, where as many as two thirds of honeybee populations have been wiped out. The Soil Association in this country and leading experts have also called for these pesticides to be banned.

I would like to encourage others to join me in writing to Hilary Benn today to call for action. The decline in the bee population means that urgent, decisive action is needed. The UK needs to be taking a leaf out of the book of our European neighbours and ban harmful Neonicotinoid pesticides at the earliest opportunity. Benn's email is: bennh@parliament.uk

Monday, April 27, 2009

Being LGBT is not a disease

I have to note my horror at the news that a conference in London organised by the Anglican Mainstream Organisation was aimed at informing delegates about ‘curing’ gay men and lesbians. I've heard from several Green party colleagues and others who attended a demo outside the event - one of them sent this photo.

Apparently American psychologist Dr Joseph Nicolosi claims he has helped many people to become heterosexual. But as reported in the news the Royal College of Psychiatrists said there was no supporting evidence and such treatment could be damaging. The Church of England at least has said it did not promote such therapies. The Royal College said the American Psychiatric Association had concluded there was no scientific evidence that homosexuality was a disorder and removed it from its diagnostic glossary of mental disorders in 1973. The World Health Organisation's International Classification of Diseases followed suit in 1992.

I can't believe it took that long - anyhow there is an international day to commemorate that decision by WHO - IDAHO - the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia - I am at present approaching the District Council re flying the flag on 17th May - hopefully news in a blog very soon.

Here is the quote I gave re this: "There is no sound scientific evidence that sexual orientation can be changed. This misguided group are trying to take us back to the dark ages. So-called treatments of homosexuality often allow prejudice and discrimination to flourish and indeed can be deeply damaging."

See South West Green party comments:
http://swlgbtgreens.blogspot.com/2009/04/being-lgbt-is-not-disease.html

Lesley Hedges, spokesperson for the Green Party’s LGBTIQ group at: http://www.ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/09/Apr/2401.htm

Future Energy Exhibition

Today I've had several meetings in Stroud - one re the Core Strategy (see more here why we should all participate) - I was helping put together our Green party response - coming soon to Glos Green party website.

Then two meetings regarding the Eco-Renovation Open Homes project this September. We are finalising the 20 plus homes which will open this year - plus hopefully news being confirmed soon re support from Ecotricity.

However here is a related exhibition that might interest next month - Future Energy Exhibition - The diocese has organised an exhibition in Gloucester Cathedral, which will showcase new and groundbreaking ways of how you can reduce your carbon footprint. Nearly 30 companies across the county will be exhibiting, so please come along and take a look.

The exhibition starts on May 11th and finishes on 17 May. You can download a poster and invitation to the launch if you click on the links below. You can print these and display them on your noticeboards. See the poster advertising the exhibition with times etc:
http://www.gloucester.anglican.org/downloads/876.jpg

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Willow Elfin's and glorious Randwick Woods

Well a very busy week with work and meetings every night last week - indeed two meetings on two nights! Three of those last week were for Woodcraft - it all started last weekend with Sunday at the British School for an all day Woodcraft training session, later in the week we had a parents meeting to plan our sessions for the term then Thursday our first session of the term with children at Willow Elfins.

Some might remember we were appealing for new members of the Willow group - see here (incl background re group) well we are now up to 18 children (2 places left - boys please as we are short of them) and virtually all turned up to the first session. I came away exhausted but it was fun - the evening included making bows and arrows out of hazel which were then cautiously tested.

Next Thursday we will be in Randwick Woods trying them out more seriously and of course enjoying the bluebells - it is stooooooopendous there at the moment.

Yesterday I had a wonderful walk around the woods - these pics do no justice to the wonderful carpet after carpet of blue. Don't miss them - they must be one of the best places in the country to see them! There are also the tail-end of the wood anenomes (see blog here).

Hampshire antifluoridation campaigners in Stroud

Wednesday night saw me at the Safe Water Campaign meeting - learnt lots about the campaign in Hampshire - inspiring to meet two committed activists who are still determined to overturn the decision to fluoridate there. Indeed there support seems to be growing. See my press release re meeting and more pics here.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Transition Stroud May newsletter

ts-logo-dark-red.png
I've been involved with Transition Stroud from it's early days and it has been exciting to see it grow - below is the latest news sent out by the coordinator Helen Royall - it is an inspiring list - indeed so much so that I wanted to share it here - and it doesn't even include a whole host of activities that are going on - read and consider getting involved if you are not already! Lots to get your teeth into and there is always room for creating more groups - See more at: www.transitionstroud.org

Welcome to the May newsletter. The season is warming up and lots of outdoor activities are being planned. I hope you’ll try to get to as many as possible, but, more importantly, bring lots of friends.

§ The YOUTH GROUP are holding an Eco Mania day for young people at Upper Grange,

(Lovedays Mead, Stroud GL5 1XB) on Saturday May 9th from 11.00am to 3.00pm.. Harry (13) is the co-ordinator of the Youth Group and has worked very hard for this event. On Saturday there will be entertainment from Captain Spanner, pizzas from Angelo’s Wood Fired Pizzas, recycled arts and crafts, buy or barter stall, sunflower growing competition and the chance for children to make their ideal town out of a collection of recycled bits and pieces. Harry went out busking with his violin on Saturday to raise money for the event and to advertise it (he was joined by Helen R and Pete Nightingale). Please encourage any children you may know to come along and come along yourself as well. Attached is a flyer for the day.

§ The TEXTILE GROUP

Emily Smith will be taking over the co-ordination of this group again. Thanks to Rose who has done an excellent job. It was lovely to see so many last night up at the beautiful Westley Farm, rag rugging and rug plaiting. The next meeting will be in three weeks time, some suggested dates Tuesday 12th May 7.30pm Wednesday 13th May 7.30pm . I’ll send out a reminder when they decide. The group are busy preparing for the weekend at Westley Farm in June. “The Art of Westley Farming” A collective cross-pollination celebrating ecological and creative diversity.

§ The BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT GROUP

Simon and Fi will be speaking at the Positive Future Conference 2009 in Liverpool on 5th May run by the Improvement and Development Agency for local government. It is on climate change and sustainability and will equip delegates with knowledge on the innovative practice and latest developments in a changing policy landscape. Speaking with Jonathan Porrit and Rob Hopkins. See www.idea.gov.uk/positivefuture09. Ed Milliband invited!

Fi and Dave (Cockcroft) were also featured in the Times - see here.

§ The new HEALTH GROUP will be meeting for the first time at the Apothecary, Ruskin Mill (Old Bristol Road, Nailsworth, GL6 0LA - take the Horsley Rd off the A46), Thursday 30th April at 7.30. New members would be very welcome. They will be looking at the effect of diminishing oil supplies on pharmaceuticals, considering the possibility of growing homeopathic medicines nearer home, and general policies on Health issues related to inability to travel, among other issues.

§ The ENERGY GROUP are working towards the Eco-renovation

Open Homes weekend in September. So far there are 20 homes that will be opening their doors to visitors. For more information see http://www.stroudopenhomes.org.uk/


§ The TRANSPORT GROUP

If you’re not up to date with all the amazing work the Transport Group have been involved with check out the web site http://www.transitionstroud.org/content/view/92/127/

Planning continues for Green Travel Month (June) including stalls on the Sub Rooms forecourt on 13th June.

§ The LIFESTYLES AND LIVELIHOODS GROUP are still working hard for the new local currency. The training evening was very helpful with much lively debate about how we will encourage local businesses to participate. See the Transition Stroud blog for more about the evening http://transitiontownstroud.blogspot.com/

OTHER NEWS

* The Space Cinema Club will be showingTHE AGE OF STUPIDonSunday May 3rd, 8.00pm and again on Friday May 8th at 7.00pm. ‘Starring Pete Postlethwaite, this remarkable film is captivating and constantly surprising: the first successful dramatisation of climate change to reach the big screen. You must see it’. (The Guardian). WE WOULD LIKE AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE TO GO AND SEE THIS FILM. Call Rick at 01453 755 706 if you wish to see it.

*This year's Stroud Communiversity – Inspiring Self-Reliant Communities – takes place on Friday 15th, Saturday 16th and Sunday 17th May. We are now able to offer the full programme at the reduced concessionary rate of £190 to all participants. This fee includes all lunches and evening meals and covers the cost of each site visit. There are also a limited number of bursaries for those struggling to meet this cost. We encourage people to commit to the whole weekend for continuity within the Action Learning work and deeper group dynamics. However, we are able to offer a single day rate of £70 with the understanding that for some, a full weekend is not easily freed up. And last but not least, for those that can make the time, there is the unique opportunity to attend the launch of The Exchange on Thursday 14th May, free of charge to Communiversity participants. ***Book Now to Avoid Disappointment*** For more information and booking forms see here.

Transition Minchinhampton have sent us news: “Our next event is on 16th May Feeding the 5,000: Can We in Minchinhampton Feed Ourselves with Local Food? with Jade Bashford. We are all really excited about it, then we have a Duchy Home Farm visit in June and an evening on Energy in July before the schools break up (format yet to be discussed!)”. Contact Sue Edgley or Michael Sheldon 01453 885707

*Don’t forget National Beanpole week starts 25th April until 3rd May. National Beanpole Week 2009 is calling on gardeners to support Britain’s remaining coppiced woodlands by choosing eco-friendly, locally-grown coppiced beanpoles instead of imported bamboo canes.

* Transition Newent have sent us details of a talk -An evening with Rob Hopkins & Shaun Chamberlinon Wednesday 29th April (Newent Community School, 7 for 7.30pm prompt). This event is coming together well with seat reservations steadily arriving from Transition groups far & wide. If you would like to come and haven’t yet reserved your seat, please call Ann on 01989-720646 or e-mailann@kenandannallen.co.uk

*The results of the Transition web project carried out by the Transition Network have been put together and graphs and slides in pdf can be seen here.

Don’t forget the next TRANSITION DRINKS will be Tuesday 12th May at 7.30 at the Prince Albert, Rodborough.

And finally another new word for 2009 Intaxication: Euphoria at getting a tax refund, which lasts until you realize it was your money to start with. Hope to see you at one of the meetings. Happy Transitioning, Helen

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Budget is a missed opportunity

BriefIt seems so obvious and yet Labour just don't get it - once again this is a missed opportunity - see budget comment sent to local press here.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Stop proposal to limit vitamin doses

This is a timely petition against the European Commission’s imminent proposal to limit maximum dosages of vitamin and mineral food supplements across the European Union.
I've covered this issue before - see for example here and here - and Youtube video here - we need to demonstrate to European regulators - as well as to governments at Codex - that unnecessary limits on food supplements are an infringement of our right to natural health.

Photo: Randwick woods

Any limits must be based on proper science, not arbitrary science that is heavily influenced by political concerns. So, from whatever country you reside in, if you agree with the concerns expressed in the petition text, please sign and ask as many of your friends, relatives and contacts to do the same:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/anh-vitaminrestrictions

Monday, April 20, 2009

Sunday Times on looming food shortages and Stroud plans

Yesterdays Sunday Times mentions the work of a couple of Green party councillors in putting together the report re food in Stroud District -this is worth a read - we hope to hear more about this over coming months as this is an issue that needs to be heard.

Photo: Grapes in my garden last year

Why we forgot how to grow food

As a food shortage looms, people are digging for Britain — and their dinner table. John-Paul Flintoff gets back to our roots

Not long before Christmas, a man walked into the care home next door to his house and asked the manager if it would be possible for a group of neighbours to grow food in the vast gardens. The manager said he would be delighted. In the days that followed, the man casually asked various neighbours whether they would like to get involved. They all said yes. So he popped over to the care home with them, and each remarked how large the garden was, and what a lot of food could be grown there.

As well as beds for vegetables, there could be fruit trees trained to grow up the south-facing walls, a bed of herbs for the kitchens, and flowers to take inside. The group could perhaps even keep chickens, once the fruit and veg were up and running.

The man went home after each trip feeling tremendously pleased with himself. I know this, because the man was me. Now, it’s not as if I did anything special: I didn’t lift a spade. Many people have done considerably more, as part of a grass-roots movement spreading rapidly across the nation, to grow our own food. And fast. Because for the first time in decades, Britain faces the real prospect of severe food shortages.

About 40% of the food we eat is imported. That includes an astounding 95% of our fruit and most of the wheat in our bread. This reliance on goods from abroad is perilous. During the 2000 fuel strike, Sainsbury’s chief executive wrote to the prime minister to warn that food supplies would run out “in days rather than weeks”. Supermarkets rationed bread, sugar and milk. The situation is now arguably worse: world food reserves are at historically low levels, and last year several countries stopped exporting staples because their own populations were going hungry.

If the problems were only temporary, it would be bad enough. But they’re not. We have become dependent on fossil fuels that are starting to run out. Taking account of all the oil- and gas-derived fertilisers, pesticides, distribution and retail practices, our modern farming uses an incredibly wasteful 10 calories of energy to put a single calorie of food on your plate.

Reverting to old-fashioned farming will be hard because our soil is in poor shape. Fertility has come to rely on annual, chemical top-ups instead of the traditional long-term build-up using animal manure and crop rotation. Suddenly taking away all the artificial fertilisers will result in drastically lower yields. And if we’re to feed ourselves, we can’t afford lower yields — because the UK is more densely populated than China, Pakistan or any African country except Rwanda.

Meanwhile, levels of minerals such as phosphate, which plants need for healthy growth, are falling fast. Global supplies have peaked, and last year phosphate prices rose by 700%. Britain imports 80% of its phosphates. The only alter-native is to return all food waste and animal and human manure to the land, instead of flushing it to sea. And let’s not forget the extremes of weather that will result from global warming. Rising sea levels spell doom for the 57% of grade-1 arable land in east England already below sea level. In 2000, during the unprecedented heat wave, crop yields in Italy and France fell by a third.

Perhaps most importantly, we lack know-how. Most of us today have little experience of food- growing. The farmers we do have are mostly approaching retirement, and there are few of them: agricultural employment has fallen from 40% in 1900 to 2% today, and much of the work is done by casual workers brought in from abroad.

Modern governments have not regarded self-sufficiency in food as a desirable aim, according to Professor Tim Lang of City University in London; but last year that changed. A report from the Cabinet Office concluded that “existing patterns of food production are not fit for a low-carbon, more resource-constrained future”. In response, Colin Tudge, the author of the book Feeding People is Easy, called for “a global renaissance in agriculture”. This more or less agreed with the insights of a less well-known environmentalist, Jeremy Clarkson: “We are heading towards The End of Days, and you’d better get yourself an allotment.”

That’s what I did last year, just in time, because now dozens of others are on the waiting list.

All over the country, people are starting to think about producing food. Some because they fancy a bit of the River Cottage lifestyle, but many — including Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall — have been inspired by the growing Transition Town movement. Transition Towns were started by an Englishman, Rob Hopkins, after a stint working as a teacher in Kinsale, Ireland. At the time, he never imagined that oil might one day run out. “But then I showed students a film, The End of Suburbia. I have to say it was as traumatic and shocking for me as it was for the students.” The film made it clear that no aspect of life will be the same after cheap oil runs out — which it suggested will happen very soon. “When we got over the shock, we set about looking at Kinsale,” says Hopkins. “We examined how the town might look in 20 years if it adapted instead of pretending it wasn’t happening. We came up with a vision, then backcast it to see how to get there, year by year.”

Unlike other environmental initiatives, this deliberately involved finding the “upside” rather than dwelling on doom. “I like to use the analogy of inviting a reluctant friend to join you on holiday,” Hopkins explains. “If you paint a picture of the beach, the pool and the candlelit taverna by the sea, they’re more likely to come.”

Returning to England, Hopkins helped to create a similar “energy descent” plan in Totnes, Devon — the first Transition Town. Others soon followed. Lewes, Glastonbury and Stroud are full of middle-class hippie types, but in Bristol it’s the poorer districts that have been most dynamic, and across Wales the impetus has largely come from the agricultural community. Today, there are more than 150 “official” groups (who have formally asked to join the network) and hundreds of others still preparing or mulling it over. There are TTs in New Zealand, the US, and on The Archers.

After first talking to Hopkins, two years ago, I registered my own corner of northwest London on the Transition Town website and hoped that someone would join me. Nothing happened. So I cycled to south London to meet Duncan Law, an actor and director who parked the day job many, many months ago to devote himself full time to launching Transition Town Brixton.

The cafe where we met, Honest Foods, had a policy of sourcing food locally. Law asked for a word with the chef, said he knew someone with a vast crop of pears in their garden, and asked if the chef would be interested in buying them? Without hesitation, the chef said yes. I was impressed.

Law took me on a tour of Brixton: him on his recumbent bike and me on my foldaway with tiny wheels. If we looked odd together, the effect was increased by Law stopping every so often to collect apples that had fallen from trees. He told me about an entrepreneur who made £4,000 in the early 1950s — more than Law’s headmaster father earned in a year — by commissioning children to gather blackberries for him. TT Brixton, he said, was about to start mapping fruit trees across south London. (They’ve since done that.)

Near Balham, we visited Sue Sheehan, a Transition Town supporter who recently started growing fruit and veg in boxes in the tiny space in front of her terraced house. I still hadn’t got the hang of how to be upbeat about peak oil and climate change and ungraciously told her that the crop, though plentiful, would not be enough to keep her alive when the trouble starts. But every lettuce you grow yourself, Law said, saves growing another one miles away and shipping it to you, and all the emissions associated with that.

A few days later, I watched The Power of Community: How Cuba survived Peak Oil, a documentary film about what happened to Cuba after Soviet oil supplies dried up. It shows how Cubans gradually turned away from a heavy reliance on carbon-intensive agriculture: in rural areas, they learnt to plough with oxen; in cities, all kinds of spaces were turned to horticulture, from window boxes to wasteland. The transition took more than two years, and Cubans had to forgo the equivalent of a meal a day — but by the end, even people in cities were producing half their annual fruit and vegetable needs.

I finally found like-minded people nearer my home, willing to launch a Transition Town. In Belsize library, we hosted a week of film screenings culminating with The Power of Community. It was clear from the question-and-answer session afterwards that the audience was gagging to start growing food. Strangely, they just seemed to want some kind of permission to get started. I improvised: “Just go for it! What can you lose?”

Transition Belsize was born and I found myself co-ordinating the 40-strong food group. The first thing the group did was visit my allotment. My new friends weeded, built a new raised bed, and took home some of my surplus apples. Since then, we have gathered names of people on the waiting list for allotments and put them in touch with householders who possess gardens but insufficient time, expertise, or ability to grow food themselves. We’ve set up a section in the local library with books and magazines devoted to food-growing, co-ordinated bulk purchasing of otherwise costly organic food so a wider portion of the population can access it, and got agreement from the local franchise of Budgens to sell produce grown by local people in gardens and allotments.

Another member, Councillor Alexis Rowell, rather brilliantly persuaded the council to allow residents on its estates to grow food there. Having done that, he went knocking on doors of one neighbouring estate to ask if people would like to grow food there. Over the course of a single weekend, members of the Transition group transformed the previously overgrown and unused gardens. Residents supplied hot soup and drinks, and joined in the work too. I travelled one cold January morning to Stroud, Gloucestershire, where members of another Transition group have done amazing things. Stroud has one of the country’s most successful farmers’ markets, and two Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) schemes, through which householders fund a farmer to supply food to them directly. The first was started in 2001, by four individuals renting an acre of land and employing a vegetable grower. After two years they had formally established a co-operative and rented 23 acres. Today two full-time growers provide veg and meat to 189 households, with enough profit to pay a bonus.

Meat production runs at a loss, and has to be subsidised by the veg, but the farmers see stock as essential to good stewardship of the land, providing plentiful manure. There’s another benefit: marketing. Animals can be very attractive parts of any membership project. For that reason, the CSA houses its pigs in a prominent position, beside notices explaining how the scheme works.

One of the hardest things for the CSA is getting people involved. Most members are happy to pay to receive veg — after all, it’s cheaper than buying from most supermarkets — and will turn up to occasional events on the farm, such as wassailing parties and apple pruning in January, blossom celebrations in May, haymaking in August, a bonfire-night party, and singing to cows in the barn at Christmas.

But schemes like this need a critical mass of members willing to help out more routinely, and might lose energy or collapse altogether if a small minority of volunteers find themselves always responsible for making it work. Wandering over weed-infested fields with two such volunteers, Helen Pitel and Caroline Denny, I see for myself how hard the work is. “But we can’t let this fail,” says Pitel cheerfully.

Among other setbacks, the CSAs have had meat stolen from their packing shed, and had to deal with unsupportive neighbours, such as one who complained about the appearance of polytunnels on the hillside and forced the CSA to secure retrospective planning approval. Even members can be difficult. As part of recent efforts to get them to share trips to the farm to collect food for each other, a list of names and addresses were sent out. Some complained that this breached data security and risked ID theft, reveals one member of the core group: “It sometimes feels like there is a long way to go in building the ‘community’ bit of Community Supported Agriculture!”

I’m not surprised to find that setting up and running large-scale projects of this sort can be difficult, and no less impressed for that reason.

One of the most significant achievements of Stroud’s food group did not involve growing anything. It’s a comprehensive analysis, conducted by members who happen both to be local councillors, into whether or not the district could feed itself. The report by Fi Macmillan and Dave Cockcroft was inspired by an article in The Land magazine, Can Britain Feed Itself?, written by Simon Fairlie, a journalist and campaigner who has a sideline selling scythes (to, among others, me). Fairlie lives in Somerset and has some connection to a local Transition group, but he’s been doing this kind of work for years. His article was itself inspired by a book published in 1975.

Using the same model, Macmillan and Cockcroft investigated whether 110,000 people living in Stroud district could be fed if they relied on the 37,000 hectares of available farmland. The initial finding was encouraging: the district does have enough land to feed itself, though only if people reduce their meat intake to a quarter of the current UK average of 80 kilograms per person per year, and significantly reduce their sugar intake. There would be some surplus with which to trade for staples such as citrus, tea and coffee.

Alas, the analysis doesn’t stop there. Macmillan and Cockcroft go on to examine whether Stroud can feed itself without inputs from fossil fuels, and with land set aside to produce the biofuels needed to replace them. (An additional pressure on land, which they only mention in passing, is the need for land-based textiles, whether from sheep or fibres from hemp and other crops.)

The conclusion, this time, is distressing: “We have nowhere near enough land to produce a significant proportion of our current level of transport and heating fuels.” Crikey. If that’s the dismal outlook for the district of Stroud, set among all those rolling fields, what hope is there for London? Is it time to get out?

Rob Hopkins thinks not. He used to believe the most responsible thing to do was to move to rural areas, build a house and grow your own food. “But when I found out about peak oil I came to question that. We had built our own house, and were growing our own food, but this was only going to be sustainable if I am prepared to sit at the gate with a shotgun. What do I do with my carrots if the village up the road is cold and hungry?

“We have to move towards collective solutions,” he says. “Peak oil is a call to those of us who have been out in the highlands to come back and help, because the skills are very much in demand now.” According to Simon Fairlie, supplying our needs in the future will also need considerable movement in the other direction: dispersal of both livestock and humans around the country, not least so that all that human manure can be put back on the land.

For now, the best thing I can do is to make a go of food-growing in London, as they did in Havana. So on my return from Stroud I throw myself with renewed energy into the Belsize group.

Over dinner, the core group wrestles with strategies for growing the group ever larger. We agree to work hard in our own streets, as individuals, then the next street, and so on. One attractive idea is to deliberately grow “too many” seedlings, giving ourselves a perfectly amiable pretext for knocking on doors and inoffensively getting neighbours started on food-growing.

Back home, inspired by the Guerrilla Gardening movement to grow beans on a patch of scrubby land beyond the end of my garden, I stare across at the vast gardens of the neighbouring care home, and notice — not for the first time — just how big and bare they are. Then I look down the road and notice that one of my neighbours, five doors down, has likewise been cultivating the wasteland. I knock on his door, we get chatting, and in no time he’s touring the gardens of the care home with me. A few days later, I ask a family with girls about the same age as my own daughter. They visit the site too.

I set up a neighbourhood project on an online food-growing network and soon my neighbours sign up. I decide to ask them over for drinks. We’ll watch the first episode of The Good Life, then The Power of Community. In a few weeks time we will have achieved nearly as much here as Belsize, down the road, achieved all last year. After that, who knows, we might set up our own veg-box scheme…

But I shouldn’t get carried away. In The Transition Handbook, published last year and already reprinted several times, Rob Hopkins offers what he calls a “cheerful disclaimer”: “Just in case you were under the impression that Transition is a process defined by people who have all the answers, you need to be aware of a key fact. We truly don’t know if this will work.

“Transition is a social experiment on a massive scale. What we are convinced of is this: (a) if we wait for the government, it’ll be too little, too late; (b) if we act as individuals, it’ll be too little; but (c) if we act as communities, it might just be enough, just in time.'

Government must go further on 20 mph

At the weekend I responded to the reports (see Telegraph here) that the government will be reducing speed limits in residential areas and around schools by saying the Government needs to go further.

Photos; taken on our recent assessment for '20 is Plenty' signs which we have now been told we might not be allowed! More of that soon when I get clarification from Highways who seemed to have told us different things. See my blog on The Citizen site for background to 20 mph. I've also heard that Highways have removed the '20 is Plenty' signs from Cashes Green.

This is an issue I've covered many times on this blog - in this latest news release I said: "Green councillors around the country have long been pushing hard for this. However if the government is serious it should go further. Greens are calling for full-blown Safe Routes to School programmes everywhere. This involves a more comprehensive approach to keeping school children safe like assessing the most appropriate measures for a given school, like rearranging junctions and crossings to ensuring the best possible provision for cycling and walking."

Transport consultant and Lancaster Green Party councillor professor John Whitelegg today said: "You can implement a package like this for as little as £60,000 per school. If you do it for several neighbouring schools at once, the benefits reinforce one another. If we did this everywhere we'd make school travel safer and we'd cut morning peak-hour traffic by 10%."

I also noted about the efforts to reduce dangerous traffic speeds in the villages of Whiteshill, Ruscombe and Randwick, commenting: "The County have so far refused to implement a 20 mph zone despite support for this from residents and Parish Councils. At times the main roads through our villages like Whiteshill are little better than traffic sewers that make the roads too dangerous for children to cross alone to use the excellent playground. 20mph is largely accepted as a way of saving lives, preventing injuries, encouraging more walking and cycling and making our streets more pleasant to live on. In Whiteshill, Ruscombe and Randwick we are now seeking a voluntary '20 is Plenty' scheme as a step towards encouraging the County to take the actions necessary. Let us hope this Government move will encourage more support for safer communities."

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Fire-breathing newts in Stonehouse?

I was up at 6am yesterday to take my partner's granddaughter newt counting with Stroud Valley's Project in a large pond opposite the Stonehouse Court Hotel. Sadly despite some of the children saying the newts breathed fire we did not get to see those ones - we were in search of the Great Crested variety...

Photos: from our newt adventures

Surveys have shown that up to 50% of Gloucestershire's ponds have disappeared since 1950, depleting the newt's natural habitat. Today there are fewer than 3,000 of the original farm ponds left. During Spring 2007, 60 ponds in the county were surveyed but great crested newts were only present in 14%.

Stroud Valleys Project (SVP) is undertaking a long-term study into the state of the population of great-crested newts living in the Stonehouse pond. The launch of this study coincides with the peak courtship and egg-laying period which occurs mid-March to mid-May. During this time, adult males attract females by undertaking a complicated courtship ‘dance’ and you can go out with a torch and see if you have them in your pond. We sadly saw no crested newts but did see 9 'boy' newts and 1 'girl' newt - see below - females are less colourful on their bellies - see below

1 in 10 gardens now have a pond but natural ponds are disappearing throughout the countryside due to infilling, pollution and draining as a result of modern agricultural practices. As a result great crested newts are now a protected species as the lack of natural habitats; particularly the loss of breeding grounds is impacting on the size of the newt population in general. Indeed the police have a Wildlife Crime Officer who patrols some of the key sites at key times.

On my visit to the Stonehouse site we witnessed that one newt was dying as a result of the strimming of grass there (see photo below) - I will ask to see if there is a way the Parish can change the times of strimming to have less of an impact on the newts.

The long term goal of the study is for SVP to work with local residents to look after the pond, ensuring that the newt population continues to thrive despite the housing development that’s been built around the pond in recent years. The survey involves putting out special newt-friendly traps on the Friday evening, and then returning to the pond at 7.00am the following morning to empty the traps and see what's been caught. The early start is to minimise any disturbance to the newts. We were apparently working with one of the country’s leading great-crested newt experts who lives in Stroud and is properly licensed to handle these legally protected animals.

There is also now a project to protect great crested newts in Gloucestershire - with £34,396 collected from landfill taxes to ensure the 'No Newts is Bad Newts' conservation scheme will run for two more years. In an attempt to halt the decline of newts the team has held pond survey training days with more than 60 volunteers. They have issued advice and management plans for 38 ponds, restored four ponds and created a further four new ponds and seven artificial hibernating shelters for the newts during the project's first year.




Former Green District councillor Dr Simon Pickering, Chair of the Gloucestershire Biodiversity Partnership, is quoted in the press saying: "This is a stunning innovative project that will set new standards for great crested newt conservation in Europe by protecting and enhancing networks of ponds not just individual ponds."

This pic is of the fence - a special design to stop the newts getting out onto the main road - however there are apparently flaws with it? Anyhow it was a very enjoyable time - I learnt lots - would have been even better with an espresso machine but nevertheless a good time - look out for similar events next year.


GREAT CRESTED NEWTS

The species is legally protected in the UK
It is possible for them to reach an age of 27 years
They may grow up to 17cm long (body and tail)
They are nocturnal, hiding on land during the day in burrows or under logs, stones
They hibernate between October and late February
They have dark grey-brown backs and flanks, and are covered with darker coloured spots

Hard Rain: one of the most powerful exhibitions to come to Stroud

Yesterday I managed to go to the Hard Rain exhibition in Stratford Park - it is only here until 28th April and we are very fortunate to have it on our doorstep. It is hugely powerful stuff that moved me to tears - as the old Chinese proverb says: "A Picture's Meaning Can Express Ten Thousand Words" - together the photos bring to life Dylan's passion and words in unexpected and effective ways. A must see. Huge thanks to all who made it possible - it is a great call to action for all of us.

Photos: some of the pics from the exhibition - start at the bottom and work back - not like some folk who read it all backwards.

The exhibition opened the night before with a mass singing of the Dylan Song that was apparently very moving. John Marjoram I am told made a powerful speech calling for action. The Hard Rain website is more than worth a look. Here is some of how the Town Council are advertising the event:

After touring the globe and visiting such places as the Eden Project and the UN Headquarters in New York, one of the world's most acclaimed photo exhibitions is due to stop off in Stroud. The exhibition puts together images collected by international photographer Mark Edwards and words from Bob Dylan's classic song 'Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall'. It will run at the Museaum in The Park from April 17th-28th - and you are invited to help open the show.

Dave Cockcroft, vice-chair of our Finance and Recreation Committee, on the Town Council said: "This is a stunning exhibition and we're delighted to support in PhotoStroud bringing it Stroud. I think anyone who goes to view it will be deeply moved by the words and images which bring home the environmental catastrophe we are all facing."

http://www.hardrainproject.com

Organiser Fred Chance explained: "As you know, PhotoStroud has organized a season of events through April linking together words and photographs. The last of these is the very moving 'Hard Rain' exhibition. It has toured some of the most important exhibition sites in the world and has now, of course, found it's way to Stroud. The exhibition puts together images made and collected by internationally acclaimed photographer Mark Edwards and words by Bob Dylan. There is, in fact, one photograph to each line of Dylan's 'Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall'. If you know the song you will remember that there are quite a few lines. The photographs and the words are printed on material which will be shown outdoors in Stratford Park on a single banner which is an amazing 50 meters long."

It will be shown on a greenwood frame which is being specially made or the event and can be seen until the end of April. The launch of such an important exhibition, though, is an important event in itself.

The exhibition has been made possible by the generosity of Stroud based Ecotricity and it's founder Dale Vince OBE. Stroud Town Council have helped make the framework to support the exhibition with a grant of £500 and Kendrick Street wine merchants Oeno have offered assistance with the launch arrangements.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Full Council: 50 mins on dog poo

On Monday I was quoted under a headline "Green fears over leaflet drops" - well more of that in a moment with the dog poos but first a very brief summary of some of the other issues raised at Thursdays' Full Council meeting...

Photo below: view of Ebley Mill from Randwick

Well there was the Interim Sustainable Communities Strategy - Greens have made many comments about this in the past (see for example here) and are drafting a letter about how we want to see the main strategy develop - certainly this is wholly inadequate as it is at the moment as it tags on cliamte change as if it is an extra point like others rather than setting it at the heart of policy. The Sustainable Communities Bill was finally passed - Greens put a motion in a while back - see here.

Both Stroud and Nailsworth planning strategies were passed - great stuff, there was also a report from the Scrutiny committee I sit on plus the Private Sector Housing Renewal Policy - something many opposition councillors voted against as it appears a reduction in service to disabled members of the community. Greens also raised many concerns re changes to the way Parishes and individuals may object to applications - more on that soon in a separate blog....

OK to the 'Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act - and Fixed Penalty Notices' - here is how THe Citizen reported it before the meeting...

FEARS that new laws tackling litter could silence free speech have been allayed by district council leaders. But Green Party members want to know more about legislation allowing leaflet distributors to be fined for handing out material that is dropped in the street. As The Citizen reported last week, anyone caught dropping litter in Stroud could be fined £75 and that would extend to "unauthorised distribution of literature". The legislation is expected to be passed by Stroud District Council on April 16.

Campaigners, activists, pressure groups and political parties often hand out flyers to Stroud town centre shoppers and Stroud district councillor Philip Booth, (Green, Over Stroud) was concerned it might affect legitimate political activity. SDC's Conservative administration has moved to allay those concerns but Coun Booth said: "I would have concerns that it could be imposed on small businesses who use leaflets and flyers. I would want to know more about the legislation. The existing legislation is sufficient to cover the problem."

If the council passes the new laws under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act, anyone caught abandoning a car, dropping litter, daubing graffiti, damaging bins, not clearing up dog mess, or causing nuisance parking could be hit with a fixed penalty fine of between £75 and £200. Coun Joe Forbes (C, Minchinhampton), SDC cabinet member for community safety, made it clear there are exemptions from the legislation. The act gives councils the option to make an order to prohibit the unauthorised distribution of printed material to try and prevent the significant problems of littering associated with free leaflets, most of which end up on the floor only a few metres from where they are handed out," he said.

"It is primarily designed to prevent the big problems of litter in city centres, caused by the handing out of pub or club flyers. These glossy flyers are hard for street sweeper machines to pick up. This isn't a major problem within our district. However, it is important to include them in the council report, so that members are aware of the breadth of the legislation. There are also exemptions to the order, notably the handing out of leaflets by charities, or where the distribution is for political purposes or for the purposes of a religion."


Well I have to say I was deeply disappointed that despite starting to ask my questions several weeks ago I did not get answers to all the issues I raised before Council however I was somewhat reassured at the meeting and talking to Officers about the Council's plans for use of these Fixed Penalty Notices - about the fact that education would be a priority before issuing them. I still though wonder if there are not better ways than such fines and as for the 'unauthorised literature' who authorises it? We should note that while our current officers and members are fine the powers could possibly be abused in the future...and hey this is yet more legislation - Labour have brought in literally hundreds of new laws since they came to power - laws upon laws don't necessarily make us a more cohesive and safer society....at least they seemed to have recognised that their CCTV culture has gone too far - see Guardian here.

In the end Council spent what seemed like more than an hour on discussing dog poo and litter - yes I know it is an important issue and can blight many communities but hey this was the issue we spent most time discussing not climate change or......and it was not the most constructive discussion - and yes I know the stuff is dangerous - indeed a doctor has told me that my mothers' toxiplasmosis (often caught from dog poo) prior to having me could have led to my less strong immune system....anyhow I was going to write more but have another appointment so must dash and save this for another time...

Cyril Laffort's photo exhibition of Glastonbury Festival

Today I saw the exhibition of photographs of Glastonbury festival at The Space in Lansdown, Stroud (10 t0 4pm each day). It is only open until Tuesday - I strongly recommend getting down there (although I thought it went until Thursday).

Photos: snaps I took of exhibition - but go see it!

Stroud photographer Cyril Laffort was one of the Glastonbury photographers in residence or some such title and has some great quality pics that conjure up the feel of Glastonbury - his photos are presented along with poems from Glastonbury Festival's official website poets and some from Stroud wordsmith Adam Horovitz.

This exhibition is the first time he has shown his personal edited selection of 75 images of highlights from the Glastonbury festivals in 2007 and 2008. All the photographs, printed on a limited edition, are for sale with 35% of the profits going to WaterAid. Excellent stuff. See more at Glastonbury website here.

Greens launch organic beer for elections

The Green Party will launch their Euro and Glos County election campaign on Saturday 2nd May in Nailsworth with an Open Mic night and a specially brewed organic beer - 'Green Knight' named after Ricky Knight, the Greens lead Euro candidate. It is possible the first beer ever to be named after a European election candidate!

Leaflet: draft ad to publicise event

The Nailsworth Brewery at The Village Inn has brewed the beer especially for the election campaign and 'Green Knight' will be on sale that evening from 6.30pm for the first time after a short speech from Ricky Knight.

Not sure quite how but I seem to have ended up organising the event - the evening will then see a short Green Pub Quiz and then from 8pm an Open Mic night. All acts are welcome - comedy, music or poetry. Ricky will also be doing a number. A full PA system is available, with mics, leads and monitoring system.

The Village Inn is well known for it's quality Open Mic night's on Wednesdays so we are hoping many will join us for the evening. It is a great way to see a variety of local talent - and of course a chance to try out this new beer - apparently it is a light, hoppy organic beer with hints of grapefruit and elderflower coming in at 4.4% abv.

Ricky Knight , a Green councillor in Barnstable, who gave up his job as a language teacher to campaign full time for the European elections said: "I am honoured to have a beer named after me, but this is really about getting a Green voice in the South West. We need it more than ever. The European Elections are run on a Proportional Representation system, which means the Greens are in for a really good chance this time. At the moment, there is no Green voice representing the South West. The 38% of the electorate who voted last time returned three Conservatives, two UKIP and one Lib Dem and Labour MEPs. This time, with the economy in such a mess and the environment balanced on tipping points, the best possible message to send to those that have failed to represent us, is to vote Green on June 4th." See more of what Ricky has to say re pubs closing here.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

New nuke for Oldbury

radioactive_hazard_symbolWell Oldbury has been picked for a new nuke - no surprises there - see local Green party press release that I sent out this morning here - and while we are on nuclear I also recommend an article in The Independent re Sellafield - see here - plus if you want a round-up of nuke news download NuCLear News here - it has latest on sea-level rise predictions and more.

Meanwhile the Whitehaven News poll on new reactors is still running on line - please vote to give some support to the locals fighting the plans. The poll/vote section is 1/2 down the page:
http://www.whitehaven-news.co.uk/

Airport's PV light held to ransom

The Citizen covered the story about Kevin Lister taking the PV light - see my previous blog on that here - and my letter last night about Direct Action - I was disappointed to see a whole page of web responses which The Citizen published under the title "They are idiots for taking eco lights." Many of the responses were in someway in favour of the Airport. I've also included below some of Kevin's research into the Airport's claims re safety - I've not yet had time to look at in detail - he has a whole report on the topic - why haven't the Councils been looking at these claims themselves? At times it seems they have taken at face value pretty much anything the Airport has given them....

The Citizen report that campaigner Kevin Lister is holding to ransom the photovoltaic light for Glos Airport's entrance sign (14/04/09). I understand he has resorted to this action to highlight the failures of the democratic process to cut CO2 emissions.

The misleadingly named “Green Management Plan” for the Airport has no sanctions if targets of 95,000 plane movements per year are breached nor does it have targets for reducing CO2. Mr Lister has noted he will return the equipment if such measures are introduced and that targets reflect the latest scientific evidence presented at the recent Copenhagen Conference. Indeed that conference concluded, “Inaction is inexcusable”.


A Guardian poll this week reveals 9 out of 10 climate experts do not consider current political efforts will keep warming below the crucial 2C. James Hansen, NASA climate scientist, says the democratic process is not working and that "peaceful demonstration is not out of order, because we're running out of time."


US Ex-Vice President Al Gore now calls for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants while David Cameron's advisor Zac Goldsmith appeared as a defence witness in the trial of Greenpeace activists charged with causing £30,000 of criminal damage. The jury concluded in that case that a degree of damage to property can be justified when protesting to prevent a greater damage to property from climate change.

Some of the comments in The Citizen have described Mr Lister's actions as stupid and idiotic, yet it is the inaction on climate change that is not just foolish, but criminal. Non-violent direct action is a legitimate form of political activity when traditional forms are blocked - it was used against slavery, for women's right to vote and against apartheid. We face a similar clear moral stand today.

It is a sad reflection on our current political leadership that although the science is clear, and the three main parties say they agree, none have the guts to actually take the action needed.


Cllr. Philip Booth, Stroud District Green Party.

Airport Safety Plan increases risk to residents

Kevin Lister said: “Gloucestershire Airport’s expansion proposals have been repeatedly justified on safety grounds. In the Green Management Plan presentations at both Gloucester and Cheltenham scrutiny committees this fact was reiterated with councillors claiming that they do not want to be held liable in the event that there is a crash at Gloucestershire Airport. However, the airport has submitted no quantified risk assessment and all councillors are unquestioningly taking the airport’s assertion that the proposed works will increase operational safety.

"However, the fact is that the runway extension will move the take off point much closer to the heavily populated residential area in Churchdown which has the effect of moving more of housing into the critical Public Safety Zone. In addition, the airport has constantly stated that the extension works will enable planes to take off with a full fuel load. This is inherently more risky. In the event of an engine failure or other equipment failure, a plane will be less able to recover and be more likely to crash into Churchdown and the heavier fuel load will make the impact much more severe.

"The Green Management plan has demonstrated flight numbers will increase after the extension works, especially from business type jets and other scheduled services. In addition, the airport and council have not agreed that the targets in this document are in any way binding. A significant increase in flights must now be expected with a corresponding increase in risk exposure to the residents in Churchdown.

"This increased risk exposure is significant and should not be underestimated. Recently, a Cessna Citation crashed into a housing estate near Farnborough. A review of the American National Transportation Safety Board Data base shows that in the period from 2000 to present, there were 31 Lear Jets, 4 Cessna Citations and 21 Bombardier Business jets involved in accidents during take off in the US alone. These are all of the class of plane that Gloucestershire Airport is trying to attract with its development. Many of these crashes were fatal.

"As a minimum the airport should comply with the requirements that would be expected in any other safety critical industry such as the rail or oil and gas industries were quantified risk assessments with a detailed Failure Mode and Effect Analysis are demanded by clients so proper consideration can be made of the safety risk exposure. The councils have a duty to ensure that this is prepared and published so the third party risk can be quantified and properly assessed

"Councillors need to recognise that take off is by far the most dangerous part of any flight. Since giving planning permission for the Churchdown housing development knowing that the airport was there, they have a duty to minimise the risk to the residents who moved into this estate.”

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Mark Thomas endorses the Green party

It is official - we have the cutest sandals!

Rudolf Ziegelbecker and water fluoridation

A couple of days ago I highlighted a meeting we are planning in Stroud to help build the case against water fluoridation here in Glos - see here - however I also wanted to note that I recently heard from Rudolf Ziegelbecker Jr. This guy's father (with the same name), was a main force in keeping or making Continental Europe (except Spain) fluoride-free but sadly passed away on 12th January.

Photo: Graph showing mean number of decayed, missing or filled teeth in 12 year olds in EU countries - all going down!

It sounds like the son is continuing the work of his father - he has sent his father's first and most important papers (written in German) and a biography - I am happy to pass on the work of this Austrian researcher to other campaigners.

Rudolf Senior was appointed 'Citizen of the Provincial Capital Graz' by the town council as a sign of their esteem for his work. His work helped end at least 53 million people getting compulsory medical treatment via drinking water. As the biography noted: "drinking water fluoridation was stopped: In Kassel (Germany) 1971, in Sweden 1971, in The Netherlands 1976, in Czechoslovakia 1988 (in Prague and Czeske Budejovice and in 1990 in the other cities of the former CSSR, in the (former) German Democratic Republic (GDR) 1990, in the USSR 1990, in Poland 1990, in Finland 1993, in the Canton of Basle-City 2003 – as contrasted with the WHO resolutions of the years 1969, 1975, 1978. Persuant the fact finding of the Great Council of Basle-City the dentists have not been able to prove the claimed efficacy of fluoridation even after its operation for 40 years. Fluoride tablets campaigns were also stopped, e.g. in the City of Graz 1973, in the Province Styria in the year 1973, in the Province Carinthia in 1986, in entire Austria in 1994, in Saarbrücken in 1984, in Saarlouis in 1984, in Bielefeld in 1984, in Berlin-Charlottenburg in 1985, in Berlin-Wilmersdorf in 1985, etc."

The biography also gave some background as to why he got involved: "The inducement for Rudolf Ziegelbecker to busy himself with the "fluoride problem" were serious damages of vegetation and health afflictions of his own children and of the population by the exhausts from a new-built brickworks in Graz-St. Peter – in 1966, about half a kilometre away - which contained fluorides. After a fight lasting for years, which went through all instances up to the supreme courts, and after installation of a specifically developed flue-gas washing facility, which was not operated full-time however, the factory was closed in 1976. During that time a heavy pollution of tidal air and a storing of fluorides in useful and ornamental plants, in fruits and vegetables occurred, which gave rise to a widespread dying off of these plants. Because of the high levels of fluoride in fruits and vegetables the family’s garden could not be used for 4 years. Since his children – who received fluoride tablets daily in school, during holidays at home and used tooth pastes containing fluoride – as well as other children from the neighbourhood lamented more and more over tiredness, queasiness, stomachache, joint pain and pain in the limbs, Rudolf Ziegelbecker demanded of the City of Graz scientific records and rationals for the benefits and harmlessness of the fluoride tablets campaign and disclosure about the marginal value of the total exposures to fluoride. The City of Graz was not able to provide useful documents, whereupon he interdicted the delivering of fluoride tablets to his children in school and discontinued the use of fluoride toothpastes at home and the consumption of the fluoride-contaminated fruits and vegetables. A few weeks later his childrens’ troubles with their health disappeared. Subsequently the experienced researcher, who partially had worked himself with highly toxic fluorine compounds at the Center for Electron Microscopy and who as a physicist looked at tables and curves differently than dentists, ordered the dentists’ literature about fluoride and analysed it himself."

It was at this point Rudolf published various papers that led to shifts in opinion.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Cameron's electoral reform plans miss the point

Yesterday I was in David Camerons constituency looking at fritillaries, today I blog about his comments to cut by 10%, the number of MPs and an equalising of constituency sizes.

Photo: "No matter who you vote for all Government is wrong" graffiti on Capel Mill

Make My Vote Count are asking folk to write to him for real electoral reform. See their comments here with a link to Cameron's email address. Here is my email to Mr Cameron:

I completely agree with your comments that the way MPs are currently elected is unfair. Every vote should carry the same weight and every vote should count. However, leveling up the size of constituencies will not achieve this. There will still be marginal seats and safe seats under this system. At the moment there is a bias in Labour's favour, but the solution cannot surely be to retain the old unfairness but just nudge it back in favour of the Tories a bit to compensate? If you are serious about reform of the electoral system you would be looking at the sort of ideas advocated by the Electoral Reform Society and Make Votes Count. Their ideas would enfranchise everybody in the country with real reform using some form of proportional representation. I welcome your contribution to this debate but only in so far as it will allow us to open up the discussion to include potential reforms that will actually make everybody's vote count, not just benefit the Conservative party as your proposals would.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Snake's Head Fritillary Sunday near Witney

The Snake's Head Fritillary is the county flower of Oxfordshire and indeed also the provincial flower of Uppland in Sweden where it is known as Kungsängen lily. These wonderful plants are now not so common in the wild but can still be found in wet grassland areas - which is why Oxfordshire plays host to several thriving populations along the Thames floodplain.

Apparently in the past there were often many fields - but with ground drained for agriculture, gravel extraction and development, the wild colonies are now few and far between.

Wikipedia say that "the Meadow of Magdalen College, Oxford, the village of Ducklington, Oxfordshire and the North Meadow National Nature Reserve, Wiltshire are some of the best locations to view this flower".

Iffley Meadows is apparently also a good place to see them but these photos are all from Duckington near Witney - the flowers are out now and this Sunday you can gain access to the field as part of their festival. If you are in the area like I was the Easter weekend then it is worth a visit...lovely.

They also sometimes get called the 'Checkered Lily', 'Chequered Daffodil', 'Lazarus Bell' and 'Leper Lily', referring to the bell shape of the flowers, similar to the bells carried by lepers in medieval times.

There are lots of cultivated forms but in my view none match the native wildflower for it's wonderful chequered pattern which really does have a reptilian look about it. They appear mostly in shades of purple overlaying pale silvery scales but there are also many, like at Duckington, that are coloured creamy-white - but when the light shines through them you will still see that even those ones have a pale chequered watermark.

I've just 'bought' some land at Heathrow

Yes I am now a 'beneficial owner' of a piece of the plot that Greenpeace have bought in the middle of Heathrow. See more: www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/airplot/about-airplot

Tackling climate change means stopping airport expansion and this plan is a great way to help stop the expansion at Heathrow. Greenpeace want 100,000 people signed up and already have over 41,000 in the opening days of this campaign.

A piece of land or property can only be registered in the names of a maximum of 4 people. These are the "legal owners" of the land. However, these people can own the land on behalf of any number of "beneficial owners" who have rights and responsibilities in relation to the property.

Greenpeace are not actually selling off pieces of the plot, so it's not going to cost you anything if you join me. Of course a donation would be great - a monthly gift by direct debit or a one time gift on your credit card. Go now to the campaign website: www.airplot.org.uk

Support Archway School project to create a school in Bihar


In the Farmers Market in Stroud on Saturday there was an Archway School stall promoting the Project Bihar (India) - it is about 'building a school for orphans and marginalised children'.

The Initiative for Social Change and Action - see more here including re the Archway School visit - has helped fund a residential home for children and temporary huts for the schooling of 160 children however heavy rains have washed the temporary huts away. Archway are helping raise funds for a permanent building, staff costs, counselling, healthcare and projects to raise awareness about ensuring social equality and education for all. See more how you can help here and click on Bihar Project - email them at:
biharproject@archwayschool.net

Back in 1984 I was fortunate to spend nearly a month in Bihar helping an 'alternative' tourism project - it was about trying to show people the real India rather than just the tourist sites - I have mixed feelings about that - a topic for another blog perhaps - but it was an amazing experience - the state is one of the poorest in India with many displaced people, private armies ran parts of the country
- indeed The Economist wrote in 2004 about Bihar having become a "byword for the worst of India, of widespread and inescapable poverty, of corrupt politicians indistinguishable from mafia-dons they patronise, caste-ridden social order that has retained the worst feudal cruelties".

I also spent some of the time at McCluskieganj, a small town which used to have a significant Anglo-Indian community. It was a most unusual place in that it was founded by the Colonization Society of India in 1933 as an independent homeland for Anglo-Indians and was home to 400 Anglo-Indian families. When I was there, there were some 25 plus families - less than a 100 people but according to Wikipedia only 20 families remain there - indeed most of the Anglo-Indian community left after World War II. Of course many others Indians live in the town and surrounding area and I can remember a great walk to the nearest market - anyhow I'm rambling off topic suffice to say that I think a project like this one Archway are helping in Bihar is important.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Fact file on GM crops

Just a quick blog to highlight this useful fact file on GM crops below but first a bit on the latest re UK Government then on some controvesy in the Catholic Church.

Photo: Russ cartoon kindly reproduced with permission

It was in the late 1990s, New Labour led by Prime Minister Blair, Biotech corporations and some scientists celebrated GM crops as the solution to world hunger and various diseases. The citizens said: 'No! We do not want GM food!' Instead of honouring that, both Blair and now Brown’s governments have continued to push GM - the latest move is to commission a new study which many believe is in the hope that it will give them the answer they want ie GM is safe and will solve hunger problems.

However already we have a plethora of good studies which have refuted claims by the Biotech companies that GM crops will play a significant role in alleviating global hunger. For example Columbian priest Seán McDonagh writes: "In April 2008, a report from the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) was published. It was a very extensive report involving the World Bank, the United Nations Environment Programme, the World Health Organisation, agronomists from many government agencies, civic society groups and scientific bodies. More than 400 scientists were involved in the research which took four years to complete. It maintained that GM crops were controversial and that they will not play a substantial role in addressing the challenge of climate change, the loss of biodiversity, food security, poverty and hunger. It did not rule out a role for GM crops in the future, but highlighted the problems which the current regime of patenting crops has had for farmers and researchers. The report maintained that the most pressing agricultural need is to support small-scale farmers who operate in diverse ecosystems. These farmers need better access to education and more appropriate technology designed to improve farming in a particular location. Micro-credit schemes are needed to protect farmers from loan-sharks. Robert Watson, the director of IAASTD, and chief scientist at the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, responded to a question from a reporter with The Daily Mail: “Are GM crops the simple answer to hunger and poverty?” with the words, “I would argue, no.”"

In November 2008, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the UN Environment Programme produced a report that found that, contrary to claims that the only way to increase agricultural output is through modernising agriculture, organic farming holds the key to food security in Africa. In February 2009, Friends of the Earth International published a substantial report on Food Sovereignty; Who benefits from GM crops? It concluded that, “GM crops cannot, and are unlikely to ever contribute to poverty reduction, global food security or sustainable farming.” Firstly, hunger is chiefly attributed to poverty, not lack of food production. Secondly, the vast bulk of GM crops are fed to animals, not to the world’s poor. Thirdly, GM crops do not increase yield and they often lead to a greater use of pesticide. Fourthly, the real beneficiaries of GM crops are the biotech corporations who have make huge profits from selling expensive seeds and pesticides.

Catholic Church and GM

Pope Benedict XVI has given African bishops a draft document that specifically attacks producers of genetically modified foods, in the context of a more general condemnation of multinationals for "invading" Africa and damaging the environment by "defiling God's creation". See more here - and here an important Synod document also wants re GM. Yet a closed-door meeting is to be held at the Vatican in Rome in May to discuss a campaign backing GM crops. In spite of the concern over GM crops in Catholic circles, it is claimed that the meeting will give GM the "moral high ground of the Vatican" - see here. GMWatch note: The Pontifical Academy has regularly been hijacked to punt industry interests such as nuclear power, without it in any way reflecting official blessing. The news coming out of Africa, where the Pope has just released a working document highly critical of GMOs, clearly shows that not only do the aims of this meeting of GM lobbyists not have official blessing, they are actually immoral.

Facts in the File

1.ARE GM CROPS TAKING OVER GLOBAL AGRICULTURE?
2.ARE GM CROPS EXPANDING IN EUROPE?
3.WHAT GM CROPS ARE BEING GROWN?
4.DO GM CROPS MATCH THE HYPE?
5.ARE GM CROPS REDUCING PESTICIDE USE?
6.WHO BENEFITS FROM GM CROPS?
7.WHO'S MILKING THE FOOD CRISIS?
8.QUOTE: SELLING THE DREAM
9.FACT FILE SOURCES

1.ARE GM CROPS TAKING OVER GLOBAL AGRICULTURE?
*GM plantings make up a mere 2.4% of global agricultural crop land
*nearly 80% of the global area planted to GM crops was in just three countries - the US, Argentina and Brazil
*the US alone plants over 50% of the world's GM crops
*less than 3% of cropland in India and China is planted with GM crops, almost exclusively just 1 crop - GM cotton

2.ARE GM CROPS EXPANDING IN EUROPE?
*in the 27 countries of the European Union, GM crop cultivation represents a mere 0.21% of agricultural land
*the number of hectares of GM crops fell last year in Europe
*EuropaBio inflated the figures for GM crops grown in Europe by almost a quarter to mask the decline
*the area of GM crops being grown has actually fallen in Europe every year since 2005

3.WHAT GM CROPS ARE BEING GROWN?
*most investment has gone into a small number of crops and traits targeted toward large-scale commercial farming
*only four crops - soya, maize, cotton and canola (oilseed rape) - comprise virtually 100% of GM agriculture
*GM rice, wheat, tomatoes, sweetcorn, potatoes and popcorn have all been rejected as unacceptable in the global marketplace
*GM papaya cultivation in Hawaii has been declining over several years

4.DO GM CROPS MATCH THE HYPE?
*none of the GM crops on the market are modified for increased yield potential
*some studies show GM crops reduce yield
*disease-tolerant GM crops are practically non-existent
*the GM industry has not marketed a single GM crop with enhanced nutrition, drought-tolerance, salt-tolerance or any of the other 'beneficial' traits long-promised by the industry
*there are no commercially available GM crops designed for biofuels

5.ARE GM CROPS REDUCING PESTICIDE USE?
*almost all GM crops involve just 2 traits, mainly just one trait - herbicide tolerance
*herbicide tolerance is found in over 80% of all GM crops planted worldwide
*GM crops have contributed substantially to increased pesticide use
*most new GM crop varieties are also pesticide-promoting
*GM crops have caused an epidemic of herbicide-resistant weeds
*this is encouraging the use of more toxic petsicides, including ones banned in some European countries

6.WHO BENEFITS FROM GM CROPS?
*the real beneficiaries are the GM companies which profit from patents, expensive GM seeds, and increased pesticide sales
*Monsanto is the world's largest seed firm
*Monsanto holds a near monopoly in the biotech "traits" incorporated in GM seeds
*Monsanto is the world's fifth largest pesticide firm
*Monsanto markets Roundup, the world's biggest selling pesticide
*Monsanto controls roughly 60% of the market for glyphosate (the active ingredient of Roundup)
*Roundup is used in conjunction with Monsanto's 'Roundup Ready seeds'

7.WHO'S MILKING THE FOOD CRISIS?
*The World Bank attributes 75% of global food price inflation to "biofuels"
*Monsanto has been at the heart of the "biofuels" lobby, particularly the lobby for corn ethanol
*The price of Monsanto's GM triple-stack corn will reportedly increase by around 35% in 2009 - by $95-100 per bag, to top $300 per bag
*The average price for soybean seed, the largest GM crop in the US, has risen by more than 50% in just two years from 2006 to 2008 - from $32.30 to $49.23 per planted acre
*Retail prices for Roundup herbicide have increased from just $32 per gallon in December 2006 to $45 per gallon a year later, to $75 per gallon by June 2008 - a 134% price hike in less than two years

8.QUOTE: SELLING THE DREAM
"All those dreams... the blind will see, the lame will walk... has turned out to be science fiction. They are basically chemical companies selling more chemicals. They've been able to spread these herbicide-promoting plants around because it is more convenient for farmers who can just mass-spray their crops. But they've given absolutely nothing to the consumer while causing more chemical pollution and contamination."
-- Andrew Kimbrell, lawyer and executive director of the Center for Food Safety (USA)
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8854

9.FACT FILE SOURCES
Almost all the facts in our fact file are taken from "Who Benefits from GM crops?: Feeding the biotech giants, not the world's poor", Friends of the Earth International (2009)
Full report:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/full_report_2009.pdf
Executive Summary:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/Exec_summary_2009.pdf
EU briefing:
http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/Who_Benefits/EU_briefing_2009.pdf

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Get your carbon allowance card now

Looking at personal carbon allowances has been something Greens have been pushing for a while - see a previous blog of mine here. I am delighted that a new website has been created that aims to lobby for the principle of fair, safe carbon shares for everyone:
http://www.fairsharesfairchoice.com

Please sign up as an individual, business or organisation - let's show folk support for this just way forward to lower carbon living and working. Already Jonathon Porritt, Mark Lynas and Glos MPs David Drew, Martin Horwood and Geoffrey Clifton-Brown are signed up - I am signed up twice as my original signature back in March didn't seem to register and now has - I have let them know and also will be writing to other local Councils and organisations to promote this campaign.

Glos street lighting to be dimmed

The Citizen yesterday reported that 10,000 of the 59,000 street lights in Gloucestershire will be dimmed by 35% from 10pm to 5.30am. It will save £210,000 per year and cut emissions by 28% saving more than 980 tonnes of carbon.

Photo: Coffee to help keep me writing

I am quoted in the article saying: "I am delighted with the news. This is something that I have been pushing for a long time. There is overwhelming evidence that dimming street lights saves carbon emissions and saves money. And there is no evidence that dimming street lights increases crime rates."

However I also wanted to note that this is only a start - some villages and towns like Nailsworth have seen part night switch off of their lighting - why is this not being rolled out across the County as well? There is a failure to see the urgency needed in tackling climate change and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Furthermore there are huge advantages in reducing light pollution - an issue I have covered before on this blog.

I have written several emails and had conversations with the County as both Randwick and Whiteshill and Ruscombe Parishes have agreed to participate ages ago in a partial switch off - part of the delay I am told has been caused by an "opportunity" to obtain some government funding towards the cost of the scheme. The bureaucracy involved in pursuing this, apparently imposed an inordinate delay on doing anything. I will write again today to see if things can move. I'll let you know any news...

Join us to stop threat to Glos water

Yesterday I did a blog on the Citizen's Community Blog regarding the threat to our water - I repeat it here to maximise those who might see it:

Threat to Gloucestershire water

Health bosses voted in February to add fluoride to tap water in Hampshire despite the County Council and 72% of 10,000 respondents in a public consultation opposing the plan. The Safe Water Campaign, of which I am Secretary, considers this takes us a step closer to fluoridation locally.

Photo: Banner from Safe Water campaign

Already the NHS Bristol have announced last month that they are now considering the fluoridation of Bristol’s drinking water and we hear reports from other parts of the country that there are similar moves. In an effort to ensure Glos water does not face this threat we have invited two Hampshire campaigners to join us so that we can learn from their campaign - details below.

The Hampshire campaign was hugely successful in getting the message across, yet the health authority has refused to listen to the evidence. They have also ignored the will of the people - an astounding 72% didn't want it and yet they still going ahead. The Hampshire decision is the first time a health trust in England has been allowed to introduce fluoridation under the new law that this Government brought in.

Water fluoridation is a human rights issue: no one should be medicated without their consent. Furthermore the Government's own scientific review found very little evidence to show that fluoridation of our water supplies improves dental heath. Moreover, its chair, Professor Sheldon, stated that 'the review did not show water fluoridation to be safe'. Many people have real health concerns about adding fluoride to our water.

"No physician in his right senses would prescribe for a person he has never met, whose medical history he does not know, a substance which is intended to create bodily change, with the advice: 'Take as much as you like, but you will take it for the rest of your life because some children suffer from tooth decay. ' It is a preposterous notion."
Dr. Peter Mansfield, a physician from the UK and an advisory board member of the York review
Poverty and the over-availability of addictive, sugar-rich foods are significant causes of tooth decay. But the Government is unlikely to challenge the profitable position of the major food manufacturers and retailers who benefit at the expense of our children's health - and teeth. Better dental care and education is also needed, but that too is hampered by higher dental charges for adults as the Government has overseen dentistry move into the private sector - and for many in Gloucestershire finding a dentist at all is a serious challenge.

Are you interested in learning more?

The Safe Water Campaign which has over 1,500 Gloucestershire supporters and meets each month in Stroud will meet at 5.30pm in Stroud on 22nd April. Please call Rob Mehta on 01453 763943 if you would like to attend.

Cllr Philip Booth
See more re Safe Water Campaign here: http://safewatercampaign.blogspot.com/

Download also National Pure Water Association advert:
http://www.npwa.org.uk/files/why_you_should_say_no.pdf

Friday, April 10, 2009

March against Incineration: 99 Red balloons

Here is the advert for the march against an incinerator at Javelin Park - I can't make the march as have another campaign event but Greens will be amongst those joining this march. It should be noted that the County Council have not yet made a decision about an incinerator and this march is aimed at making sure they don't go down the incinerator route.

Photo: me collecting signatures for FoE petition in Gloucester last month and below a Green party poster in another area.

Saturday 18th April 2009 Starting @ 9-30am

The Haresfield Parish Council has organised a protest against the Gloucester County Council's plan to build an incinerator at Javelin Park.

Please meet at the following:-
9-30am Quedgeley Retail Park
9-50am Roundabout at Nass Lane/Field Court Road
10-15am Official March starting point opposite Mcdonalds/ Esso Garage
Hardwicke.

11am The March will end at Javelin Park with a rally and the releasing of 99 Red Balloons - representing the danger of possible emissions (apparently they are eco-balloons). Each balloon will be tagged so we will be able to trace how far they travel.

STOP THIS PLAN NOW - JOIN THE MARCH

Airport's solar panel nicked

I've just heard that Climate campaigner Kev claims to have the solar panel from the Staverton Airport sign!

He writes: "We will hand your impressive solar power system back when: • The council confirms that if the ceilings are breached then operations at the airport will be discontinued for the measurement period. • When the council confirms a reduction target for the total CO2 emissions that reflects the latest scientific evidence presented at the Copenhagen Conference."

See the campaigner's full comment here (photo above pinched from his website). This week has seen the Airport's Green Management policy discussed at Scrutiny in both Gloucester and Cheltenham - you can see below more about the issues raised with them. It is great that councillors are now insisting on such a plan which sees a CO2 emissions limit of 4,000 tonnes but as Kev writes of the proposed limit: "Unless there is a serious restriction on operations if these limits are breached, the Green Management plan is an irrelevance. At this point there appears to be no sanctions.

Furthermore there are no specific year-on-year CO2 reductions, other than the vague statement “Ensuring that climate change issues are addressed in future plans for the airport.”

This does really make a nonsense of it. Here is how The Citizen have reported it yesterday:

BOSSES at Gloucestershire Airport have been told they must keep carbon emissions to 2007 levels if they want new safety plans approved. Managers from the airport in Staverton have been consulting with a working group jointly set up by Cheltenham borough and Gloucester city councils to come up with a policy on carbon emissions covering noise pollution, energy use in the airport buildings and how staff travel to work. Both councils have agreed to support the airport's safety plans, which involve increasing the size of the runway clearance area, provided it can come up with an acceptable set of policies. The airport says the 30 metre extension is critical to enable them to meet safety regulations and enable commercial flights to continue.

The airport has set itself a target of flights not exceeding 4,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year, which is just a few tonnes above its 2007 emissions of 3,979 tonnes. That figure is equivalent to 0.17 per cent of all emissions in 2005/06 for the Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury areas according to DEFRA figures.


Airport director of operations Darren Lewington said: "We think this is a realistic target for emissions from aircraft. The important thing is that this is a ceiling and if our runway safety plans are approved, the limit means we will not be overrun by Easyjet or Ryanair as some people might think we will be."

As well as working on emissions, the green policy restricts flights to 95,000 per year excluding emergency- related flying. Only 1.5 per cent of the total of flights using the airport will be allowed to fly out of normal hours, which end at 7.30pm in summer.
Mr Lewington said: "The emissions target is from aircraft using the airport and that's harder for us to control, but we are confident we can achieve a 10 per cent cut in carbon use linked to our ground operations."

Managers have hired the Severn Wye Energy Agency to make recommendations on how to use less energy. The company will fit low-energy bulbs throughout the airport, look for sources of renewable energy and investigate the use of controlling lights by infra-red detection which will cut energy use by 90 per cent in times of low occupation.


Richard Conibere of Cheltenham Friends of the Earth said: "It's a small step in the right direction, but this policy is currently too weak to make a real difference. If the expansion was really about a safety project we wouldn't have a green policy that allows for a significant growth in flights."
The policy will be examined by Cheltenham Borough Council's Overview and Scrutiny Committee at its meeting today at 6pm in the Municipal Offices. Gloucester City Council's Cabinet will consider the report at its meeting on April 15 and Cheltenham Borough's Cabinet will do the same on April 21.

As another campaigner commented on the article: "Airport remarks are, as ever, a quite accomplished piece of greenwash."

Campaigners have never alleged that Ryanair and Easyjet would be using the site. But we have said that the development could allow for operators like FlyBe and for Manx 2 to expand their services.

The fact that airport emissions account for 0.17% of the total for local districts is irrelevant. In the grand scheme of things my personal emissions account for a miniscule fraction of the whole. As do the emissions of all of us. As I have noted before in this blog Glos Airport's emissions are indeed relatively small - the point is that the onus must be on reduction rather than expansion. We have to cut emissions by 80% plus so allowing this business to increase would mean others have to cut emissions even more - that is seriously unfair for a business that supports big corporations, private jets and trying to expand the holiday flight market.

The promise of a 10% cut on ground emissions is laughable. One of the campaigners scrutiny questions revealed that ground emissions account for only 4% of emissions so they're promising a 'stunning' reduction of 0.4% of overall emissions!

Puzzle solved?

It's been a puzzle to us for a while how the policy can say that flights are to increase by around 15,000 yet emissions will remain more or less the same - a 25% increase in flights will surely imply a 25% increase in emissions at least. However one campaigner thinks the answer might lie in how they have worked out the baseline emissions figure for 2007. The figure is calculated by taking the busiest 30 day period of the year and multiplying it by 12. By using the busiest time the figure is therefore inflated above the actual emissions for 2007, giving the illusion that nothing is changing.

It is great however that the Airport's plans to offset emissions with grass growing next to the runway have disappeared! Also their ridiculous comparisons with motorway emissions that were laughable. Establishing the policy has been a victory in itself for campaigners but alot of it may well end up being tokenism unless their are real sanctions - and they are still expanding significantly - maybe not as much as they wanted but it is still alot and I am not confident the Councils will really stick to their guns.

I can't believe that it was some 6 years ago I wrote a letter against these plans and was ridiculed by an editorial in The Citizen along with a letter or two. We have moved a long way to even be talking about Green Management Strategies and can fill Council chambers with campaigners on a regular basis - but this is a sad day - councillors have failed to grasp the urgency or need to cut emissions.

I'll finish this with some of the issues that were shared with councillors before the meetings regarding emissions by one campaigner:

1. The CO2 cap is based on calculations relating to the busiest 30 day period in 2007, which are then multiplied by twelve. This inflates the CO2 baseline by (I calculate) at least 20%, allowing the airport to increase traffic CO2 by 25% before they reach the cap. To be representative the figures should be based on a more typical 30 day period, or the results should be scaled to take account of the disproportionate amount number of flights in the period chosen.
2. The green policy builds in 'flexibility' for the Airport. This allow : CO2 emissions to increase by 25% (see 1 above). The number of flights to increase from 80,000 (2008 figure) to 95,000 - an increase of 18.75%. The number of out of hours flight to potentially increase to 1425 (1.5% of 95,000) from the 2007/2008 figures quoted in the green policy of 708 (0.9% of 75,711) - an increase of over 100%. The number of 'night time' (23:00-0600) flights, which is currently far less than the 2007/2008 figure of 57 quoted in the green policy for flights 'more than two hours outside opening hours' would be permitted to increase to 100, at least a 100% increase. A green policy that permits such significant increases in traffic, emissions, out of hours and night-time flights over and above current levels does little to reassure local residents - and does not appear very 'green'.
3. The flight caps exclude Police, medical and other emergency-related flights. The policy does no define exactly what this means; On many occasions out-of-hours and night-time flights take place involving Police/medical aircraft that are not on Police/Emergency business. In particular test flying of aircraft undergoing maintenance often occurs out of hours, but I understand that the Airport log this as Police/Medical. The caps should apply to this 'non-emergency' activity.

4. The noise figures provided by the Airport do not take into account the lower approach height of Aircraft on runway 27 due the to relocation of the threshold nearer to the Airport perimeter.

5. The green policy does not make clear what mechanism or sanctions would be used to ensure that the Airport complies with the limits set by the policy.

Transition Stroud and local Government




This video shows many local folk giving the lowdown on Transition stuff - it finishes with Stroud Transition Coordinator Helen Royall. One of the issues raised is about how we bring about wider change - and as folk may remember I was involved with the Business and Government Group of Transition - they have been continuing meetings with the District Council in an effort to get these issues embedded in policy.

Just out is a good article that looks at the relationship of local Government with Transition and quotes stuff re Stroud. Here is the article below but go here for full article with links.

Peaking too soon?

Peak oil is the moment when global oil production will reach its maximum level and then go into decline. This could happen as soon as 2010 so what are the implications for local authorities? Andrew Ross finds out about transition initiatives and the Transition Network.

The UK boasts more than 80 transition initiatives (TIs), which is the new name for 'transition towns'. The first was set up in Totnes in 2006 and the number is rising.

Rob Hopkins is the founder of the TI movement, and runs the organisation Transition Network. This helps communities adapt for the end of cheap oil and gives individual TIs their ‘official’ accreditation.

He will be giving a keynote presentation at the Improvement and Development Agency’s (IDeA’s) national conference for local sustainability practitioners, in Liverpool on 5 and 6 May.

Hopkins says that the TI primer – published by Transition Network and now in its 26th version – is proof that the movement is a work in progress. He adds:

“We have no idea if this works.”

The transition initiative movement has emerged from a desire by communities to highlight and act on two pressing concerns – climate change and peak oil. Local government now has a mandate to tackle the first of these. But the concept of peak oil –and its implications for local areas – is less well understood.

It is not that we are about to run out of oil, but that we are running out of ‘easy-to-get, cheap oil’. The TI movement believes that the implications of this for communities around the globe are dramatic. The solution they propose requires a radical ‘relocalisation’ of activity and production, so that communities can cut energy use.

The 'Transition Initiative Primer' says that local government should be ‘supporting not driving’ TIs in their area. But what are local authorities supposed to be driving? And how?

What councils are doing

Somerset and Leicestershire County Councils have both passed a resolution endorsing the authority as a ‘transition council’. Somerset’s statement includes allocating funds to assist in achieving the outcomes of the transition initiative movement.

It requires:

“all directorates to engage with and provide support for transition initiatives in Somerset”.

Transition Stroud has developed an informal relationship with Stroud District Council, involving regular meetings to swap information on progress. The local strategic partnership (LSP) has set up a ‘Global Changes Think Tank’, which considers ‘the twin impacts of climate change and peak oil’.

To inform its work the think tank asked Transition Stroud to write a report on food availability. This is one of a set of think-tank reports that the district council is using to shape its forthcoming core strategy. This means that peak oil and climate change considerations are being fed directly into the council’s planning decisions.

Meanwhile, the London Borough of Lambeth has been supporting Transition Town Brixton, a community-led initiative that seeks to raise awareness locally of climate change and peak oil. Lambeth has:

  • provided meeting rooms for workshops and film screenings
  • helped with networking
  • facilitated opportunities for the Transition Town Brixton Convenor, Duncan Law, to address cabinet and council meetings.

Things to think about

While the TI movement wants to develop relationships with local councils, not everyone agrees this is the best way forward. Some people believe they allow local councils to wrap themselves in a green cloak of respectability and continue business as usual.

Hopkins accepts that this could be a possibility but says:

“If we don’t engage creatively with local authorities then we’re always going to be restricted in what we can do.”

Jessica Currie, Sustainable Development Policy Officer at London Borough of Lambeth, agrees. She says:

“Transition Town Brixton could tick over on their own and in theory carry on forever having no contact with the council. But it doesn’t really make sense because the whole point is that they eventually influence services and so on.”

Many councils have welcomed their local TI. Robert Vint is a councillor at South Hampshire District Council representing a ward in Totnes and is an active member of Transition Town Totnes. He warns that the movement is potentially naïve about the political reality in which councils operate.

“It is almost too apolitical in the sense that it doesn’t have a strategy for taking on an uncooperative council.”

Conflict of interests

Transition Malvern Hills actually began life as a subgroup of Malvern Hills LSP set up to address climate change. John Raine is a councillor at Malvern Hills District Council and a member of the LSP subgroup. He says that a recent visit by a council performance officer highlighted the potential tensions which are built into the Malvern Hills approach.

“He presented a typical managerial perspective focused on ensuring that we achieve our goals. But the transition perspective was ‘we’re doing this from the bottom up and we don’t want to be driven by top down performance indicators’. It was a clash of cultures.”

Simon Allen is convenor of the Government and Business Working Group at Transition Stroud. While their work on food has been very well received locally, he is concerned about what will happen as a result. He says:

“We want to see action as well.”

Nigel Riglar, Strategic Director at Stroud District Council, accepts that if you are part of a community-based movement that is anxious about the pressing problems of climate change and peak oil then the last thing you want is a local authority officer saying:

“Our core strategy will take three years to put to bed.”

The key, he says, is to ‘not to be afraid’ of these differences.

“Transition initiative doesn’t necessarily have a culture that fits neatly into the way that local government likes to operate. You need to find people on both sides who are willing to work together and over time bring the two closer together. But it does take a bit of time to understand where both are coming from.”

What’s in it for local government?

More than 90 per cent of local authorities are signed up to at least one of the climate change national indicators. However, many still have to convince the electorate that this is territory local government should be taking on. For this reason some local authorities have decided that TI is well placed to help.

Nigel Riglar says that because Transition Stroud is self sufficient, there and it works, it has saved the council the work of trying to create that.

“If we didn’t have Transition Stroud we would have to create all that community infrastructure around these issues for the first time.”

Rowenna Skidmore is Beacon Coordinator at Worcestershire County Council within which Transition Malvern Hills is located. She says:

“People want to hear information from someone who doesn’t necessarily have anything to gain from it. If you’re a community group you may have a bigger impact in terms of people hearing what you have to say as opposed to the council.”

Badger vaccine: not the answer?

Local badger campaigner Martin Hancox sends me this letter below following news of research into vaccines - I am by no means an expert in this topic but have spent many hours reading papers, talking to farmers, vets and campaigners - I also helped write the Glos Green party submission to the Government consultation - see here. Indeed it is me in that badger costume in the photos...

I have long expressed concerns about the impact all this is having on farmers and I believe the Government has let them down badly. The announcement re vaccines is in my view not to be dismissed as readily as Martin does below but clearly on the basis of the info to date it does seem a fairly futile study - we have still failed to look at the issues raised by this letter like that bovine TB continues to be spread by cattle because the TB testing regime is inadequately
enforced by Animal Health. Why is more research not being done into that?

The challenge remains to get tough on TB testing so that the real cause of this epidemic - cattle to cattle transmission - can be put into reverse. The science shows it can be done, but it requires real political will to deliver that objective.

The whole badgers and TB saga has now after nearly 40 years entered a new realm of virtual reality Alice in Wonderland. A few MAFF vets decided way back during the low point in cattle tb in the 1970-1980s , that cattle were not the infectious source of TB to other cattle (or badgers). Indeed annual testing found cases so early that often a herd outbreak WAS only 1-2 cattle. No testing during foot and mouth 2001 meant a lot more cattle reached the infectious stage and so the present crisis has been a direct result of spread within the cattle population :- spread from the low hotspots of c. 1500 sq.km to now some 30,000 sq.km and heading for 40,000 TBcattle / year. It seems TOTALLY Beyond belief, but farmers and vets are still trying to account for this spread as due to badgers .... even though the 2007 ISG Report found a mere 1500 TB badgers out of 11,000 culled from 2000 sq.km.

Badger1Captain H Benn aboard the good ship SS Barking Badger, has been under immense pressure ever since he refused to allow badger culls last summer for a rethink . His appearance before the EFRA Committee last November was pure pantomime . He failed to grasp that the huge rise in cattle TB is amongst cattle, nothing to do with badgers, and in fact it is merely that hotspot testing took in an extra 1000 parishes in late 2006 .. so merely catching up with post FMD spread . In truth TB is coming down fast where testing has been longest on annual testing (the 30 trial areas).

And so the announcement today (19th march) of a 5 year badger injectable vaccine study from next year in 6 times 100 sq km areas will be totally meaningless (out of 30,000). It will be completely impractical to catch badgers, and there are so few with TB its mindless. So rather sad that farmers and badger trust folk give it a cautious welcome .. a political exercise in PURE FUTILITY.

Martin Hancox, Nouncells Cross, Stroud

Thursday, April 09, 2009

999 Planet in Peril launched today

Jonathon Whittaker, a local Councillor in Gloucester, has been a campaigner on climate change for a long while - he has now launched this new venture.

Photo: Launch of 999 Planet in Peril with Rebecca Dobson and Ian Lander from Vision 21 along with Jonathon in the middle.

He writes: Copenhagen December 2009 represents the last chance for humanity to seriously tackle human induced global warming in time. The delegates will only come away with a workable deal if there is sufficient pressure put upon them. That pressure will come from an informed public, knowing the Talks importance.
‘999 Planet in Peril’ is a simple innovative mechanism to engage a seemingly indifferent public.

The success of ‘999 Planet in Peril’ can give us hope!
Using well tested mechanisms and current public interests - all for FREE! Check out the website: http://www.999planetinperil.com

The hype, celebrity and money of 2007’s Live Earth failed. The simplicity and avoidance of money with this initiative could well succeed where more illustrious attempts have failed before.

Local wedding and portrait photographer

Here is a quick plug for a local photographer, Maggie Booth - no relation - she lives in Whiteshill and the above three pics are taken from her website - what I like about her wedding pics is that there are lots of spontaneous natural photos. See her website here: www.maggieboothphotography.co.uk

News on climate change and a walk in Standish woods

Going through my emails from while I was away I have come across a number that I wanted to share below. I am now nearly through all emails from when I was away - hopefully will tackle last few later today!

Photo: the photos in this blog entry are from a walk on Sunday in Standish woods - wonderful wood anenomes - we live in a very special place!!

Monbiot on why we can't afford to abandon efforts to cut emissions: "If we behave as if it's too late, then our prophecy is bound to come true....Quietly in public, loudly in private, climate scientists everywhere are saying the same thing: it's over." See article here. Indeed I read this week that even our business leaders are unhappy about action on climate change - they have delivered a surprise attack on the government's environmental policy, arguing that ministers are not doing enough to cut global warming emissions or make sure the UK does not run out of power. See Guardian 6th Apr 2009.

Photo; new beech leaves

Green energy crisis: the growing crisis of confidence in the green energy sector is exposed by a survey which revealed that more than three quarters of Britain's green energy companies were now facing enormous financial difficulties gaining vital access to loans and investment money. Indeed I was dismayed to read that BP has decided to lay off 620 people, more than a quarter of its workforce, at its solar business. Solar energy could soon become available for the mass market, but this move could significantly stall progress towards harnessing this abundant energy source. Similarly The Times report Royal Dutch Shell has announced plans to scale back its renewable energy business and focus purely on oil, gas and biofuels - this is very dire - see here. The UK Government, for all its pontificating about the need to invest in green technology, is failing to support and create incentives for investment in the UK renewables industry. We have a proud history of manufacturing in the UK and yet presented with opportunities to become a major player in 21st century technologies, we appear to be letting the chances slip by. Sadly one project that is moving ahead is a plant in Dorset to create power from imported virgin palm oil - see more here. It claims to be green but as this blog has covered the dangers of biofuels at length before so I wont repeat them here - go to here for further info.

Photo: beached beech tree leaves

London success and failures: The London Development Agency has proposed to offer free energy saving measures to every London home. The announcement follows a major investigation by the London Assembly's Environment Committee, which chaired by Darren Johnson, which flagged up the success of a free insulation scheme in Huddersfield which was put together by Green party councillors and is already delivering lower bills, reduced CO2 emissions and new jobs. The new London scheme represents a major u-turn by the LDA who were previously planning to abandon home insulation work altogether - see more re the 2,200 jobs and average annual savings of £230 per household it will create here. As Party leader Caroline Lucas MEP said at the party conference a nationwide programme along these lines would generate almost 140,000 UK jobs. However the bad news is that Boris is slashing London's environment/climate change programme in half - will they still be able to deliver. We knew Boris was not going to be good for London compared to Ken Livingstone but this is seriously gloomy news and will mean London cannot hope to lead on this issue. See more here.

Photo: beech leaves out already

Paul Mobb's new website: Paul Mobbs who was in Stroud last year has done lots to his website - well worth an exploration of peak Oil issues - in particular is The Great Outdoors initiative which is about "communicating the most basic of skills that are essential to life – cooking, making fire, heating water and finding shelter – so that we can rediscover our potential as 'human animals'; functional beings who can look after their own needs irrespective of what's happening around them. What fifty years of consumerism has done for Britain is de-skill its citizens; if we look at the practical skills possessed by their grandparents, many people today have only the vaguest idea of how to manage without mains services and ready-prepared food." See it at: http://www.fraw.org.uk/outdoors/index.shtml

Photo: wood anenomes like the first photo in this series carpeting the woods - and the very first couple of bluebells out already along with violets and more

Lower Shaw Farm events: talking of reskilling - Lower Shaw Farm near Swindon has lots of events - some may remember this blog joined the campaign to help save this exciting place which is now v much more secure - anyhow see their website: http://www.lowershawfarm.co.uk/

Photo: Dog Mercury lush green in woods

Archbish's lecture:
The Gloucestershire Churches Environmental Justice Network at which I have spoken forwarded the Archbishop's recent lecture in York: Environment is 'an issue of justice'. The Archbish spelt out why respect for the environment is not an optional extra, particularly for Christians. Getting our relationship with the rest of the created order into proper perspective is both a responsibility and a necessity. Failure could have disastrous consequences especially for some of the poorest and most vulnerable. “There is no way of manipulating our environment that is without cost or consequence … we are inextricably bound up with the destiny of our world.” Dr Williams suggests that “we are capable of changing our situation”; in “Christian terms, this needs a radical change of heart, a conversion.” He said: "The ‘redemption’ of people and material life in general is not a matter of resigning from the business of labour and of transformation – as if we could – but the search for a form of action that will preserve and nourish an interconnected development of humanity and its environment." He concluded with a quotation from the contemporary Greek theologian, Christos Yannaras who speaks in his Variations on the Song of Songs, “of how love compels you to see things differently – to love ‘the landscapes we have looked at together.’” “We love” says Dr Williams “what we see together with God.” See more and hear speech at: www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/2351

Vision 21 news: the March edition is out now of Gloucestershire green news..."21 Today is a regular electronic newsletter which focuses on a variety of sustainable issues in Gloucestershire. In the newsletter you can find out about local news, views, events, top environmental tips and useful contacts." See here.

Photo: a patch in leaves where a deer must have slept

Lib Dems hypocrisy: LibDem leader Nick Clegg helped launch a new Greenpeace report on energy-efficiency and jobs, but the LibDems have a rather "rather spotty record on energy, not least in Clegg's own Sheffield power-base." See here.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

G20 failure

A colleague forwarded this letter in Saturday's Guardian to me - it does sum up some of the failures of the G20. Stroud Greens also have a response - see below.
The G20 (Report, 3 April) are doomed to fail in the long term, because they suffer from the common delusion that the "laws" of economics trump those of physics. But alas, they don't. The planet is finite; proverbially, "anyone who believes in indefinite growth on a finite planet is either a madman or an economist". Therefore "normal growth" - the mirage pushed by all the G20 - is an oxymoron. It is physically impossible. An economic system that might actually endure will have to be based on the laws of physics and the concepts of: sustainability, not growth; enough not more; conservation not throughput; need not want; quality of life not quantity of product; natural income not natural capital; local not global; 100% recycling; 100% renewable energy; and gentle sine curves, with equal ups and downs, not exponentials(x% per annum) as now, leading to ever greater crashes. A precondition of success is a stable or reducing population. But, of course, no G20 debate on any of these.
Roger Martin, Upper Croxley, Somerset.

Some reports of the G20 summit make it sound like a success. However the outcomes for British industry and the planet are not the much needed shot in the arm but rather more of the same - just what got us into this mess in the first place.

Gordon Brown's approach has been a huge missed opportunity. In Britain he's pushing for jobs-poor, environmentally dubious technology in the form of so-called 'clean coal,' and equally jobs-poor but dangerous technology in the form of nuclear. And on the world stage he's managed to pull off a global stimulus that includes less than seven per cent climate-friendly investment.

Britain's over-reliance on financial services has been a spectacular failure. Instead we need investment to kick-start the Green industrial revolution that will give us the economy of the future - a balanced economy that includes a balanced range of world class manufacturing and self-reliance on energy. We have a golden opportunity to beat the recession and the climate crisis in one - and we're wasting it.

Friends of the Earth's executive director Andy Atkins has accused G20 of "short-changing the planet". The G20 leaders don't seem to understand that the policies we need for tackling climate change, a Green New Deal, can also create jobs and lift people out of poverty.

There is a potential win-win outcome - if only our leaders have the vision to grasp it. We need more Greens in elected office, because we need to push parliaments and assemblies and local councils towards a better understanding and a better set of policies.

Councillor Martin Whiteside, Thrupp, Stroud
Green Party Parliamentary Candidate for Stroud

Meanwhile it was enormously sad to read of the death of Iam Tomlinson, one of the demonstrators. Green London Assembly member has already embarked on questioning the police - Gayle O'Donovan, a Green party member who was there said: "The behaviour of the police was the worst I have seen on any demonstration." See other witness statements here. Guardian has video which I saw last night of the man being assaulted by police at the G20 protests prior to his death - I hear the police are now planning a full investigation - certainly it is shocking to see:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/07/video-g20-police-assault

As Johann Hari said in The Independent it is the protestors we should be listening to - see his article here where he says: "The protesters here in London were trying to sound an alarm now, at five minutes to ecological midnight."

Some newspapers covered scientists like Professor Hansen who said of the politicians that "their 'planet in peril' rhetoric is probably just that - empty rhetoric." The Green Party have been pointing this out for many years, while at the same time stressing the right greenhouse gas targets as far as possible and spelling out the full range of policies needed to meet those targets in a globally and locally equitable manner. Peter Cranie, a Green party Euro candidate commented: "As a scientist you can assess the truth of this by means of observation and analysis. Now, has the crisis reached the point where as a scientist you should start spelling out which political party has the right policies?"

In addition to growing concerns re climate change the recession is biting hard in key areas. The cost of basic living has shot up in the past 12 months: power has gone up 22%, food 11%, and transport fares 8%. We do need to act now on a real Green New Deal. Gordon Brown has just promised an environmentally friendly Budget later this month to kick start a "green recovery" - we'll keep fingers-crossed as so far news has not been good...

The 535-million-pound ($750 million) “green stimulus” announced by Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling in November included only 100 million pounds of new funds. Most of the funds are merely accelerated spending on railways and energy efficiency already pledged in future budgets. Taking money out of a budget two years down the road and bringing it forward to this year doesn’t really count as a ‘green new deal’ at all. Darling has also retracted a commitment to tax airlines on each flight rather than on each passenger and withdrawn a measure that would have increased taxes on higher-emitting vehicles that have already been purchased. But I've rambled enough on this one time for a mug of tea...

Two petitions for Burma

The United Nations recently declared that the continued detention of Burma's democracy leader, Aung San Suu Kyi is illegal. The judgment, by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, stated unequivocally that Aung San Suu Kyi's detention was in violation of both Burmese and international law. The UN urged the regime to immediately release her. Voices for democracy are being heard more and more.

A couple of weeks ago I called on folk to sign the global petition calling on the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to make it his personal priority to secure the release of all political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi. Please sign if you haven't already - the petition target is 888,888 signatures, symbolising 8.8.88, the day the junta massacred some 3,000 people who courageously protested in Burma’s largest democracy uprising - I have just heard we have already hit the 200,000 point so are doing really well - please pass onto others: http://www.burmacampaign.org.uk/fbppn.htm

There is now another petition:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/free_burma_political_prisoners/96.php/?CLICK_TF_TRACK

Time magazine reported the latest moves in the scramble for oil in Burma here.

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Roads and more roads

moterway2A few days ago I read the CPRE report re road building - and have dashed off a news release today as I am disgusted by what they have found. See my press release here which I put together with a couple of other Green councillors in the region - and below stuff re the ridiculous plans for the M25.

The CPRE report shows that the majority of regional transport funding is going on roads, and will be for years to come, that road traffic levels have risen sharply over the last 2 decades and every region is now set to see transport emissions rise. Although it is not possible to separate out entirely the different types of transport funded in each region, CPRE have estimated the South West Region proportion spent on roads is a whopping 70%. As I said in the news release this is "wholly unacceptable, unnecessary and economically and environmentally damaging".

PFI for M25 is a bad idea for a bad scheme - take action

A wee while back I heard that the PFI deal for the M25 widening for the last remaining sections is on the rocks. PFI deals rely on banks having money to lend, but because we’ve had to bail so many out, there isn’t enough cash floating around to fund the scheme.

Now widening the M25 is about as silly an idea as they come. Government analysis has shown that any new capacity on that motorway just fills up within a year or so of it opening; there’s nothing to suggest that this won’t happen here. But the Government wants to bail out the widening project from a national infrastructure fund that is being set up to keep PFI schools and hospitals afloat. I’m not sure we should be bailing out PFI deals at all, but if we do, at least focus on things we need and not ever wider motorways.

So the Campaign for Better Transport has been asking people if they would mind taking a few minutes to email Geoff Hoon and ask him to rethink bailing out the M25 project. The link is here and there’s a template letter there as well. Please write if you have a mo.

'The Lone Canadian' in Randwick

Local historian Guy Ellis has just completed a short piece on "The Lone Canadian" whose grave can be found in Randwick Church yard. See the full story here:
http://historyjournal.co.uk/canada.aspx

Photo: pinched from History Journal site

That site also includes a history of Bread Street and about the Wellington that came down in the valley - great stuff!

Monday, April 06, 2009

Link to the Green Party bloggers

Here is the hub for Green Party bloggers and activists from around the UK. It has recently been updated and looks much better - a good place to see what the grassroots of the party are up to - the site is run and edited by members, independently of the Party - a good place to find a debate, story or campaign. Enjoy at: http://greenpartyblogs.org.uk/

Wonderful Jaine Rose exhibition in Stroud

I am just back from a meeting at Star Anise cafe in Stroud - a meeting of Green party District councillors to prepare responses to Full Council meeting next week and plan next steps - lots going on at the mo but for this blog I wanted to celebrate what is on the walls at the cafe...

...the Stroud artist Jaine Rose has an exhibition entitled 'Journey's from home' - it is wonderful and I urge others to visit - she also has a website with some of the stuff including this pic I have pinched for use here to encourage folk to visit! Magical, eco and fun - don't miss it!

I meant to also add she has a website at: http://www.jainerose.co.uk/

Age of Stupid comes to Stroud


The film Age of Stupid is coming to The Space in Stroud on 3rd May.
You would be stupid to miss it. Box Office: 07973 225 694. By all accounts this is a great film.

Instead of the conventional ‘red carpet’ at the Age of Stupid premiere, there was a green one, made from recycled materials. See Ed Miliband squirm there when he is challenged by director Franny Armstrong (also director of McLibel) and the movie's star, Pete Postlethwaite - the latter pledges his support to the Not Stupid campaign by vowing to return his OBE if the UK government fail to stop Kingsnorth - see it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5RCHXLW93E

Amazingly the finance for the movie’s £450,000 budget came from many dozens of individual or group subscriptions. The crew gave their labours freely or for very basic pay. The film also must be one of the first for including in the final credits a ‘carbon budget’, detailing its contribution from its making to global warming. Apparently it came to 94 tonnes of CO2 which is equal to that generated by four average Americans or 185 patio heaters in one month.

A number of Greens saw the film previously at a Green party conference before the premiere and those I spoke to have been delighted with it - although one said in parts he was not always sure of what the film is saying. Nevertheless this film apparently 'knocks spots off An Inconvenient Truth' which Al Gore won an Oscar for....

Keep an eye on the www.ageofstupid.net website for details of other screenings and how to organise your own screening. See also Gillian Anderson discusses airport expansion and coal power stations here.

Changes to planning threatens democracy?

The District Council are proposing changes to the scheme of delegation for the determination of planning applications.

Photo: the old Stroud College being destroyed to make way for the new and homes - local views about cycle paths, access and more were ignored.

The reason behind the proposed changes are that the Government sets targets on planning delivery, which we are expected to meet. The Council's performance is measured against these Government set indicators, and that performance is rewarded through a system of annual grants known as PDG (Planning Delivery Grants), (now HPDG – Housing & Planning Delivery Grants). The latter now includes grants based on housing construction rates.

The targets are:-
· 60% of Major applications determined in less than 13 weeks.
· 65% of Minor applications determined in less than 8 weeks.
· 80% of householder & other planning applications determined in less than 8 weeks.

The vast majority of all of the applications that come to DCC (Development Control Committee) miss these targets. In a recent report from the Audit Commission that we discussed at Scrutiny last week the performance of the current scheme of delegation was cited as being the reason for the Council’s poor performance in the speed with which it determines planning applications.

The Council need to now look closely at the scheme of delegation and they argue comply more closely with the DCLG (Department of Communities & Local Government) recommendations, that in excess of 90% of applications should be dealt with through delegation. Indeed in a recent Government review of the planning system it is recommended that Development Control Committees should only deal with those applications that are of ‘major importance or wider significance’, raising the bar even higher. The Government’s view is that this would speed up the decision making process for applicants, where delays can impact on viability, and for neighbours, in that the period of uncertainty can be limited.

At this point the Tory administration are seeking views. They note that the input from Town and Parish Councils "has been, and still is extremely important to us, and we always welcome their views and knowledge of local issues and these will always be taken into account when making a final decision. However, we believe that where their policy based comments are contrary to an officer’s recommendation, it should not be automatic that the application is then presented to the full Development Control Committee, as is the case at present."

Stroud is now the only District in Gloucestershire that does so and this is reflected in what is described as 'poor performance' relative to the other neighbouring authorities.

The changes that they are considering, relate to the creation of a panel of three members who would consider the level of importance or wider significance of a proposal and the related representations, and then decide whether or not these applications should be presented to the Development Control Committee. They also note that: "Whilst we are being externally driven, we must also achieve the best results for the whole District – both in sound, well-judged decisions, but also in terms of achieving value for money and maximising funding through the attainment of targets."

At the Scrutiny meeting several councillors including myself made clear their concerns about the loss of democracy by reducing Parish Council rights - there was also anger from some that Government targets are driving this change - often when a target is not met within the time it is because greater consideration to local views is being taken. However it is also true that the Council could improve targets and that a number of applications that come to DCC that go against officers decisions then go onto appeal and are lost costing the Council money. Is this a fair cost for greater democracy? Or is this about better training for all councillors? For me a large part of it is that central government have such a tight hold on us that there is little room for manoeuvre on decisions - indeed I have heard some councillors say there is no point in DCC as you can't really make decisions locally. This is not a view I take but it is true that powers of DCC and the Council are much much more limited than the public imagine.

Anyhow in addition the Council also wants to look at issues over how Development Control Committee operates, for example, should any alterations be made to the Development Control Committee? Meeting times, membership, reducing numbers or what? Should major applications automatically come to DCC ? Or be automatically delegated ? Or go before the suggested panel?

I do have very real concerns about changes and want to see all the options being presented but it is right that the Council looks at this - and to be fair it is the Government that is driving the changes? What are others views? Do let me know - Greens will be looking at them in more detail over the coming week - we have already submitted detailed questions about why planning applications are delayed at the moment and a host of other issues. Comments can be made up until the end of the month then the proposals will be presented to the Council's AGM on May 21st for adoption.

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Gully Monitor appointed!

As regular blog readers will know I have been pursuing solutions to the local blocked gullies for a wee while - local farmer Julia Currie has been doing it even longer - well we had progress last year and now it looks like we are getting closer to some answers...but we will have to see as we've had a number of false promises in the past...

Photo: Gully in Bread Street

Julia Currie had a meeting on site a couple of weeks ago and we have both had various correspondence - she jokingly suggested to the county that she should officially get the title of 'Gully Monitor'. However joking apart we now have the County confirming that the 3 gullies at the bottom of Ruscombe Road/Bread Street will be cleaned out after heavy rainfall to reduce the risk of flooding at that point. This had been promised to me previously along with a couple of other gullies in Randwick that have problems, but didn't seem to be happening.

Additionally, this cleaning will involve removing the years of debris which has been piled up against the Cotswold Stone wall which forms the boundary to a cottage there. This would be shaped back to the height of the continuing verge. We will than be able to judge if this improves the situation at times of extreme rainfall. At least it will remove the chance of bank/gully debris being washed into the gully.

The work however wont start for two months so we will need our new Gully Monitor to be vigilant. See how to report incidents here.

Civil Aviation Authority failing to protect crews and passengers re cabin air qualit

Here is a story that I think should get wider coverage and an issue Greens have been working on in Europe as well as here. A year ago the Global Cabin Air Quality Executive (GCAQE) called for a public inquiry to examine why the Labour government has allowed airline crews and passengers to be exposed to air contaminated with engine oils when flying. The Greens, the Conservatives and the LibDems supported the call, but the government refused to hold a public inquiry despite its acknowledgment that oil fumes are reported on one in every hundred flights.

Still the government has not taken any action to prevent passengers and crews from being exposed to toxic chemicals in passenger aircraft or to ensure that passengers are informed when such exposures have occurred. So last month the GCAQE has renewed its call for an independent public inquiry to investigate the government's continued failure to protect the travelling public.

Head of Research for the Global Cabin Air Quality Executive, former airline pilot and PhD researcher, Captain Susan Michaelis, commented: "The present air monitoring investigations being undertaken on behalf of the Department for Transport are seriously flawed. They fail to utilize data from international experts and appear designed to protect the airline industry rather than the health and safety of the travelling public and working crews. The German Broadcaster WDR has undertaken swab tests on 30 European passenger aircraft of which 28 positively identified the presence of the neurotoxic and immunotoxic organophosphate chemical, Tricresyl Phosphate (TCP). TCP is present in most commercial jet engine oils. This study replicated swab tests taken in the UK, Europe, Australia and the US which also proved passengers and crews are definitely being exposed to engine oil pyrolysis products in the aircraft cabins."

"The term 'Aerotoxic Syndrome' should be accepted by the UK Government rather than continuing to deny the problem exists. With a growing number of crews dying and becoming ill with brain tumours and other serious neurological illnesses, why does the Government refuse to agree to an independent epidemiological survey of crews? The need for a proper epidemiological survey has again been supported by the recently published paper by M.Hale and J.Al-Seffar in the Journal of the Association of Neurophysiological Scientists.

"We applaud the decision taken this week by the 'Aerotoxic Association' and the Non Profit Group 'Toxic Free Airlines' to send every MP and Lord a copy of the investigative documentary film 'Welcome Aboard Toxic Airlines.' This will ensure everyone knows exactly what is going on. The airline industry funded Civil Aviation Authority has negligently failed to protect the travelling public. There is overwhelming evidence to show that exposure to contaminated cabin air is causing unacceptable risks to health and flight safety and the precautionary principle should be applied. Solutions to resolve this problem such as installing filtration technologies or developing non toxic oils exist and they know it.

"Airlines continue to preside over a global scandal. Not only are they supplying the travelling public with unfiltered engine air to breathe, known for decades to sometimes become contaminated with toxic chemicals but they don't tell the public there is a risk of exposure when flying or when they have been exposed. This has to be a breach of their human rights. No commercial airliner has any form of detection system fitted to warn when the air is contaminated. This is a serious risk to flight safety. The travelling public deserve to be better protected."

As well as the Greens, the campaign is also supported by Teresa Villiers MP and Norman Baker MP, the Conservative and LibDem shadow transport secretaries. See more here.

Saturday, April 04, 2009

John Marjoram's party

Just before going away I was invited to John Marjoram's party - a very special evening indeed where his friends filled the Trinity Rooms for an evening of much talk, good food plus many great local acts - see here for example the amazing Bruce Airhead - husband of a well-known local Green councillor in a show that is unforgettable plus poetry from Jehanne Mehta and also a wonderful poem about Stroud from Jeff Cloves. There was also the Stroud School of Samba, the Horsley Band and the amazing Mad Cows with their non-stop dance music. Even David Drew MP was there to give a speech about this remarkable man. See here another view with more info on the evening.

Why we all need to respond to latest consultation

A new generation of planning policies which will set out the locations for housing, jobs and community facilities is being put together by Stroud District Council. That means we need to consider issues like whether we want housing in Ruscombe fields as proposed by a landbanking company? See some of the previous campaign blogs against that here. Or the last bits of green between Randwick and Cashes Green filled up with houses? Or whether we want more energy self-reliance across this District with more wind turbines sensitively sited?

Photos: views of Whiteshill and Randwick

These questions and more we need to consider - it would be wonderful if all local folk could respond to the simple survey that considers some of the issues addressed by new planning policies as the basis of a Core Strategy. This strategy will provide the framework for how the district will evolve over the next 15 years - we need to get it right!

The information provided by the public will be used to help draw up the Core Strategy which will then be voted on by the District Council. Then provided a Government Planning Inspector is happy that the correct procedure has been followed it will be approved. Once approved all planned development must contribute towards achieving the goals of the Core Strategy.

Locations for building new homes need to be identified; facilities that cater for the young and the old have to be provided and communities need to be kept active - these are all areas that the Core Strategy will consider. Take for example the Government plans that for over the next 20 years approximately 9000 new homes in the district have to be built. These homes must meet the needs of whole community whilst also causing minimal disruption to the natural environment. Real thought needs to given to find the best locations and to the facilities that will have to be built to support new communities.

We also need to bear in mind that more young people then ever are leaving rural areas to seek work and affordable accommodation. Coupled with an ageing population the sustainability of our villages is declining. Is the solution to extend our villages with more jobs and homes or to improve the transport links to urban areas?

Multi-use games areas have been built like the one in Cashes Green to promote active play and overall health. These sites can also be used by adults. Should more outside public spaces be redeveloped as multi-use areas or should there be a focus on creating indoor areas for activities? Or what about more natural play areas that focus on boulders, trees, ditches, mounds etc rather than standardised play equipment - see my letter here and here.

In Stroud town many plans have been made and are in the process of going forward as part of their Public Realm Strategy. This is intended to make environmental improvements and make the town more attractive to residents, workers and visitors. What improvements to our villages are necessary? And what of public transport? How will the transport needs of an ageing population be met? With rising fuel prices and the pressure to reduce CO2 emissions what is the solution to cutting car usage?

SDC with Gloucestershire County Council has supported successful and innovative bus services, such as the Wotton Hopper in and around Wotton-under-Edge, and Village Link, a demand-responsive bus service operating in Dursley area. Should SDC continue to invest in these initiatives, expand them or are there other improvements to bus services better?

There is lots more. Here is my quote sent in for the Parish magazine, The WaRbler: Philip Booth, Whiteshill and Ruscombe's District councillor said: "It is great our Parish Council are publicising this 'Core Strategy'. It may sound boring but it plays a critical role in how we wish to see the area developed in the future. Do residents want to continue to oppose homes being developed in the Ruscombe Valley fields? How do we protect the environment for future generations? Do we want to see more investment in say energy efficiency schemes that cut our bills and CO2 emissions? It is important that residents participate in this genuine consultation to find the best ways forward for the District."

20 key areas that will shape the future of our distinct - its down to you

• Improving the image of the District.
• Providing job opportunities across the District.
• Achieving a better transport system to help reduce CO2 emissions.
• How can we improve the vitality and viability of our town centres.
• How can we develop the tourist potential of the District.
• Supporting and capitalising on the District's artistic and cultural assets.
• Meeting the District's identified future housing needs.
• Maintaining and improving the sustainability of our villages.
• Improving provision of facilities for young people.
• Meeting the needs of an increasingly elderly population.
• Meeting the District's need for sports facilities.
• Achieving social inclusion and active communities, where community initiatives are the norm.
• Conserving and enhancing Stroud District's countryside and biodiversity.
• Protecting and enhancing our historic environment.
• Contributing to the provision of renewable and low carbon energy generation in the District.
• Minimising waste generation and increasing recycling.
• Ensuring that the Cotswold Canals restoration plays a positive role in the District.
• Provide resilience to flood risk.
• Meeting the District's need for open and green spaces.
• Which are the most important issues for the Core Strategy to focus on.

The deadline for feedback is Friday 1st May. The questionnaire is available online at www.stroud.gov.uk/core or by post: Core Strategy, Stroud District Council, Ebley Mill, Stroud, GL5 4UB. For further information call 01453 754092.

Glos Airport's so-called 'green policy'

An update on Gloucestershire Airport - campaigners have submitted questions to Cheltenham Scrutiny meeting on April 8th - and I think Gloucester City meeting is the next day.

The Councils have come up with an action plan of so-called ‘green’ measures to be considered so that the Airport can control its carbon footprint. The Gloucestershire Airport Green Policy has been drafted following consultation with Cheltenham Borough and Gloucester City Councils, who jointly own the airport. It will be discussed at both the councils’ Overview and Scrutiny meetings and will then go to cabinet meetings for final approval this month.

Adoption of a green policy was a requirement of both Cheltenham Borough and Gloucester City Councils in giving their in principle support to the Runway Safety Project. The press quote the Joint Airport Scrutiny Working Group (made up of councillors and officers) saying they believe that tackling climate change is vital. I have to say I have seen precious little evidence of this to date - indeed it is almost laughable 'greenwash' if it wasn't so serious - here we have an airport expanding and massively increasing emissions and they are trying to sell the idea and mitigate a few emissions to get their plans approved.....

Many questions have been asked of Scrutiny and there are still many very serious concerns that have not been addressed. It is true the policy includes some good stuff like workers travel plans but we need those anyway plus a ceiling is proposed on total number of flights per annum - except of course the proposed new flights are larger planes and they don't want to set the target now plus can we really believe them - Heathrow similarly promised no expansion...

Let us hope councillors see sense and dismiss this plan to expand our local airport - it would be the wrong decision in so many ways.

Friday, April 03, 2009

Village Agent vacancy

GRCC
It is very sad news but Judith Newman, our local Village Agent, will be leaving at the end of the month - the County have been advertising the post - below is stuff re the Village Agents post which is aimed at over 50s - as their job description says;
  • provide high quality information
  • put people in direct contact with the agencies that are able to provide the service they need
  • carry out a series of practical checks
  • help build communities
Reference:8/PJ/09/1299. Salary:£7 per hour. Hours:10 hours per week. Working pattern:Part Time, Contract position. Location:West Dean area of the Forest of Dean and for the parishes of Randwick, Whiteshill and Cashes Green in Stroud District. Closing date:07/04/2009 23:00 PM

Gloucestershire Rural Community Council is looking to recruit 2 Village Agents for the West Dean area of the Forest of Dean and for the parishes of Randwick, Whiteshill and Cashes Green in Stroud District. Village Agents are based in the community and provide older people with easier access to information and services. If you: Live in or close to the area above, Have the use of a reliable car and Are committed to helping older people in rural areas.

Please contact Gloucestershire Rural Community Council on 01452 528491 for more information and an application form. Closing date 7th April 2009.

We look forward to meeting the new person soon!


Thursday, April 02, 2009

Blow to Stroud Arts

This evening I was at Stroud District Council's Performance and Audit Overview and Scrutiny committee meeting - just home from it - lots of issues discussed - I will get to arts, but first some of the other issues I raised this evening:

Photo: View of Ebley Mill from Randwick

- concerns about failures re housing performance eg Stroud is amongst worst performing councils nationally re vacant private homes sector, the number of vacant dwellings returned to use. average energy efficiency ratings and average time to complete non-urgent repairs. Some of the reasons given are understandable and as with all of this some of the targets and indicators themselves are a bit of nonsense.
- indeed nonsense is just how I described the performance indicators in the Audit Commissions report re recycling that shows we are one of the worst in the country - I've covered that before on this blog and again I applauded the Council for not going down route to collect green waste which has led to other councils artificially raising their recycling rates - however while they may be best in Glos I also noted they could be doing much better.
- the need for carbon audits if you really are going to look at value for money of schemes cutting carbon
- why the Waste Management Advisory Group, of which I am a 'reserve' member has not met yet decisions and discussions have been taking place re waste eg stopping Stanleys trial.
- welcoming in principle sharing audit stuff with neighbouring Councils

Other issues discussed included asking why more work was not done on Stanleys trial before - this is the food waste collection that won awards and was then cancelled - loosing community goodwill and more - yes the costs of running such a scheme were prohibitive across the DIstrict but surely those could have been recognised before the trial started? Plus it is largely due to the nonsense contract set up to collect our waste - a fault of the Government's moves to privatisation.....

Arts groups threatened with funding cuts

Hey but you can watch webcast in a day or so when it is uploaded onto District Council site and of course read mnutes but they take longer ...let me get to arts funding...an issue raised by Sarah Lunnon...

Arts organisations and others like the Stroud Valleys Project have been contacted by the District Council and effectively told that their funding will be reduced - many of the groups face year on year cuts. I have been meaning to write about this for ages as it is very bad news indeed.

Those arts groups facing cuts include Prema Arts Centre in Uley, the Wotton Arts Project, Stroud Valleys Artspace and more. Under The Edge and Stroud International Textile Festival are to be cut by half in 2010 and completely by 2012. Jo Bousfield, Chair of The SPACE in Stroud writes of the cuts in a letter to the press last month: "This will mean no SITE 09 and International Textile Festival and probably the closing down of Stroud's Performing Arts Centre (The SPACE) and Under The Edge Arts, both of which are run on a shoestring."

Stroud Valleys Arts Space will have to cut some of it's community stuff and become just studios for artists and Prema will also face losses. Here is a comment from Prema in the SNJ from a wee while ago: Director of Prema Gordon Scott said this would have a "devastating effect" on local art projects and could even spell closure for Prema. Prema, which has been running for the last 30 years, will see its grant of £10,000 drop to £5,000 next April and half again the year after, ultimately being cut by 2012. Mr Scott said: "This will make a massive difference to us, I think it could end in redundancies or worse. I understand that the council needs to make some savings, nobody wants their council tax to go up, I don’t want my council tax to go up. But they are cutting grants to some of the most vulnerable organisations. We cannot absorb these kinds of cuts. We already run on a skeletal staff, but I can see that we may have to make redundancies. We also employ around 200 local artists throughout the year and this would have to be cut down. A large part of Prema’s income comes from Arts Council England, however Mr Scott said the council expected funding to be a partnership and that if they see there is no local support they may cut their funding as well. I want to make clear that Prema is not about to close and won’t close in the next year or two, but I am concerned that these grant cuts could create a domino effect and we would be left without enough funding to continue. Then we would have to close."

I started my bit at the Scrutiny meeting making the point that the Telegraph once said "Stroud is to Art what Hay-on-Wye is to books" - and stressed huge concerns about the impact these cuts will have on the District. I did and still do acknowledge that the Council faces a very difficult future and discretionary spending will need to be considered fully but I wanted assurances that the knock-on effects that arts have on communities and the economy are taken into account fully - these sums are not just small fry they are tiny fry when compared to the money going on the canal. The benefits to arts are often not so tangible but are increasingly recognised - see my previous blog on this here. It is crucial that the benefits are properly considered if cuts will need to be made - for me this spending enriches our community beyond measure and I thank all those who have contributed...

As regular blog readers will know I have celebrated a fair number of the local arts exhibitions and events on this blog - it is one of the reasons that makes Stroud special - and as I said at the meeting one of the reasons that makes it a joy for me to live here - a privilege to be in such a vibrant creative community.

Jo Bousfield put it well in her letter: "The impact on the well-being of council taxpayers and the general economy of Stroud will be affected everywhere, with no audiences and participants using food outlets. There will be nowhere for youth theater/youth dance/young artists/musicians to go and do what they do. There will be no cinema clubs, no festivals, no live performance, no billowing pink flags on the pedestrian bridge this summer. I could go on a long time with the list of repercussions. But who cares? In a recession, everyone is so depressed no one wants to go and dance or sing or draw or write poems or have a laugh in a workshop or learn photography with other council taxpayers or watch a foreign film or go and look at exciting art. We will all just stay at home and watch telly- if we can afford the licence fee."

Hey it is late again and another busy day tomorrow so will stop now...in the meantime consider noting arts when you complete the 'Have Your Say' which arrived with Council Tax bills over the last month - this consultation is crucial and I will be doing another blog on it soon and about why it is so important to contribute your views - please go to the online survey now here!

Gloucestershire Greenpeace Group is back!

Crazy week - apart from catching up on emails etc there have been meetings every evening like the Stroud Valleys Water Forum Monday, Ruscombe Brook on Tues - will blog a little on that later, last night Transition Stroud Coordinators then onto the monthly Green party meeting, tonight Scrutiny at Council from 6pm - and work is busy too - this really is not a sustainable lifestyle...but did want to mention that Gloucestershire Greenpeace Group is back again!

I used to be a member but sadly wont be able to help at the mo - the group is having a stall campaigning against Heathrow's 3rd Runway in Stroud High Street this Saturday 4th April. They'll be there from 10AM onwards so do please make yourself known if you are interested in supporting them. Coincidently the letter I'd written a month ago about Heathrow was in the SNJ this week - see here.

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

Stroud Town seeks more allotments

Just before I went away we had a meeting re plans for our local allotments - still moving ahead - do sign up with Parish Clerk if you are interested. However I wanted to draw attention to moves in Stroud for more allotments.

Stroud Town Council owns five allotment sites – at Spider Lane, Summer Street, Gannicox, Uplands and Bisley Old Road – providing around 190 plots. But a new survey has shown there are currently 25 people on waiting lists, with just two vacant plots.

Green party Councillor Dave Cockcroft is quoted in Stroud Life saying: "There has been a steady rise over several years, so I don't think it's all down to households having tighter budgets. People have clearly become more aware of the need to reduce food miles, they are wanting to know where their food comes from, prefer organic and fresh produce, and have re-discovered the pure joy of growing your own food."

Click here!The National Trust recently confirmed a rising interest in allotments with news that it would create 1,000 new plots across the country - see more on a previous blog of mine here.

Stroud Town hope to acquire at least two new sites. An offer has already been made to take over a vacant site in the town owned by the county council, but the identity of the site is under wraps while negotiations continue. Seven years ago, just seven of the 50 plots on the Bisley Old Road Allotments were being used. This led to the site being promoted for housing as an alternative to greenfield sites. Thankfully saved when in 2007, a big increase in plot holders led the town council to announce that plans to turn the site into a 45-home housing estate had been ditched.

The town council has just added a new page to its website, www.stroudtown.gov.uk, offering details of all five allotment sites and contact details. But, in order to help plan future provision, it is keen to hear from people unable to get a plot. Coun Cockcroft said: "People who find themselves in such positions should contact the town council office in London Road so that we can get an idea of where sites are most needed."

It is great to see so many initiatives - Scotland are developing plans for more allotments, London has a plan - see here - indeed it seems all are getting interested.....

Organic 'Victory' Garden Planted at White House

First Lady Michelle Obama broke ground on the White House's first organic kitchen garden since the Roosevelt Administration. According to the First Lady "I've been able to have my kids eat so many different things that they would have never touched if we had bought it at a store because they either met the farmers that grew it, or they saw how it was grown."

Are you ready to follow the First Lady's lead? Make a pledge here. There are many great examples of gardens being developed locally and elsewhere - many covered in this blog previously - lots of different models from community gardens to allotments - see for example Edible Estates website here which I have only just come across. See also more here: www.nsalg.org.uk